(05-29-2019 04:12 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: (05-29-2019 03:57 PM)Rice93 Wrote: (05-29-2019 03:54 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: (05-29-2019 03:42 PM)Rice93 Wrote: (05-29-2019 03:26 PM)georgewebb Wrote: Where do you meet these people?
All walks of life including (I'm sorry to say) extended family.
Quote:I hate to say it, but I'm not sure you're being honest here. Where does one meet multiple leftists and NOT find at least one who is racist, and one or more who is (at the very least) unpatriotic? I see multiple examples of each type just among the leftists that I am Facebook friends with.
Where does one meet multiple conservatives and NOT find at least one who is racist?
Interesting. So whom amongst OO, Owl#s, Webb, and myself are racist in your view of the world?
4 is definitely 'multiple', mind you......
I know you're joking here so I won't try to defend it
Im serious. You made a bald ass fing statement that wherever there are 'multiple conservatives that one must be a conservative.'
There is a list of multiple 'conservatives'. Prove your statement up. Or is the comment just a knee jerk reaction that you pulled out of your ass? Im fine with either response in return.
To be blunt, I wouldnt defend that idiotic remark either.
Quote:I could make the same argument that either Lad or I must be racist/unpatriotic per George's post.
I guess you cannot fathom any sort of difference between the specific term 'multiple' (asserted as a fact, mind you).
The terminology on your retort was 'very many' who are unpatriotic (I probably dont agree with that), and 'more than a few' who are anti-patriotic (one that I do agree with).
Either case, with a population of two, I think it not odd that you and lad are *not* necessarily unpatriotic, nor odd that you and lad are *not* anti-patriotic.
But your statement was quite a bit more precise. So, I have given you your "multiple" and your view is than one cannot avoid a racist with any multiple. Very specifically and explicitly. SO either one of the named *is* racist, or you are pulling specific and explicit statements pretty much literally out of your ass to make a rhetorical flourish.
So which is it? One of us has to be racist, or your comment was a typical knee-jerk rhetorical flourish that many progressives are drawn to like a Mardi Gras stripper is to a C-note.
I think there has been this knee-jerk reaction on the part of those on the left to brand any conservative as "racist," and that certainly intensified in the Obama years. It was always easier simply to say, "you hate him because he is a black man," than it was to debate the specifics of issues.
I have known many conservatives. I would consider maybe two of them to be racists. I have known an equal number of leftists, or more, that I would consider racists. The "or more" part depends on how you would describe blacks who are anti-white. If that is included in your definition of racism, then the "or more" would be "many more."
I have known many leftists. I would consider maybe two of them to be patriotic. I wouldn't necessarily consider the rest unpatriotic or anti-patriotic, just indifferent to patriotism. I don't have any truly anti-patriotic friends. They wouldn't be my friends if they were.
I sincerely believe that the MO of the democrat party in my lifetime has been, "Keep 'em dumb, keep 'em poor, keep 'em dependent on handouts, and you will keep 'em voting democrat." I really think the democrats do a horrible job of making things better for poor and minority Americans, but they enjoy the support of those groups because they promise bigger and bigger handouts. To my knowledge, that has only been challenged by a handful of conservatives, primarily black conservatives who lifted themselves out of poverty. Perhaps the most irritating thing to me in all of American politics is that the republicans are unable to articulate an alternative to the "welfare trap" or "poverty trap" that our welfare system has become.
I guess the other thing that irritates me about American politics is that I know many people who are reasonably intelligent and tend democrat, but they have astonished me with their willingness to fall hook, line, and sinker for socialist/communist/collectivist rhetoric that has invaded the democrat party from the left. I can't conceive how someone can equate the political philosophy of Barack Obama, much less Bernie or AOC, with the historic democrat philosophy, as espoused by the lies of JFK or Truman, or for that matter even FDR. I just don't get it.