CSNbbs
National UTEP football prjections - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: CUSAbbs (/forum-514.html)
+---- Forum: CUSA Team Talk (/forum-432.html)
+----- Forum: UTEP (/forum-454.html)
+----- Thread: National UTEP football prjections (/thread-642465.html)

Pages: 1 2


National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-02-2013 12:29 AM

I think it would be interesting to compile a list of projections from various writers and come up with an average expectation of UTEP's upcoming season.

I initially expected a rebuilding year but after extensive research, it seems most people believe that the Miners can have a winning season this year.

I don't want to get my hopes up so I was thinking that if we could average out the projections, then we could get a reasonable expectation and go from there.

IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

However, if the average projection is higher, then maybe we should expect more.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - randaddyminer - 08-05-2013 01:18 AM

USC SUCKS!!!!!

how do you like that projection?


RE: National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-17-2013 02:58 PM

(08-05-2013 01:18 AM)randaddyminer Wrote:  USC SUCKS!!!!!

how do you like that projection?

Is this another feeble attempt by you to upset me?

I'm not even a USC fan.

You might find it interesting to know however that the PAC 12 has 2 teams in the top 4.

More than any other conference.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - randaddyminer - 08-17-2013 04:41 PM

(08-17-2013 02:58 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-05-2013 01:18 AM)randaddyminer Wrote:  USC SUCKS!!!!!

how do you like that projection?

Is this another feeble attempt by you to upset me?

I'm not even a USC fan.

You might find it interesting to know however that the PAC 12 has 2 teams in the top 4.

More than any other conference.

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSiD4gvEgNZPZPuLe8d-4j...5-hb486moK]


RE: National UTEP football prjections - randaddyminer - 08-17-2013 04:44 PM

By the way fit, USC was ranked number 1 last season in the preseason polls03-nutkick


RE: National UTEP football prjections - RUNVSFD MINER - 08-17-2013 06:33 PM

(08-02-2013 12:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-18-2013 12:33 PM

(08-17-2013 06:33 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-02-2013 12:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.

Are you serious? This is what you guys have been reduced to?

03-lmfao


RE: National UTEP football prjections - mistabinks - 08-18-2013 06:05 PM

(08-18-2013 12:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-17-2013 06:33 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-02-2013 12:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.

Are you serious? This is what you guys have been reduced to?

03-lmfao

Hint, hint, hint. You are being set up. You are the one who has had your arguments shredded to nothing and were left with only being able to correct a spelling error. You are the one that has to throw wild accusations and use emoticons to try and make a point. Hint, hint, hint, you are looking at their jabs while they are loading their right crosses for your jaw.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-19-2013 11:23 PM

(08-18-2013 06:05 PM)mistabinks Wrote:  
(08-18-2013 12:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-17-2013 06:33 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-02-2013 12:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.

Are you serious? This is what you guys have been reduced to?

03-lmfao

Hint, hint, hint. You are being set up. You are the one who has had your arguments shredded to nothing and were left with only being able to correct a spelling error. You are the one that has to throw wild accusations and use emoticons to try and make a point. Hint, hint, hint, you are looking at their jabs while they are loading their right crosses for your jaw.

I think you have me mixed up with Randaddy. I don't personally attack people and I'm not a grammar Nazi either.

Oh and I don't get my arguments shredded.

Again, just because you disagree with them doesn't mean that I am wrong and you are right.

Can't you just agree to disagree?


RE: National UTEP football prjections - randaddyminer - 08-19-2013 11:57 PM

[Image: keep-calm-usc-sucks.png]


RE: National UTEP football prjections - mistabinks - 08-20-2013 09:39 AM

(08-19-2013 11:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think you have me mixed up with Randaddy. I don't personally attack people and I'm not a grammar Nazi either.

No. There was a particularly fun discussion were you got beat so bad you were reduced to correcting a spelling error.

(08-19-2013 11:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Oh and I don't get my arguments shredded.

You are punched drunk at this point if you honestly believe that.

(08-19-2013 11:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Again, just because you disagree with them doesn't mean that I am wrong and you are right.

We have had this discussion before so I won't waste my time.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - RUNVSFD MINER - 08-20-2013 10:24 PM

(08-18-2013 12:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-17-2013 06:33 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-02-2013 12:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.

Are you serious? This is what you guys have been reduced to?

03-lmfao

Either you don't understand decimals, or you would be happy with winning 500 games this year.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-21-2013 11:44 AM

(08-20-2013 10:24 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-18-2013 12:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-17-2013 06:33 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-02-2013 12:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.

Are you serious? This is what you guys have been reduced to?

03-lmfao


Either you don't understand decimals, or you would be happy with winning 500 games this year.

I understand decimals. I neglected to put the decimal. It was a typo.

I didn't realize that you guys would diminish the conversation to correcting typos.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - RUNVSFD MINER - 08-22-2013 12:46 AM

(08-21-2013 11:44 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-20-2013 10:24 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-18-2013 12:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-17-2013 06:33 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-02-2013 12:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  IMHO, I would be happy with 500 this first year.

That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.

Are you serious? This is what you guys have been reduced to?

03-lmfao


Either you don't understand decimals, or you would be happy with winning 500 games this year.

I understand decimals. I neglected to put the decimal. It was a typo.

I didn't realize that you guys would diminish the conversation to correcting typos.

Well, it's hard to tell with you, on what is an honest mistake, and what isn't.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-22-2013 10:40 AM

(08-22-2013 12:46 AM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-21-2013 11:44 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-20-2013 10:24 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-18-2013 12:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-17-2013 06:33 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  That is impossible!!!!!

.500 maybe.

Are you serious? This is what you guys have been reduced to?

03-lmfao


Either you don't understand decimals, or you would be happy with winning 500 games this year.

I understand decimals. I neglected to put the decimal. It was a typo.

I didn't realize that you guys would diminish the conversation to correcting typos.

Well, it's hard to tell with you, on what is an honest mistake, and what isn't.

I guess if you and others are going to nit pick my posts.

I guess I should be flattered.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - gcp_mineros - 08-22-2013 02:16 PM

Message board flattery: there is no greater form of compliment. The pinnacle of one's life work. nobel laureates aint got nothing on you fatbad.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-22-2013 02:37 PM

(08-22-2013 02:16 PM)gcp_mineros Wrote:  Message board flattery: there is no greater form of compliment. The pinnacle of one's life work. nobel laureates aint got nothing on you fatbad.

It's no big deal. I just find it awesome that I have become so popular, and the my posts are being monitored, thought about, and analysed to this extent. 04-rock


RE: National UTEP football prjections - gcp_mineros - 08-22-2013 04:08 PM

I'm glad the internet was created and eventually this message board so that you could feel validated


RE: National UTEP football prjections - RUNVSFD MINER - 08-22-2013 07:55 PM

(08-22-2013 02:37 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-22-2013 02:16 PM)gcp_mineros Wrote:  Message board flattery: there is no greater form of compliment. The pinnacle of one's life work. nobel laureates aint got nothing on you fatbad.

It's no big deal. I just find it awesome that I have become so popular, and the my posts are being monitored, thought about, and analysed to this extent. 04-rock

Lindsey Lohan is well-known. And it's not due to her intellect, contribution, or good nature.

Big diff between being popular, and being notorious.


RE: National UTEP football prjections - Fitbud - 08-23-2013 12:15 PM

(08-22-2013 07:55 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-22-2013 02:37 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(08-22-2013 02:16 PM)gcp_mineros Wrote:  Message board flattery: there is no greater form of compliment. The pinnacle of one's life work. nobel laureates aint got nothing on you fatbad.

It's no big deal. I just find it awesome that I have become so popular, and the my posts are being monitored, thought about, and analysed to this extent. 04-rock

Lindsey Lohan is well-known. And it's not due to her intellect, contribution, or good nature.

Big diff between being popular, and being notorious.

What you fail to understand is that I have a real life where I am respected and loved by my peers. So it doesn't bother me if a couple of homers have issues with my constructive criticism of UTEP on this forum.

In the end, I know that it's tough love that makes people and institutions better.