In Contempt - Printable Version

In Contempt - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: In Contempt (/thread-852407.html)

Pages: 1 2

In Contempt - green - 06-26-2018 05:11 PM

https://twitter.com/perrybaconjr/status/1011703589142659078

GIVE IT UP

RE: In Contempt - Kronke - 06-26-2018 05:16 PM

Almost as if they're hiding something.

RE: In Contempt - Native Georgian - 06-26-2018 05:41 PM

Does Rosenstein have a boss who can instruct him to provide certain documents?

RE: In Contempt - shere khan - 06-26-2018 06:59 PM

(06-26-2018 05:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote: Does Rosenstein have a boss who can instruct him to provide certain documents?

Not without the Democrat lunatics claiming he is obstructing justice....but you already knew that

RE: In Contempt - THE NC Herd Fan - 06-26-2018 07:05 PM

Impeach Rosen-stein
Impeach Rosen-stein
Impeach Rosen-stein

RE: In Contempt - TechRocks - 06-26-2018 07:35 PM

(06-26-2018 06:59 PM)shere khan Wrote:
(06-26-2018 05:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote: Does Rosenstein have a boss who can instruct him to provide certain documents?
Not without the Democrat lunatics claiming he is obstructing justice....but you already knew that

Yes, and only dims could rationalize that demanding information be made available to investigators is considered obstruction of justice.

RE: In Contempt - TechRocks - 06-26-2018 08:35 PM

The only logical conclusion as to why his Orange Majesty isn't inserting himself into the big middle of all of this and using his executive powers to make things happen is that he's giving guys like Rosenstein the rope they need to hang themselves.

RE: In Contempt - Native Georgian - 06-26-2018 08:47 PM

(06-26-2018 06:59 PM)shere khan Wrote:
(06-26-2018 05:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote: Does Rosenstein have a boss who can instruct him to provide certain documents?
Not without the Democrat lunatics claiming he is obstructing justice....but you already knew that

Heh.

Yes about the lunatics and yes about I-already-knew-it.

But my real point is that there are times (and this is one of them) when leaders have to step up and Just Do It rather than playing for field position.

Trump needs to tell Sessions and Rosenstein — in a voice loud enough for everyone else to hear — to get off their @sses and comply with the subpoenas. All of them. Right now. Let the haters hate and the moaners moan. No one cares what they say or do anymore.

RE: In Contempt - TechRocks - 06-26-2018 08:57 PM

(06-26-2018 08:47 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:
(06-26-2018 06:59 PM)shere khan Wrote:
(06-26-2018 05:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote: Does Rosenstein have a boss who can instruct him to provide certain documents?
Not without the Democrat lunatics claiming he is obstructing justice....but you already knew that
Heh.

Yes about the lunatics and yes about I-already-knew-it.

But my real point is that there are times (and this is one of them) when leaders have to step up and Just Do It rather than playing for field position.

Trump needs to tell Sessions and Rosenstein — in a voice loud enough for everyone else to hear — to get off their @sses and comply with the subpoenas. All of them. Right now. Let the haters hate and the moaners moan. No one cares what they say or do anymore.

My take on it NG, for what it's worth, is that Trump already knows the final outcome. As friggin' president of the United States, how hard would it be for him to make himself aware of what's there? I think he's merely letting this thing plod along and will pull the trigger at the opportune time. Why take a shot at a single duck when there's another clearly about to cross paths with the one already in the sights?

RE: In Contempt - Marc Mensa - 06-26-2018 08:58 PM

Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.

RE: In Contempt - TechRocks - 06-26-2018 09:06 PM

(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.

Nice try, but one doesn't have anything to do with the other, no? We're talking about the actions of the FBI investigating the Trump campaign, pre-Bueller, versus Trump either colluding with Russians or obstructing justice. So the former would have nothing to do with the latter.

Where they might end up tying together is that it'll eventually become evident, even to dims wearing blinders, is that the Bueller investigation is a farce and a set-up.

RE: In Contempt - Native Georgian - 06-26-2018 09:06 PM

(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.

Won’t happen until he is an ex-President.

As an institution, the American presidency has existed for 229+ years. Never ever — not Nixon, not Clinton, not anybody — has an incumbent president been forced to testify against his will. About anything.

RE: In Contempt - Marc Mensa - 06-26-2018 09:45 PM

(06-26-2018 09:06 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:
(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.
Won’t happen until he is an ex-President.

As an institution, the American presidency has existed for 229+ years. Never ever — not Nixon, not Clinton, not anybody — has an incumbent president been forced to testify against his will. About anything.

Its new territory for sure but it is believed a President can be forced to testify if he alone can provide the needed information/evidence. If he refuses it can lay the groundwork for impeachment... which is a real possibility if the Democrats take the House.

RE: In Contempt - Native Georgian - 06-26-2018 09:50 PM

(06-26-2018 09:45 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: it is believed a President can be forced to testify if he alone can provide the needed information/evidence

Link?

Quote:If he refuses it can lay the groundwork for impeachment... which is a real possibility if the Democrats take the House.

Agreed. But they still can’t force him to testify.

I actually believe a Democrat-majority in the House would impeach Trump regardless of whether he testifies or not.

RE: In Contempt - TechRocks - 06-26-2018 10:04 PM

(06-26-2018 09:45 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:
(06-26-2018 09:06 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:
(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.
Won’t happen until he is an ex-President.

As an institution, the American presidency has existed for 229+ years. Never ever — not Nixon, not Clinton, not anybody — has an incumbent president been forced to testify against his will. About anything.

Its new territory for sure but it is believed a President can be forced to testify if he alone can provide the needed information/evidence. If he refuses it can lay the groundwork for impeachment... which is a real possibility if the Democrats take the House.

Good chance that'll happen, though I'm counting on seeing one of these first.

[Image: Unicorn-unicorns-10796170-500-375.jpg]

RE: In Contempt - ODU BBALL - 06-26-2018 10:08 PM

(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.

1). Collusion = Failed.
2). Obstruction = Failed.
3). Perjury = Yeah, let's see if that one will work!!!

RE: In Contempt - stinkfist - 06-26-2018 10:11 PM

(06-26-2018 08:35 PM)TechRocks Wrote: The only logical conclusion as to why his Orange Majesty isn't inserting himself into the big middle of all of this and using his executive powers to make things happen is that he's giving guys like Rosenstein the rope they need to hang themselves.

XACLY! too many have whiffed the sadistic 'why'....

ol' boy understands how the game works....

#captainsmallhandsisuptheirarse

#myturnbiatch

been tellin' you cats for 3 years I understand the psyche w/o the billions......

#ol'boy

RE: In Contempt - SoMs Eagle - 06-26-2018 11:38 PM

(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.

Trump already knows any information they might yet get. He’s waiting to blow the cabal to hell just before the midterms. Release it all at the very time ole Mueller boy leaks to the press he is closing in on Trump and the Russians.

RE: In Contempt - Kaplony - 06-27-2018 05:50 AM

(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.

RE: In Contempt - TigerBlue4Ever - 06-27-2018 06:34 AM

(06-26-2018 09:45 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:
(06-26-2018 09:06 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:
(06-26-2018 08:58 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote: Republicans in the House are simply trying to pass along information to the Trump legal team so l L’Orane will not perjure himself in the event he is forced to testify.
Won’t happen until he is an ex-President.

As an institution, the American presidency has existed for 229+ years. Never ever — not Nixon, not Clinton, not anybody — has an incumbent president been forced to testify against his will. About anything.

Its new territory for sure but it is believed a President can be forced to testify if he alone can provide the needed information/evidence. If he refuses it can lay the groundwork for impeachment... which is a real possibility if the Democrats take the House.

I believe in the Easter Bunny too but that doesn't make him any more real.