![]() |
|
Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html) +---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html) +---- Thread: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today (/thread-397010.html) |
Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - GGniner - 11-04-2009 04:39 PM Who can blame them: http://texasgop.org/news.asp?artid=85 as many as 50-70 are reportedly about to change from D to R in Texas to CYA after last night.
RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - DrTorch - 11-04-2009 04:51 PM Is that necessarily a good thing? More RINOs? I never completely understood this changing party thing. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - Claw - 11-04-2009 04:51 PM I may have to move to Texas. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - claytonbigsby - 11-04-2009 05:14 PM I think that's crap. You run as a democrat then switch parties to CYA? That's pretty low class. I'm sure I would trust them. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - GGniner - 11-04-2009 05:15 PM http://libertarianrepublican.blogspot.com/2009/11/huge-news-out-of-texas-73-democrat.html Quote:Commented Preston on the main reason for the Switching: Today's election results with Republicans on the verge of a blow-out and the fact that "Obama's name is becomming poison here in Texas." If you aren't a real marxist, this is a logical response. abandon ship RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - smn1256 - 11-04-2009 09:55 PM (11-04-2009 05:14 PM)claytonbigsby Wrote: I think that's crap. You run as a democrat then switch parties to CYA? That's pretty low class. I'm sure I would trust them. I think it's crap, too. And how do these guys think they'll get re-elected? Besides, it not what you call yourelf, it's how you vote. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - Rebel - 11-04-2009 09:58 PM (11-04-2009 05:14 PM)claytonbigsby Wrote: I think that's crap. You run as a democrat then switch parties to CYA? That's pretty low class. I'm sure I would trust them. I happen to agree with this as well. If you want to change parties, fine. Hold a special election and you pay for it. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - SumOfAllFears - 11-05-2009 06:39 AM They are leaving because the New Democratic Party has become a party of Obama radicals. Make that Socialists, Communists and Fascists. Code: Nov 4, 2009RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - Owl 69/70/75 - 11-05-2009 08:22 AM (11-04-2009 05:14 PM)claytonbigsby Wrote: I think that's crap. You run as a democrat then switch parties to CYA? That's pretty low class. I'm sure I would trust them. I've never understood this. Maybe it's because I have no party loyalty (I pretty much hate them all at this point). But I just don't see what difference it makes. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - I45owl - 11-05-2009 01:24 PM (11-04-2009 09:55 PM)smn1256 Wrote:(11-04-2009 05:14 PM)claytonbigsby Wrote: I think that's crap. You run as a democrat then switch parties to CYA? That's pretty low class. I'm sure I would trust them. It worked for Phil Graham (who I never trusted after his party switch - I didn't know much about him before then, though). The Democrats forced Graham's hand back in 1984 or so, so I guess this is somewhat different. And, changing what he called himself did change how he voted in congress, so it does matter. Typically, there is a fairly large proportion of votes that are determined by the party whips, etc, compared to votes that are done to represent the district or that are done on principle. IMHO, that is doubly so for the kind of politicians that switch parties on someone's whim. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - claytonbigsby - 11-05-2009 01:31 PM Richard Shelby and Arlen Spector did it too. Lieberman at least ran as an independent, but he's a weisel for trying to be the Democratic(2000) and Republican(2008) VP nominee. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - BlazerFan11 - 11-05-2009 02:07 PM (11-04-2009 09:55 PM)smn1256 Wrote:(11-04-2009 05:14 PM)claytonbigsby Wrote: I think that's crap. You run as a democrat then switch parties to CYA? That's pretty low class. I'm sure I would trust them. Unfortunately, that isn't true for much of the mindless masses. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - Owl 69/70/75 - 11-05-2009 02:22 PM (11-05-2009 01:24 PM)I45owl Wrote: It worked for Phil Graham (who I never trusted after his party switch - I didn't know much about him before then, though). The Democrats forced Graham's hand back in 1984 or so, so I guess this is somewhat different. And, changing what he called himself did change how he voted in congress, so it does matter. Are you aware of significant votes where he voted in a manner after the switch that was inconsistent with how he voted before the switch? I'm not, your post would imply that you are, and I'd be interested in knowing about them. RE: Elected Texas Dems change Registration to Republican today - I45owl - 11-05-2009 02:44 PM (11-05-2009 02:22 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:(11-05-2009 01:24 PM)I45owl Wrote: It worked for Phil Graham (who I never trusted after his party switch - I didn't know much about him before then, though). The Democrats forced Graham's hand back in 1984 or so, so I guess this is somewhat different. And, changing what he called himself did change how he voted in congress, so it does matter. I can't cite anything out of his voting record, so I'm just posting on my perception. Looking at wikipedia, it seems I forgot that he resigned his seat in 1983 and won as a Republican in a special election (he only spent 6 years in the House, 4 as a Democrat, 2 as a Republican). I didn't assert that significant votes changed, either - those are not the ones controlled by party whips. I would assert - without being able to back it up - that there were a number of insignificant votes that changed. But, insignificant votes are the stock and trade of Washington, and that's the death of 1000 cuts that bleeds our country dry. |