CSNbbs
BYU wants one or two more games - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: College Sports and Conference Realignment (/forum-637.html)
+---- Thread: BYU wants one or two more games (/thread-910412.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - Foreverandever - 11-24-2020 07:45 PM

(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - THUNDERStruck73 - 11-24-2020 07:48 PM

(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Neither one of them is going to risk a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Playing a middle ranked team gives you a better price so see so to speak. Both are playing with house money in that most likely Cincy is in a NY6 and BYU just needs to add one more game over a middle ranked team if possible.

I don’t think that has happened since TCU/Boise that two non-P5 teams made it to a NY6 bowl. And the played each other. That was BS. And that Is what most likely would happen if Cincy and BYU made it (barring a Cincy playoff run).

And if there ever is a g5 that makes the playoffs, they will have the future of the whole g5 on their shoulders in that if they go out and bomb, the G5 will never get another bid (or at least for a looooooong time).


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - quo vadis - 11-24-2020 07:51 PM

(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Yes, right now BYU is staring down the barrel of a game vs Army in the Independence Bowl.

07-coffee3


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - whittx - 11-24-2020 07:51 PM

(11-24-2020 07:48 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Neither one of them is going to risk a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Playing a middle ranked team hives you a better price. Both are playing with house money right now.

If Liberty can knock off Coastal, both teams can play on 12/19.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - quo vadis - 11-24-2020 07:52 PM

(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Actually, it's the advantage of playing in a pretty good conference with pretty good teams on their schedule. Cincy would have little chance of making the playoffs if, e.g., it had to play the top teams like Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. but thanks to being in the AAC, they avoid all that and get to count games vs UCF, Tulsa and SMU as "good wins".


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - THUNDERStruck73 - 11-24-2020 08:02 PM

(11-24-2020 07:51 PM)whittx Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:48 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Neither one of them is going to risk a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Playing a middle ranked team hives you a better price. Both are playing with house money right now.

If Liberty can knock off Coastal, both teams can play on 12/19.

You mean BYU and Liberty, right?


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - bullet - 11-24-2020 08:19 PM

(11-24-2020 07:48 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Neither one of them is going to risk a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Playing a middle ranked team gives you a better price so see so to speak. Both are playing with house money in that most likely Cincy is in a NY6 and BYU just needs to add one more game over a middle ranked team if possible.

I don’t think that has happened since TCU/Boise that two non-P5 teams made it to a NY6 bowl. And the played each other. That was BS. And that Is what most likely would happen if Cincy and BYU made it (barring a Cincy playoff run).

And if there ever is a g5 that makes the playoffs, they will have the future of the whole g5 on their shoulders in that if they go out and bomb, the G5 will never get another bid (or at least for a looooooong time).

Well if they get in it improves the chances of the A5 voting for an 8 game playoff.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - whittx - 11-24-2020 08:49 PM

(11-24-2020 08:02 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:51 PM)whittx Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:48 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Neither one of them is going to risk a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Playing a middle ranked team hives you a better price. Both are playing with house money right now.

If Liberty can knock off Coastal, both teams can play on 12/19.

You mean BYU and Liberty, right?

Yup


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - RUScarlets - 11-24-2020 09:01 PM

Only way for BYU to get in would be to schedule an A&M should they also be on a bye the final week on the road. Really punished for the SOS, but that’s what happens some years when you are an Indy sans ND.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - Crayton - 11-24-2020 09:18 PM

(11-24-2020 09:01 PM)RUScarlets Wrote:  Only way for BYU to get in would be to schedule an A&M should they also be on a bye the final week on the road. Really punished for the SOS, but that’s what happens some years when you are an Indy sans ND.

Agreed; but would A&M risk the loss (assuming the SEC sanctions it)?

An A&M win on 12/19 would look favorable against undefeated teams (ND/UA) who lost on 12/19. A&M would need that win against a "playoff-caliber" team; an undefeated BYU team may be the closest thing available.

I still think, if Cincy is knocking on the playoff door, that the American should just call the Tulsa-Cincy game the defacto championship and steal that 12/19 date with A&M themselves.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - THUNDERStruck73 - 11-24-2020 09:29 PM

(11-24-2020 08:49 PM)whittx Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 08:02 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:51 PM)whittx Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:48 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Neither one of them is going to risk a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Playing a middle ranked team hives you a better price. Both are playing with house money right now.

If Liberty can knock off Coastal, both teams can play on 12/19.

You mean BYU and Liberty, right?

Yup
Liberty is now a one loss g5 team. Doesn’t help them.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - Native Georgian - 11-24-2020 09:34 PM

(11-23-2020 01:02 AM)f1do Wrote:  https://twitter.com/johnnywolthuis/status/1330693509909671936

1) PAC cancelled 3 gms vs. #BYU due to COVID, & BYU fills schedule.
2) PAC delays start w/ 6 game season.
3) PAC says won’t play OOC.
4) PAC changes rule bc of cancellations.
5) PAC mandates OCC rules.
6) #UW calls & says play us, but may cancel on Thursday.

Report: #BYU scared
That is awesome.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - Foreverandever - 11-24-2020 09:54 PM

(11-24-2020 07:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Actually, it's the advantage of playing in a pretty good conference with pretty good teams on their schedule. Cincy would have little chance of making the playoffs if, e.g., it had to play the top teams like Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. but thanks to being in the AAC, they avoid all that and get to count games vs UCF, Tulsa and SMU as "good wins".

Sure. Where is BYU ranked again? Or Marshall? Or Coastal?

Sorry Quo, the committee made it pretty clear, a one loss B12 team would finish behind Cincy and likely a one loss PAC team with a full schedule. Miami with one loss is ranked behind Cincy, so any one loss ACC team as well not named Clemson (or this year ND). The conference matters.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - CliftonAve - 11-25-2020 09:03 AM

(11-24-2020 07:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Actually, it's the advantage of playing in a pretty good conference with pretty good teams on their schedule. Cincy would have little chance of making the playoffs if, e.g., it had to play the top teams like Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. but thanks to being in the AAC, they avoid all that and get to count games vs UCF, Tulsa and SMU as "good wins".

But nobody is in a conference that consists of Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, etc. Instead Ohio State is paying schools with big names that are bad to mediocre this year; namely Nebraska, Penn State, Michigan State, and Michigan. The Big 12 has teams that lost to Arkansas State and Louisiana. The ACC outside Clemson and Notre Dame doesn't look that much different than teams on UC's schedule like UCF, SMU, Memphis and Tulsa. The PAC12? Idk man- how are you going to compare a team that gets 5-6 games in to a school that plays 12? Oregon's schedule consists of mediocre Oregon State, Washington State, Cal and Stanford-- that's nearly all their schedule outside a date with Washington and the PAC12 championship.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - quo vadis - 11-25-2020 09:08 AM

(11-24-2020 09:54 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Actually, it's the advantage of playing in a pretty good conference with pretty good teams on their schedule. Cincy would have little chance of making the playoffs if, e.g., it had to play the top teams like Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. but thanks to being in the AAC, they avoid all that and get to count games vs UCF, Tulsa and SMU as "good wins".

Sure. Where is BYU ranked again? Or Marshall? Or Coastal?

Sorry Quo, the committee made it pretty clear, a one loss B12 team would finish behind Cincy and likely a one loss PAC team with a full schedule. Miami with one loss is ranked behind Cincy, so any one loss ACC team as well not named Clemson (or this year ND). The conference matters.

I'm not sure we disagree. The CFP is clearly giving the AAC a good deal of weight. IMO, too much, given that Cincy does not have to face any top teams, as the other playoff contenders have to.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - esayem - 11-25-2020 09:12 AM

(11-24-2020 09:01 PM)RUScarlets Wrote:  Only way for BYU to get in would be to schedule an A&M should they also be on a bye the final week on the road. Really punished for the SOS, but that’s what happens some years when you are an Indy sans ND.

Some years? You mean an anomaly pandemic year? Their original schedule was much stronger than any G5 team’s schedule.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - quo vadis - 11-25-2020 09:18 AM

(11-25-2020 09:03 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Actually, it's the advantage of playing in a pretty good conference with pretty good teams on their schedule. Cincy would have little chance of making the playoffs if, e.g., it had to play the top teams like Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. but thanks to being in the AAC, they avoid all that and get to count games vs UCF, Tulsa and SMU as "good wins".

But nobody is in a conference that consists of Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, etc. Instead Ohio State is paying schools with big names that are bad to mediocre this year; namely Nebraska, Penn State, Michigan State, and Michigan. The Big 12 has teams that lost to Arkansas State and Louisiana. The ACC outside Clemson and Notre Dame doesn't look that much different than teams on UC's schedule like UCF, SMU, Memphis and Tulsa. The PAC12? Idk man- how are you going to compare a team that gets 5-6 games in to a school that plays 12? Oregon's schedule consists of mediocre Oregon State, Washington State, Cal and Stanford-- that's nearly all their schedule outside a date with Washington and the PAC12 championship.

That's all true, but not really my point, which is that Cincy is getting an extraordinarily high ranking for a team that has not and will not play any highly-ranked teams, or possibly any ranked teams at all. All of the other teams that are currently in the Top 10 have or will certainly play another team that is currently in the Top 10, save for Ohio State, and they played #12 Indiana. Cincy has not played anyone ranked in the Top 25, and aren't scheduled to do so until they play #25 Tulsa three weeks from now, and who knows if Tulsa will even be ranked then?

And yet they are #7?

In fact, one can argue that the only reason Tulsa is #25 is so Cincy can claim to have played a top-25 team. It was a nice for Cincy that Tulsa vs Houston was canceled, as the models predicted a 52% chance of Houston winning, and Cincy needs Tulsa to be ranked.

It's extraordinary how high Cincy is, given the lack of test-games on their schedule.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - CliftonAve - 11-25-2020 09:28 AM

(11-25-2020 09:18 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-25-2020 09:03 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:26 PM)f1do Wrote:  What this ranking means is BYU better be hunting for another game for 12/5 and will need help to get high enough for a NY6 game. And that 12/5 matchup isn't going to be Cincinnati (why would they not just run their schedule out with their #7 ranking?).

Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Actually, it's the advantage of playing in a pretty good conference with pretty good teams on their schedule. Cincy would have little chance of making the playoffs if, e.g., it had to play the top teams like Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. but thanks to being in the AAC, they avoid all that and get to count games vs UCF, Tulsa and SMU as "good wins".

But nobody is in a conference that consists of Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, etc. Instead Ohio State is paying schools with big names that are bad to mediocre this year; namely Nebraska, Penn State, Michigan State, and Michigan. The Big 12 has teams that lost to Arkansas State and Louisiana. The ACC outside Clemson and Notre Dame doesn't look that much different than teams on UC's schedule like UCF, SMU, Memphis and Tulsa. The PAC12? Idk man- how are you going to compare a team that gets 5-6 games in to a school that plays 12? Oregon's schedule consists of mediocre Oregon State, Washington State, Cal and Stanford-- that's nearly all their schedule outside a date with Washington and the PAC12 championship.

That's all true, but not really my point, which is that Cincy is getting an extraordinarily high ranking for a team that has not and will not play any highly-ranked teams, or possibly any ranked teams at all. All of the other teams that are currently in the Top 10 have or will certainly play another team that is currently in the Top 10, save for Ohio State, and they played #12 Indiana. Cincy has not played anyone ranked in the Top 25, and aren't scheduled to do so until they play #25 Tulsa three weeks from now, and who knows if Tulsa will even be ranked then?

And yet they are #7?

In fact, one can argue that the only reason Tulsa is #25 is so Cincy can claim to have played a top-25 team. It was a nice for Cincy that Tulsa vs Houston was canceled, as the models predicted a 52% chance of Houston winning, and Cincy needs Tulsa to be ranked.

It's extraordinary how high Cincy is, given the lack of test-games on their schedule.

Ah but Quo- Cincinnati did play two teams that were ranked (at the time- SMU and Army were ranked), and Tulsa will be the third. UCF, while not ranked, was receiving enough votes that they were one spot away from a Top 25 appearance. The problem with being in the AAC is the voters instantly discredit a loss- dropping you completely out of the Top 25, whereas if you are in a P5 you may only drop a few spots if you lose.

I am not going to sit here and say UC isn't playing teams with the dudes that Clemson, Alabama, etc. have. All I am saying is that they have played some pretty solid opponents and have won handily other than UCF which was a close game.

The other factor I think you are not taking into consideration is the number of games played. By playing more games, a school like Cincinnati has had more risk of loss than some of these schools that have played only 4-5 games thus. Anything can happen on any given day-- injuries keeping key players out of a game, covid, fluke plays, bad turnovers, etc. that can cost you. A team playing 3-4 more games should be given the benefit of the doubt and it is clear the committee is doing so.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - esayem - 11-25-2020 09:56 AM

This is what gets me:

BYU and Cincinnati both beat common opponent Houston handily.

BYU crushes ranked Boise State, while Cincinnati crushes ranked SMU.

How is Cincinnati #7 and BYU #14?

That is a HUGE difference in poll-land, and I think the two should be much closer to one another, however you want to make that happen.


RE: BYU wants one or two more games - quo vadis - 11-25-2020 10:19 AM

(11-25-2020 09:28 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(11-25-2020 09:18 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-25-2020 09:03 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(11-24-2020 07:45 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  Other AAC teams may be possible. But Cincy is on track with the way the schedules are set to have a very good chance to sneak in the back door to the play off, that's the benefit of being in a strong conference and knowing you will have strong teams on your schedule guarenteed.

Actually, it's the advantage of playing in a pretty good conference with pretty good teams on their schedule. Cincy would have little chance of making the playoffs if, e.g., it had to play the top teams like Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. but thanks to being in the AAC, they avoid all that and get to count games vs UCF, Tulsa and SMU as "good wins".

But nobody is in a conference that consists of Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, etc. Instead Ohio State is paying schools with big names that are bad to mediocre this year; namely Nebraska, Penn State, Michigan State, and Michigan. The Big 12 has teams that lost to Arkansas State and Louisiana. The ACC outside Clemson and Notre Dame doesn't look that much different than teams on UC's schedule like UCF, SMU, Memphis and Tulsa. The PAC12? Idk man- how are you going to compare a team that gets 5-6 games in to a school that plays 12? Oregon's schedule consists of mediocre Oregon State, Washington State, Cal and Stanford-- that's nearly all their schedule outside a date with Washington and the PAC12 championship.

That's all true, but not really my point, which is that Cincy is getting an extraordinarily high ranking for a team that has not and will not play any highly-ranked teams, or possibly any ranked teams at all. All of the other teams that are currently in the Top 10 have or will certainly play another team that is currently in the Top 10, save for Ohio State, and they played #12 Indiana. Cincy has not played anyone ranked in the Top 25, and aren't scheduled to do so until they play #25 Tulsa three weeks from now, and who knows if Tulsa will even be ranked then?

And yet they are #7?

In fact, one can argue that the only reason Tulsa is #25 is so Cincy can claim to have played a top-25 team. It was a nice for Cincy that Tulsa vs Houston was canceled, as the models predicted a 52% chance of Houston winning, and Cincy needs Tulsa to be ranked.

It's extraordinary how high Cincy is, given the lack of test-games on their schedule.

Ah but Quo- Cincinnati did play two teams that were ranked (at the time- SMU and Army were ranked), and Tulsa will be the third. UCF, while not ranked, was receiving enough votes that they were one spot away from a Top 25 appearance. The problem with being in the AAC is the voters instantly discredit a loss- dropping you completely out of the Top 25, whereas if you are in a P5 you may only drop a few spots if you lose.

I am not going to sit here and say UC isn't playing teams with the dudes that Clemson, Alabama, etc. have. All I am saying is that they have played some pretty solid opponents and have won handily other than UCF which was a close game.

I was referring to ranked right now. Lots of teams were previously ranked - when Mississippi State beat LSU, LSU was ranked, for whatever that means now. Army and SMU aren't ranked and won't be moving forward, neither will UCF.

I can't remember the last time a team was ranked in the top 10 of the CFP without having played any teams ranked in the top 25. It's pretty rare.

I do agree with your other bolded statement. Cincy has played some pretty solid opponents. But that typically is not enough to get you ranked at #7 in the CFP. And yet, despite not having played any top opponents, Cincy's playoff hopes basically hinge on the teams ahead of them playing, and losing, to more top opponents (e.g., Clemson has already played Notre Dame, and may have to yet again) while Cincy does not have to pass that kind of test.