+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store (/thread-672191.html)
Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - EagleRockCafe - 01-14-2014 01:32 PM
This guy had evidently been watching too many movies and playing too many video games. Real life doesn't work that way. He should have surrendered instead of using that poor woman as a shield. Warning..graphic video of the guy going down.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - RaiderATO - 01-14-2014 01:42 PM
Good thing he wasn't homeless and minding his own business. Things could have gotten uglier.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - Jerry Falwell - 01-14-2014 01:44 PM
Gut shot?
Good thing they had millions of dollars of SWAT equipment, when all they needed was a $500 rifle.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - mlb - 01-14-2014 01:46 PM
Probably just another damned pot smoking idiot. Right okla?
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - SumOfAllFears - 01-14-2014 01:52 PM
no more boom boom for that mama son
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - Centdukesfan - 01-14-2014 02:30 PM
(01-14-2014 01:44 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote: Gut shot?
Good thing they had millions of dollars of SWAT equipment, when all they needed was a $500 rifle.
Easy to say that behind a computer desk muchacho. Just like our military, Law enforcement needs to have the upper hand in any confrontation. This instance only required a rifle, but the requirements for SWAT are a bit more broad than what we see here.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - JMUDunk - 01-14-2014 03:45 PM
Nice shot. Two would have been better.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - SuperFlyBCat - 01-14-2014 03:50 PM
Ouch I bet that hurt.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - Jerry Falwell - 01-14-2014 04:24 PM
(01-14-2014 02:30 PM)Centdukesfan Wrote:(01-14-2014 01:44 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote: Gut shot?
Good thing they had millions of dollars of SWAT equipment, when all they needed was a $500 rifle.
Easy to say that behind a computer desk muchacho. Just like our military, Law enforcement needs to have the upper hand in any confrontation. This instance only required a rifle, but the requirements for SWAT are a bit more broad than what we see here.
Read up bub. The Police do not need "upper hands", so sayeth the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - Niner National - 01-14-2014 05:12 PM
did he die?
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - EagleRockCafe - 01-14-2014 05:50 PM
(01-14-2014 05:12 PM)Niner National Wrote: did he die?
Last I heard he was not dead yet.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - VA49er - 01-14-2014 06:03 PM
(01-14-2014 05:50 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:(01-14-2014 05:12 PM)Niner National Wrote: did he die?
Last I heard he was not dead yet.
For some reason this came to mind.
![[Image: bring-out-your-dead.jpg]](http://fishandbicylces.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/bring-out-your-dead.jpg)
Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - chargeradio - 01-14-2014 09:14 PM
How does Colorado get in the news so much for shootings?
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - 49RFootballNow - 01-14-2014 09:20 PM
(01-14-2014 09:14 PM)chargeradio Wrote: How does Colorado get in the news so much for shootings?
..............thin air?
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - Centdukesfan - 01-15-2014 08:26 AM
(01-14-2014 04:24 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:(01-14-2014 02:30 PM)Centdukesfan Wrote:(01-14-2014 01:44 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote: Gut shot?
Good thing they had millions of dollars of SWAT equipment, when all they needed was a $500 rifle.
Easy to say that behind a computer desk muchacho. Just like our military, Law enforcement needs to have the upper hand in any confrontation. This instance only required a rifle, but the requirements for SWAT are a bit more broad than what we see here.
Read up bub. The Police do not need "upper hands", so sayeth the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Thats not what this says.
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - Jerry Falwell - 01-15-2014 08:38 AM
(01-15-2014 08:26 AM)Centdukesfan Wrote:(01-14-2014 04:24 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:(01-14-2014 02:30 PM)Centdukesfan Wrote:(01-14-2014 01:44 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote: Gut shot?
Good thing they had millions of dollars of SWAT equipment, when all they needed was a $500 rifle.
Easy to say that behind a computer desk muchacho. Just like our military, Law enforcement needs to have the upper hand in any confrontation. This instance only required a rifle, but the requirements for SWAT are a bit more broad than what we see here.
Read up bub. The Police do not need "upper hands", so sayeth the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Thats not what this says.
Q: What's the difference in Police with military equipment and military?
A: None.
Do you actually believe the Posse Comitatus Act would allow MRAPs to roam the streets of America? You can't be that dumb.
![[Image: RG-33_MRAP_4x4_Socom_wheeled_armour.jpg]](http://media.photobucket.com/user/bmarkline/media/Ford/random/RG-33_MRAP_4x4_Socom_wheeled_armour.jpg.html)
RE: Denver SWAT shoot hostage-taker outside Denver convenience store - Centdukesfan - 01-15-2014 01:58 PM
(01-15-2014 08:38 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:(01-15-2014 08:26 AM)Centdukesfan Wrote:(01-14-2014 04:24 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:(01-14-2014 02:30 PM)Centdukesfan Wrote:(01-14-2014 01:44 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote: Gut shot?
Good thing they had millions of dollars of SWAT equipment, when all they needed was a $500 rifle.
Easy to say that behind a computer desk muchacho. Just like our military, Law enforcement needs to have the upper hand in any confrontation. This instance only required a rifle, but the requirements for SWAT are a bit more broad than what we see here.
Read up bub. The Police do not need "upper hands", so sayeth the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Thats not what this says.
Q: What's the difference in Police with military equipment and military?
A: None.
Do you actually believe the Posse Comitatus Act would allow MRAPs to roam the streets of America? You can't be that dumb.
meh, surplus MRAPs that need to go to use, and will for deliberate assault for SWAT teams (in very specific circumstances). Would you rather we destroy them? When i see an m1a1 rolling down broadway, then you might have a point.
The police do not have access to all the same equipment as the military. How often do you have interactions with cops or military folks? Have you been to israel? Thats the military running the duties of law enforcement. Thats having a guy with an m4 in front of every mall. Its a sizable and noticeable difference difference.