Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

      
Post Reply 
UC in RPI Rankings
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
bearcatmark Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,844
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 808
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #221
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-21-2012 04:06 PM)bearcatfan Wrote:  UConn is going to get preferential treatment since they won it all last year, and because of their 'name' value. So they keep getting penciled into the tournament despite their on court performance.

Their wins and their SOS are a bigger deal that what happened last year. Teams have been left out before after really good years. If I remember correctly Syracuse was left out the year after their national championship.
 
02-21-2012 04:12 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatlawjd Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,590
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 94
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #222
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
What you did last year always helps. I think the name value of UConn and VCU will help them get in. After the fight, Cincinnati could make for an interesting story; however, ESPN might want that story to play out in the NIT.

If UC wins two more games, I'll be happy because thats where this team's talent should have them at in the conference. If its NIT, I hope we never schedule like we did again.
 
02-21-2012 04:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RealDeal Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,634
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 83
I Root For: UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #223
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-21-2012 04:13 PM)bearcatlawjd Wrote:  If UC wins two more games, I'll be happy because thats where this team's talent should have them at in the conference. If its NIT, I hope we never schedule like we did again.

If UC misses the tournament whoever is responsible for the schedule, either AD or coach, has to take responsiblity. We should NEVER be in a position where 10 BE wins isn't good enough to be an NCAA team.
 
02-21-2012 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BigDawg Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,817
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 39
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:

Donators
Post: #224
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-21-2012 04:33 PM)RealDeal Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 04:13 PM)bearcatlawjd Wrote:  If UC wins two more games, I'll be happy because thats where this team's talent should have them at in the conference. If its NIT, I hope we never schedule like we did again.

If UC misses the tournament whoever is responsible for the schedule, either AD or coach, has to take responsiblity. We should NEVER be in a position where 10 BE wins isn't good enough to be an NCAA team.

Regardless the schedule needs to improve and I believe we have an AD in place now that understands that spending the money for the better buy games can only help the basketball team down the line and make it easier to make the NCAAs and we will spend the money to improve the schedule. I think Thomas was too worried about the budget while Whit will find the money to make this happen.
 
02-21-2012 04:40 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
levydl Online
All American
*

Posts: 4,426
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 138
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #225
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-21-2012 03:03 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Palm was the only major projector that I followed last year that had the field 100% right. Palm does not merely look at the RPI number as the determining factor and it is silly to say he does.

Palm missed 2 last year.
 
02-21-2012 04:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmill Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,338
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation: 63
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #226
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
I think this type of scheduling went out the door with M Thomas
 
02-21-2012 05:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cincy11 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 531
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 19
I Root For: The Sun
Location: Atlantic Beach
Post: #227
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
So tired of hearing about how bad the out of conference schedule is... Nothing has been beaten to death as bad as that this year - not even the fight. It is simply a $ issue.
 
02-21-2012 05:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcat_Bounce Offline
God Like Summoner

Posts: 6,467
Joined: Mar 2011
I Root For: Winners
Location: Under a Bridge
Post: #228
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
Cincinnati is #37 in KenPom, #46 in the Massey Ratings and #42 in the Sagarin.
 
02-27-2012 07:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcats#1 Offline
Ad nauseam King
*

Posts: 45,310
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 1224
I Root For: Pony94
Location: In your head.
Post: #229
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
our OOC sched wouldn't be such a big deal if we had beaten friggen Presby and marshall....that's a fact
 
02-27-2012 08:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatfan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,524
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 195
I Root For: The Bearcats!
Location:
Post: #230
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-21-2012 05:11 PM)cincy11 Wrote:  So tired of hearing about how bad the out of conference schedule is... Nothing has been beaten to death as bad as that this year - not even the fight. It is simply a $ issue.

If it keeps UC out of the NCAA tournament it's an even bigger $ issue - potential lost $.
 
02-28-2012 10:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ragpicker Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,962
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 198
I Root For: Black & Gold
Location:

Donators
Post: #231
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-21-2012 05:11 PM)cincy11 Wrote:  So tired of hearing about how bad the out of conference schedule is... Nothing has been beaten to death as bad as that this year - not even the fight. It is simply a $ issue.

:ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs:
04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow
04-cheers04-cheers04-cheers
 
02-28-2012 11:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,844
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 808
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #232
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-28-2012 11:05 AM)Ragpicker Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 05:11 PM)cincy11 Wrote:  So tired of hearing about how bad the out of conference schedule is... Nothing has been beaten to death as bad as that this year - not even the fight. It is simply a $ issue.

:ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs:
04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow
04-cheers04-cheers04-cheers

1. It's not just a $ issue or there would not be a number of teams behind us with significantly better non-conference SOS's that spend less than us (see Seton Hall).
2. It's a lack of creativity issue and a failure to understand smart scheduling issue.
3. Even if you disagree with that, if you read threads about RPI, and bubble talk SOS is inevitably going to come up because it has to when you discuss if UC will make the tournament, where they will be seeded, what they need to do to move up, to play themselves out..etc. SOS is a criteria, it is part of our resume so if you are tired of hearing about it don't read threads where it has to be talked about.
 
02-28-2012 12:48 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WarningSigns Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 904
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 13
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #233
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
Hypothetical: Had we not lost to Presby and Marshall, would we be a lock now?
 
02-28-2012 01:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcat_Bounce Offline
God Like Summoner

Posts: 6,467
Joined: Mar 2011
I Root For: Winners
Location: Under a Bridge
Post: #234
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-28-2012 01:15 PM)WarningSigns Wrote:  Hypothetical: Had we not lost to Presby and Marshall, would we be a lock now?

Yes. Probably as a 7-9 seed. The OOC schedule was still terrible, but at least they wouldn't have lost (outside of Xavier).

The better question is, if they had the same record but with a 122 OOC instead of a 322, could they be as highly seeded as Louisville (who is a 5 in the latest projections)?
 
(This post was last modified: 02-28-2012 01:21 PM by Bearcat_Bounce.)
02-28-2012 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BearChatter v2.0 Offline
Rounding Third and headed...
Jersey Retired

Posts: 8,548
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 62
I Root For: Da Bearcats!
Location: Blue Ash
Post: #235
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-21-2012 04:33 PM)RealDeal Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 04:13 PM)bearcatlawjd Wrote:  If UC wins two more games, I'll be happy because thats where this team's talent should have them at in the conference. If its NIT, I hope we never schedule like we did again.

If UC misses the tournament whoever is responsible for the schedule, either AD or coach, has to take responsiblity. We should NEVER be in a position where 10 BE wins isn't good enough to be an NCAA team.

Amen.

10 wins in the Big East and not making the NCAA Tournament = no excuses. Whoever is to blame should step up.
 
02-28-2012 02:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mptnstr@44 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,047
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 427
I Root For: Nati Bearcats
Location:
Post: #236
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
Guessing if we get left out due to SOS schedule the blame will be put on MT and the tight budget as he can't really defend himself. Easy scapegoat although we all now others had to sign off on that schedule too.
 
02-28-2012 02:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcat2012 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,408
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 70
I Root For: Cincy Bearcats
Location:
Post: #237
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-28-2012 01:15 PM)WarningSigns Wrote:  Hypothetical: Had we not lost to Presby and Marshall, would we be a lock now?

The one that sticks with me is that OT loss to WVU. That one goes the other way we are a lock now 03-banghead
 
(This post was last modified: 02-28-2012 02:36 PM by Bearcat2012.)
02-28-2012 02:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WarningSigns Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 904
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 13
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #238
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-28-2012 02:28 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  Guessing if we get left out due to SOS schedule the blame will be put on MT and the tight budget as he can't really defend himself. Easy scapegoat although we all now others had to sign off on that schedule too.

Like the coach. AD's don't schedule by themselves. I'm a MC fan but he has publicly defended the light scheduling as part of working out the kinks for the BE schedule.

Problem is, this isn't SEC football--and light scheduling actually matters. It gives us no wiggle room in conference play, which is always brutal. I'm thinking Mick and Whit will make sure this isn't a such a drastic issue in the future.
 
02-28-2012 02:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Coopdaddy67 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,770
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 85
I Root For: ice cream
Location:
Post: #239
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-28-2012 01:15 PM)WarningSigns Wrote:  Hypothetical: Had we not lost to Presby and Marshall, would we be a lock now?

Yes. UC's problem is they scheduled a horrid non-conference and then proceeded to loss games they shouldn't have.
 
02-28-2012 03:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ragpicker Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,962
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 198
I Root For: Black & Gold
Location:

Donators
Post: #240
RE: UC in RPI Rankings
(02-28-2012 12:48 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  
(02-28-2012 11:05 AM)Ragpicker Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 05:11 PM)cincy11 Wrote:  So tired of hearing about how bad the out of conference schedule is... Nothing has been beaten to death as bad as that this year - not even the fight. It is simply a $ issue.

:ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs::ncaabbs:
04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow04-bow
04-cheers04-cheers04-cheers

1. It's not just a $ issue or there would not be a number of teams behind us with significantly better non-conference SOS's that spend less than us (see Seton Hall).
2. It's a lack of creativity issue and a failure to understand smart scheduling issue.
3. Even if you disagree with that, if you read threads about RPI, and bubble talk SOS is inevitably going to come up because it has to when you discuss if UC will make the tournament, where they will be seeded, what they need to do to move up, to play themselves out..etc. SOS is a criteria, it is part of our resume so if you are tired of hearing about it don't read threads where it has to be talked about.

1. Is there a comparison of what BE schools specifically spend on OOC schedule?

Just ask around other programs, especially minor sports, at UC, both players and coaches that you may know. They will tell you that things have changed dramatically with what is spent on their program. Better travelling conditions and more funds for recruiting is what I have heard.

Mick + MT = poor OOC schedule
Mick + Whit = good OOC schedule (from what we have seen and heard so far)

And the one variable is........
 
02-28-2012 05:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.