+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: MACbbs (/forum-513.html)
+---- Forum: MAC - West Team Talk (/forum-464.html)
+----- Forum: Western Michigan (/forum-469.html)
+----- Thread: Liar, liar pant suit on fire? (/thread-784960.html)
Liar, liar pant suit on fire? - gobaseline - 07-22-2016 10:09 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/14/judge-andrew-napolitano-hillary-clinton-and-personal-honesty.html
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - Ken Barna - 07-23-2016 10:19 AM
Dear gobaseline,
One should look at the source of this article. That judge works for Fox News. Personally, I wouldn't believe half of what he says. Let's also remember that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, did some of the things with emails that Clinton did.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - MajorHoople - 07-23-2016 10:30 AM
(07-23-2016 10:19 AM)Ken Barna Wrote: former Secretary of State Colin Powell, did some of the things with emails that Clinton did.
...as did Condoleezza Rice.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - gobaseline - 07-23-2016 10:53 AM
(07-23-2016 10:19 AM)Ken Barna Wrote: Dear gobaseline,
One should look at the source of this article. That judge works for Fox News. Personally, I wouldn't believe half of what he says. Let's also remember that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, did some of the things with emails that Clinton did.
What is it about the comments you disagree? What half of what Judge Napolitano writes do you agree with?
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - gobaseline - 07-23-2016 10:53 AM
(07-23-2016 10:30 AM)MajorHoople Wrote:(07-23-2016 10:19 AM)Ken Barna Wrote: former Secretary of State Colin Powell, did some of the things with emails that Clinton did.
...as did Condoleezza Rice.
I'm listening ...
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - Dirty Ernie - 07-23-2016 11:29 AM
My reaction, it is almost laughable that the base continues to beat this dead horse.
Eight biased Congessional investigations, a close look by the FBI, there isn't anything there.
Basically, it continues to be popular on Facebook, my Republican friends continue with their Killery and Lock Her Up prattle, but most of the country is moving on already.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - okgc - 07-23-2016 11:32 AM
Neither Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice told the bold face falsehoods that the FBI has accused Hillary of.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - Dirty Ernie - 07-23-2016 11:40 AM
Tiresome.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - MajorHoople - 07-23-2016 01:08 PM
(07-23-2016 10:53 AM)gobaseline Wrote:(07-23-2016 10:30 AM)MajorHoople Wrote:(07-23-2016 10:19 AM)Ken Barna Wrote: former Secretary of State Colin Powell, did some of the things with emails that Clinton did.
...as did Condoleezza Rice.
I'm listening ...
Article in NEWSWEEK around two months ago about it.
Already recycled my hard copy, probably still on web site.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - Ken Barna - 07-23-2016 02:52 PM
Dear gobaseline,
When I said I don't believe half of what the judge said, I meant listening to his comments over the years. He is nothing more than a shill for Fox News, in my opinion. As an example: She lied. There has been no proof of her lying. In fact, when the chairman of the Bengazi Committee was told by the FBI Director, that there were inconsistent statements by Clinton, his eyes lit up like a light bulb. He then said they (the committee) would look into possible perjury by Clinton. Well, that was what over a week ago, but there have been no further statements coming from the chairman.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - Dirty Ernie - 07-23-2016 03:01 PM
Goudy's hairstyle is one of the wierdist things I've ever seen.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - MajorHoople - 07-23-2016 03:07 PM
"Goudy"?
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - MajorHoople - 07-23-2016 03:12 PM
(07-23-2016 11:32 AM)okgc Wrote: Neither Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice told the bold face falsehoods that the FBI has accused Hillary of.
FBI did not accuse her of any "bald-faced lies."
They investigated what she was accused of by political enemies and could not find evidence to recommend charges.
Big difference.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - Dirty Ernie - 07-23-2016 03:53 PM
(07-23-2016 03:07 PM)MajorHoople Wrote: "Goudy"?
Gowdy. My spell checker must have thought this was a sports board. Trey, not Curt.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - gobaseline - 07-23-2016 05:52 PM
(07-23-2016 02:52 PM)Ken Barna Wrote: Dear gobaseline,
When I said I don't believe half of what the judge said, I meant listening to his comments over the years. He is nothing more than a shill for Fox News, in my opinion. As an example: She lied. There has been no proof of her lying.
No lying? No ability to or possible will to determine criminal intent.
Lying? Explain this exchange between the Director and Chris Schenkel.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/22/senator-stiff-armed-over-concerns-fbi-double-standard-for-hillary-clinton.html
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - CMichFan - 07-23-2016 06:00 PM
(07-23-2016 03:12 PM)MajorHoople Wrote:(07-23-2016 11:32 AM)okgc Wrote: Neither Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice told the bold face falsehoods that the FBI has accused Hillary of.
FBI did not accuse her of any "bald-faced lies."
They investigated what she was accused of by political enemies and could not find evidence to recommend charges.
Big difference.
This. I am NOT a Clinton fan, but if there were any way to actually charge here with something that would actually stick, you have to believe it would have been done already. Hillary was careless, yes, and that's just one more reason that I don't want her near the oval office. But this has about as much chance of going somewhere as the flap about Obama's birth certificate.
And as for Trump, well...
I'll be spending the next few months looking for a 3rd-party candidate that I can stand, barring something unforeseen happening.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - ESSSS - 07-23-2016 06:04 PM
(07-23-2016 10:30 AM)MajorHoople Wrote:(07-23-2016 10:19 AM)Ken Barna Wrote: former Secretary of State Colin Powell, did some of the things with emails that Clinton did.
...as did Condoleezza Rice.
Though NOT CLOSE to comparing apples to apples, any honest person would admit that stupidity\carelessness/arrogance of this magnitude would make Powel and Rice unworthy of the presidency.
But NOT with HRC
It's cult-like.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - gobaseline - 07-23-2016 06:12 PM
(07-23-2016 06:00 PM)CMichFan Wrote:(07-23-2016 03:12 PM)MajorHoople Wrote:(07-23-2016 11:32 AM)okgc Wrote: Neither Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice told the bold face falsehoods that the FBI has accused Hillary of.
FBI did not accuse her of any "bald-faced lies."
They investigated what she was accused of by political enemies and could not find evidence to recommend charges.
Big difference.
This. I am NOT a Clinton fan, but if there were any way to actually charge here with something that would actually stick, you have to believe it would have been done already.
Based on what?
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - ESSSS - 07-23-2016 06:26 PM
What you can accomplish after 25 years of running for the presidency:
AMONG THE NEARLY 20,000 internal emails from the Democratic National Committee, released Friday by Wikileaks and presumably provided by the hacker “Guccifer 2.0,” is a May 2016 message from DNC CFO Brad Marshall. In it, he suggested that the party should “get someone to ask” Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders about his religious beliefs.
From:MARSHALL@dnc.org
To: MirandaL@dnc.org, PaustenbachM@dnc.org, DaceyA@dnc.org
Date: 2016-05-05 03:31
Subject: No ****
It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.
RE: Liar, liar pant suite on fire? - CMichFan - 07-23-2016 06:29 PM
(07-23-2016 06:12 PM)gobaseline Wrote:(07-23-2016 06:00 PM)CMichFan Wrote:(07-23-2016 03:12 PM)MajorHoople Wrote:(07-23-2016 11:32 AM)okgc Wrote: Neither Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice told the bold face falsehoods that the FBI has accused Hillary of.
FBI did not accuse her of any "bald-faced lies."
They investigated what she was accused of by political enemies and could not find evidence to recommend charges.
Big difference.
This. I am NOT a Clinton fan, but if there were any way to actually charge here with something that would actually stick, you have to believe it would have been done already.
Based on what?
Let me try rephrasing: do your really think that if the Republican-controlled Congress honestly believed she would be convicted of a crime, that Clinton would not have been charged by now?