Why is the MWC board so dead? Is it just due to a general lack of positive feeling about the direction the MWC is headed? As a CSU alum I am pretty excited about CSU football under McElwain.

Not many MWC fans on this board. Just a few of us.
Most are on this board http://www.mwcboard.com

Wow that looks like a bicker board - lots of smack talking

bump.

Think a few more MW fans are on this board, but mostly they comment on the realignment section as well as the AAC board.

Is the AAC indisputably a stronger league at this point? Are the MAC and C-USA beginning to catch up in terms of the number of competitive programs? Boise State and San Diego State still seem to be repping the MWC well so far, but can they sustain the momentum? Here are my Week 3 rankings of the Access Bowl contenders to start the conversation:

http://saturdayblitz.com/2016/09/21/grou...-rankings/

The AAC has four teams within the top 50 (of 128 teams), where the MWC just has two; and only three in the top 60. Additionally, the AAC's middle four teams are tightly bunched and near the top half of FBS. The MWC has 9 of its 12 teams in the bottom half of FBS. This will likely change some by mid-October, but that would mean that the middle of the MWC pack will have to make a dent in the next 1 to 2 OOC games, but UNM, Fresno St, and Hawaii are terrible....just turrible.

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm



[IMAGE LINK]

I support the rise of all the so called g5s
You know before the BCS and 4team playoffs I don't think there were any FBS teams that were told that your gonna be left out of a big bowl game because you have no real history of being good, even if that team was a top10team for what ever reason

Well....

Still hoping for some more MW fans to post and comment on this board rather than the other one the majority are on.