+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: MACbbs (/forum-513.html)
+---- Forum: MAC - West Team Talk (/forum-464.html)
+----- Forum: Toledo (/forum-479.html)
+----- Thread: Updated USA Today database of Division I athletic finances (/thread-821451.html)
Updated USA Today database of Division I athletic finances - SylvaniaRocket - 07-06-2017 05:56 PM
http://footballscoop.com/news/usa-today-updated-database-division-athletics-finances/
RE: Updated USA Today database of Division I athletic finances - rocket 51 - 07-08-2017 10:18 AM
WMU, Akron and Buffalo? Haven't gotten into the weeds of the numbers but that surprises me especially in light of the amount of $$ Toledo needs to raise just to make up for the lesser amount of $$ from institutional support.
RE: Updated USA Today database of Division I athletic finances - Stpetebeachrocketfan - 07-08-2017 11:22 AM
(07-08-2017 10:18 AM)rocket 51 Wrote: WMU, Akron and Buffalo? Haven't gotten into the weeds of the numbers but that surprises me especially in light of the amount of $$ Toledo needs to raise just to make up for the lesser amount of $$ from institutional support.
When it comes to the MAC, those numbers are really not revenue, its the total amount of money spent. The actual revenue numbers are much much lower for everyone. Money coming from student fees and direct institutional support in my eyes isn't really revenue, its subsidy. Toledo actually has the most revenue (ticket sales, donations, royalty, etc) of any MAC school. The higher the revenue number shown by USA today actually means that you have a much larger subsidy. The lowest numbers are best when it comes to the MAC.