*** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html) +---- Forum: The Kyra Memorial Spin Room (/forum-540.html) +---- Thread: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** (/thread-909997.html) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 |
RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Bearcat419 - 11-06-2020 07:25 PM (11-06-2020 07:23 PM)TheOriginalBigApp Wrote: can y'all learn to crop your replies? We don't need to see Comey's face and re-read 36 reply threads to just to get to your post. Say what? RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - TheOriginalBigApp - 11-06-2020 07:26 PM (11-06-2020 07:25 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote: Say what? read. and (maybe) learn. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Bearcat419 - 11-06-2020 07:28 PM You're fun... RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Attackcoog - 11-06-2020 07:30 PM (11-06-2020 07:20 PM)macgar32 Wrote:(11-06-2020 05:46 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:(11-06-2020 05:07 PM)macgar32 Wrote:(11-06-2020 04:55 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:(11-06-2020 03:42 PM)macgar32 Wrote: Oh... Is it? Or is it just exposing bias. I mean--didnt Comey stand in front of the nation and meticulously explain everything Hillary did was illegal--sounding like he was laying the opening argument for charges---and then says--but we decided not to charge her cuz she didnt mean to commit a crime. Ok----a few months later---its clear Flynn did exactly what every NSA guy for every administration has done during a transition and had zero intent to commit a crime---but the FBI targets him and presses charges? Does anyone really think Flynn meant to commit a crime? Hell---I think its questionable if he even did commit a crime. regardless---it sure seems like his case was handled much differently than Hillary's. As for collusion---there was literally NOTHING in the file when Mueller started other than an unproven dossier. If Mueller was truely ethical---the moment he opened that file and found nothing, he should have made it clear that investigation would be over in a few weeks at most. We now know that while all these officials were saying on TV there was evidence to prove that there was collusion--at the same time, in closed testimony under oath to Congress---they were all admitting there was no proof. Why the dichotomy? Because lying on TV isnt a big deal. On the other hand, lying to congress is federal crime--so they told the truth under oath. Thus, its clear there was simply never anything to support it----ever. So, yeah--there is bias. That's hardly a conspiracy theory. Its pointing out flaws in government. If thats a conspiracy theory, then so is "systemic racism". RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Bearcat419 - 11-06-2020 07:57 PM https://mobile.twitter.com/rickhasen/status/1324825242716446725?s=20 Big yikes on the donations to both parties recount fundraising. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - CrimsonPhantom - 11-06-2020 08:02 PM RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - UofMstateU - 11-06-2020 08:02 PM Alito steps in. THe SC is going to rule against those late ballots. Trump with a huge advantage on the provisionals yet to be counted. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - UofMstateU - 11-06-2020 08:06 PM MI will now hold oversight hearings tomorrow at 10am. Its time for them to start considering to overturn the fraud and vote for the Trump electors. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Bearcat419 - 11-06-2020 08:08 PM Didn't the supreme court allow them, or at least punt on the issue, to begin with? RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - mptnstr@44 - 11-06-2020 08:09 PM (11-06-2020 08:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: Alito steps in. THe SC is going to rule against those late ballots. Trump with a huge advantage on the provisionals yet to be counted. I believe the Trump complaint on these late arriving ballots will hold up as the decision to extend the deadline was made by the PA Scotus not the PA Legislature which by the US Consitution has all of the decision making power for elections. The PA Scotus acted extra-Constitutionally and it's a pretty easy ruling for the US Scotus. What I am afraid of is that the PA precincts ignored the US Scotus initial order to set aside late arriving ballots and will say ooops sorry. So while Trump will win on the merits it will amount to nothing. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - mptnstr@44 - 11-06-2020 08:10 PM (11-06-2020 08:08 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote: Didn't the supreme court allow them, or at least punt on the issue, to begin with? the punted at a 4-4 vote allowing it but with the order to set aside late ballots. they did not rule on the merit of the argument. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - UofMstateU - 11-06-2020 08:12 PM (11-06-2020 08:08 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote: Didn't the supreme court allow them, or at least punt on the issue, to begin with? No, they refused to rule at the time. THey didnt "stop" them at the time, but they didnt allow them. That is still an open case that will be heard. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Bearcat419 - 11-06-2020 08:20 PM (11-06-2020 08:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:Got it. So they are the ballots that the election coverage keeps referring to as having already been set aside.(11-06-2020 08:08 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote: Didn't the supreme court allow them, or at least punt on the issue, to begin with? RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - mptnstr@44 - 11-06-2020 08:26 PM (11-06-2020 08:20 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote:(11-06-2020 08:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:Got it. So they are the ballots that the election coverage keeps referring to as having already been set aside.(11-06-2020 08:08 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote: Didn't the supreme court allow them, or at least punt on the issue, to begin with? yes...any ballots received after 8 p.m. on election day, regardless of postmark, can be counted but are to be set aside. (I assume set aside so if they are ruled ineligible the count would be removed from the vote tallies) RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Bearcat419 - 11-06-2020 08:31 PM I can't envision that the supreme court will invalidate the votes of citizens who were casting votes in what they were told was a legal manner, but that's just me. *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - 80sTiger - 11-06-2020 08:36 PM Judges loathe substituting their own decision for votes Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - UofMstateU - 11-06-2020 08:44 PM Alito's order says neither the PA Secretary of the commonwealth or the GOP say whether PA has complied with the law. If you cant prove the law was followed, there's going to be some striking down of some votes. RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - UofMstateU - 11-06-2020 08:50 PM AZ just had a dump of 3000 votes, and 75% went to Trump. *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - UTSAMarineVet09 - 11-06-2020 09:04 PM **** just got real... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro RE: *** Official 2020 Election Thread *** - Attackcoog - 11-06-2020 09:10 PM (11-06-2020 08:08 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote: Didn't the supreme court allow them, or at least punt on the issue, to begin with? Thats what they were supposed to do under hte original order as I understand it---but apparently it was ignored in many counties. |