+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Kyra Memorial Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: Ginsburg in again (/thread-903631.html)
Pages: 1 2
Ginsburg in again - bullet - 07-30-2020 11:14 AM
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-hospitalized-bile/story?id=72065498&cid=clicksource_4380645_2_heads_hero_live_headlines_hed
"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who recently announced that she is battling a recurrence of liver cancer, has been hospitalized in New York City after undergoing a "minimally invasive non-surgical procedure," according to a Supreme Court spokeswoman.
Doctors at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center "revised a bile duct stent" that was originally placed in Ginsburg last summer, court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said in a statement...."
RE: Ginsburg in again - rath v2.0 - 07-30-2020 11:37 AM
Each time she goes in it's always initially reported that it’s for some routine non- invasive procedure or for a mild infection...later in the week it always comes out that she has something going on that is massive. She is not doing her job, her clerks are.
If we can’t get term limits, let’s set an age cap. There is one on the front end for President...why shouldn’t there be one on the back end for all the Washington DC critters? Make it 80. Reduce this crap where people are holding on for political purposes only.
RE: Ginsburg in again - stinkfist - 07-30-2020 11:39 AM
#justdie
fwiw, I'm in your camp, Rath...
@untilthenifwhen
RE: Ginsburg in again - Eldonabe - 07-30-2020 12:27 PM
Even if RBG went today there is a ZERO point ZERO chance that her replacement is confirmed prior to the election. This will make the Kavanaugh thing look like a nice light dinner with friends....
Let's focus on getting DJT back in the oval office first.
RE: Ginsburg in again - stinkfist - 07-30-2020 12:29 PM
(07-30-2020 12:27 PM)Eldonabe Wrote: Even if RBG went today there is a ZERO point ZERO chance that her replacement is confirmed prior to the election. This will make the Kavanaugh thing look like a nice light dinner with friends....
Let's focus on getting DJT back in the oval office first.
yep....political suicide if so...
RE: Ginsburg in again - Ohio Poly - 07-30-2020 02:44 PM
(07-30-2020 11:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Each time she goes in it's always initially reported that it’s for some routine non- invasive procedure or for a mild infection...later in the week it always comes out that she has something going on that is massive. She is not doing her job, her clerks are.
If we can’t get term limits, let’s set an age cap. There is one on the front end for President...why shouldn’t there be one on the back end for all the Washington DC critters? Make it 80. Reduce this crap where people are holding on for political purposes only.
With a Democratic Senate next year, it could happen. And a lot of other good things.
RE: Ginsburg in again - Owl 69/70/75 - 07-30-2020 02:46 PM
(07-30-2020 02:44 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote: With a Democratic Senate next year, it could happen. And a lot of other good things.
With a democrat senate, house, and white house, I can't see ANY good things happening.
RE: Ginsburg in again - stinkfist - 07-30-2020 02:59 PM
(07-30-2020 02:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:(07-30-2020 02:44 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote: With a Democratic Senate next year, it could happen. And a lot of other good things.
With a democrat senate, house, and white house, I can't see ANY good things happening.
you don't snort fairy dust...
RE: Ginsburg in again - MemTigers1998 - 07-30-2020 03:01 PM
(07-30-2020 02:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:(07-30-2020 02:44 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote: With a Democratic Senate next year, it could happen. And a lot of other good things.
With a democrat senate, house, and white house, I can't see ANY good things happening.
You don’t think destroying the economy, ruining the suburbs w/ section 8 housing, crippling the healthcare system, and defunding the police while trying to have Beto confiscating guns are good??
RE: Ginsburg in again - Owl 69/70/75 - 07-30-2020 03:01 PM
(07-30-2020 02:59 PM)stinkfist Wrote:(07-30-2020 02:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:you don't snort fairy dust...(07-30-2020 02:44 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote: With a Democratic Senate next year, it could happen. And a lot of other good things.With a democrat senate, house, and white house, I can't see ANY good things happening.
Actually, I can see one good thing happening. Maybe--just maybe--they will overplay their hand and conservatives/republicans will finally figure out that we are in a war to the death with socialism/communism, and they are supposed to be the ones protecting us from it.
RE: Ginsburg in again - JMUDunk - 07-30-2020 03:11 PM
(07-30-2020 11:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Each time she goes in it's always initially reported that it’s for some routine non- invasive procedure or for a mild infection...later in the week it always comes out that she has something going on that is massive. She is not doing her job, her clerks are.
If we can’t get term limits, let’s set an age cap. There is one on the front end for President...why shouldn’t there be one on the back end for all the Washington DC critters? Make it 80. Reduce this crap where people are holding on for political purposes only.
Anyone know if there is a provision similar to the 25th or 29th (not looking) amendment that weasel Rosenstien was tossing around a couple years ago? To remove a Supreme? Maybe a unanimous vote by the other Justices? A majority? Course I doubt they would do that, not these days, but at some pt., c'mon.
RE: Ginsburg in again - TigerBlue4Ever - 07-30-2020 03:33 PM
(07-30-2020 02:44 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:(07-30-2020 11:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Each time she goes in it's always initially reported that it’s for some routine non- invasive procedure or for a mild infection...later in the week it always comes out that she has something going on that is massive. She is not doing her job, her clerks are.
If we can’t get term limits, let’s set an age cap. There is one on the front end for President...why shouldn’t there be one on the back end for all the Washington DC critters? Make it 80. Reduce this crap where people are holding on for political purposes only.
With a Democratic Senate next year, it could happen. And a lot of other good things.
Such as, name one... I'll wait.
RE: Ginsburg in again - TigerBlue4Ever - 07-30-2020 03:35 PM
(07-30-2020 03:01 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:(07-30-2020 02:59 PM)stinkfist Wrote:(07-30-2020 02:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:you don't snort fairy dust...(07-30-2020 02:44 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote: With a Democratic Senate next year, it could happen. And a lot of other good things.With a democrat senate, house, and white house, I can't see ANY good things happening.
Actually, I can see one good thing happening. Maybe--just maybe--they will overplay their hand and conservatives/republicans will finally figure out that we are in a war to the death with socialism/communism, and they are supposed to be the ones protecting us from it.
Id that happens it will be too late for the republicans to get their heads out of their asses and their butts off their hands.
RE: Ginsburg in again - TigerBlue4Ever - 07-30-2020 03:37 PM
(07-30-2020 03:11 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:(07-30-2020 11:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Each time she goes in it's always initially reported that it’s for some routine non- invasive procedure or for a mild infection...later in the week it always comes out that she has something going on that is massive. She is not doing her job, her clerks are.
If we can’t get term limits, let’s set an age cap. There is one on the front end for President...why shouldn’t there be one on the back end for all the Washington DC critters? Make it 80. Reduce this crap where people are holding on for political purposes only.
Anyone know if there is a provision similar to the 25th or 29th (not looking) amendment that weasel Rosenstien was tossing around a couple years ago? To remove a Supreme? Maybe a unanimous vote by the other Justices? A majority? Course I doubt they would do that, not these days, but at some pt., c'mon.
Off topic but if Biden is elected articles of impeachment should be leveled at him the day after he takes office. Who cares if they are successful, if shot down ready the next set of charges. They can even be bogus ala our democrat friends. And keep hammering away at him. If by some remote chance he's removed have another set of charges ready for the VP.
RE: Ginsburg in again - rath v2.0 - 07-30-2020 03:59 PM
(07-30-2020 03:11 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:(07-30-2020 11:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Each time she goes in it's always initially reported that it’s for some routine non- invasive procedure or for a mild infection...later in the week it always comes out that she has something going on that is massive. She is not doing her job, her clerks are.
If we can’t get term limits, let’s set an age cap. There is one on the front end for President...why shouldn’t there be one on the back end for all the Washington DC critters? Make it 80. Reduce this crap where people are holding on for political purposes only.
Anyone know if there is a provision similar to the 25th or 29th (not looking) amendment that weasel Rosenstien was tossing around a couple years ago? To remove a Supreme? Maybe a unanimous vote by the other Justices? A majority? Course I doubt they would do that, not these days, but at some pt., c'mon.
Nope. Lots of examples over the past 200 years of Supreme Court justices in their dotage who would be wheeled in to sleep through oral arguments. RBG has caught up on plenty of beauty sleep on the bench over the past 5-8 years.
RE: Ginsburg in again - rath v2.0 - 07-30-2020 04:02 PM
(07-30-2020 03:37 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:(07-30-2020 03:11 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:(07-30-2020 11:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Each time she goes in it's always initially reported that it’s for some routine non- invasive procedure or for a mild infection...later in the week it always comes out that she has something going on that is massive. She is not doing her job, her clerks are.
If we can’t get term limits, let’s set an age cap. There is one on the front end for President...why shouldn’t there be one on the back end for all the Washington DC critters? Make it 80. Reduce this crap where people are holding on for political purposes only.
Anyone know if there is a provision similar to the 25th or 29th (not looking) amendment that weasel Rosenstien was tossing around a couple years ago? To remove a Supreme? Maybe a unanimous vote by the other Justices? A majority? Course I doubt they would do that, not these days, but at some pt., c'mon.
Off topic but if Biden is elected articles of impeachment should be leveled at him the day after he takes office. Who cares if they are successful, if shot down ready the next set of charges. They can even be bogus ala our democrat friends. And keep hammering away at him. If by some remote chance he's removed have another set of charges ready for the VP.
Their likely will be. Both for his role in Biden, Inc’s overseas profiteering and interference in investigations as well as his active role in spy gate.
RE: Ginsburg in again - Bronco'14 - 07-30-2020 04:25 PM
Her mind is still healthy
RE: Ginsburg in again - Owl 69/70/75 - 07-30-2020 04:33 PM
(07-30-2020 04:02 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Their likely will be. Both for his role in Biden, Inc’s overseas profiteering and interference in investigations as well as his active role in spy gate.
Given his short list of VP candidates, I wouldn't be impeaching him any time soon.
RE: Ginsburg in again - rath v2.0 - 07-30-2020 04:34 PM
Impeachment is now a political tool. Never getting 2/3 of the Senate to agree on about anything let alone impeachment.
Ginsburg in again - maximus - 07-30-2020 05:06 PM
When one is admitted to the hospital continuously they are not going to last long.... i give her 2 weeks.
A strong lefty. I dont agree with anything she has ever subscribed to but I credit her for being someone who stuck to her guns.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk