(11-12-2013 03:42 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:30 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 11:02 AM)gdunn Wrote:  My problem is this chart is 9 years old.

no your problem is that you dont like what the chart says.

theres very little change in those kinda trends over a single decade

You got a outdated image for that as well? How about one that says: "Not to be used as fact"?

It doesn't matter now what you post, I call BS on everything. I don't care if you tell me the sky is blue, you've proven yourself to be outdated and misinformed.

But since you're so smart, tell me what was that federal money spent on?

nah you just dont like hearing the facts. there hasnt exactly been any major population shift or military shift in between 04 & 13

You got a graph for that?

I don't like facts? Really? You're posting images that are not to be used for fact or are 10 years old. WTF are you smoking?

Tell you what John Boy, go find the data to back up your graph you posted and we'll have a conversation. I promise not to use big words.

i already posted a graph, go post a graph showing how different things are in that 9 year period.......

John, government spending doesn't relate strictly to the military. I used those for instances along with other examples.

I mean seriously, you're not doing yourself any favors.

(11-12-2013 03:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:30 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 11:02 AM)gdunn Wrote:  My problem is this chart is 9 years old.

no your problem is that you dont like what the chart says.

theres very little change in those kinda trends over a single decade

You got a outdated image for that as well? How about one that says: "Not to be used as fact"?

It doesn't matter now what you post, I call BS on everything. I don't care if you tell me the sky is blue, you've proven yourself to be outdated and misinformed.

But since you're so smart, tell me what was that federal money spent on?

nah you just dont like hearing the facts. there hasnt exactly been any major population shift or military shift in between 04 & 13

Yeah - that's why there actually HAS been a population shift in the last 10 years from north to south.

(11-12-2013 03:43 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:42 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:30 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no your problem is that you dont like what the chart says.

theres very little change in those kinda trends over a single decade

You got a outdated image for that as well? How about one that says: "Not to be used as fact"?

It doesn't matter now what you post, I call BS on everything. I don't care if you tell me the sky is blue, you've proven yourself to be outdated and misinformed.

But since you're so smart, tell me what was that federal money spent on?

nah you just dont like hearing the facts. there hasnt exactly been any major population shift or military shift in between 04 & 13

You got a graph for that?

I don't like facts? Really? You're posting images that are not to be used for fact or are 10 years old. WTF are you smoking?

Tell you what John Boy, go find the data to back up your graph you posted and we'll have a conversation. I promise not to use big words.

i already posted a graph, go post a graph showing how different things are in that 9 year period.......

An OUTDATED graph. Which would be thrown out if you were on a major news network. Your silly ass would be parodied on Jon Stewart that night.

(11-12-2013 03:44 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:30 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 11:02 AM)gdunn Wrote:  My problem is this chart is 9 years old.

no your problem is that you dont like what the chart says.

theres very little change in those kinda trends over a single decade

You got a outdated image for that as well? How about one that says: "Not to be used as fact"?

It doesn't matter now what you post, I call BS on everything. I don't care if you tell me the sky is blue, you've proven yourself to be outdated and misinformed.

But since you're so smart, tell me what was that federal money spent on?

nah you just dont like hearing the facts. there hasnt exactly been any major population shift or military shift in between 04 & 13

Yeah - that's why there actually HAS been a population shift in the last 10 years from north to south.

but nowhere near enough to sway the numbers dude

seriously leave it to homers like you to try to dispute something like this as irrelevant simply because you dont like what it shows

(11-12-2013 03:43 PM)gdunn Wrote:  John, government spending doesn't relate strictly to the military. I used those for instances along with other examples.

I mean seriously, you're not doing yourself any favors.

hey i didnt introduce military spending into this argument. that was your GOP buddies

The issue is perfectly valid.

The National Guard is a State instrumentality, meaning its governed by State law, not Federal.

Is where one receives funding primarily determinative as to which law should control? That's a valid question.

(11-12-2013 03:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:39 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:28 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:18 PM)john01992 Wrote:  oh so any perceived civil rights violations is irrelevant because it only happens to a few people? its not 5, the estimation from the article is over 1000.

but regardless of the estimation if its 1, 1000, or 10,000 IT DOES NOT MATTER because there is no excuse for this.

Estimation!!! Oh - okay. When the Federal Government uses the IRS to target conservative groups, if it's 1 or 1000 DOES NOT MATTER - except it's okay if it's for what you want. See how that works. I didn't see any threads you created about that issue voicing your indignation - and that was national in scope.

If Texas doesn't recognize same sex marrige - I guess those same sex marriage people can move to a state that does recognize it. Problem solved.

well no one should be forced to move to another state because their current state govt supports ignorance, bigotry, & hatred.

See, that's just your opinion. I'm sure there plenty of people that don't share your vision of ignorance, bigotry, and hatred. What if others don't believe in same sex marriage - just tough sh!t for them I suppose as long as your vision is met? BTW, I'm all for legal civil unions and believe that governments should stay out of the marriage business all together.......but it IS a state issue.

sorry but anything thats considered a civil rights issue is a federal issue. thats the same argument southerners used in the 1950s.

you can say you are against civil unions.....however thats the exact same issue here because texas is still trying to make it harder for both civil unions & gay marriage's

GOOD. This is the south, where people still have morale and values.

i just dont get it with cons. why would you get such a big kick out of making someone drive an extra 70 miles just to get the same federal benefits as you? that type of pointless hatred is beyond me.

(11-12-2013 04:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:39 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:28 PM)Crebman Wrote:  Estimation!!! Oh - okay. When the Federal Government uses the IRS to target conservative groups, if it's 1 or 1000 DOES NOT MATTER - except it's okay if it's for what you want. See how that works. I didn't see any threads you created about that issue voicing your indignation - and that was national in scope.

If Texas doesn't recognize same sex marrige - I guess those same sex marriage people can move to a state that does recognize it. Problem solved.

well no one should be forced to move to another state because their current state govt supports ignorance, bigotry, & hatred.

See, that's just your opinion. I'm sure there plenty of people that don't share your vision of ignorance, bigotry, and hatred. What if others don't believe in same sex marriage - just tough sh!t for them I suppose as long as your vision is met? BTW, I'm all for legal civil unions and believe that governments should stay out of the marriage business all together.......but it IS a state issue.

sorry but anything thats considered a civil rights issue is a federal issue. thats the same argument southerners used in the 1950s.

you can say you are against civil unions.....however thats the exact same issue here because texas is still trying to make it harder for both civil unions & gay marriage's

GOOD. This is the south, where people still have morale and values.

yeah......the wrong kind (as usual)

It isn't hatred.

(11-12-2013 04:04 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It isn't hatred.

(11-12-2013 04:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:39 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  well no one should be forced to move to another state because their current state govt supports ignorance, bigotry, & hatred.

See, that's just your opinion. I'm sure there plenty of people that don't share your vision of ignorance, bigotry, and hatred. What if others don't believe in same sex marriage - just tough sh!t for them I suppose as long as your vision is met? BTW, I'm all for legal civil unions and believe that governments should stay out of the marriage business all together.......but it IS a state issue.

sorry but anything thats considered a civil rights issue is a federal issue. thats the same argument southerners used in the 1950s.

you can say you are against civil unions.....however thats the exact same issue here because texas is still trying to make it harder for both civil unions & gay marriage's

GOOD. This is the south, where people still have morale and values.

yeah......the wrong kind (as usual)

Supporting two men or women getting married and accepting their lifestyle is disgusting and shows a lack of morale and class. The fact that you call that wrong goes to show exactly what kind of person you are, especially when you call it hatred. Nobody hates it, we just disagree with it. Liberal logic is unbelievable.

(11-12-2013 04:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:04 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It isn't hatred.

The WBC doesn't speak for most Texans, or ordinary Christians.

That's like me saying Lenin speaks for Democrats.

Pitiful example, come on man I thought you were smarter than that.

(11-12-2013 04:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:04 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It isn't hatred.

Perfect... A hate group who calls themselves a Baptist Church. Try again. Those idiots represent only themselves.

(11-12-2013 04:08 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 03:39 PM)Crebman Wrote:  See, that's just your opinion. I'm sure there plenty of people that don't share your vision of ignorance, bigotry, and hatred. What if others don't believe in same sex marriage - just tough sh!t for them I suppose as long as your vision is met? BTW, I'm all for legal civil unions and believe that governments should stay out of the marriage business all together.......but it IS a state issue.

sorry but anything thats considered a civil rights issue is a federal issue. thats the same argument southerners used in the 1950s.

you can say you are against civil unions.....however thats the exact same issue here because texas is still trying to make it harder for both civil unions & gay marriage's

GOOD. This is the south, where people still have morale and values.

yeah......the wrong kind (as usual)

Supporting two men or women getting married and accepting their lifestyle is disgusting and shows a lack of morale and class. The fact that you call that wrong goes to show exactly what kind of person you are, especially when you call it hatred. Nobody hates it, we just disagree with it. Liberal logic is unbelievable.

yeah we will never see eye to eye on this one.....

you dislike people without even meeting them simply because of who you are and want to deny them the same rights & benefits that you already have......

(11-12-2013 04:10 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:04 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It isn't hatred.

Perfect... A hate group who calls themselves a Baptist Church. Try again. Those idiots represent only themselves.

kinda like the family research council????

We have the same rights; we can all marry whomever we wish as long as it isn't your mother, brother, uncle, inanimate object, multiple people, an animal, or a person of the same sex.

(11-12-2013 04:14 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  We have the same rights; we can all marry whomever we wish as long as it isn't your mother, brother, uncle, inanimate object, multiple people, an animal, or a person of the same sex.

and thats the problem......

(11-12-2013 04:15 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-12-2013 04:14 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  We have the same rights; we can all marry whomever we wish as long as it isn't your mother, brother, uncle, inanimate object, multiple people, an animal, or a person of the same sex.

and thats the problem......

You completely missed the point.

That's disappointing.