(02-18-2017 10:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  We can't link him to Russia let's claim he has a STD

(02-18-2017 11:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The guy is a sleaze ball in many ways. So was Bill Clinton, who turned out to be a pretty good president. So was Richard Nixon, who didn't. Jury is still out on this one.

(02-18-2017 11:33 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-18-2017 11:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The guy is a sleaze ball in many ways. So was Bill Clinton, who turned out to be a pretty good president. So was Richard Nixon, who didn't. Jury is still out on this one.

Bill Clinton did more damage to this country with Monica than Nixon did with Watergate. We've had a coarsening of our language and relations with others and a vast lowering of all kinds of standards. He also allowed HRC to infect the Democratic Party with her total lack of ethics. Whereas with Watergate, standards were upheld as the president was accountable and resigned.

Nixon also made this a fundamentally safer world while Clinton blindly allowed Al-Queda to grow and spread despite the bombing of the WTC in his first year as president while he chose to bomb Serbs, traditional Russian allies, with predictable strengthening of nationalistic elements in Russia (national boundaries matter unless it involves Slavic countries).

Only Nixon could go to an opera and see himself portrayed. He took the first steps that lead to the eventual destruction of Communism.

(02-18-2017 10:04 AM)58-56 Wrote:  "It is my personal Vietnam. I feel like a great and very brave soldier.” -
Donald J. Trump, referring to sexually transmitted diseases.

But did proud combat veteran Donald come home unscathed?

https://newrepublic.com/article/140702/medical-theory-donald-trumps-bizarre-behavior

(02-18-2017 11:33 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-18-2017 11:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The guy is a sleaze ball in many ways. So was Bill Clinton, who turned out to be a pretty good president. So was Richard Nixon, who didn't. Jury is still out on this one.

Bill Clinton did more damage to this country with Monica than Nixon did with Watergate. We've had a coarsening of our language and relations with others and a vast lowering of all kinds of standards. He also allowed HRC to infect the Democratic Party with her total lack of ethics. Whereas with Watergate, standards were upheld as the president was accountable and resigned.

Nixon also made this a fundamentally safer world while Clinton blindly allowed Al-Queda to grow and spread despite the bombing of the WTC in his first year as president while he chose to bomb Serbs, traditional Russian allies, with predictable strengthening of nationalistic elements in Russia (national boundaries matter unless it involves Slavic countries).

Only Nixon could go to an opera and see himself portrayed. He took the first steps that lead to the eventual destruction of Communism.

(02-18-2017 12:29 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(02-18-2017 11:33 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-18-2017 11:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The guy is a sleaze ball in many ways. So was Bill Clinton, who turned out to be a pretty good president. So was Richard Nixon, who didn't. Jury is still out on this one.

Bill Clinton did more damage to this country with Monica than Nixon did with Watergate. We've had a coarsening of our language and relations with others and a vast lowering of all kinds of standards. He also allowed HRC to infect the Democratic Party with her total lack of ethics. Whereas with Watergate, standards were upheld as the president was accountable and resigned.

Nixon also made this a fundamentally safer world while Clinton blindly allowed Al-Queda to grow and spread despite the bombing of the WTC in his first year as president while he chose to bomb Serbs, traditional Russian allies, with predictable strengthening of nationalistic elements in Russia (national boundaries matter unless it involves Slavic countries).

Only Nixon could go to an opera and see himself portrayed. He took the first steps that lead to the eventual destruction of Communism.

Jesus that is a leap.

(02-18-2017 07:11 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  You can't make these public diagnoses, IMO. If he doesn't have anything wrong with him, you're basically insulting people who really have problems by comparing them to him.