(05-06-2020 03:55 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  I watched about half of it yesterday.

Seemed to be a fair amount of disconnect in some of the "A then B created C", things she was trying to connect together.

And how in the hell could she be jailed for 5 years and that didn't come to someone else's attention?

I could probably stand to watch it again with the TV off, but some of it sounded plausible, some other of it sounded kind of kooky and pretty far-fetched.

Who knows.

(05-06-2020 04:00 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Told yall he had a TV preacher vibe. Always trust your common sense

(05-06-2020 04:08 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 04:00 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Told yall he had a TV preacher vibe. Always trust your common sense

One thing he did early on had me wondering. He pretty much discounted hydroxy, despite successful results in some places, while pumping up Remdesivir. Hydroxy is an old generic drug which nobody makes money on. Remdesivir is a new drug by Gilead, which some people will make millions on.

And Gilead is likely one of the big pharma companies that helps fund some of Fauci's research.

And...Fauci is on the board of the Gates Foundation, which is now getting into vaccine production. Fauci has said repeatedly that a vaccine is the real solution.

Maybe it's all above board. But maybe not.

(05-06-2020 09:02 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  You have to understand the game that big Pharma is involved in. Say you're a scientist working madly on a cure for cancer and you find what you think is one. To get through all the FDA hoops can cost $100 million, and at the start you have about a 1% chance of success. So you peddle your idea to big Pharma, they fund the FDA approval, and you get a nice chunk of change or stock. Big Pharma controls all the drugs because they are the only ones with deep enough pockets to run the FDA gauntlet. FDA likes it because they keep a lot of bureaucrats employed monitoring the system. Big Pharma likes it because they get a monopoly, or at least oligopoly, position with unscalable barriers to entry.

Then when big Pharma wants to broaden its market and sell overseas, they get told, "We'll pay you your marginal cost to make a pill, plus 5-10% profit, but we won't pay any of your R&D costs. And if you don't play ball with us, we'll void your patent here and let somebody make it generically." So the foreigners get it for $1/pill, and US customers have to absorb the $100 million FDA approval costs.

(05-06-2020 04:08 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 04:00 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Told yall he had a TV preacher vibe. Always trust your common sense

One thing he did early on had me wondering. He pretty much discounted hydroxy, despite successful results in some places, while pumping up Remdesivir. Hydroxy is an old generic drug which nobody makes money on. Remdesivir is a new drug by Gilead, which some people will make millions on.

And Gilead is likely one of the big pharma companies that helps fund some of Fauci's research.

And...Fauci is on the board of the Gates Foundation, which is now getting into vaccine production. Fauci has said repeatedly that a vaccine is the real solution.

Maybe it's all above board. But maybe not.

(05-06-2020 03:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I've watched about a third of this so far. If true, it's frightening, and Fauci has to answer for a lot. She is a scientist who claims to have uncovered widespread corruption between HHS and NAIAD with the large pharmaceutical companies that goes back decades.

She claims when she tried to expose some of this, she was arrested, held without charges, threatened with firing, given a gag order, etc.

This is disturbing. Oh, and Fauci and Robert Redfield, the head of CDC, are supposedly the ringleaders. She claims, due to a certain piece of legislation, they actually own patents on some of these drugs they push, and hold back others, to the detriment of many patients.

Somebody needs to investigate whether she's just a rogue scientist trying to sell a book, or whether she is telling the truth.

(05-06-2020 04:17 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  She is a woman. She must be believed.

(05-07-2020 08:19 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-06-2020 03:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I've watched about a third of this so far. If true, it's frightening, and Fauci has to answer for a lot. She is a scientist who claims to have uncovered widespread corruption between HHS and NAIAD with the large pharmaceutical companies that goes back decades.

She claims when she tried to expose some of this, she was arrested, held without charges, threatened with firing, given a gag order, etc.

This is disturbing. Oh, and Fauci and Robert Redfield, the head of CDC, are supposedly the ringleaders. She claims, due to a certain piece of legislation, they actually own patents on some of these drugs they push, and hold back others, to the detriment of many patients.

Somebody needs to investigate whether she's just a rogue scientist trying to sell a book, or whether she is telling the truth.

And YT has deleted that video.

(05-07-2020 10:16 AM)Hernando Hills Tiger Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 10:22 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 10:16 AM)Hernando Hills Tiger Wrote:  

(repost from other thread for consistency)

#grazie ... that shite sickens me....

now more understand/know why JR and many others on this board hammer lobbyists/washtub/term limits/etc - which I define such as, "corpshite 'murica"

#freedom is a misnomer...

#swamp is apropos....

(05-07-2020 10:26 AM)fsquid Wrote:  Certainly worth an investigation, but by whom?

(05-07-2020 10:35 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 10:22 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(05-07-2020 10:16 AM)Hernando Hills Tiger Wrote:  

(repost from other thread for consistency)

#grazie ... that shite sickens me....

now more understand/know why JR and many others on this board hammer lobbyists/washtub/term limits/etc - which I define such as, "corpshite 'murica"

#freedom is a misnomer...

#swamp is apropos....

lmmfao....in an instant, she's been silenced again by #muhInternutz.....