+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes (/thread-650481.html)
Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - EverRespect - 09-20-2013 03:36 PM
Quote:POQUOSON, Va. — The York-Poquoson Sheriff’s Office says a Hampton woman who passed herself off as a teenage boy is accused of seven counts of sexual battery after she was found in woods with a 15-year-old girl.
Media reports say deputies arrested 21-year-old Stephanie Marie Griffith earlier this week while responding to another call. They said they found the girl with Griffith, who claimed to be a 15-year-old boy.
Investigators said Griffith told them the sex with the minor was consensual.
Besides the sexual battery charges, Griffith was charged with one count of crimes against nature and one count of piercing a minor.
Right IMBY. This case is the epitome of why Cuccinelli wants to keep these laws on the books.
http://hamptonroads.com/2013/09/police-woman-posing-boy-accused-sex-girl
RE: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - EverRespect - 09-20-2013 03:43 PM
First they tell teens that it's okay to have sex and give the condoms and show them how to use it. Then they tell them they can have abortions with parental consent. Then they threaten to prosecute parents who want thier "gender confused" children to see a pschyatrist. Then they make it okay for mother to marry her best friend Jane and daddy to marry his buddy Bart. Then they force the military to let them all in. And THIS is illegal? Now who's confused? Is it any wonder our kids are too?
RE: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - SuperFlyBCat - 09-20-2013 04:47 PM
I thought Robs lived in Illinois?
RE: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - smn1256 - 09-20-2013 05:48 PM
(09-20-2013 03:43 PM)EverRespect Wrote: First they tell teens that it's okay to have sex and give the condoms and show them how to use it. Then they tell them they can have abortions with parental consent. Then they threaten to prosecute parents who want thier "gender confused" children to see a pschyatrist. Then they make it okay for mother to marry her best friend Jane and daddy to marry his buddy Bart. Then they force the military to let them all in. And THIS is illegal? Now who's confused? Is it any wonder our kids are too?
Good point.
RE: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - Smaug - 09-21-2013 07:39 AM
"Crime against nature". That term always breaks me up.
Could mean everything from sodomy to littering, I suppose.
Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - chargeradio - 09-22-2013 10:16 AM
Speaking of littering, I find it ironic that the fines for littering in many places are higher than those for speeding and other moving violations. Litter doesn't typically result in car crashes.
RE: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - john01992 - 09-22-2013 10:44 AM
Furthermore, in 2003, in Lawrence v. Texas, the US Supreme Court held that nonremunerative sex between consenting adults in private was protected by the Constitution and could not be criminalized under "crimes against nature" laws. Thus, fellatio, cunnilingus and homosexual sex can no longer fall within the scope of such laws.
in other words.....crimes against nature cant be based off homosexuality
RE: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - EverRespect - 09-22-2013 11:40 AM
(09-22-2013 10:44 AM)john01992 Wrote: Furthermore, in 2003, in Lawrence v. Texas, the US Supreme Court held that nonremunerative sex between consenting adults in private was protected by the Constitution and could not be criminalized under "crimes against nature" laws. Thus, fellatio, cunnilingus and homosexual sex can no longer fall within the scope of such laws.
in other words.....crimes against nature cant be based off homosexuality
Between consenting adults.
RE: Woman Pretending To Be Teen Boy Charged With Sex Crimes - john01992 - 09-22-2013 12:04 PM
(09-22-2013 11:40 AM)EverRespect Wrote:(09-22-2013 10:44 AM)john01992 Wrote: Furthermore, in 2003, in Lawrence v. Texas, the US Supreme Court held that nonremunerative sex between consenting adults in private was protected by the Constitution and could not be criminalized under "crimes against nature" laws. Thus, fellatio, cunnilingus and homosexual sex can no longer fall within the scope of such laws.
in other words.....crimes against nature cant be based off homosexuality
Between consenting adults.
yeah and thats why it got included in this case. it has nothing to do with homosexuality