![]() |
|
[NEWS] Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html) +---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html) +---- Thread: [NEWS] Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster (/thread-940191.html) |
Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - CrimsonPhantom - 01-13-2022 07:43 PM Quote:The Democratic Party is either openly “racist” or it doesn’t believe a word it is saying about the filibuster. Link RE: Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - Attackcoog - 01-13-2022 07:49 PM Im glad its being blocked----but Im at a loss as to how the Democrats think they could pass legislation taking over the election process. Article II of the Constitution is pretty clear that the state legislatures decide how the electors are appointed Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector. RE: Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - stinkfist - 01-13-2022 07:53 PM (01-13-2022 07:49 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: Im glad its being blocked----but Im at a loss as to how the Democrats think they could pass legislation taking over the election process. Article II of the Constitution is pretty clear that the state legislatures decide how the electors are appointed it’s pretty simple … when the kiddies run the store, sugar rotten toofuses becomes irrelevant… that’s all those fkbags deserve in response… #fkEmAll RE: Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - green - 01-13-2022 08:01 PM SHAKY GROUND RE: Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - stinkfist - 01-13-2022 10:54 PM (01-13-2022 08:01 PM)green Wrote: Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - JMUDunk - 01-13-2022 11:22 PM Weren’t all the “Bad guys” Sloe* referred to Dims?!? Do we really need to adjudicate all this, yet again?!? Please people, go do some basic history. Sloes* been on the wrong side for a HALF FVCKING CENTURY. Suddenly now you think this idiots gonna get it right? Are you just dumb? Good grief, people these days. Dumb fvckland I guess. #Costasendmehome RE: Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - Attackcoog - 01-14-2022 12:23 AM (01-13-2022 08:01 PM)green Wrote: Very shaky ground. Section 4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence. You'd have to prove the "manner" prescribed by the states doesnt reflect a "republican form of government". Thats a pretty general broad brush statement. No state is has proposed using a monarcy, dictatorship, or military rule---so---every state is clearly using a "Republic" form of government. Zero chance the power hungry Democrats seeking to violate Article II while pointing at Article 4 will win that argument--especially with the current SC. Article II clearly leaves the details of elections to the individual states. RE: Senate Democrats Immediately Use ‘Racist’ Filibuster - Eldonabe - 01-14-2022 08:08 AM (01-13-2022 11:22 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: Weren’t all the “Bad guys” Sloe* referred to Dims?!? C'mon man.... Law of averages says he has to get something right once in a while? You know, like Blind Squirrel finds nut kind of stuff..... |