![]() |
|
Santorum now must be vetted. - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html) +---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html) +---- Thread: Santorum now must be vetted. (/thread-545886.html) Pages: 1 2 |
Santorum now must be vetted. - Fo Shizzle - 01-03-2012 10:31 PM Ok Prick...Now YOU have to face the media sh!tstorm!!! ![]() This should be funny as hell to see.
RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Max Power - 01-03-2012 10:34 PM GOPers should hope so. Obama would curbstomp Frothy. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Dak10 - 01-03-2012 10:35 PM I'm not sure Santorum would pull 35% in the general. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - smn1256 - 01-04-2012 12:22 AM Obama might not ultimately run against Santorum, he just might run against the economy.....and his record. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Ninerfan1 - 01-04-2012 12:30 AM Santorum= Huckabee. He'll be done by the end of Florida, if not sooner. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Attackcoog - 01-04-2012 12:36 AM Santorum is a joke. His speeches are like listening to a bucket of mud speak. He gets his 15 days and a media enima---then we get back to the real candidates. Probably end up with Romney fighting whoever becomes the anti-Romney guy--probably Gingrich along with Paul. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Ninerfan1 - 01-04-2012 12:37 AM Paul won't be the anti-Romney. Paul is done. Drudge reporting McCain will endorse Romney. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Attackcoog - 01-04-2012 12:54 AM (01-04-2012 12:37 AM)Ninerfan1 Wrote: Paul won't be the anti-Romney. Paul is done. Haha. Of course he will. They are the same guy. Whis is why he's an awful choice to run against Obama. I think Paul will be more of a protest vote, but I think he will stay in till the end. I expect Gingrich to rebound once the debates begin again and Santorum proves to be a dud. Gingrich is the only other real option. At least he can whip Obama in a debate. But if Gingrich cant raise any money then we will be stuck with Romney. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Native Georgian - 01-04-2012 01:09 AM (01-03-2012 10:35 PM)Dak10 Wrote: I'm not sure Santorum would pull 35% in the general.If he's running against Obama, he would. The Republicans could run Mark Sanford against Obama and still get the same 46% that McCain got in 08. And someone -- ANYONE -- without Sanford's drama would do even better than that. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Machiavelli - 01-04-2012 01:25 AM I don't think there's a worse candidate in the general than Santorum. Maybe Bachmann. I just can't believe the music stopped and Rick has a chair at the big table. This guy was polling in the single digits two weeks ago. I'm with GTS. The biggest loser of the night was the GOP. They can't rally around a candidate. Hating the guy on the other side won't do it in the end. I remember thinking a sock puppet could beat Bush in 04'. Obama gets a bump frpm this. You watch. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Native Georgian - 01-04-2012 01:29 AM (01-04-2012 01:25 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: I remember thinking a sock puppet could beat Bush in 04'.That explains a lot. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Attackcoog - 01-04-2012 01:29 AM (01-04-2012 01:25 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: I don't think there's a worse candidate in the general than Santorum. Maybe Bachmann. I just can't believe the music stopped and Rick has a chair at the big table. This guy was polling in the single digits two weeks ago. I'm with GTS. The biggest loser of the night was the GOP. They can't rally around a candidate. Hating the guy on the other side won't do it in the end. I remember thinking a sock puppet could beat Bush in 04'. Obama gets a bump frpm this. You watch. Unfortunately, Im afraid you are correct. The upside is Santorum has spent the last year in Iowa. Now he has to face real media scruitny and he really has nothing going forward in terms of groundwork and organization---so I think the door is still open for someone else. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Machiavelli - 01-04-2012 01:41 AM It's past 1:30 in the morning and I'm up waiting for the results of a caucas of a party I don't support. I'm officially a political junkie. There is absolutely no hope for me and I have to be up in less than 3 hrs for work tomorrow. WTF am I doing!!! RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Machiavelli - 01-04-2012 01:43 AM 18 votes seperate Santorum and Romney and they can't find 2 precincts. They have no idea where the ballots are. You can't make this **** up! RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Machiavelli - 01-04-2012 01:46 AM I'm going to bed at 2. No matter what. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Attackcoog - 01-04-2012 01:46 AM Iowa is joke. Why are they first again? RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - ClairtonPanther - 01-04-2012 01:49 AM F*cking serious... SMFH... smells like voter fraud if you ask me. No way votes from 2 precincts suddenly vanishes. RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - ClairtonPanther - 01-04-2012 01:51 AM (01-04-2012 01:46 AM)attackfrog Wrote: Iowa is joke. Why are they first again? And I can't remember the last time PA was relevant when it came voting for a GOP candidate. SMH RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Machiavelli - 01-04-2012 01:52 AM 4 votes seperate them RE: Santorum now must be vetted. - Machiavelli - 01-04-2012 01:53 AM get intrade account ready. You can make big money they underreported Romney |