Quote:The nation’s oldest men’s group has filed a Title IX complaint against Northeastern University, prompted by a professor’s op-ed exploring the merits of hating men.

“Why Can’t We Hate Men?” was published June 8 by Suzanna Danuta Walters, the chair of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Department, who wrote that it ultimately “seems logical” to feel hatred towards men.

"How could a male student ever expect fair, just, and equitable treatment from Professor Walters?" Tweet This

[RELATED: Prof says feminists have ‘every right’ to ‘hate men’]

Walters later doubled-down on her remarks. In an interview with The Chronicle of Higher Education, she clarified that she “doesn’t hate men in some generic way,” but insisted that it makes sense for women to have “legitimate rage” against men.

“My point here was to say that it makes sense for women to have rage, legitimate rage, against a group of people that has systematically abused them,” Walters told the Chronicle’s Alexander Kafka.

After the controversy, some speculation was raised over whether Northeastern’s Title IX office would investigate. Although Walters is not scheduled to teach next semester, she does hold the highest leadership position in her department, and also advises students.

UM-Flint Professor Mark Perry was among those to call for a Title IX investigation. In an email sent to Northeastern, he urged the school to investigate, asking, “How could a male student ever expect fair, just, and equitable treatment from Professor Walters?”

“How could a male faculty colleague applying for tenure and/or promotion...expect fair treatment from Professor Walters, after her public admission of hatred toward all men?” Perry added.

He did not receive a response.

(08-27-2018 12:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Snowflakes

(08-27-2018 12:36 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Snowflakes

Just playing the game with the rules set down by the other side. Fire with fire!

(08-27-2018 12:47 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:36 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Snowflakes

Just playing the game with the rules set down by the other side. Fire with fire!

That’s the problem. Nobody wants to take the high road. Instead of taking the best from people we choose to learn the worst from them.

(08-27-2018 07:53 PM)banker Wrote:  The thing I hate most about these type of leftist - they refuse to deal with individuals on their merit. They have to place everyone into groups and as part of the group you are required to be labeled with crass generalizations.

I don't know if it's just too complex for them to judge people individually or if it's just the level of intellectual dishonest that is required to justify their opinions, but it is, to me, their most annoying quality.

(08-27-2018 12:47 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:36 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Snowflakes

Just playing the game with the rules set down by the other side. Fire with fire!

That’s the problem. Nobody wants to take the high road. Instead of taking the best from people we choose to learn the worst from them.

(08-27-2018 09:10 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:47 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:36 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(08-27-2018 12:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Snowflakes

Just playing the game with the rules set down by the other side. Fire with fire!

That’s the problem. Nobody wants to take the high road. Instead of taking the best from people we choose to learn the worst from them.

Because in today's world if you take the high road - you get run over. All of this type of garbage was brought about by the dicks who think there microaggressions everywhere. The best way to beat a SJW that trivializes problems is to hoist them with their own petard. You use the system they are creating against them. Only when a SJW is beaten over the head with their own standards will they realize how idiotic they truly are (hopefully...).