Quote: When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

Following my last article, Homewood checked a swathe of other South American weather stations around the original three. In each case he found the same suspicious one-way “adjustments”. First these were made by the US government’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). They were then amplified by two of the main official surface records, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (Giss) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), which use the warming trends to estimate temperatures across the vast regions of the Earth where no measurements are taken. Yet these are the very records on which scientists and politicians rely for their belief in “global warming”.

(02-08-2015 06:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  I've never seen a place with people who are so proud of their ignorance.

(02-08-2015 06:54 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 06:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  I've never seen a place with people who are so proud of their ignorance.

Obviously you have never been to the Democratic National Convention

(02-08-2015 06:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  I've never seen a place with people who are so proud of their ignorance.

(02-08-2015 06:54 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 06:47 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  I've never seen a place with people who are so proud of their ignorance.

Obviously you have never been to the Democratic National Convention

(02-08-2015 07:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  It's not that you're disagreeing with me, you're disagreeing from literally every respected scientific institution.

(02-08-2015 07:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  It's not that you're disagreeing with me, you're disagreeing from literally every respected scientific institution.

(02-08-2015 09:32 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 07:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  It's not that you're disagreeing with me, you're disagreeing from literally every respected scientific institution.

Not everybody is gullible and close minded enough to believe everything that is professed as "proven science" when it is constantly proven to be anything but "proven". But go ahead and be a blind liberal who questions nothing about the "proven" science of supposed climate change because it fits your political agenda. As for calling people names, you libs are excellent at that. Good job.

(02-08-2015 11:02 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  So are these climate change alarmists...I mean scientists more accurate than the ones who claimed we were facing an imminent ice age?

(02-08-2015 06:03 PM)No Bull Wrote:  See. Obama and the progressives don't believe in Jesus and Christianity... they are happy to talk about it and lecture Christians...

What will they do about the death of their religion? The cult of global warming is about to time out.



And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

Jesus is Lord and always will be.

All the dictators, communists, progressives, scientists and their theories are written in the sand.

(02-08-2015 10:36 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 09:32 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 07:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  It's not that you're disagreeing with me, you're disagreeing from literally every respected scientific institution.

Not everybody is gullible and close minded enough to believe everything that is professed as "proven science" when it is constantly proven to be anything but "proven". But go ahead and be a blind liberal who questions nothing about the "proven" science of supposed climate change because it fits your political agenda. As for calling people names, you libs are excellent at that. Good job.

Climate science is a rapidly changing and evolving science, and within that, you can of course find faults. But it's the same sort of faults and obscure findings that Phillip Morris touted for decades longer than they should, or the NFL did for that matter. It's not a conspiracy of scientists, it's a conspiracy of actual data.