+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: ACCbbs (/forum-381.html)
+---- Forum: ACC Conference Talk (/forum-351.html)
+---- Thread: ACC attendence, nationally (/thread-705993.html)
ACC attendence, nationally - lumberpack4 - 10-01-2014 01:54 PM
15. FSU 81.8K
16. ND 80.8 K
17. CU 80.4 K
26. VT 62.0 K
33. NCSU 54.5 K
34. UNC 54.0 K
39. Louis 53.3 K
42. GT 49.3 K
48. Miami 44.8 K
50. Pitt 43.2 K
53. Syr 40.8 K
56. UVa 36.9 K
62. BC 33.5 K
64. WF 27.5 K
65. Duke 25.5 K
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - lumberpack4 - 10-01-2014 02:06 PM
(10-01-2014 01:54 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote: 15. FSU 81.8K /81.3 = 101% capacity
16. ND 80.8 K /80.8 = 100%
17. CU 80.4 K /81.5 = 99%
26. VT 62.0 K / 66 = 94%
33. NCSU 54.5 K /57.5 = 95%
34. UNC 54.0 K /63 = 86%
39. Louis 53.3 K /55 = 97%
42. GT 49.3 K /55 = 90%
48. Miami 44.8 K /76 = 59%* (65 K more reasonable?)
50. Pitt 43.2 K /65 = 66%** (55 K more reasonable?)
53. Syr 40.8 K /49 = 83%
56. UVa 36.9 K /61.5 = 60%
62. BC 33.5 K /44.5 = 75%
64. WF 27.5 K /31.5 = 87%
65. Duke 25.5 K /34K = 75%
It's amazing how unpopular UVa football has become in Charlottesville.
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - Hokie Mark - 10-01-2014 03:07 PM
(10-01-2014 01:54 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote: 15. FSU 81.8K
16. ND 80.8 K
17. CU 80.4 K
26. VT 62.0 K
33. NCSU 54.5 K
34. UNC 54.0 K
39. Louis 53.3 K
42. GT 49.3 K
48. Miami 44.8 K
50. Pitt 43.2 K
53. Syr 40.8 K
56. UVa 36.9 K
62. BC 33.5 K
64. WF 27.5 K
65. Duke 35.5 K
Given that there are 65 "P5" teams, is Duke 65th among the 65, or among the 128 FBS teams? If it's the latter, that's a lot more impressive (and means some other P5 teams must be below Duke).
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - Wilkie01 - 10-01-2014 05:35 PM
(10-01-2014 01:54 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote: 15. FSU 81.8K
16. ND 80.8 K
17. CU 80.4 K
26. VT 62.0 K
33. NCSU 54.5 K
34. UNC 54.0 K
39. Louis 53.3 K
42. GT 49.3 K
48. Miami 44.8 K
50. Pitt 43.2 K
53. Syr 40.8 K
56. UVa 36.9 K
62. BC 33.5 K
64. WF 27.5 K
65. Duke 35.5 K
Some is wrong here with Wake Forest and Duke. You need to make a correction.
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - lumberpack4 - 10-01-2014 06:10 PM
(10-01-2014 05:35 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:(10-01-2014 01:54 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote: 15. FSU 81.8K
16. ND 80.8 K
17. CU 80.4 K
26. VT 62.0 K
33. NCSU 54.5 K
34. UNC 54.0 K
39. Louis 53.3 K
42. GT 49.3 K
48. Miami 44.8 K
50. Pitt 43.2 K
53. Syr 40.8 K
56. UVa 36.9 K
62. BC 33.5 K
64. WF 27.5 K
65. Duke 25.5 K
Some is wrong here with Wake Forest and Duke. You need to make a correction.
Thanks I fixed it. These are results from an n of 65, not 128. For instance, I'm sure ECU is averaging at least 45K
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - Wilkie01 - 10-01-2014 06:40 PM
The good thing is in a 65 team division all of the ACC is in the 65.
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - Hokie Mark - 10-01-2014 09:36 PM
(10-01-2014 06:10 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:(10-01-2014 05:35 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:(10-01-2014 01:54 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote: ...
62. BC 33.5 K
63. ?
64. WF 27.5 K
65. Duke 25.5 K
Some is wrong here with Wake Forest and Duke. You need to make a correction.
Thanks I fixed it. These are results from an n of 65, not 128. For instance, I'm sure ECU is averaging at least 45K
Ugh! nothing to crow about if your group has 3 of the 4 lowest attendance averages
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - Wilkie01 - 10-02-2014 12:57 AM
(10-01-2014 06:10 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote: [quote='Wilkie01' pid='11191628' dateline='1412202943']
[quote='lumberpack4' pid='11190772' dateline='1412189670']
15. FSU 81.8K
16. ND 80.8 K
17. CU 80.4 K
26. VT 62.0 K
33. NCSU 54.5 K
34. UNC 54.0 K
39. Louis 53.3 K
42. GT 49.3 K
48. Miami 44.8 K
50. Pitt 43.2 K
53. Syr 40.8 K
56. UVa 36.9 K
62. BC 33.5 K
64. WF 27.5 K
65. Duke 25.5 K
Well, something to think about:
BYU 61,161
West Virginia 56,400
ECU 47,013
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - lumberpack4 - 10-02-2014 08:27 AM
(10-01-2014 09:36 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:(10-01-2014 06:10 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:(10-01-2014 05:35 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:(10-01-2014 01:54 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote: ...
62. BC 33.5 K
63. ?
64. WF 27.5 K
65. Duke 25.5 K
Some is wrong here with Wake Forest and Duke. You need to make a correction.
Thanks I fixed it. These are results from an n of 65, not 128. For instance, I'm sure ECU is averaging at least 45K
Ugh! nothing to crow about if your group has 3 of the 4 lowest attendance averages
Another way to look at it is that you can only pack so much into a finite space. Looking at the bottom quintile of the 65 teams here is the rest of the actual attendance bottom and their percentage:
54. Oregon State 40.8K /45.6 89%
55. Colorado 36K /53.5 73%
56. Illinois 38.6 /60.6 64%
58. Kansas 36.1 / 50 72%
59. Northwestern 35.8 /47.1 76%
60. Vandy 35.7 /47.1 88%
61. Purdue 35.3 /40.6 56%
63. Washington State 32 /33.5 96%
In the contest for the most empty non-NFL stadium, Purdue seems to be on top followed by Illinois, then UVa. If you look at the crowd below 75% in a non-NFL stadiums you have Purdue, Illinois, Virginia, Colorado, Kansas and California.
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - Chappy - 10-02-2014 10:18 AM
"Nationally"...
...BC would fall right in between Boise State (34,124) and UTSA (33,472)
...Wake Forest would be between Arkansas State (27,586) and Louisiana Tech (26,004)
...Duke would be between Appalachian State (25,861) and Texas State (24,910)
RE: ACC attendence, nationally - CrazyPaco - 10-02-2014 11:17 AM
Pitt's attendance is probably going to drop like a rock after losing to Akron.