+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) (/thread-754163.html)
Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - Okie Chippewa - 10-21-2015 07:55 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2015/10/21/believe-back-future-predicted-trumps-run/74359844/
Happy Back to the Future Day!
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - stinkfist - 10-21-2015 08:10 PM
(10-21-2015 07:55 PM)Okie Chippewa Wrote: http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2015/10/21/believe-back-future-predicted-trumps-run/74359844/
Happy Back to the Future Day!
gannett d0ses another obvious 0.....
rufie stepford tactic....that's just how I like my biatches at this point.....
it's pathetic what gets reported and how it's represented.....
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - bullet - 10-22-2015 07:48 PM
Doc Brown and Marty McFly from 1985 land on Jimmy Kimmel live. Its hilarious. There's a youtube video (and yes, they do ask Jimmy about where that rich casino owner Biff is).
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - Motown Bronco - 10-22-2015 07:54 PM
I thought it'd be cool if they reshot some of those 2015 scenes in BTTF2 as their current "older" selves, and release it as an alternate version.
With CGI now, they can also probably slip in some modern things, like a Star Wars 7 poster or something (like Jaws 17).
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - Ole Blue - 10-22-2015 11:19 PM
They underestimated Trump's ability to out stupid himself!
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - HeartOfDixie - 10-22-2015 11:30 PM
I have to admit, I've never watched those movies and just about every joke, minus the Delorean ones, is wasted on me.
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - Fort Bend Owl - 10-23-2015 12:15 AM
Don't bother watching #2 or 3 - they both stink. But the original one (where they go back to 1955) is awesome.
Michael J Fox has his Parkinson's in check for the most part these days but has trouble speaking clearly. Christopher Lloyd is 77. Their appearance on Kimmel was painful to watch.
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - HeartOfDixie - 10-23-2015 09:04 AM
(10-23-2015 12:15 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: Don't bother watching #2 or 3 - they both stink. But the original one (where they go back to 1955) is awesome.
Michael J Fox has his Parkinson's in check for the most part these days but has trouble speaking clearly. Christopher Lloyd is 77. Their appearance on Kimmel was painful to watch.
Well thanks for the tip!
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - bullet - 10-23-2015 10:44 AM
(10-23-2015 12:15 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: Don't bother watching #2 or 3 - they both stink. But the original one (where they go back to 1955) is awesome.
Michael J Fox has his Parkinson's in check for the most part these days but has trouble speaking clearly. Christopher Lloyd is 77. Their appearance on Kimmel was painful to watch.
I think 2 is pretty good. Its fun watching how the original movie is weaved in when they go back to the past (the 1955 part works better than the 2015 part).
I felt like a lot of the hesitation was for comic effect, not an impact of his age. Whatever, it was, I thought it all worked pretty well as the Doc Brown character.
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - Motown Bronco - 10-23-2015 11:45 AM
I agree, I thought #2 was well done. Didn't really get into #3.
RE: Is Donald Trump really Biff Tannen? (Or Vice-Versa?) - UCF08 - 10-23-2015 10:22 PM
(10-23-2015 10:44 AM)bullet Wrote:(10-23-2015 12:15 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: Don't bother watching #2 or 3 - they both stink. But the original one (where they go back to 1955) is awesome.
Michael J Fox has his Parkinson's in check for the most part these days but has trouble speaking clearly. Christopher Lloyd is 77. Their appearance on Kimmel was painful to watch.
I think 2 is pretty good. Its fun watching how the original movie is weaved in when they go back to the past (the 1955 part works better than the 2015 part).
Yeah, 1 & 2 are definitely worth watching, the 3rd is the one which really jumps the shark.