CSNbbs
Trump Administration - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: Members (/forum-401.html)
+----- Forum: Rice (/forum-444.html)
+------ Forum: Rice Archives (/forum-640.html)
+------ Thread: Trump Administration (/thread-797972.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 09:43 AM

Thanks for the screenshot.

Am I misidentifying the person whom Myers is talking about (Snipes from Florida)?

And, by the way, would we be in agreement that 'get a rope and tree' has multiple meanings and/or connotations? Or is the term now *only* racist in nature for you?

If racist, is *any* call for 'vigilantism' if directed at a person of (whatever line is being drawn) now a racist/sexist/homophobic/whatnot remark?

Look, I can't defend this guy completely -- he is obviously a knothead.

I can understand the call in the general sense for 'people self-help' when it comes to Snipes --- a person who is obviously unable as fk to perform her public position. So given that term 'get a rope and a tree' means in one sense to express a call for 'people self-help', I dont think the evidence is overwhelming of racism given the 'object' (considering a call for 'people self-help' seems to have a connection to the source of Snipe's role and power.)

I guess we are damn lucky there was no minority evah in the commercial for pace Picante in this day and age.


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 12-07-2018 10:19 AM

(12-07-2018 09:43 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Thanks for the screenshot.

Am I misidentifying the person whom Myers is talking about (Snipes from Florida)?

And, by the way, would we be in agreement that 'get a rope and tree' has multiple meanings and/or connotations? Or is the term now *only* racist in nature for you?

If racist, is *any* call for 'vigilantism' if directed at a person of (whatever line is being drawn) now a racist/sexist/homophobic/whatnot remark?

Look, I can't defend this guy completely -- he is obviously a knothead.

I can understand the call in the general sense for 'people self-help' when it comes to Snipes --- a person who is obviously unable as fk to perform her public position. So given that term 'get a rope and a tree' means in one sense to express a call for 'people self-help', I dont think the evidence is overwhelming of racism given the 'object' (considering a call for 'people self-help' seems to have a connection to the source of Snipe's role and power.)

I guess we are damn lucky there was no minority evah in the commercial for pace Picante in this day and age.

I knew there'd be an argument that alluding to lynching a black person wasn't racist for some reason...

That type of choice phrasing is the same as if someone had suggested that an oven or gas be used to kill someone who was Jewish. Or do you think racists just make comments like that to Jewish people by accident?

No, calling for vigilantism is not in and of itself racist. But when doing so, if you select a method that was historically used to terrorize a specific race, it's racist. There's no way someone his age doesn't know that black people were terrorized via lynchings with ropes and trees in this country - they happened during his life time.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 10:36 AM

(12-07-2018 10:19 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 09:43 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Thanks for the screenshot.

Am I misidentifying the person whom Myers is talking about (Snipes from Florida)?

And, by the way, would we be in agreement that 'get a rope and tree' has multiple meanings and/or connotations? Or is the term now *only* racist in nature for you?

If racist, is *any* call for 'vigilantism' if directed at a person of (whatever line is being drawn) now a racist/sexist/homophobic/whatnot remark?

Look, I can't defend this guy completely -- he is obviously a knothead.

I can understand the call in the general sense for 'people self-help' when it comes to Snipes --- a person who is obviously unable as fk to perform her public position. So given that term 'get a rope and a tree' means in one sense to express a call for 'people self-help', I dont think the evidence is overwhelming of racism given the 'object' (considering a call for 'people self-help' seems to have a connection to the source of Snipe's role and power.)

I guess we are damn lucky there was no minority evah in the commercial for pace Picante in this day and age.

I knew there'd be an argument that alluding to lynching a black person wasn't racist for some reason...

That type of choice phrasing is the same as if someone had suggested that an oven or gas be used to kill someone who was Jewish. Or do you think racists just make comments like that to Jewish people by accident?

And that choice of terminology has exactly one point. Rope and tree has multiple. Especially in Texas.

Quote:No, calling for vigilantism is not in and of itself racist. But when doing so, if you select a method that was historically used to terrorize a specific race, it's racist. There's no way someone his age doesn't know that black people were terrorized via lynchings with ropes and trees in this country - they happened during his life time.

Are you aware what happened to cattle rustlers in the West in the 1880's, Lad? Or do you fundamentally and absolutely discount that for all time? Hint: it involved ropes and trees. Or are you simply unaware of that very historical fact? Or do you choose to ignore that? Hate to tell you but most Texans are deeply aware that the 'rope and tree' is *also* a reference to vigilantism as a whole.

So much that it was the punchline to fing salsa commercial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX2AyjVrrck

But choose whatever blinders you want to wear for the day Lad.....


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 12-07-2018 10:54 AM

(12-07-2018 10:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:19 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 09:43 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Thanks for the screenshot.

Am I misidentifying the person whom Myers is talking about (Snipes from Florida)?

And, by the way, would we be in agreement that 'get a rope and tree' has multiple meanings and/or connotations? Or is the term now *only* racist in nature for you?

If racist, is *any* call for 'vigilantism' if directed at a person of (whatever line is being drawn) now a racist/sexist/homophobic/whatnot remark?

Look, I can't defend this guy completely -- he is obviously a knothead.

I can understand the call in the general sense for 'people self-help' when it comes to Snipes --- a person who is obviously unable as fk to perform her public position. So given that term 'get a rope and a tree' means in one sense to express a call for 'people self-help', I dont think the evidence is overwhelming of racism given the 'object' (considering a call for 'people self-help' seems to have a connection to the source of Snipe's role and power.)

I guess we are damn lucky there was no minority evah in the commercial for pace Picante in this day and age.

I knew there'd be an argument that alluding to lynching a black person wasn't racist for some reason...

That type of choice phrasing is the same as if someone had suggested that an oven or gas be used to kill someone who was Jewish. Or do you think racists just make comments like that to Jewish people by accident?

And that choice of terminology has exactly one point. Rope and tree has multiple. Especially in Texas.

Quote:No, calling for vigilantism is not in and of itself racist. But when doing so, if you select a method that was historically used to terrorize a specific race, it's racist. There's no way someone his age doesn't know that black people were terrorized via lynchings with ropes and trees in this country - they happened during his life time.

Are you aware what happened to cattle rustlers in the West in the 1880's, Lad? Or do you fundamentally and absolutely discount that for all time? Hint: it involved ropes and trees. Or are you simply unaware of that very historical fact? Or do you choose to ignore that? Hate to tell you but most Texans are deeply aware that the 'rope and tree' is *also* a reference to vigilantism as a whole.

So much that it was the punchline to fing salsa commercial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX2AyjVrrck

But choose whatever blinders you want to wear for the day Lad.....

You're missing the point. It's not that using the "rope and tree" term is racist in and of itself. It's using it when reference a black person that it 100% is. Same thing as I mentioned with phrases reference ovens/gas with Jewish people.

I'm not wearing blinders. I'm just not as willing to live in Tanq world where one blithely ignores the very obvious context of the words that were used.

Ironically, you posted a perfect example of how context of how the phrase is used (a bunch of literal cowboys talking to each other) makes the phrase have 0 racist undertones.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 11:07 AM

Lad,

thinking about it a tad let me clarify.

There are three issues at play here: a) insensitivity; b) intelligence; and c) racism.

Myers statement is an '11' on the insensitivity scale, and a -9 on the apparent intelligence scale. That latter is also based upon that he doesnt really seem to even understand the term 'white nationalist' in the way that many do. (In fact, he defines it in a way that is absolutely counter to the term when he says "race doesnt matter').

Is the blob insensitive: Yep, no doubt.

Is the dude not the sharpest stick in the batch: Again, yep, no doubt.

Insensitive + dumb <> racist.

You should be astute enough to recognize that fact in the line above. One would hope you would be astute enough to practice that recognition.

Or, I guess, you can knee jerk every single statement you want into 'racism' (as much as you rail against the concept).


RE: Trump Administration - OptimisticOwl - 12-07-2018 11:13 AM

Racism seems to be rampant on both sides of the aisle. The Dems just have a better control of their mouths.

https://www.diversityinc.com/news/vp-biden-offends-jews-asians-consecutive-days

"In Delaware, the largest growth of population is Indian-Americans moving from India. You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I'm not joking."

"the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy."


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 11:27 AM

(12-07-2018 10:54 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:19 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 09:43 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Thanks for the screenshot.

Am I misidentifying the person whom Myers is talking about (Snipes from Florida)?

And, by the way, would we be in agreement that 'get a rope and tree' has multiple meanings and/or connotations? Or is the term now *only* racist in nature for you?

If racist, is *any* call for 'vigilantism' if directed at a person of (whatever line is being drawn) now a racist/sexist/homophobic/whatnot remark?

Look, I can't defend this guy completely -- he is obviously a knothead.

I can understand the call in the general sense for 'people self-help' when it comes to Snipes --- a person who is obviously unable as fk to perform her public position. So given that term 'get a rope and a tree' means in one sense to express a call for 'people self-help', I dont think the evidence is overwhelming of racism given the 'object' (considering a call for 'people self-help' seems to have a connection to the source of Snipe's role and power.)

I guess we are damn lucky there was no minority evah in the commercial for pace Picante in this day and age.

I knew there'd be an argument that alluding to lynching a black person wasn't racist for some reason...

That type of choice phrasing is the same as if someone had suggested that an oven or gas be used to kill someone who was Jewish. Or do you think racists just make comments like that to Jewish people by accident?

And that choice of terminology has exactly one point. Rope and tree has multiple. Especially in Texas.

Quote:No, calling for vigilantism is not in and of itself racist. But when doing so, if you select a method that was historically used to terrorize a specific race, it's racist. There's no way someone his age doesn't know that black people were terrorized via lynchings with ropes and trees in this country - they happened during his life time.

Are you aware what happened to cattle rustlers in the West in the 1880's, Lad? Or do you fundamentally and absolutely discount that for all time? Hint: it involved ropes and trees. Or are you simply unaware of that very historical fact? Or do you choose to ignore that? Hate to tell you but most Texans are deeply aware that the 'rope and tree' is *also* a reference to vigilantism as a whole.

So much that it was the punchline to fing salsa commercial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX2AyjVrrck

But choose whatever blinders you want to wear for the day Lad.....

You're missing the point. It's not that using the "rope and tree" term is racist in and of itself. It's using it when reference a black person that it 100% is. Same thing as I mentioned with phrases reference ovens/gas with Jewish people.

I'm not wearing blinders. I'm just not as willing to live in Tanq world where one blithely ignores the very obvious context of the words that were used.

Ironically, you posted a perfect example of how context of how the phrase is used (a bunch of literal cowboys talking to each other) makes the phrase have 0 racist undertones.

Cute that you use the term 'blithely ignore' when you seemingly completely overlook the full context of Myers' statements when labeling him a racist at the outset.

Tell me, what does the quote "race doesnt mean anything at all' mean to you? Is that the mark of a true white nationalist?

When you tell me that I am 'blithely ignoring' items in this thread, your utter overlooking of the full comments (and very specific ones in the Observer, mind you) seems quite the cute counterpoint to your screech there, does it not?

As for overlooking context, you seem to do a fing awesome job of that as well when you complain so loudly about it.

The guy is a dumb***, and an absolute lout. I guess you dont fing think that he is from Tarrant County, Ft Worth, Cowtown, rustlers are hung, Texas has any bearing on the comment at all. Got it. Zero bearing at all. nada. Zilch. Zero. No chance what so fing ever.

Racism at first glance; in Lad world --- 'Git a rope'.

Kind of proving for all time the mantra that floats for progressives : Don't bother ascribing anything to any other reason when you can ascribe it to racis/sexism/whatever-ism.

As I noted I think the guy is pretty fing stupid, and pretty fing crass. In my book that is not an automatic kneejerk equivalent to racist as it seemingly is for those far more enlightened than my blithely ignorant ass.


RE: Trump Administration - RiceLad15 - 12-07-2018 12:13 PM

(12-07-2018 11:27 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:54 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:19 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 09:43 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Thanks for the screenshot.

Am I misidentifying the person whom Myers is talking about (Snipes from Florida)?

And, by the way, would we be in agreement that 'get a rope and tree' has multiple meanings and/or connotations? Or is the term now *only* racist in nature for you?

If racist, is *any* call for 'vigilantism' if directed at a person of (whatever line is being drawn) now a racist/sexist/homophobic/whatnot remark?

Look, I can't defend this guy completely -- he is obviously a knothead.

I can understand the call in the general sense for 'people self-help' when it comes to Snipes --- a person who is obviously unable as fk to perform her public position. So given that term 'get a rope and a tree' means in one sense to express a call for 'people self-help', I dont think the evidence is overwhelming of racism given the 'object' (considering a call for 'people self-help' seems to have a connection to the source of Snipe's role and power.)

I guess we are damn lucky there was no minority evah in the commercial for pace Picante in this day and age.

I knew there'd be an argument that alluding to lynching a black person wasn't racist for some reason...

That type of choice phrasing is the same as if someone had suggested that an oven or gas be used to kill someone who was Jewish. Or do you think racists just make comments like that to Jewish people by accident?

And that choice of terminology has exactly one point. Rope and tree has multiple. Especially in Texas.

Quote:No, calling for vigilantism is not in and of itself racist. But when doing so, if you select a method that was historically used to terrorize a specific race, it's racist. There's no way someone his age doesn't know that black people were terrorized via lynchings with ropes and trees in this country - they happened during his life time.

Are you aware what happened to cattle rustlers in the West in the 1880's, Lad? Or do you fundamentally and absolutely discount that for all time? Hint: it involved ropes and trees. Or are you simply unaware of that very historical fact? Or do you choose to ignore that? Hate to tell you but most Texans are deeply aware that the 'rope and tree' is *also* a reference to vigilantism as a whole.

So much that it was the punchline to fing salsa commercial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX2AyjVrrck

But choose whatever blinders you want to wear for the day Lad.....

You're missing the point. It's not that using the "rope and tree" term is racist in and of itself. It's using it when reference a black person that it 100% is. Same thing as I mentioned with phrases reference ovens/gas with Jewish people.

I'm not wearing blinders. I'm just not as willing to live in Tanq world where one blithely ignores the very obvious context of the words that were used.

Ironically, you posted a perfect example of how context of how the phrase is used (a bunch of literal cowboys talking to each other) makes the phrase have 0 racist undertones.

Cute that you use the term 'blithely ignore' when you seemingly completely overlook the full context of Myers' statements when labeling him a racist at the outset.

Tell me, what does the quote "race doesnt mean anything at all' mean to you? Is that the mark of a true white nationalist?

When you tell me that I am 'blithely ignoring' items in this thread, your utter overlooking of the full comments (and very specific ones in the Observer, mind you) seems quite the cute counterpoint to your screech there, does it not?

As for overlooking context, you seem to do a fing awesome job of that as well when you complain so loudly about it.

The guy is a dumb***, and an absolute lout. I guess you dont fing think that he is from Tarrant County, Ft Worth, Cowtown, rustlers are hung, Texas has any bearing on the comment at all. Got it. Zero bearing at all. nada. Zilch. Zero. No chance what so fing ever.

Racism at first glance; in Lad world --- 'Git a rope'.

Kind of proving for all time the mantra that floats for progressives : Don't bother ascribing anything to any other reason when you can ascribe it to racis/sexism/whatever-ism.

As I noted I think the guy is pretty fing stupid, and pretty fing crass. In my book that is not an automatic kneejerk equivalent to racist as it seemingly is for those far more enlightened than my blithely ignorant ass.

If it talks like a duck (White Nationalist), posts on Facebook like a duck (Get a rope of the black woman), then what do you think it is, a cat?

I don't ignore those items you think I do. I give them little credence because he's just saying them to pacify people like you who are more than happy to use these pieces of evidence to help him wipe his hands of a label for what he is. All he did was provide enough evidence for people to go, see, he isn't actually a racist - just insensitive!

If he didn't want to be labeled a racist, he shouldn't have tried to reclaim the word "white nationalist" or post about getting a rope and tree for a black woman.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 01:10 PM

(12-07-2018 12:13 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 11:27 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:54 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 10:19 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  I knew there'd be an argument that alluding to lynching a black person wasn't racist for some reason...

That type of choice phrasing is the same as if someone had suggested that an oven or gas be used to kill someone who was Jewish. Or do you think racists just make comments like that to Jewish people by accident?

And that choice of terminology has exactly one point. Rope and tree has multiple. Especially in Texas.

Quote:No, calling for vigilantism is not in and of itself racist. But when doing so, if you select a method that was historically used to terrorize a specific race, it's racist. There's no way someone his age doesn't know that black people were terrorized via lynchings with ropes and trees in this country - they happened during his life time.

Are you aware what happened to cattle rustlers in the West in the 1880's, Lad? Or do you fundamentally and absolutely discount that for all time? Hint: it involved ropes and trees. Or are you simply unaware of that very historical fact? Or do you choose to ignore that? Hate to tell you but most Texans are deeply aware that the 'rope and tree' is *also* a reference to vigilantism as a whole.

So much that it was the punchline to fing salsa commercial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX2AyjVrrck

But choose whatever blinders you want to wear for the day Lad.....

You're missing the point. It's not that using the "rope and tree" term is racist in and of itself. It's using it when reference a black person that it 100% is. Same thing as I mentioned with phrases reference ovens/gas with Jewish people.

I'm not wearing blinders. I'm just not as willing to live in Tanq world where one blithely ignores the very obvious context of the words that were used.

Ironically, you posted a perfect example of how context of how the phrase is used (a bunch of literal cowboys talking to each other) makes the phrase have 0 racist undertones.

Cute that you use the term 'blithely ignore' when you seemingly completely overlook the full context of Myers' statements when labeling him a racist at the outset.

Tell me, what does the quote "race doesnt mean anything at all' mean to you? Is that the mark of a true white nationalist?

When you tell me that I am 'blithely ignoring' items in this thread, your utter overlooking of the full comments (and very specific ones in the Observer, mind you) seems quite the cute counterpoint to your screech there, does it not?

As for overlooking context, you seem to do a fing awesome job of that as well when you complain so loudly about it.

The guy is a dumb***, and an absolute lout. I guess you dont fing think that he is from Tarrant County, Ft Worth, Cowtown, rustlers are hung, Texas has any bearing on the comment at all. Got it. Zero bearing at all. nada. Zilch. Zero. No chance what so fing ever.

Racism at first glance; in Lad world --- 'Git a rope'.

Kind of proving for all time the mantra that floats for progressives : Don't bother ascribing anything to any other reason when you can ascribe it to racis/sexism/whatever-ism.

As I noted I think the guy is pretty fing stupid, and pretty fing crass. In my book that is not an automatic kneejerk equivalent to racist as it seemingly is for those far more enlightened than my blithely ignorant ass.

If it talks like a duck (White Nationalist), posts on Facebook like a duck (Get a rope of the black woman), then what do you think it is, a cat?

I don't ignore those items you think I do. I give them little credence because he's just saying them to pacify people like you who are more than happy to use these pieces of evidence to help him wipe his hands of a label for what he is. All he did was provide enough evidence for people to go, see, he isn't actually a racist - just insensitive!

If he didn't want to be labeled a racist, he shouldn't have tried to reclaim the word "white nationalist" or post about getting a rope and tree for a black woman.

The question still stands. What does the sentence 'Race doesnt matter at all' mean to you? Seems pretty fing straightforward to my ignorant cracker ass.

Actually, none of his comments in the article(s) tend to support his 'white nationalist' claim, and in fact one of the articles actually even questioned if he knew what the fk it meant.

But that means nothing to you. Got it.

Take the two words and run with em there, son. Growing into quite the progressive there.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 01:45 PM

(12-06-2018 11:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Reading the entirety of the quotes, I think it's more semantic than real. But republicans need to be more aware that there are media types out there just combing social media and any other sources to find unfortunate misstatements that can be used against them.

This is what Newt insisted upon in 1994. The media are going to take things out of context and use them to hurt you, so don't give them the chance. It's like the football coach saying, "Don't give the refs a chance to beat you." So stay on message. When they try to knock you off stride, get right back on message.

This guy should lose his place on the platform committee. Not because he's a racist--he almost certainly is not--but because he's an idiot.

He's worse than an idiot. A maroon really.

But some seem to think that ignorant + crass == racist.

Come to think of it, a poster here has labeled be 'blithely ignorant'. And I do say crass things. I guess I am a racist. My psychological problems are solved!!!

Edited to add: I am caucasion, and I am a nationalist. I am accordingly a white nationalist (based on the Observer article's subject, that is). Even more proof!!!

I think OO also said *he* was a white nationalist as well. What fing cesspool we have here......

Proof galore!!!! Quack quack quackity quack according to Lad's thesis. Makes me the foulest. But by making those derogatory comments about ducks, wouldnt *he* be the 'fowl-ist'?


RE: Trump Administration - OptimisticOwl - 12-07-2018 02:38 PM

(12-07-2018 01:45 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(12-06-2018 11:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Reading the entirety of the quotes, I think it's more semantic than real. But republicans need to be more aware that there are media types out there just combing social media and any other sources to find unfortunate misstatements that can be used against them.

This is what Newt insisted upon in 1994. The media are going to take things out of context and use them to hurt you, so don't give them the chance. It's like the football coach saying, "Don't give the refs a chance to beat you." So stay on message. When they try to knock you off stride, get right back on message.

This guy should lose his place on the platform committee. Not because he's a racist--he almost certainly is not--but because he's an idiot.

He's worse than an idiot. A maroon really.

But some seem to think that ignorant + crass == racist.

Come to think of it, a poster here has labeled be 'blithely ignorant'. And I do say crass things. I guess I am a racist. My psychological problems are solved!!!

Edited to add: I am caucasion, and I am a nationalist. I am accordingly a white nationalist (based on the Observer article's subject, that is). Even more proof!!!

I think OO also said *he* was a white nationalist as well. What fing cesspool we have here......

Proof galore!!!! Quack quack quackity quack according to Lad's thesis. Makes me the foulest. But by making those derogatory comments about ducks, wouldnt *he* be the 'fowl-ist'?

I think thatwas Owl69, although it could sort of apply to me, as I believe in America First(nationalism) and I am mostly white, or all white if you count my Native American and Hispanic ancestry as white.

But that does not mean I hate blacks, or think they should be killed, or sent back to Africa, as Lincoln did. It does not mean that I think only White Lives Matter, or that anybody should get precedence for jobs or other access based on race.

I saw segregation and racial hate when I was young. I did not support it then, do not want a return to it. That does not mean I am in favor of toppling monuments to brave soldiers. So many things are now classified as racist that I don't think are racist, and so many things are classified at not-racist that I think ARE racist.

Everybody should be treated the same. Pretty simple version of the Golden Rule. I have no idea if this guy we are discussing has practiced that or not. It seems to me the worst he can be guilty of is Wrongthink, and the least is stupidity. I know of no actions against other citizens. But as for me and mine, we will continue to not be racists.


RE: Trump Administration - georgewebb - 12-07-2018 03:23 PM

(12-06-2018 11:04 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  So if I say I’m a communist because I support the community, you’d just shrug it off and say it was semantics?

I am curious: what would your reaction be if a Democrat said that?
Or if a Democrat said something like, "We don't just need socialism at the local level, or the state level. What we need is NATIONAL socialism!"

I can certainly see Ocasio saying either one of those -- and being incredulous when people considered her words ill-chosen.

As an aside, a friend of mine who is a good ol' fashioned liberal (i.e. NOT an identity-obsessed “progressive”) made a joke on Facebook not long ago about Trump being a socialist of the national variety. Not one of his leftist Facebook friends got the joke. Instead they responded with arguments why Trump is not socialist; one even criticized my friend for besmirching the "good name" of socialism. After several such comments, my friend felt compelled to explain the historical term "national socialism" -- a term that you would think most educated people had learned in 6th grade. I mean, I thought the joke was as obvious as the day is long. Reading the thread, I was as discouraged as my friend was, and sent him a note of sympathy.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 03:52 PM

I find it interesting that the same people who seemingly complain about leaps to judgement and using broad-strokes to make judgments are the first people to jump all over what *could* be a misstatement or cloddish remark.

Even when given an alternative, the automatic reflex movement is to yell 'racist' for some.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-07-2018 08:18 PM

A wall to mark the legal border between the U.S. and Mexico and prevent illegal entry, which U.S. law already prohibits, is … “immoral”.... interesting choice of 'semantics'.

House Speaker to-be On the 'Morality' of marking the border

I will give her the benefit of the doubt of this being a cloddish remark or a 'misstatement', and *not* a complete paean to the concept of open borders that seem to enthrall many on the progressive side, much in line with what I would hope (but dont think) some others might do with other statements.


RE: Trump Administration - Owl 69/70/75 - 12-07-2018 08:46 PM

(12-07-2018 08:18 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  A wall to mark the legal border between the U.S. and Mexico and prevent illegal entry, which U.S. law already prohibits, is … “immoral”.... interesting choice of 'semantics'.
House Speaker to-be On the 'Morality' of marking the border
I will give her the benefit of the doubt of this being a cloddish remark or a 'misstatement', and *not* a complete paean to the concept of open borders that seem to enthrall many on the progressive side, much in line with what I would hope (but dont think) some others might do with other statements.

I won't give her that benefit. What I see happening is the democrats radicalizing right before our eyes. Center-left is gone.


RE: Trump Administration - OptimisticOwl - 12-08-2018 10:08 AM

legal challenge to campaign law


.
A little-noticed legal showdown in California poses a threat to a law seen as the backbone of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of 2016 Russian election interference.


RE: Trump Administration - OptimisticOwl - 12-08-2018 10:46 AM

(12-07-2018 08:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 08:18 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  A wall to mark the legal border between the U.S. and Mexico and prevent illegal entry, which U.S. law already prohibits, is … “immoral”.... interesting choice of 'semantics'.
House Speaker to-be On the 'Morality' of marking the border
I will give her the benefit of the doubt of this being a cloddish remark or a 'misstatement', and *not* a complete paean to the concept of open borders that seem to enthrall many on the progressive side, much in line with what I would hope (but dont think) some others might do with other statements.

I won't give her that benefit. What I see happening is the democrats radicalizing right before our eyes. Center-left is gone.

Yes, the gulf is widening, and it is doing so under impetus from the Democrats. In a few years Lad may have to reevaluate whether he wants to be far left or left of right center.


RE: Trump Administration - tanqtonic - 12-08-2018 10:50 AM

(12-08-2018 10:08 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  legal challenge to campaign law


.
A little-noticed legal showdown in California poses a threat to a law seen as the backbone of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of 2016 Russian election interference.

The main issue there doesnt really seem to impact the Russia/US Presidential race issue.

The case in the article deals with the law being applied to a Mexican national being a a source of funds for a consultant for a mayoral race. The defense is citing the 10th amendment --- stating explicitly that the power to police local election finance laws resides with the states and the Feds really cant exercise the law in a local election.

That may or may not be the case. But, I think it is unambiguous that the Federal government can certainly lay down the law as it pertains to Federal races.

That doesnt touch any of the other issues that may arise/have arisen in the particulars of the alleged Russia/Presidential context. But the defense of the 10th amendment precluding the Federal government from policing Federal elections doesnt seem to even touch the case cited.

Interesting argument re: local elections though.....


RE: Trump Administration - ausowl - 12-08-2018 04:42 PM

(12-08-2018 10:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 08:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 08:18 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  A wall to mark the legal border between the U.S. and Mexico and prevent illegal entry, which U.S. law already prohibits, is … “immoral”.... interesting choice of 'semantics'.
House Speaker to-be On the 'Morality' of marking the border
I will give her the benefit of the doubt of this being a cloddish remark or a 'misstatement', and *not* a complete paean to the concept of open borders that seem to enthrall many on the progressive side, much in line with what I would hope (but dont think) some others might do with other statements.

I won't give her that benefit. What I see happening is the democrats radicalizing right before our eyes. Center-left is gone.

Yes, the gulf is widening, and it is doing so under impetus from the Democrats. In a few years Lad may have to reevaluate whether he wants to be far left or left of right center.

With many of the 40 new D's in Congress coming from R or R-leaning districts, I wonder if the center-left is disappearing or reemerging? Yes, a 29 year socialist won in NYC and is soaking up a bunch of press . . .

The Congressional R's who survived in their ultra safe districts probably look a lot more like the Freedom Caucus than the Boehner-Ryan wing of the party.

Haven't checked to see if someone has done an ideological matrix of this new House class.


RE: Trump Administration - Owl 69/70/75 - 12-08-2018 04:52 PM

(12-08-2018 04:42 PM)ausowl Wrote:  
(12-08-2018 10:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 08:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(12-07-2018 08:18 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  A wall to mark the legal border between the U.S. and Mexico and prevent illegal entry, which U.S. law already prohibits, is … “immoral”.... interesting choice of 'semantics'.
House Speaker to-be On the 'Morality' of marking the border
I will give her the benefit of the doubt of this being a cloddish remark or a 'misstatement', and *not* a complete paean to the concept of open borders that seem to enthrall many on the progressive side, much in line with what I would hope (but dont think) some others might do with other statements.
I won't give her that benefit. What I see happening is the democrats radicalizing right before our eyes. Center-left is gone.
Yes, the gulf is widening, and it is doing so under impetus from the Democrats. In a few years Lad may have to reevaluate whether he wants to be far left or left of right center.
With many of the 40 new D's in Congress coming from R or R-leaning districts, I wonder if the center-left is disappearing or reemerging? Yes, a 29 year socialist won in NYC and is soaking up a bunch of press . . .
The Congressional R's who survived in their ultra safe districts probably look a lot more like the Freedom Caucus than the Boehner-Ryan wing of the party.
Haven't checked to see if someone has done an ideological matrix of this new House class.

Center left and center right are both pretty much gone. It's going to be team over country from now on, on both sides. With one controlling the house and the other the senate, that means a very high probability of gridlock. Since I don't like either team's ideas, I'm happy with gridlock. I just hope no crisis arises that requires actual action to respond.

Some of the D's who won in formerly R districts promised to be centrists in order to get votes. I predict they won't be. We shall see.