Quote:Having suffered a major setback when Phil Robertson of “Duck Dynasty” got his job back, the gay lobby is now going for a softer target – a pro-family activist in Ohio whose book, “Maybe He’s Not Gay,” undercuts their recruitment efforts among kids.

Author Linda Harvey, who runs a pro-family ministry called Mission America, seems to have emerged as more of a target than Phil Robertson.

Robertson was suspended – then reinstated – from the show after making comments critical of homosexuality, some of them based on biology and the facts of life, and others on Bible passages.

The “Maybe He’s Not Gay” book “seeks to tell kids the truth about homosexual behavior,” Harvey says. It explains in a conversational tone why no one is born homosexual, the health risks associated with the lifestyle and factors that may lead to same-sex attractions.

Harvey asserts that the homosexual movement is revolutionary and designed to overturn traditional cultural values. “It’s a revolution, both inside the minds and hearts of today’s youth – and in our culture,” her book says.

In response, the pro-homosexual Huffington Post attacked the book as “potentially dangerous” because it suggests children don’t have to engage in dangerous homosexual conduct and that parents can influence how their children turn out. The publication also claimed that Amazon had “pulled” the book in response to homosexual criticism.

(01-13-2014 08:45 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The percentage of homosexuals in the population is typically estimated to be roughly 5%. And that percentage isn't going to change.

(01-13-2014 09:48 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It's utterly amazing how the left thinks they can force the gay agenda on America.

(01-13-2014 09:01 AM)AngryAphid Wrote:  Who here hasn’t experienced an attempted recruiting?

Those so-called 5% sure get around…
Heck! even Jehovah's Witnesses are less presumptuous.

(01-13-2014 08:45 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The percentage of homosexuals in the population is typically estimated to be roughly 5%. And that percentage isn't going to change. People can't be recruited/talked into a sexual orientation. You could've had a "recruiter" (quoting the article) spend countless hours trying to sell me the joys of a gay lifestyle when I was a teenager, but my hetero orientation would not have budged.

Anyone who says that gay rights advocates are "masters of demonic manipulation," as Linda Harvey does, deserves all the scorn she gets. Of all the things to get worked up over in our day and age, it's two homosexuals in a loving relationship that tops her list. I'll never understand that.

(01-13-2014 10:32 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Maybe he's not gay, maybe it's Maybeline?

(01-13-2014 10:19 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 08:45 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The percentage of homosexuals in the population is typically estimated to be roughly 5%. And that percentage isn't going to change. People can't be recruited/talked into a sexual orientation. You could've had a "recruiter" (quoting the article) spend countless hours trying to sell me the joys of a gay lifestyle when I was a teenager, but my hetero orientation would not have budged.

Anyone who says that gay rights advocates are "masters of demonic manipulation," as Linda Harvey does, deserves all the scorn she gets. Of all the things to get worked up over in our day and age, it's two homosexuals in a loving relationship that tops her list. I'll never understand that.

How long ago were you a teenager? Being a fag is an up and coming fad that many young people will "try" if they're manipulated into thinking it's cool. You're being naive.

(01-13-2014 10:51 AM)ncbeta Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 10:19 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 08:45 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The percentage of homosexuals in the population is typically estimated to be roughly 5%. And that percentage isn't going to change. People can't be recruited/talked into a sexual orientation. You could've had a "recruiter" (quoting the article) spend countless hours trying to sell me the joys of a gay lifestyle when I was a teenager, but my hetero orientation would not have budged.

Anyone who says that gay rights advocates are "masters of demonic manipulation," as Linda Harvey does, deserves all the scorn she gets. Of all the things to get worked up over in our day and age, it's two homosexuals in a loving relationship that tops her list. I'll never understand that.

How long ago were you a teenager? Being a fag is an up and coming fad that many young people will "try" if they're manipulated into thinking it's cool. You're being naive.

I was a teen recently and there was maybe 1 kid like that in my HS. No one talked to him except those weird kids that dressed in all black. Also, I'm from small town America next to a military base in the south... so that's probably not the best sample of the "trendy" population.

(01-13-2014 10:19 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 08:45 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The percentage of homosexuals in the population is typically estimated to be roughly 5%. And that percentage isn't going to change. People can't be recruited/talked into a sexual orientation. You could've had a "recruiter" (quoting the article) spend countless hours trying to sell me the joys of a gay lifestyle when I was a teenager, but my hetero orientation would not have budged.

Anyone who says that gay rights advocates are "masters of demonic manipulation," as Linda Harvey does, deserves all the scorn she gets. Of all the things to get worked up over in our day and age, it's two homosexuals in a loving relationship that tops her list. I'll never understand that.

How long ago were you a teenager? Being a fag is an up and coming fad that many young people will "try" if they're manipulated into thinking it's cool. You're being naive.

(01-13-2014 11:31 AM)Crebman Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 10:19 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 08:45 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The percentage of homosexuals in the population is typically estimated to be roughly 5%. And that percentage isn't going to change. People can't be recruited/talked into a sexual orientation. You could've had a "recruiter" (quoting the article) spend countless hours trying to sell me the joys of a gay lifestyle when I was a teenager, but my hetero orientation would not have budged.

Anyone who says that gay rights advocates are "masters of demonic manipulation," as Linda Harvey does, deserves all the scorn she gets. Of all the things to get worked up over in our day and age, it's two homosexuals in a loving relationship that tops her list. I'll never understand that.

How long ago were you a teenager? Being a fag is an up and coming fad that many young people will "try" if they're manipulated into thinking it's cool. You're being naive.

Somehow, I never thought I'd enhance my "coolness" by sticking a D_ck in my mouth - And I've been propositioned on more than one occasion. One of the propositions was pretty funny looking back on it - wasn't quite as funny as it was happening though.

(01-13-2014 08:45 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The percentage of homosexuals in the population is typically estimated to be roughly 5%. And that percentage isn't going to change. People can't be recruited/talked into a sexual orientation. You could've had a "recruiter" (quoting the article) spend countless hours trying to sell me the joys of a gay lifestyle when I was a teenager, but my hetero orientation would not have budged.

(01-13-2014 02:44 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  "Gay agenda" is a funny term. Equality is "too gay" for a lot of older folks it seems.

The reason the percentage of homosexuals has gone up recently is because people aren't getting killed (as often) for being gay. Imagine being openly gay in the 70s or 80s - you could die. Now, that is much less likely, and the culture has changed with immense support from all areas of life - from education to entertainment.

(01-13-2014 02:44 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  "Gay agenda" is a funny term. Equality is "too gay" for a lot of older folks it seems.

The reason the percentage of homosexuals has gone up recently is because people aren't getting killed (as often) for being gay. Imagine being openly gay in the 70s or 80s - you could die. Now, that is much less likely, and the culture has changed with immense support from all areas of life - from education to entertainment.