+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: SunBeltbbs (/forum-317.html)
+---- Forum: Sun Belt East Team Talk (/forum-289.html)
+----- Forum: Old Dominion (/forum-688.html)
+----- Thread: The circular argument thread. (/thread-808434.html)
The circular argument thread. - MonarchManiac - 02-08-2017 11:03 PM
SHAPES ARE COOL.
SO ARE ARGUMENTS. LET'S HAVE MORE OF BOTH. SANITY BE DAMNED!
RE: The circular argument thread. - Razor Ramon Monarch - 02-08-2017 11:09 PM
(02-08-2017 11:03 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote: Here you go, I'll make it easy. Here's where we can all go to have the fire jj, keep jj, odu sucks, odu isn't that bad, we're doomed, we'll be ok discussion. Rather than polluting every game thread, everyone can argue to their hearts desire here.
Win-win.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Just because it's a hard discussion to have and not a discussion you enjoy doesn't mean it's polluting every thread.
Seriously when you suggest something better to discuss in ANY thread then maybe I'll take your "suggestion" a little more seriously.
RE: The circular argument thread. - ODUBB35 - 02-09-2017 12:03 PM
If we don't go dancing next year, we'll either have to consider firing JJ or else we owe Jeff Capel an apology.
RE: The circular argument thread. - Blue_Trombone - 02-09-2017 12:06 PM
If you take all of those out of the game thread, there won't be any game thread left...
RE: The circular argument thread. - Monarchblue - 02-09-2017 12:13 PM
(02-09-2017 12:06 PM)Blue_Trombone Wrote: If you take all of those out of the game thread, there won't be any game thread left...
I don't know about you all, but I prefer square to circles. Thoughts?
RE: The circular argument thread. - MonarchManiac - 02-09-2017 12:17 PM
(02-09-2017 12:06 PM)Blue_Trombone Wrote: If you take all of those out of the game thread, there won't be any game thread left...
YOU ARE WRONG. I LIKE PARALLELOGRAMS.
RE: The circular argument thread. - Monarchblue - 02-09-2017 12:20 PM
Can we change the name of this thread to ***** about the posters that you can't stand. It seems like we have gotten off topic.
Sooo... Circles or squares?
RE: The circular argument thread. - MonarchManiac - 02-09-2017 12:23 PM
IF YOU DON'T THINK OCTAGONS ARE AWESOME THAN YOU ARE DEAD TO ME.
RE: The circular argument thread. - ODUBB35 - 02-09-2017 12:24 PM
(02-09-2017 12:17 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:06 PM)Blue_Trombone Wrote: If you take all of those out of the game thread, there won't be any game thread left...
Sorry, I disagree...we normally make it a good 50-70 posts before it devolves into:
ODU SUCKS FIRE JJ HIRE COACH K RECRUIT LEBRON! ODU ROCKS EVERYONE BE PATIENT WE'RE SWEET 16 NEXT YEAR FOR SURE!
I'm just suggesting we save the sanity for those of us who would prefer not to be subjected to the same argument by the same 6 guys. They can argue in one place until they are blue in the face and the rest of us can talk about whatever the thread is supposed to be about.
After all, isn't that what thread topics are created for?
Like it or not, posts about what's wrong with the program are valid and related to the game threads, especially after a home loss to FAU.
RE: The circular argument thread. - odu09 - 02-09-2017 12:30 PM
(02-09-2017 12:17 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:06 PM)Blue_Trombone Wrote: If you take all of those out of the game thread, there won't be any game thread left...
Sorry, I disagree...we normally make it a good 50-70 posts before it devolves into:
ODU SUCKS FIRE JJ HIRE COACH K RECRUIT LEBRON! ODU ROCKS EVERYONE BE PATIENT WE'RE SWEET 16 NEXT YEAR FOR SURE!
I'm just suggesting we save the sanity for those of us who would prefer not to be subjected to the same argument by the same 6 guys. They can argue in one place until they are blue in the face and the rest of us can talk about whatever the thread is supposed to be about.
After all, isn't that what thread topics are created for?
Seriously, if you want change, then post the discussion you want to discuss and don't respond to the the posts that you don't like. A lot of times there will be a few conversations going on at once, some of it is good conversation and some of it is just repeated information, but my point is if you want to discuss the game - then post about it. Posting about the actions of others is just going to derail the conversation even further.
RE: The circular argument thread. - odu09 - 02-09-2017 12:31 PM
(02-09-2017 12:20 PM)Monarchblue Wrote: Can we change the name of this thread to ***** about the posters that you can't stand. It seems like we have gotten off topic.
Sooo... Circles or squares?
I'm more of a triangle guy myself, mostly because the less sides the better. I also don't like those 90 degree triangles, screw that. They either need to be acute or obtuse for sure, in my mind. Period.
RE: The circular argument thread. - MonarchManiac - 02-09-2017 12:32 PM
FAIR ENOUGH. THE TRIBE HAS SPOKEN. LOCK IT UP. ENJOY THE MADNESS.
RE: The circular argument thread. - Monarchblue - 02-09-2017 12:38 PM
(02-09-2017 12:31 PM)odu09 Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:20 PM)Monarchblue Wrote: Can we change the name of this thread to ***** about the posters that you can't stand. It seems like we have gotten off topic.
Sooo... Circles or squares?
I'm more of a triangle guy myself, mostly because the less sides the better. I also don't like those 90 degree triangles, screw that. They either need to be acute or obtuse for sure, in my mind. Period.
YOU are the only thing that is OBTUSE around here! Squares are where its at! Everyone know 4 sides are better than 3!
RE: The circular argument thread. - Blue_Trombone - 02-09-2017 12:52 PM
(02-09-2017 12:38 PM)Monarchblue Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:31 PM)odu09 Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:20 PM)Monarchblue Wrote: Can we change the name of this thread to ***** about the posters that you can't stand. It seems like we have gotten off topic.
Sooo... Circles or squares?
I'm more of a triangle guy myself, mostly because the less sides the better. I also don't like those 90 degree triangles, screw that. They either need to be acute or obtuse for sure, in my mind. Period.
YOU are the only thing that is OBTUSE around here! Squares are where its at! Everyone know 4 sides are better than 3!
I think we can all agree the more sides the better. But I take issue with your assertion that all four sided shapes are squares. There is a large and diverse set of quadrilaterals like Rectangles, Trapezoids, and Parallelograms who all deserve equal consideration and discussion.
I will say my personal favorite is the Rhombus.
RE: The circular argument thread. - ODUBB35 - 02-09-2017 12:55 PM
Keep your circles, squares, and triangles.
I like curves myself.
RE: The circular argument thread. - mac - 02-09-2017 12:59 PM
Go Monarchs!
RE: The circular argument thread. - Razor Ramon Monarch - 02-09-2017 01:10 PM
Quadrilaterals or GTFO.
RE: The circular argument thread. - Monarchblue - 02-09-2017 01:12 PM
(02-09-2017 12:52 PM)Blue_Trombone Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:38 PM)Monarchblue Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:31 PM)odu09 Wrote:(02-09-2017 12:20 PM)Monarchblue Wrote: Can we change the name of this thread to ***** about the posters that you can't stand. It seems like we have gotten off topic.
Sooo... Circles or squares?
I'm more of a triangle guy myself, mostly because the less sides the better. I also don't like those 90 degree triangles, screw that. They either need to be acute or obtuse for sure, in my mind. Period.
YOU are the only thing that is OBTUSE around here! Squares are where its at! Everyone know 4 sides are better than 3!
I think we can all agree the more sides the better. But I take issue with your assertion that all four sided shapes are squares. There is a large and diverse set of quadrilaterals like Rectangles, Trapezoids, and Parallelograms who all deserve equal consideration and discussion.
I will say my personal favorite is the Rhombus.
The square with its four 90 degree angles and equal sides clearly is the most balanced option. Take your Rhombazoid or whatever and shove it. You are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. It just won't work.
RE: The circular argument thread. - odu09 - 02-09-2017 01:48 PM
Can one of our insiders find out what JJ's favorite shape is? We need to get to the bottom of this.
RE: The circular argument thread. - mturn017 - 02-09-2017 02:00 PM
(02-09-2017 01:48 PM)odu09 Wrote: Can one of our insiders find out what JJ's favorite shape is? We need to get to the bottom of this.
Doughnut shaped (Low Blow?)