Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Big12bbs (/forum-260.html) +---- Forum: Big 12 Team Talk (/forum-783.html) +----- Forum: The Gregory A. Ruehlmann Sr. Memorial Cincinnati Board (/forum-404.html) +----- Thread: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight (/thread-810171.html) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 |
RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - BearcatsUC - 04-25-2017 10:52 PM While I'm thinking about it, there was some speculation that FCC may stay at Nippert should MLS come calling. There was a February article in the Business Courier that said an architect has been picked as have two sites between UC and the Ohio River. Really trying to figure out where those sites are. West End? An old industrial site? RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - bearcatmark - 04-26-2017 06:24 AM (04-25-2017 03:07 PM)Ahhhorsepoo Wrote: lol @ assertion UC is losing money in this FCC venture.. FCC brings more people to the campus than either Football or Basketball, and while ticket revenue isn't all given to the university as UC sports are(the ones that do collect ticket revenue) the secondary revenues(parking, split concessions, stadium rental) as mentioned previously far surpass anything that any entity besides football and maybe basketball will produce on a yearly basis.. FCC makes money, UC does, and the community around the campus does too.. this is win win win all around.. please move on from thinking FCC is robbing UC blind.. It's very unbecoming on all of you.. What is wrong with having a third sport that makes us money even if it is just as a partner as opposed to a university run sport.. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - The T-Shirt - 04-26-2017 07:04 AM (04-25-2017 10:38 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-25-2017 06:56 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-25-2017 05:21 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-24-2017 10:02 AM)doss2 Wrote:(04-24-2017 09:48 AM)BearcatJerry Wrote: [quote='OKIcat' pid='14283026' dateline='1492788815'] You're correct, FCC was brought here to make UC money. The benefits and support to the surrounding businesses were certainly an obvious side consideration, and that's all anyone has argued. As for "conjuring" my other points, sure, in the immediate context of your initial post. However, it was meant more as a summary of the issues that the opposition to the soccer deal have taken a stance on throughout this longstanding debate, with the addition of not being allowed to get a "boner" over the continued growth and prosperity of Clifton as a whole. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Ahhhorsepoo - 04-26-2017 11:55 AM (04-25-2017 04:48 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: Thanks for the lecture, fullofhorsepoo. Now GFY. what was wrong with what I said? I will change my tune if there are inaccuracies.. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Recluse1 - 04-26-2017 03:10 PM So basically, more money and more exposure is bad. Why then, do the naysayers want realignment? ... RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - BearcatsUC - 04-26-2017 03:24 PM (04-26-2017 03:10 PM)Recluse1 Wrote: So basically, more money and more exposure is bad. Why then, do the naysayers want realignment? ... strawman. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - BearcatsUC - 04-26-2017 03:25 PM (04-26-2017 11:55 AM)Ahhhorsepoo Wrote:(04-25-2017 04:48 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: Thanks for the lecture, fullofhorsepoo. Now GFY. Fair question. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Recluse1 - 04-26-2017 03:51 PM (04-26-2017 03:24 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:10 PM)Recluse1 Wrote: So basically, more money and more exposure is bad. Why then, do the naysayers want realignment? ... If the impact of having FCC is more money and exposure, and FCC is bad, logically it follows that they are objecting to money and exposure. Unless they are simply bigoted toward the game of soccer, in which case they have no business supporting an institution like UC that fields soccer teams. **** or get off the pot. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - BearcatsUC - 04-26-2017 04:01 PM (04-26-2017 03:51 PM)Recluse1 Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:24 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:10 PM)Recluse1 Wrote: So basically, more money and more exposure is bad. Why then, do the naysayers want realignment? ... No one here is saying FCC is bad. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Recluse1 - 04-26-2017 04:12 PM (04-26-2017 04:01 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:51 PM)Recluse1 Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:24 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:10 PM)Recluse1 Wrote: So basically, more money and more exposure is bad. Why then, do the naysayers want realignment? ... If they aren't bad, then you have nothing to argue about. Every university has facilities that are leased or used for ancillary purposes. If that offends your good senses, you obviously don't support the university. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - BearcatsUC - 04-26-2017 04:45 PM (04-26-2017 04:12 PM)Recluse1 Wrote:(04-26-2017 04:01 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:51 PM)Recluse1 Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:24 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:(04-26-2017 03:10 PM)Recluse1 Wrote: So basically, more money and more exposure is bad. Why then, do the naysayers want realignment? ... No one has said leasing university facilities is bad. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - gerhard911 - 04-26-2017 06:29 PM LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. They are profiting off of UC's largess, primarily because of the Lindner family's (Carl Jr, NOT CL III)) support of UC. I get that, but I don't have to support that. All I need to know about this deal is that UC is paying for the bastardization of Nippert. Try to spin that anyway you can but that's just F'in wrong! RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Not Duane - 04-26-2017 06:57 PM (04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. My understanding is that the University gets recouped for that following completion--didn't that get established in a previous thread? So it sounds like you are simply upset that the remodeling happened, regardless of how it was paid for. Just exactly when did Nippert become holy ground? Has the pope been here? Did Moses part the Red Sea at the fifty? It's a football field that can be used for a variety of activities--FCC is using it during the off-season...I really don't get the acrimony here. My guess is you'd be happier if it sat empty all summer...generating no revenue for anyone? Doesn't make any sense at all. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - The T-Shirt - 04-26-2017 07:28 PM (04-26-2017 06:57 PM)Not Duane Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. FCC paid for it, then FCC gets to collect 100% concession revenue until it regains what it spent. Then concessions get split 50 50. UC never spends a dime. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Racinejake - 04-26-2017 07:34 PM (04-26-2017 07:28 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:57 PM)Not Duane Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. If that is revenue UC is foregoing that it would otherwise be entitled to, didn't UC really pay for it then? RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - gerhard911 - 04-26-2017 07:34 PM (04-26-2017 07:28 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:57 PM)Not Duane Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. UC never spends a dime? WTF did you study accounting? Dumbarse... RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - The T-Shirt - 04-26-2017 07:43 PM (04-26-2017 07:34 PM)Racinejake Wrote:(04-26-2017 07:28 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:57 PM)Not Duane Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. Without FCC, no summer revenue exists at all, though. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - gerhard911 - 04-26-2017 07:46 PM (04-26-2017 07:43 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-26-2017 07:34 PM)Racinejake Wrote:(04-26-2017 07:28 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:57 PM)Not Duane Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. Pretty much ALL of which accrues to FCC. Try again, skippy. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - gerhard911 - 04-26-2017 07:50 PM (04-26-2017 06:57 PM)Not Duane Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. No, I would rather that it generate some positive revenue for UC. Nobody has presented any evidence that this is the case. RE: Nippert Defilement - Saw it Tonight - Racinejake - 04-26-2017 07:52 PM (04-26-2017 07:43 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-26-2017 07:34 PM)Racinejake Wrote:(04-26-2017 07:28 PM)The T-Shirt Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:57 PM)Not Duane Wrote:(04-26-2017 06:29 PM)gerhard911 Wrote: LOL at all of the BS thrown around by the FCC fan boyz. Bottom line, FCC is a commercial enterprise. They are NOT a University of Cincinnati activity. Fair point if you assume UC has no other way to raise money via Nippert which is beside the point. But that also assumes UC needs FCC more than the other way around which I'm not sure is the case that they need to incentivize FCC to play there (to cover the cost of something that gives UC zero benefit otherwise). I'm also not suggesting it's not a good long term move for UC. Only hoping they are giving FCC some concessions now with the ability to reap major financial benefits if FCC makes it to MLS (and plays at Nippert still that is). |