+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: Undercard debate (/thread-768425.html)
Undercard debate - blunderbuss - 01-28-2016 08:40 PM
What's the point?
RE: Undercard debate - firmbizzle - 01-28-2016 08:48 PM
Secretary of Trump.
RE: Undercard debate - Fo Shizzle - 01-28-2016 09:52 PM
justifying the money.
RE: Undercard debate - CardFan1 - 01-29-2016 06:25 AM
Carly Fiorina, Kicking A$$ and taking names last night. Prime VP slot positioning
RE: Undercard debate - firmbizzle - 01-29-2016 10:41 AM
(01-29-2016 06:25 AM)CardFan1 Wrote: Carly Fiorina, Kicking A$$ and taking names last night. Prime VP slot positioning
No. That's the main debate.
RE: Undercard debate - EverRespect - 01-29-2016 10:47 AM
They are doing a great disservice by including all these people, even in the main debate. The cut off should have been 10% in the polls. Of course, without Trump, it would have left Cruz and Marco. How many prople tune out when others are talking, especially when they go through the 20 minute stretches of Kasich and Christie? How are you suppose to discuss policy and go deep into arguments with 1 minute responses and 30 second rebuttals?
RE: Undercard debate - pharaoh0 - 01-29-2016 11:58 AM
IMO, the cutoff should be 10% in a national, Iowa, NH, or SC poll OR more than $10million in the war chest. If you don't have money or support, who cares? We've had seven of these...let's start getting serious....only ONE DEBATE in a night...no undercard.
RE: Undercard debate - Kronke - 01-29-2016 12:00 PM
(01-29-2016 11:58 AM)pharaoh0 Wrote: IMO, the cutoff should be 10% in a national, Iowa, NH, or SC poll OR more than $10million in the war chest. If you don't have money or support, who cares? We've had seven of these...let's start getting serious....only ONE DEBATE in a night...no undercard.
Agreed.