CSNbbs
Casey for MVP!!!!! - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Sports Bar (/forum-531.html)
+----- Forum: Pro Sports (/forum-516.html)
+----- Thread: Casey for MVP!!!!! (/thread-217570.html)

Pages: 1 2 3

- JFlight21 - 06-03-2004 09:36 AM

This guy is playing out of his mind. Hitting over .390 with 10 long balls and 42 RBI's. Who is playing better this year?????

- Herd Fan 4-Life - 06-03-2004 11:58 AM

He's already Mayor....how about MVP?

- tysramm1 - 06-03-2004 03:25 PM

catfanjw21 Wrote:This guy is playing out of his mind. Hitting over .390 with 10 long balls and 42 RBI's. Who is playing better this year?????
vlad has been better

- JFlight21 - 06-03-2004 04:51 PM

Smarta$$ 05-nono

- jrhessey - 06-04-2004 07:57 AM

catfanjw21 Wrote:This guy is playing out of his mind. Hitting over .390 with 10 long balls and 42 RBI's. Who is playing better this year?????
he'll continue to play this well as long as guy in Herd's sig continues to protect him...

- Hardcore Husky - 06-04-2004 07:43 PM

Vladamir or Casey should be the MVP. 04-bow 04-rock

- cbfranchise3 - 06-04-2004 08:36 PM

It doesn't really matter who has been better, since Vlad and Casey are in separate leagues. :rolleyes:

I think neither will win it at the end of the year. It will be Pujols and Manny.

- 1125 - 06-04-2004 10:19 PM

Consistancy...Who can be the most consistant will take it

- tysramm1 - 06-05-2004 10:25 AM

rolen has been the best NL hitter so far

- axeme - 06-05-2004 01:24 PM

tysramm1 Wrote:rolen has been the best NL hitter so far
Quote:...Player....................AB    R H HR RBI BB SB BA OBP SLG

Casey, Sean 1B CIN 206 42 79 10 42 15 1 .383 .427 .631

Pujols, Albert 1B STL 201 51 63 17 40 37 2 .313 .420 .652

Rolen, Scott 3B STL 192 33 68 13 57 18 1 .354 .413 .630
I think you could make the case for any of the three if you lean on BA and OBP and Hits, it's Casey. If you lean on power, Pujols has the HR's and SLG %, and Rolen has the RBI's.
If the season were to end today, it would be hard to argue with .383 and comparable power.
Ans: Casey.

- cbfranchise3 - 06-05-2004 01:35 PM

tysramm1 Wrote:rolen has been the best NL hitter so far
When you say somebody is the best hitter, that means they have the highest BA. So that is incorrect.

- tysramm1 - 06-05-2004 02:13 PM

cbfranchise3 Wrote:
tysramm1 Wrote:rolen has been the best NL hitter so far
When you say somebody is the best hitter, that means they have the highest BA. So that is incorrect.
no that is definitely not true, you have to take into consideration when the hits come and what kind of hits they are, (HR as opposed to singles)

- flyingswoosh - 06-05-2004 02:33 PM

cbfranchise3 Wrote:
tysramm1 Wrote:rolen has been the best NL hitter so far
When you say somebody is the best hitter, that means they have the highest BA. So that is incorrect.
no, you're definitely wrong.

- cbfranchise3 - 06-05-2004 02:53 PM

Best hitter=best BA.

use another term for what you are talking about, like best offensive player in baseball, or best overall hitter. But the best plain hitter is simply who has the highest BA. Who gets the most hits when they come to the plate, no matter what kind or when they come.

This is just a situation of using the wrong term, thats all.

- 1125 - 06-05-2004 03:35 PM

cbfranchise3 Wrote:
tysramm1 Wrote:rolen has been the best NL hitter so far
When you say somebody is the best hitter, that means they have the highest BA. So that is incorrect.
How bout On Base %

- cbfranchise3 - 06-05-2004 04:06 PM

UCBearcats1125 Wrote:
cbfranchise3 Wrote:
tysramm1 Wrote:rolen has been the best NL hitter so far
When you say somebody is the best hitter, that means they have the highest BA. So that is incorrect.
How bout On Base %
That includes walks, errors, and being hit by pitches. Not just hitting.

- flyingswoosh - 06-05-2004 04:36 PM

cbfranchise3 Wrote:Best hitter=best BA.

use another term for what you are talking about, like best offensive player in baseball, or best overall hitter. But the best plain hitter is simply who has the highest BA. Who gets the most hits when they come to the plate, no matter what kind or when they come.

This is just a situation of using the wrong term, thats all.
actually, no. Where did you get this idea?

- flyingswoosh - 06-05-2004 04:39 PM

why can't bonds be considered the MVP. His numbers are every bit as good as casey's and pujols'.

BA: .360
Runs: 41
HR: 15
RBI: 31
BB: 74 (and only 10 strikeouts!)
OBP: .618
Slugging %: .829
OPS: obviously, 1.447

- GDawgs88 - 06-05-2004 05:35 PM

flyingswoosh Wrote:why can't bonds be considered the MVP. His numbers are every bit as good as casey's and pujols'.

BA: .360
Runs: 41
HR: 15
RBI: 31
BB: 74 (and only 10 strikeouts!)
OBP: .618
Slugging %: .829
OPS: obviously, 1.447
I think a lot of people are tired of Bonds because he wins it every year.

- flyingswoosh - 06-05-2004 06:02 PM

GDawgs88 Wrote:
flyingswoosh Wrote:why can't bonds be considered the MVP.  His numbers are every bit as good as casey's and pujols'.

BA: .360
Runs: 41
HR: 15
RBI: 31
BB: 74 (and only 10 strikeouts!)
OBP: .618
Slugging %: .829
OPS: obviously, 1.447
I think a lot of people are tired of Bonds because he wins it every year.
i can understand that. But i was just trying to prove that bonds' numbers are as good as any players' in baseball.