RPI after games 1/28 - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html) +---- Forum: AAC Conference Talk (/forum-409.html) +---- Thread: RPI after games 1/28 (/thread-841384.html) |
RPI after games 1/28 - TU4ever - 01-29-2018 12:38 PM RPI............Team....................Record 16..............Cincinnati............19-2 (8-0) 23..............Wichita................17-4 (7-2) 44..............Temple................11-10 (3-6) 49..............Houston.............. 16-4 (6-2) 61..............SMU.....................15-7 (5-4) 71..............UCF......................13-7 (4-4) 80..............UConn..................11-10 (4-5) 113............Memphis.............13-8 (4-4) 120............Tulsa....................11-10 (4-4) 128............Tulane..................12-8 (3-5) 270............USF.......................14-8 (1-8) 274............ECU......................8-14 (2-7) 4 top 50 7 top 100 Possible Tier 1 win teams (Home below 30, away below 70, neutral below 50): Home: 2 Away: 5 Neutral: 4 Possible Tier 2 win teams (Home below 70, away below 120, neutral 100): Home: 6 Away: 9 Neutral: 7 Bad losses are ECU and USF. Tulane has moved out of the good road games category. SMU is just outside the bubble. UCF is borderline tier 1. NCAA lock, Cincy and WSU NCAA probable, Houston. NCAA maybe, SMU NCAA possible, Temple and UCF NIT possible, UConn and Memphis Outside looking in, Tulane and Tulsa No chance, USF and ECU RE: RPI after games 1/28 - CougarRed - 01-29-2018 02:25 PM ESPN Strength of Record is the most predictive of the committee per Five Thirty-Eight: 11 Cincy 28 Wichita St 40 Houston 69 Temple 76 UCF 79 SMU 88 UConn 93 Memphis 124 Tulane 138 Tulsa RE: RPI after games 1/28 - TU4ever - 01-29-2018 03:30 PM (01-29-2018 02:25 PM)CougarRed Wrote: ESPN Strength of Record is the most predictive of the committee per Five Thirty-Eight: Can't say I am surprised a site related to espn said an ESPN metric is the best? The committee uses RPI, that's why I post it.. RE: RPI after games 1/28 - stever20 - 01-29-2018 03:35 PM tier 1 wins are road ones 1-75. So UCF does count as a tier 1 win on the road. tier 2 wins are home ones 31-75 (so adding UCF), and road ones 76-135(so adding Tulane) SO Possible Tier 1 win teams (Home 1-30, away 1-75, neutral 1-50): Home: 2 Away: 6 Neutral: 4 Possible Tier 2 win teams (31-75, away 76-135 neutral 51-100): Home: 4(6 total tier 1/2) Away: 4(10 total tier 1/2) Neutral: 3(7 total tier 1/2) Bad losses are ECU and USF. RE: RPI after games 1/28 - Huskypride - 01-29-2018 06:48 PM D1 11 Cincy 28 Wichita St 40 Houston 69 Temple 76 UCF 79 SMU 93 Memphis 124 Tulane 138 Tulsa D3 1 UCan't... RE: RPI after games 1/28 - TheBigEastSucks - 01-29-2018 07:20 PM (01-29-2018 03:35 PM)stever20 Wrote: tier 1 wins are road ones 1-75. So UCF does count as a tier 1 win on the road. Not really fair to rag on ECU, we lost a hall of fame great in jeff Lebo. How we will ever recover RE: RPI after games 1/28 - TU4ever - 01-29-2018 08:05 PM (01-29-2018 03:35 PM)stever20 Wrote: tier 1 wins are road ones 1-75. So UCF does count as a tier 1 win on the road. Thanks for the correction. Looks even better RE: RPI after games 1/28 - TU4ever - 01-29-2018 08:06 PM (01-29-2018 07:20 PM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:(01-29-2018 03:35 PM)stever20 Wrote: tier 1 wins are road ones 1-75. So UCF does count as a tier 1 win on the road. True, but it's not my call. The harsh committee gives no quarter. RE: RPI after games 1/28 - billybobby777 - 01-29-2018 08:36 PM (01-29-2018 02:25 PM)CougarRed Wrote: ESPN Strength of Record is the most predictive of the committee per Five Thirty-Eight: If this is true, there will only be 2 AAC teams in the tourney as a non ESPN 5 team can't be 40 plus & dance. RE: RPI after games 1/28 - TripleA - 01-29-2018 09:56 PM Still looking like 2, maybe 3, to the NCAAT, and 2 more, at best, to the NIT. RE: RPI after games 1/28 - CougarRed - 01-30-2018 07:23 AM Projected RPI 7 Cincy 14 Wichita St 42 Houston 50 SMU 57 Temple 68 UCF 86 UConn 123 Memphis 129 Tulsa 133 Tulane http://www.rpiforecast.com/index2.html Massey Composite 7 Cincy 19 Wichita St 40 Houston 48 SMU 81 Temple 84 UCF 121 Tulsa 122 UConn 125 Memphis 134 Tulane https://www.masseyratings.com/cb/compare.htm RE: RPI after games 1/28 - TU4ever - 01-30-2018 12:24 PM (01-30-2018 07:23 AM)CougarRed Wrote: Projected RPI If predicted RPI is accurate we have 3 bids (Cincy, WSU, and Houston), 1 strong bubble (SMU), 1 weak bubble (Temple) and probably 1- 2 nit teams (UCF and UConn). A side note every road game but ECU and USF would be tier 2 at least. 5 of those 10 would be tier 1. 2 of those 5 are tier 1 no matter where you play. Houston and SMU will be a tier 1 victory in the conference tourny. RE: RPI after games 1/28 - ultraviolet - 02-02-2018 02:54 PM (01-29-2018 08:06 PM)TU4ever Wrote:(01-29-2018 07:20 PM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:(01-29-2018 03:35 PM)stever20 Wrote: tier 1 wins are road ones 1-75. So UCF does count as a tier 1 win on the road. They've always been unfair to ECU. I wish. |