+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Big12bbs (/forum-260.html)
+---- Forum: Big 12 Team Talk (/forum-783.html)
+----- Forum: The Gregory A. Ruehlmann Sr. Memorial Cincinnati Board (/forum-404.html)
+----- Thread: NET Rankings! (/thread-914082.html)
Pages: 1 2
NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-04-2021 02:13 PM
We clocked in at a robust #142 in the NCAA's 1st NET rankings update that just hit today.
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball-men/d1/ncaa-mens-basketball-net-rankings
Its only day 4 of 2021 and I'm already sorta fondly remembering the halcyon days of 2020.
I think we currently count as a Q3 loss for Furman. This time next week UC could be a Q4 game for every team we play on the road.
Let that sink in....
NET Rankings! - Cataclysmo - 01-04-2021 02:24 PM
Looks like we have bragging rights over our friends down I75
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
RE: NET Rankings! - HoopsJunky - 01-04-2021 02:34 PM
Serious question
What works best for you
1) Blue Pill
2) UC Basketball loss
3) looking at the picture of you and Mick?
You are giddy after UC losses like a teenage girl
It’s clear you are a Mick Cronin fan and not a UC basketball fan
Save the bull**** about about how many games you have been to
You constantly bashed Huggins and took joy in his losses
How many sabbaticals did you have to take during Mick’s run because posters were questioning him
I hope I never get to the point like you where I root agains UC
You are the JustinHub of this board
RE: NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-04-2021 02:50 PM
Goodness. You are too knowledgeable and too good a guy to become the guy on sports message boards who makes it personal and attacks other posters when you are upset and don’t like what they post. Please take at it as the constructive criticism it’s intended to be.
RE: NET Rankings! - HoopsJunky - 01-04-2021 02:56 PM
(01-04-2021 02:50 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Goodness. You are too knowledgeable and too good a guy to become the guy on sports message boards who makes it personal and attacks other posters when you are upset and don’t like what they post. Please take at it as the constructive criticism it’s intended to be.
You have turned into the same poster who drove you away because you got tired of the constant criticism of Mick
I am not sure if it’s your payback for people that made this board unbearable for you to read during Mick’s time
RE: NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-04-2021 03:01 PM
Hmm.
I’m not mad at you so I’ll save the sword play. You do you. If you’d like to attack any thing factually incorrect about my original post, please feel free.
RE: NET Rankings! - HoopsJunky - 01-04-2021 04:07 PM
I was wrong to attack you
The constant negativity from you and others towards Brannen and the basketball team gets old
If one of the mods could Deactivate my account I would appreciate it
I didn’t see an option
For the record you are a much funnier than JustinHub
RE: NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-04-2021 04:15 PM
All good man. Nobody is pleased right now. We all just have differing opinions about why that is and what the future may hold. We all want the same thing or we wouldn’t be on here.
RE: NET Rankings! - Billy_Bearcat - 01-04-2021 07:36 PM
(01-04-2021 04:07 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote: I was wrong to attack you
The constant negativity from you and others towards Brannen and the basketball team gets old
If one of the mods could Deactivate my account I would appreciate it
I didn’t see an option
For the record you are a much funnier than JustinHub
Nope, sorry. It’s like the mafia around here. You’re in for life. Don’t even think about bailing.
Check out the ignore function if you need it. But this is Hotel California.
*** I have myself on ignore and it’s glorious.
RE: NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-04-2021 09:41 PM
Well, there is a request form that needs into be signed in triplicate in the blood of a New Zealand rabbit and submitted to Mark’s office for debate among the cabal. No sign on his building...you’ll know him because he has an uncanny resemblance to Raymond Reddington.
RE: NET Rankings! - Former Lurker - 01-04-2021 09:52 PM
At least our ratings in Sagarin and Kenpom are holding up quite a bit better.
RE: NET Rankings! - rtaylor - 01-04-2021 09:55 PM
(01-04-2021 02:50 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Goodness. You are too knowledgeable and too good a guy to become the guy on sports message boards who makes it personal and attacks other posters when you are upset and don’t like what they post. Please take at it as the constructive criticism it’s intended to be.
Laughable at best. It’s not constructive, it’s just typical you taking shots. There is a reason you have a bad rap, and it’s not fake news, it’s just you being you.
RE: NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-04-2021 09:59 PM
This thread is getting better and better.
RE: NET Rankings! - Don't tase me bro - 01-05-2021 11:00 AM
I think we're all just frustrated. I know I didn't foresee them being where they are now.
RE: NET Rankings! - natibeast21 - 01-05-2021 11:36 AM
(01-04-2021 07:36 PM)Billy_Bearcat Wrote:(01-04-2021 04:07 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote: I was wrong to attack you
The constant negativity from you and others towards Brannen and the basketball team gets old
If one of the mods could Deactivate my account I would appreciate it
I didn’t see an option
For the record you are a much funnier than JustinHub
Nope, sorry. It’s like the mafia around here. You’re in for life. Don’t even think about bailing.
Check out the ignore function if you need it. But this is Hotel California.
*** I have myself on ignore and it’s glorious.
RE: NET Rankings! - BcatMatt13 - 01-05-2021 02:19 PM
So I just saw that Colgate was 16th in the first released rankings yesterday at 1-1. They didn’t play last night. In today’s rankings they’re 46th. No wonder they won’t release the “formula”.
RE: NET Rankings! - BcatMatt13 - 01-05-2021 02:22 PM
(01-05-2021 02:19 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote: So I just saw that Colgate was 16th in the first released rankings yesterday at 1-1. They didn’t play last night. In today’s rankings they’re 46th. No wonder they won’t release the “formula”.
https://twitter.com/mattnorlander/status/1346458791269851138?s=21
RE: NET Rankings! - Bear Catlett - 01-05-2021 02:26 PM
Laugh if you want, but I truly think that playing in an empty arena is affecting the performance.
I think momentum is a tangible thing and we can't get any right now. A home crowd cheering you on does something for a team.
Does it fix 2-6? Hard to say. But I definitely think most of this team's problems are from the neck up.
RE: NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-05-2021 02:34 PM
Eastern Washington is 1-4 and their sole win is against something called The College of Idaho and they are 32 spots higher than UC in NET.
RE: NET Rankings! - rath v2.0 - 01-08-2021 11:15 AM
Finally winning a game last night jumped UC 20 spots in the NET to 122. For the NET, a 20 spot move in just one game is crazy. Beat Wichita on the road Sunday and it could be a 40 point improvement in just a week. And FWIW, Wichita is probably a better matchup for UC than SMU was.