CSNbbs
Trump Administration - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: Members (/forum-401.html)
+----- Forum: Rice (/forum-444.html)
+------ Forum: Rice Archives (/forum-640.html)
+------ Thread: Trump Administration (/thread-797972.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656


RE: Trump Administration - Rice93 - 07-20-2019 09:28 AM

(07-18-2019 04:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 02:15 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:29 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:07 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:01 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Dude is a pejorative term. You cannot use language like that because you never know who might take offense.

I do. It is demeaning t call me dude. You whippersnappers do that all the time.

But I didn't even notice the post where you granted the right. It was the one where you asked why he thought he had the right to use those terms.

Hey, if you jump up to confront people on their words, you ARE the Thought Militia. Maybe the Speech Militia.

So Trump and his supporters are the speech militia? Per Tanq, they’re confronting people because they use the word Nazi.

Edit: and what about parents who teach their children not to curse or call people names? Or what about the head of HR, who would definitely fire me for using a racial slur? Or what about the government who would hold me liable for screaming fire in a crowded theater, should someone get hurt?

As for the head of HR, he has to live in the world your guys created, where a racial slur is firing grounds. Didn't use to be. You guys changed the world. I am sure you are proud, Cowboy. I mean, Dude. I mean, whatever is OK with you.

I think it's a net plus, TBH. I have concerns over the "cancel culture" in general but I'm just fine with people losing their jobs over using a racial slur.

Back when I was in high school all my friends used the term "gay" in a pejorative fashion. The term "f*g* was thrown around freely as well. Are these the good-old-days that you pine for? I'm ashamed to have taken part in that and I recognize how hurtful that was for certain individuals in our orbit.

I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.


RE: Trump Administration - OptimisticOwl - 07-20-2019 09:46 AM

(07-20-2019 09:28 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 04:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 02:15 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:29 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:07 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  So Trump and his supporters are the speech militia? Per Tanq, they’re confronting people because they use the word Nazi.

Edit: and what about parents who teach their children not to curse or call people names? Or what about the head of HR, who would definitely fire me for using a racial slur? Or what about the government who would hold me liable for screaming fire in a crowded theater, should someone get hurt?

As for the head of HR, he has to live in the world your guys created, where a racial slur is firing grounds. Didn't use to be. You guys changed the world. I am sure you are proud, Cowboy. I mean, Dude. I mean, whatever is OK with you.

I think it's a net plus, TBH. I have concerns over the "cancel culture" in general but I'm just fine with people losing their jobs over using a racial slur.

Back when I was in high school all my friends used the term "gay" in a pejorative fashion. The term "f*g* was thrown around freely as well. Are these the good-old-days that you pine for? I'm ashamed to have taken part in that and I recognize how hurtful that was for certain individuals in our orbit.

I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

A little update for you. After graduation, Jim and Harlan moved in together. Ten years or so later, Harlan cheated on Jim and Jim committed suicide. Harlan later died of AIDS.

I wasn’t progressive. I did not not treat Jim as I did out of any political stance. He was mostly ignored in HS. I am sure you had leftist visions of the rednecks beating him up in the halls, because that is the way you guys think. You are pure, the others are evil.

I went to a small country HS. FFA was the biggest club in school. I say redneck, because that is the best way to communicate with progressives, using the same stereotypes, but cowboy would be a better description. My neighbor was a real redneck - a farmer who worked from before sunrise to after sunset. He still plowed with mules. His neck was very red.

I am just very surprised you thought being nice to a gay kid was something the Democrats invented. I am less surprised you think it praiseworthy.


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 07-20-2019 10:15 AM

(07-20-2019 09:02 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Who could be against this anti-masking law?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/portland-considers-antimask-law-aimed-at-antifa-violence/ar-AAEvBOh?li=BBnb7Kz

It will be interesting to see who opposes and why when it comes to a vote.

I mentioned a similar law that was used against the KKK in a southern state. I think it makes a lot of sense, and I don’t immediately see a civil liberties issue against it.

Masking allows you to hide in a crowd and avoid prosecution, and with the spate of violence we saw a few weeks ago, and the resulting inaction, I think this makes sense.


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 07-20-2019 10:19 AM

(07-20-2019 09:08 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Watching ABC this morning. I have two two distortions of fact already, both about (surprise!). Trump

He told the four Congresswomen to go back to the countries from where they came from.

The other was the timeworn “He called Mexicans rapists”.

I thought new organizations were supposed to stick to the facts.

I guess this will continue as long as the left continues to tacitly approve the inaccuracies with their silence.

You bolded “to the countries.” Why is that?


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 07-20-2019 10:28 AM

(07-20-2019 09:28 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 04:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 02:15 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:29 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:07 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  So Trump and his supporters are the speech militia? Per Tanq, they’re confronting people because they use the word Nazi.

Edit: and what about parents who teach their children not to curse or call people names? Or what about the head of HR, who would definitely fire me for using a racial slur? Or what about the government who would hold me liable for screaming fire in a crowded theater, should someone get hurt?

As for the head of HR, he has to live in the world your guys created, where a racial slur is firing grounds. Didn't use to be. You guys changed the world. I am sure you are proud, Cowboy. I mean, Dude. I mean, whatever is OK with you.

I think it's a net plus, TBH. I have concerns over the "cancel culture" in general but I'm just fine with people losing their jobs over using a racial slur.

Back when I was in high school all my friends used the term "gay" in a pejorative fashion. The term "f*g* was thrown around freely as well. Are these the good-old-days that you pine for? I'm ashamed to have taken part in that and I recognize how hurtful that was for certain individuals in our orbit.

I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

I can echo 93’s sentiments that HS recently was still not a completely welcoming place for people who are gay. I graduated from a high school in Florida in 2007 and dealt with guys on my own soccer team giving me **** because they thought my older brother was gay (he is, but was not out in high school). I never got the logic of why they would regularly ask if I was afraid to share a bedroom with him, given that many had sisters... And think, those were my teammates. But my brother dealt with far worse over the years in high school because, generally, teenagers are pretty ****** and lack a lot of empathy. Then later in college he still dealt with **** when he was out because there are ****** people out there. I remember when he got sucker punched in NOLA while standing in front of one of the gay bars in the Quarter - he sported a real nice shiner for a few days.

OO doesn’t realize how progressive (not in a political way, but social way) his high school was at the time. It’s a testament to the fact that, while ****** people exist, there have always been communities that were, unintentionally in a good way, progressive in how they treated members of the community that were different.


RE: Trump Administration - At Ease - 07-20-2019 10:47 AM

(07-19-2019 11:03 AM)illiniowl Wrote:  Does the admonition for sensitivity you are proposing also apply to those who cry "racist!" at people who, at bottom, just simply have a political dispute with a person who happens to be a POC? I mean, you did say that what crowds do can be misconstrued, did you not? Isn't that's what's going on here -- the casting of simple political opposition to progressive views as racist? And has been going on in some form or fashion for decades now?

I can sympathize with those who are unjustly caught up in the congruence between conservative and white nationalist rhetoric and policy support.

Of course, the near universal I AM NOT RACIST!, in the same way that telling four women of color and American citizens to leave the country is also not racist, does little to suggest that is applicable here.

(07-19-2019 11:03 AM)illiniowl Wrote:  No sane person would dispute that if Ilhan Omar had a miraculous conversion experience, like Paul on the road to Damascus, and suddenly started espousing conservative views, she'd be adored at the same rallies where she is now excoriated. Ergo, the opposition to her isn't racist.

I get that this forum is named after a former poster that didn't believe in evolution and thought Obama was a Kenyan Muslim that had no birth-right for his Presidency, and that the bar isn't very high here. But still.. how? How could you actually believe that?


RE: Trump Administration - Rice93 - 07-20-2019 11:13 AM

(07-20-2019 09:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 09:28 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 04:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 02:15 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 01:29 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  As for the head of HR, he has to live in the world your guys created, where a racial slur is firing grounds. Didn't use to be. You guys changed the world. I am sure you are proud, Cowboy. I mean, Dude. I mean, whatever is OK with you.

I think it's a net plus, TBH. I have concerns over the "cancel culture" in general but I'm just fine with people losing their jobs over using a racial slur.

Back when I was in high school all my friends used the term "gay" in a pejorative fashion. The term "f*g* was thrown around freely as well. Are these the good-old-days that you pine for? I'm ashamed to have taken part in that and I recognize how hurtful that was for certain individuals in our orbit.

I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

A little update for you. After graduation, Jim and Harlan moved in together. Ten years or so later, Harlan cheated on Jim and Jim committed suicide. Harlan later died of AIDS.

I'm sorry to hear that.

Quote:I wasn’t progressive. I did not not treat Jim as I did out of any political stance. He was mostly ignored in HS. I am sure you had leftist visions of the rednecks beating him up in the halls, because that is the way you guys think. You are pure, the others are evil.

You are a big fan of telling me what I think. If you want to know the truth, I think that neither side is pure.

Quote:I went to a small country HS. FFA was the biggest club in school. I say redneck, because that is the best way to communicate with progressives, using the same stereotypes, but cowboy would be a better description. My neighbor was a real redneck - a farmer who worked from before sunrise to after sunset. He still plowed with mules. His neck was very red.

I know what you mean by cowboy. You would probably say that a great percentage of my aunts/uncles/cousins are cowboys. It's sad that you think that a massive swath of people holds congruent attitudes that are completely alien to your experiences and point of view.

Quote:[quote]

I am just very surprised you thought being nice to a gay kid was something the Democrats invented. I am less surprised you think it praiseworthy.

OK.... when did I imply that Democrats invented that? I think you're talking to your SJW straw man yet again. Can we give your straw man a name so you can refer to him directly?

I'm surprised that the gay experience at your high school in 1963 was so positive. Not because there might have been a bunch of politically conservative families in your area, but because it was 1963. I would guess that most gay people that you talk to would say that things were tougher in 1963 than they were in 1989. And that things were tougher in 1989 than they are in 2019. I hope things are tougher for gay people today than they will be in 2039.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 07-20-2019 11:26 AM

(07-20-2019 10:47 AM)At Ease Wrote:  
(07-19-2019 11:03 AM)illiniowl Wrote:  No sane person would dispute that if Ilhan Omar had a miraculous conversion experience, like Paul on the road to Damascus, and suddenly started espousing conservative views, she'd be adored at the same rallies where she is now excoriated. Ergo, the opposition to her isn't racist.

I get that this forum is named after a former poster that didn't believe in evolution and thought Obama was a Kenyan Muslim that had no birth-right for his Presidency, and that the bar isn't very high here. But still.. how? How could you actually believe that?

I guess AtEase disputes it.

QED for the inverse proposition it appears.

Mixed it in with an ad hom directed at a 'deceased-challenged' individual. Classy too.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 07-20-2019 11:34 AM

(07-20-2019 11:13 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
Quote:
(07-20-2019 09:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 09:28 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 04:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  [quote='Rice93' pid='16200797' dateline='1563477309']

I think it's a net plus, TBH. I have concerns over the "cancel culture" in general but I'm just fine with people losing their jobs over using a racial slur.

Back when I was in high school all my friends used the term "gay" in a pejorative fashion. The term "f*g* was thrown around freely as well. Are these the good-old-days that you pine for? I'm ashamed to have taken part in that and I recognize how hurtful that was for certain individuals in our orbit.

I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

A little update for you. After graduation, Jim and Harlan moved in together. Ten years or so later, Harlan cheated on Jim and Jim committed suicide. Harlan later died of AIDS.

I'm sorry to hear that.

Quote:I wasn’t progressive. I did not not treat Jim as I did out of any political stance. He was mostly ignored in HS. I am sure you had leftist visions of the rednecks beating him up in the halls, because that is the way you guys think. You are pure, the others are evil.

You are a big fan of telling me what I think. If you want to know the truth, I think that neither side is pure.

Quote:I went to a small country HS. FFA was the biggest club in school. I say redneck, because that is the best way to communicate with progressives, using the same stereotypes, but cowboy would be a better description. My neighbor was a real redneck - a farmer who worked from before sunrise to after sunset. He still plowed with mules. His neck was very red.

I know what you mean by cowboy. You would probably say that a great percentage of my aunts/uncles/cousins are cowboys. It's sad that you think that a massive swath of people holds congruent attitudes that are completely alien to your experiences and point of view.

Quote:
Quote:I am just very surprised you thought being nice to a gay kid was something the Democrats invented. I am less surprised you think it praiseworthy.

OK.... when did I imply that Democrats invented that? I think you're talking to your SJW straw man yet again. Can we give your straw man a name so you can refer to him directly?

I'm surprised that the gay experience at your high school in 1963 was so positive. Not because there might have been a bunch of politically conservative families in your area, but because it was 1963. I would guess that most gay people that you talk to would say that things were tougher in 1963 than they were in 1989. And that things were tougher in 1989 than they are in 2019. I hope things are tougher for gay people today than they will be in 2039.

Did you grow up urban, suburban, or rural 93?

I think there is a major difference between the former two and the latter, 93. And, at least in Texas and the Southwest, it may not be in a way that I think that you and lad would expect.

Caring and fostering? Nope.

More laissez fair? My guess would be that.

We know that lad is colored by his suburban (apparently) upbringing and those bad experiences that he endured at his high school. How about you?


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 07-20-2019 11:38 AM

This quip gave me a chuckle:

Quote:PC is like Jonestown on a civilizational scale. There's enormous social pressure to drink tne Kool Aid. Future archaeologists will be unable to explain what they find.



RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 07-20-2019 11:41 AM

(07-20-2019 11:13 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
Quote:
(07-20-2019 09:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 09:28 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-18-2019 04:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  [quote='Rice93' pid='16200797' dateline='1563477309']

I think it's a net plus, TBH. I have concerns over the "cancel culture" in general but I'm just fine with people losing their jobs over using a racial slur.

Back when I was in high school all my friends used the term "gay" in a pejorative fashion. The term "f*g* was thrown around freely as well. Are these the good-old-days that you pine for? I'm ashamed to have taken part in that and I recognize how hurtful that was for certain individuals in our orbit.

I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

A little update for you. After graduation, Jim and Harlan moved in together. Ten years or so later, Harlan cheated on Jim and Jim committed suicide. Harlan later died of AIDS.

I'm sorry to hear that.

Quote:I wasn’t progressive. I did not not treat Jim as I did out of any political stance. He was mostly ignored in HS. I am sure you had leftist visions of the rednecks beating him up in the halls, because that is the way you guys think. You are pure, the others are evil.

You are a big fan of telling me what I think. If you want to know the truth, I think that neither side is pure.

Quote:I went to a small country HS. FFA was the biggest club in school. I say redneck, because that is the best way to communicate with progressives, using the same stereotypes, but cowboy would be a better description. My neighbor was a real redneck - a farmer who worked from before sunrise to after sunset. He still plowed with mules. His neck was very red.

I know what you mean by cowboy. You would probably say that a great percentage of my aunts/uncles/cousins are cowboys. It's sad that you think that a massive swath of people holds congruent attitudes that are completely alien to your experiences and point of view.

Quote:
Quote:I am just very surprised you thought being nice to a gay kid was something the Democrats invented. I am less surprised you think it praiseworthy.

OK.... when did I imply that Democrats invented that? I think you're talking to your SJW straw man yet again. Can we give your straw man a name so you can refer to him directly?

Your comment with approval on 'how progressive' the situation was for OO seems to indicate a belief that that view is only promulgated by...... drum roll........ uhhhh..... progressives. Perhaps it is also endemic to libertarian leaning areas as well, for a starter.

Edited to add:
Geez louise people learn the [quote] thingy...... third one I have had to correct in response in two days, two of them today.

Found it: 93 left a hanging [quote] in his fisking there.


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 07-20-2019 12:07 PM

(07-20-2019 11:34 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 11:13 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
Quote:
(07-20-2019 09:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 09:28 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

A little update for you. After graduation, Jim and Harlan moved in together. Ten years or so later, Harlan cheated on Jim and Jim committed suicide. Harlan later died of AIDS.

I'm sorry to hear that.

Quote:I wasn’t progressive. I did not not treat Jim as I did out of any political stance. He was mostly ignored in HS. I am sure you had leftist visions of the rednecks beating him up in the halls, because that is the way you guys think. You are pure, the others are evil.

You are a big fan of telling me what I think. If you want to know the truth, I think that neither side is pure.

Quote:I went to a small country HS. FFA was the biggest club in school. I say redneck, because that is the best way to communicate with progressives, using the same stereotypes, but cowboy would be a better description. My neighbor was a real redneck - a farmer who worked from before sunrise to after sunset. He still plowed with mules. His neck was very red.

I know what you mean by cowboy. You would probably say that a great percentage of my aunts/uncles/cousins are cowboys. It's sad that you think that a massive swath of people holds congruent attitudes that are completely alien to your experiences and point of view.

Quote:
Quote:I am just very surprised you thought being nice to a gay kid was something the Democrats invented. I am less surprised you think it praiseworthy.

OK.... when did I imply that Democrats invented that? I think you're talking to your SJW straw man yet again. Can we give your straw man a name so you can refer to him directly?

I'm surprised that the gay experience at your high school in 1963 was so positive. Not because there might have been a bunch of politically conservative families in your area, but because it was 1963. I would guess that most gay people that you talk to would say that things were tougher in 1963 than they were in 1989. And that things were tougher in 1989 than they are in 2019. I hope things are tougher for gay people today than they will be in 2039.

Did you grow up urban, suburban, or rural 93?

I think there is a major difference between the former two and the latter, 93. And, at least in Texas and the Southwest, it may not be in a way that I think that you and lad would expect.

Caring and fostering? Nope.

More laissez fair? My guess would be that.

We know that lad is colored by his suburban (apparently) upbringing and those bad experiences that he endured at his high school. How about you?

I grew up in a weird part of Florida - not traditionally suburban, as we were quite far from the closest urban area. But there was also some significant rural aspects - I lived at least 20 minutes from the nearest commercial building, and I could easily get to ranch land, orange groves, etc. within 20 minutes. Definitely wasn’t urban.

I ended up going to a high school that pulled from the entire county and was academically focused and pretty straight laced - somehow I never witnessed a single fight from 7th to 12th grade. It was composed of all kinds of people, from the super wealthy who didn’t want to pay to send their kids to private school, to people who lived below the poverty line. Was a really great amalgam of the entire, rather large, county. I also grew up hunting and spending time in Kansas, which included spending a good part of many summers in southeast Kansas.

So if you wanted to concentrate how my experience was influenced down to “suburban” as compared to rural or urban, I would say you were right. But it is a bit more complicated.


RE: Trump Administration - Rice93 - 07-20-2019 12:15 PM

(07-20-2019 11:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 11:13 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
Quote:[quote='OptimisticOwl' pid='16203133' dateline='1563633964']
[quote='Rice93' pid='16203117' dateline='1563632891']

I am astounded that you were that way, what, 20-30 years or more after I had a gay friend in high school? How regressive were you? I graduated in 1963.

I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.

Quote:Yeah, Jim was not as comfortable in my country HS full of rednecks as he would be today, but he got by.

I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.

Quote: His "friend" Harlan was one of the more popular guys in school. I guess my country school in 1962-63 was more progressive than your school. And we did it without being coerced.

Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

A little update for you. After graduation, Jim and Harlan moved in together. Ten years or so later, Harlan cheated on Jim and Jim committed suicide. Harlan later died of AIDS.

I'm sorry to hear that.

Quote:I wasn’t progressive. I did not not treat Jim as I did out of any political stance. He was mostly ignored in HS. I am sure you had leftist visions of the rednecks beating him up in the halls, because that is the way you guys think. You are pure, the others are evil.

You are a big fan of telling me what I think. If you want to know the truth, I think that neither side is pure.

Quote:I went to a small country HS. FFA was the biggest club in school. I say redneck, because that is the best way to communicate with progressives, using the same stereotypes, but cowboy would be a better description. My neighbor was a real redneck - a farmer who worked from before sunrise to after sunset. He still plowed with mules. His neck was very red.

I know what you mean by cowboy. You would probably say that a great percentage of my aunts/uncles/cousins are cowboys. It's sad that you think that a massive swath of people holds congruent attitudes that are completely alien to your experiences and point of view.

Quote:
Quote:I am just very surprised you thought being nice to a gay kid was something the Democrats invented. I am less surprised you think it praiseworthy.

OK.... when did I imply that Democrats invented that? I think you're talking to your SJW straw man yet again. Can we give your straw man a name so you can refer to him directly?


Your comment with approval on 'how progressive' the situation was for OO seems to indicate a belief that that view is only promulgated by...... drum roll........ uhhhh..... progressives. Perhaps it is also endemic to libertarian leaning areas as well, for a starter.

Edited to add:
Geez louise people learn the
Quote: thingy...... third one I have had to correct in response in two days, two of them today.

Found it: 93 left a hanging [quote] in his fisking there.

If only there were a poster on this thread who recently smugly and condescendingly went to great lengths to point out that a single word can used in multiple ways. Certainly he would understand my use of the term “progressive” here.

*sigh*

Here I used the term progressive to signify “ahead of its time”.

Imagine that I told my kids, “it was very democratic of you guys to vote for which restaurant you wanted to eat at.” That would not signify that Republicans could not behave in a similar fashion nor that Republicans do not participate in a democracy.


RE: Trump Administration - OptimisticOwl - 07-20-2019 12:34 PM

(07-20-2019 10:19 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 09:08 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Watching ABC this morning. I have two two distortions of fact already, both about (surprise!). Trump

He told the four Congresswomen to go back to the countries from where they came from.

The other was the timeworn “He called Mexicans rapists”.

I thought new organizations were supposed to stick to the facts.

I guess this will continue as long as the left continues to tacitly approve the inaccuracies with their silence.

You bolded “to the countries.” Why is that?

Because Trump did not say "to the countries"
and ABC is quoting that he did. To the countries is an interpretation. ABC presents it as fact.


RE: Trump Administration - OptimisticOwl - 07-20-2019 12:44 PM

My high school, while not the only one in the country, was the largest, and the only one with more than 100 students.

My class of 1963 had 122 grads. (about 55-60 left) Baby Boom started with the class of 1965.

I never saw any reason think it was different from similarly sized high schools in Wyoming and Florida. I was sure it was different from the giant urban schools, but primarily in the areas of what was offered and how many people you knew. I knew everybody. Everybody knew me. We didn't always get along. And there were plenty of fights.

I don't think it was remarkable that Jim could get along. I got along with a lot of people. It still astounds me that you guys think this is remarkable.

One addition to the narrative. We had a guy there named Harry. At the 20th reunion he was named Veronica.


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 07-20-2019 12:55 PM

(07-20-2019 12:34 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 10:19 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 09:08 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Watching ABC this morning. I have two two distortions of fact already, both about (surprise!). Trump

He told the four Congresswomen to go back to the countries from where they came from.

The other was the timeworn “He called Mexicans rapists”.

I thought new organizations were supposed to stick to the facts.

I guess this will continue as long as the left continues to tacitly approve the inaccuracies with their silence.

You bolded “to the countries.” Why is that?

Because Trump did not say "to the countries"
and ABC is quoting that he did. To the countries is an interpretation. ABC presents it as fact.

He did. He started his thread with how the four women come from countries that are this, that, and the other, so they should go back there and fix them and then come back.


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 07-20-2019 01:00 PM

(07-20-2019 12:44 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  My high school, while not the only one in the country, was the largest, and the only one with more than 100 students.

My class of 1963 had 122 grads. (about 55-60 left) Baby Boom started with the class of 1965.

I never saw any reason think it was different from similarly sized high schools in Wyoming and Florida. I was sure it was different from the giant urban schools, but primarily in the areas of what was offered and how many people you knew. I knew everybody. Everybody knew me. We didn't always get along. And there were plenty of fights.

I don't think it was remarkable that Jim could get along. I got along with a lot of people. It still astounds me that you guys think this is remarkable.

One addition to the narrative. We had a guy there named Harry. At the 20th reunion he was named Veronica.

OO - you went to a similarly sized high school as me. My graduating class had just over 100 people - I was to say around 140, as we were less than 1,000 students across 6 grades (7-12). We were not the only high school for the entire county, just one that served the entire county.

And OO, why are you surprised that we are surprised that in the early 1960s, that a gay man, who was apparently out in high school, was not harassed in any way? It is great that your community was so welcoming, but come on, you know that was not the case for many, many, many gay people across the country in the early 60s. Or do you live in. A fairy tale world where the entire country was accepting of gay people in the early 1960s?


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 07-20-2019 02:36 PM

(07-20-2019 12:15 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 11:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Your comment with approval on 'how progressive' the situation was for OO seems to indicate a belief that that view is only promulgated by...... drum roll........ uhhhh..... progressives. Perhaps it is also endemic to libertarian leaning areas as well, for a starter.

Edited to add:
Geez louise people learn the thingy...... third one I have had to correct in response in two days, two of them today.

Found it: 93 left a hanging in his fisking there.

If only there were a poster on this thread who recently smugly and condescendingly went to great lengths to point out that a single word can used in multiple ways. Certainly he would understand my use of the term “progressive” here.

*sigh*

Here I used the term progressive to signify “ahead of its time”.

My bad, I shouldnt have used the word "seems". So I can understand at least a portion of your snide as **** response.

How about we replace my usage "seems to" with the term "might"? Will that help get your panties unwound at least a little bit?

Because it "seems" (to me at least) that that is the way that OO might have taken it. Would you agree?

And word of note to you, maybe, just maybe, when you use a word that has one meaning and also has a very deep political meaning, that maybe, just maybe some of us deplorable knuckledraggers might perhaps read it that way.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 07-20-2019 02:51 PM

(07-20-2019 12:07 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 11:34 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(07-20-2019 11:13 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  
Quote:
(07-20-2019 09:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  I'm surprised that you are astounded by that fact. My experience was that this type of behavior was not uncommon. Maybe it was better in 1963? As I said... I am ashamed of it.


I'm glad he got by. Plenty of his people in his situation didn't get through unscathed.


Clearly your school was more progressive without any coercion. It would be interesting to me to hear from homosexuals in your area from that era to see if they felt the same way about the experience that you do.

In all honesty, I applaud you for being so progressive and having a gay friend in high school in an area that you describe as "redneck country". I too was friendly with gay people in school however that did not prevent me from using language amongst my non-gay friends that was wrong and unacceptable. All I can do is learn from my mistakes, teach my kids differently, and vote for politicians that support equal rights for everybody.

A little update for you. After graduation, Jim and Harlan moved in together. Ten years or so later, Harlan cheated on Jim and Jim committed suicide. Harlan later died of AIDS.

I'm sorry to hear that.

Quote:I wasn’t progressive. I did not not treat Jim as I did out of any political stance. He was mostly ignored in HS. I am sure you had leftist visions of the rednecks beating him up in the halls, because that is the way you guys think. You are pure, the others are evil.

You are a big fan of telling me what I think. If you want to know the truth, I think that neither side is pure.

Quote:I went to a small country HS. FFA was the biggest club in school. I say redneck, because that is the best way to communicate with progressives, using the same stereotypes, but cowboy would be a better description. My neighbor was a real redneck - a farmer who worked from before sunrise to after sunset. He still plowed with mules. His neck was very red.

I know what you mean by cowboy. You would probably say that a great percentage of my aunts/uncles/cousins are cowboys. It's sad that you think that a massive swath of people holds congruent attitudes that are completely alien to your experiences and point of view.

Quote:
Quote:I am just very surprised you thought being nice to a gay kid was something the Democrats invented. I am less surprised you think it praiseworthy.

OK.... when did I imply that Democrats invented that? I think you're talking to your SJW straw man yet again. Can we give your straw man a name so you can refer to him directly?

I'm surprised that the gay experience at your high school in 1963 was so positive. Not because there might have been a bunch of politically conservative families in your area, but because it was 1963. I would guess that most gay people that you talk to would say that things were tougher in 1963 than they were in 1989. And that things were tougher in 1989 than they are in 2019. I hope things are tougher for gay people today than they will be in 2039.

Did you grow up urban, suburban, or rural 93?

I think there is a major difference between the former two and the latter, 93. And, at least in Texas and the Southwest, it may not be in a way that I think that you and lad would expect.

Caring and fostering? Nope.

More laissez fair? My guess would be that.

We know that lad is colored by his suburban (apparently) upbringing and those bad experiences that he endured at his high school. How about you?

I grew up in a weird part of Florida - not traditionally suburban, as we were quite far from the closest urban area. But there was also some significant rural aspects - I lived at least 20 minutes from the nearest commercial building, and I could easily get to ranch land, orange groves, etc. within 20 minutes. Definitely wasn’t urban.

I ended up going to a high school that pulled from the entire county and was academically focused and pretty straight laced - somehow I never witnessed a single fight from 7th to 12th grade. It was composed of all kinds of people, from the super wealthy who didn’t want to pay to send their kids to private school, to people who lived below the poverty line. Was a really great amalgam of the entire, rather large, county. I also grew up hunting and spending time in Kansas, which included spending a good part of many summers in southeast Kansas.

So if you wanted to concentrate how my experience was influenced down to “suburban” as compared to rural or urban, I would say you were right. But it is a bit more complicated.

I went at the end of Jr high in a very small town New Mexico school, first part of high school to a very rural area between El Paso and Las Cruces.

After college, did a lot of work in North, West, Central, and Panhandle Texas, staying two-three months at a time *in* someone's house (boarder type arrangement) in a bevy of small towns.

To a tee these communities (and students) were very libertarian in the way that they viewed and handled gay students.

Go out of their way to nurture? No. But a very much laissez fair viewpoint overall.

Far better than the middle of El Paso high school that I went to for 3 years and graduated from.

My perspective is that there is a very marked difference from those communities I was a part of and suburban/urban schools.

I personally dont think OOs experiences are as uncommon as you all might think for those communities. But, that's just me.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 07-20-2019 03:07 PM

Pretty neat video from 1977 featuring William Buckley and Freidrich Hayek.

I am sure OO, #s, and George know exactly who Hayek was and what he means to libertarianism and Chicago School economics.

In short, Buckley presses Hayek fairly hard on the concepts of social justice, and the intertwining of that with tax rates, redistributive policies, absolute justice, and productivity.





I would love to get some comments from our progressive compadres here on the back and forth. I am sure you will recognize at least some of the issues being used in this forum from time to time.