(10-30-2017 05:58 AM)cnyrocketfan Wrote:  Recap of the Rocket Invitational. Nothing on the schedule for the squad until January.

And I know English can be confusing (just read some of my posts ) but this is from the article, at least as of now: "'This did not phase our girls, who competed well from start to finish.'"

I added the emphasis there. That wouldn't be faze, would it?

Here's a link.

http://www.utrockets.com/news/2017/10/28/womens-tennis-shines-in-rocket-invitational.aspx?path=wten

(10-30-2017 06:40 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 05:58 AM)cnyrocketfan Wrote:  Recap of the Rocket Invitational. Nothing on the schedule for the squad until January.

And I know English can be confusing (just read some of my posts ) but this is from the article, at least as of now: "'This did not phase our girls, who competed well from start to finish.'"

I added the emphasis there. That wouldn't be faze, would it?

Here's a link.

http://www.utrockets.com/news/2017/10/28/womens-tennis-shines-in-rocket-invitational.aspx?path=wten

Their making two many of these mistakes lately.

(10-30-2017 07:09 AM)cnyrocketfan Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 06:40 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 05:58 AM)cnyrocketfan Wrote:  Recap of the Rocket Invitational. Nothing on the schedule for the squad until January.

And I know English can be confusing (just read some of my posts ) but this is from the article, at least as of now: "'This did not phase our girls, who competed well from start to finish.'"

I added the emphasis there. That wouldn't be faze, would it?

Here's a link.

http://www.utrockets.com/news/2017/10/28/womens-tennis-shines-in-rocket-invitational.aspx?path=wten

Their making two many of these mistakes lately.

Now I'm taking things to an extreme again -

Your write about those mistakes. By the weigh, gist to let everybody no, I'm knot going to be on the bored later in the weak. I'll bee on a plain and aweigh four a few daze.

Won't leave until the weekend but won't bee hear during the game on Thursday. I hope the Rockets don't loose to NIU.

(01-20-2018 07:19 AM)cnyrocketfan Wrote:  Rockets defeat Chicago State 7-0. Or was it 6-1? Headline says one thing, article another, at least as of now.

http://utrockets.com/news/2018/1/19/womens-tennis-rockets-open-season-with-7-0-victory-over-chicago-state.aspx?path=wten

(01-20-2018 07:19 AM)cnyrocketfan Wrote:  Rockets defeat Chicago State 7-0. Or was it 6-1? Headline says one thing, article another, at least as of now.

http://utrockets.com/news/2018/1/19/womens-tennis-rockets-open-season-with-7-0-victory-over-chicago-state.aspx?path=wten

(01-20-2018 08:17 AM)cnyrocketfan Wrote:  I'm a little slow but I think I figured it out. It looks like 7-0 is correct. There is one point for doubles, given to the team that comes out on top in the doubles competition. UT won 2 of 3 matches in the doubles competition and earned the doubles point: "Toledo split two doubles matches with Chicago State with the Rockets gaining the doubles point due to the Cougars defaulting at No. 3 doubles. Junior Thalita Rodrigues teamed with Kendall-Woseley for UT's 6-4 win at No. 2 doubles."

Rockets won all 6 singles matches, so that makes it 7-0.

My reading comprehension needs work.