+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: Central command analysts reports altered? (/thread-748344.html)
Pages: 1 2
Central command analysts reports altered? - DragonLair - 09-10-2015 03:56 PM
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/former-cia-director-under-obama-132000261.html
If true that's a huge problem.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Redwingtom - 09-10-2015 04:35 PM
Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Kaplony - 09-10-2015 05:29 PM
(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - WoodlandsOwl - 09-10-2015 05:39 PM
Not the first time this accusation has been made down at Centcom. Intel reports were "amended" in 2007 in Iraq and frequently during Afghanistan. Petraeus the SOB
Central command analysts reports altered? - DragonLair - 09-10-2015 05:41 PM
Doesn't matter wether it's now or 2003 it's still major issue. There should be repercussions if there is changing or stifling Intel reports
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Owl 69/70/75 - 09-11-2015 04:19 AM
So, "Obama lied, people died"?
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - CardFan1 - 09-11-2015 05:08 AM
Funny the war on ISIS slows down while Giving the Iranian Jihadists billions of dollars and Greenlight for a Nuclear weapon in 10 years or less. Great Job Obama . May Your Brilliant Legacy Endure, hoping there will be anything left in 11 years .
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - ECUGrad07 - 09-11-2015 07:27 AM
(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
LoL as a CHILD, I was taught that just because someone else does something wrong, it doesn't make it ok for me to do the same.
It's 2015. Wake up. Bush is loonnnnng gone.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - VA49er - 09-11-2015 07:57 AM
(09-10-2015 05:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
It's not like there is anything about O they can brag about. Nevertheless, we need our intel to be good in any case. It will never be perfect though.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Redwingtom - 09-11-2015 09:15 AM
(09-10-2015 05:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
Can you please point to what I excused? Thanks.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Redwingtom - 09-11-2015 09:18 AM
(09-11-2015 07:57 AM)VA49er Wrote:(09-10-2015 05:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
It's not like there is anything about O they can brag about. Nevertheless, we need our intel to be good in any case. It will never be perfect though.
Who is they? And if you want me to brag about all of Obama's accomplishments, I can certainly do that.
Consecutive job growth months, unemployment rate, doubled stock market, cheap gas, Iran deal, ACA, ending two wars, Bin Laden death...I could go on for quite a bit longer if you'd like.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Redwingtom - 09-11-2015 09:20 AM
(09-11-2015 07:27 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
LoL as a CHILD, I was taught that just because someone else does something wrong, it doesn't make it ok for me to do the same.
It's 2015. Wake up. Bush is loonnnnng gone.
And all he left us with (well not all really
) was ISIS. Thanks W!
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Crebman - 09-11-2015 09:20 AM
(09-11-2015 09:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:(09-10-2015 05:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
Can you please point to what I excused? Thanks.
Because you are a well known Obama water carrier, instead of calling out what has been done as unacceptable, you played the "but Bush" card.
We are almost 7 years into your hero's regime. You will never mentally make him own any of his blundering. Period. It's well known by all here.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Redwingtom - 09-11-2015 09:26 AM
(09-11-2015 05:08 AM)CardFan1 Wrote: Funny the war on ISIS slows down while Giving the Iranian Jihadists billions of dollars and Greenlight for a Nuclear weapon in 10 years or less. Great Job Obama . May Your Brilliant Legacy Endure, hoping there will be anything left in 11 years .
Funny you should mention that, but a strong Iran is actually just about the best thing right now to stop ISIS. ISIS is a direct result of Iran's long sworn enemy, Iraq, losing its power thanks to us. They were created as a result of the government and military that we disbanded in Iraq with no plan for a replacement. That is squarely at the feet of the W administration. If you don't believe that, listen to Dick from 1994. It's about the only thing he has ever said that was right.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - VA49er - 09-11-2015 10:19 AM
(09-11-2015 09:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:(09-11-2015 07:57 AM)VA49er Wrote:(09-10-2015 05:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
It's not like there is anything about O they can brag about. Nevertheless, we need our intel to be good in any case. It will never be perfect though.
Who is they? And if you want me to brag about all of Obama's accomplishments, I can certainly do that.
Consecutive job growth months, unemployment rate, doubled stock market, cheap gas, Iran deal, ACA, ending two wars, Bin Laden death...I could go on for quite a bit longer if you'd like.
I'll give you that O gave the go ahead to the Seals to get Obama. That's about it though. The jury is still out on everything else and the actual long term impacts of said decisions.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - Redwingtom - 09-11-2015 10:22 AM
(09-11-2015 10:19 AM)VA49er Wrote:(09-11-2015 09:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:(09-11-2015 07:57 AM)VA49er Wrote:(09-10-2015 05:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
It's not like there is anything about O they can brag about. Nevertheless, we need our intel to be good in any case. It will never be perfect though.
Who is they? And if you want me to brag about all of Obama's accomplishments, I can certainly do that.
Consecutive job growth months, unemployment rate, doubled stock market, cheap gas, Iran deal, ACA, ending two wars, Bin Laden death...I could go on for quite a bit longer if you'd like.
I'll give you that O gave the go ahead to the Seals to get Obama. That's about it though. The jury is still out on everything else and the actual long term impacts of said decisions.
Oops.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - VA49er - 09-11-2015 11:24 AM
(09-11-2015 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:(09-11-2015 10:19 AM)VA49er Wrote:(09-11-2015 09:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:(09-11-2015 07:57 AM)VA49er Wrote:(09-10-2015 05:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:
6 1/2 years into the Obama regime and we still get "But Bush..." excuses from the leftists.
It's not like there is anything about O they can brag about. Nevertheless, we need our intel to be good in any case. It will never be perfect though.
Who is they? And if you want me to brag about all of Obama's accomplishments, I can certainly do that.
Consecutive job growth months, unemployment rate, doubled stock market, cheap gas, Iran deal, ACA, ending two wars, Bin Laden death...I could go on for quite a bit longer if you'd like.
I'll give you that O gave the go ahead to the Seals to get Obama. That's about it though. The jury is still out on everything else and the actual long term impacts of said decisions.
Oops.
lol, my bad, totally didn't do that on purpose. Of course I meant Osama. I do the same thing with the conferences ACC and AAC.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - WoodlandsOwl - 09-11-2015 06:44 PM
(09-11-2015 09:20 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:(09-11-2015 07:27 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:(09-10-2015 04:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Better late than never I presume.
Quote:Yet a growing group of intelligence analysts persisted with their complaints. For some, who have served at CENTCOM for more than a decade, scars remained from the run-up to the 2003 war in Iraq, when poorly written intelligence reports suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when it did not, formed the basis of the George W. Bush administration’s case for war.Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
“They were frustrated because they didn’t do the right thing then” and speak up about their doubts on Iraq’s weapons program, the defense official told The Daily Beast.
LoL as a CHILD, I was taught that just because someone else does something wrong, it doesn't make it ok for me to do the same.
It's 2015. Wake up. Bush is loonnnnng gone.
And all he left us with (well not all really
ISIS-Iraq is the old AQ Iraq. We know exactly who the Players are, who they run with, etc since we had Intel Files on them from the Insurgency.
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - WoodlandsOwl - 09-12-2015 01:12 PM
Clapper linked to Intel Edits..
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/10/james-clapper-pentagon-military-official
RE: Central command analysts reports altered? - olliebaba - 09-12-2015 01:29 PM
Hey, hey, everyone knows Red is not an obama supporter, anyway that's what he says.