+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Sports Bar (/forum-531.html)
+----- Forum: Pro Sports (/forum-516.html)
+----- Thread: Double Standard applied to Pete Rose?? (/thread-225653.html)
- rickheel - 03-08-2002 09:12 AM
Seems as though there was....
<a href="http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/2002/0307/1347467.html" target="_blank">http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/2002/0307/1347467.html</a>
- admin - 03-08-2002 09:36 AM
3 greatest shams in baseball: no shoeless joe in the hall of fame, no pete rose, and no team in DC
- rickheel - 03-08-2002 04:20 PM
They still have not gotten over how bad the Senators were!
- admin - 03-08-2002 11:27 PM
just wanted to use the baseball icon....and to say that the expos are easily the senators match in terms of futility so it should be a good fit for DC!!!
- EatLeadCommie - 03-10-2002 05:38 PM
the difference is that they apparently did not bet on baseball. That's a big difference.
- rickheel - 03-11-2002 07:37 PM
I do not for a minute believe they did not bet on baseball. If they bet sports, they bet baseball. Do you really think that Vincent would have allowed baseball to be tarnished by admitting the umps had bet on games? They may have been unable to find evidence, or so they say, but I honestly believe the umps bet on baseball. It was, at times, the only game in town....