Quote:The FBI didn’t flag that some emails from Hillary Clinton’s private email server were marked classified with a “©” when they were sent — something that seemingly would have been one of the first and most obvious checks in an investigation, and one that FBI agents instantly recognized put the facts at odds with Clinton’s public statements.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General noticed it after the FBI missed it, texts between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, reveal. “Holy cow,” Strzok wrote, “if the FBI missed this, what else was missed?”

“Remind me to tell you to flag for Andy [redacted] emails we (actually ICIG) found that have portion marks © on a couple of paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this,” he wrote.

“Found on the 30k [emails] provided to State originally. No one noticed. It cuts against ‘I never sent or received anything marked classified,’” he wrote, referring to statements by Clinton downplaying the danger of her email practices.

Quote:It cuts against ‘I never sent or received anything marked classified,’” he wrote, referring to statements by Clinton downplaying the danger of her email practices.

(02-08-2018 12:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  So, someone at the fbi told Clinton to print and send the emails in paper form so that when they got to them, they would use a crappy ocr software to look for portion markings, knowing that the ocr software would miss the special character portion markings.

So they then report back "nothing to see here, you can close her case quickly."

Then an IG went behind them, found the markings by visually examining documents, and they were like "wooops".

Quote:Clinton decided to print out 55,000 pages instead of providing the State Department with her emails in their digital format, a technique sometimes used by lawyers to make searches harder for their opponents. A CTRL-F search for “©” could have missed the markings because State had to re-digitize the forms with Optical Character Recognition, which can get tripped up on symbols, perhaps interpreting it as something like “[C]” or a copyright symbol. Nonetheless, the classified marker always appears at the beginning of a paragraph and is visually distinct.

(02-08-2018 12:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  So, someone at the fbi told Clinton to print and send the emails in paper form so that when they got to them, they would use a crappy ocr software to look for portion markings, knowing that the ocr software would miss the special character portion markings.

So they then report back "nothing to see here, you can close her case quickly."

Then an IG went behind them, found the markings by visually examining documents, and they were like "wooops".

(02-08-2018 12:24 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  So, someone at the fbi told Clinton to print and send the emails in paper form so that when they got to them, they would use a crappy ocr software to look for portion markings, knowing that the ocr software would miss the special character portion markings.

So they then report back "nothing to see here, you can close her case quickly."

Then an IG went behind them, found the markings by visually examining documents, and they were like "wooops".

You maybe more savy than me, but Bluebeam will flatten a document and make it ocr searchable. It's not like it's on the money but gets pretty close.

(02-08-2018 12:17 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  In before our liberal brethren can get in to tell us all how this is just more nothing. Anyone who thinks this is clean business is an idiot. Anyone who denies that there's a whole lot of fire attached to the smoke is an idiot. They are either complete morons or agenda driven and willfully ignorant.

(02-08-2018 12:18 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  So, someone at the fbi told Clinton to print and send the emails in paper form so that when they got to them, they would use a crappy ocr software to look for portion markings, knowing that the ocr software would miss the special character portion markings.

So they then report back "nothing to see here, you can close her case quickly."

Then an IG went behind them, found the markings by visually examining documents, and they were like "wooops".

Quote:Clinton decided to print out 55,000 pages instead of providing the State Department with her emails in their digital format, a technique sometimes used by lawyers to make searches harder for their opponents. A CTRL-F search for “©” could have missed the markings because State had to re-digitize the forms with Optical Character Recognition, which can get tripped up on symbols, perhaps interpreting it as something like “[C]” or a copyright symbol. Nonetheless, the classified marker always appears at the beginning of a paragraph and is visually distinct.

I put on my Mach-hat and call that clear obstruction of justice.

(02-08-2018 12:17 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  In before our liberal brethren can get in to tell us all how this is just more nothing. Anyone who thinks this is clean business is an idiot. Anyone who denies that there's a whole lot of fire attached to the smoke is an idiot. They are either complete morons or agenda driven and willfully ignorant.

(02-08-2018 12:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:24 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  So, someone at the fbi told Clinton to print and send the emails in paper form so that when they got to them, they would use a crappy ocr software to look for portion markings, knowing that the ocr software would miss the special character portion markings.

So they then report back "nothing to see here, you can close her case quickly."

Then an IG went behind them, found the markings by visually examining documents, and they were like "wooops".

You maybe more savy than me, but Bluebeam will flatten a document and make it ocr searchable. It's not like it's on the money but gets pretty close.

I would want the numbnut who did the ocr search to testify under oath what OCR software they were using.

It was already "known" in the agency that their ocr software was not converting the classified markers. If you knowingly used that software where you knew it was flawed, then that person should be fired/prosecuted.

Thank God the IG's appear to have had and still have some balls.

(02-08-2018 02:10 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:17 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  In before our liberal brethren can get in to tell us all how this is just more nothing. Anyone who thinks this is clean business is an idiot. Anyone who denies that there's a whole lot of fire attached to the smoke is an idiot. They are either complete morons or agenda driven and willfully ignorant.

They will claim "ah, nothing" because they are still "with her" and it doesn't matter what she did BECAUSE THEY DON'T CARE IF SHE BROKE THE LAW OR NOT. She has that "D" next to her name. That is all that matters.

They aren't morons - the sad fact is, they don't care if their side breaks the law. The ends justify whatever means................

(02-08-2018 03:13 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  The question is still WHY DID SHE DESTROY 33,000 EMAILS??????
No one could conceivably think this woman was honorable. Why would ANYONE vote for her.

(02-08-2018 04:24 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  crickets from the trolls