Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
bitcruncher Offline
pepperoni roll psycho...
*

Posts: 61,859
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 526
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post: #241
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
IMO the SEC can forget about getting UNC and UVa. I doubt the ACC is going to break up now, or at any time in the future...
09-25-2013 09:06 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,171
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7899
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #242
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-25-2013 08:23 AM)oliveandblue Wrote:  Why are you so convinced that Delany wants to turn the B1G into a giant conglomerate of schools that don't exactly have everything in common with each other? What happens when the TV ratings fall a bit under what we thought they'd be?

The SEC is "just right" at 14 in my opinion - and should only go to 16 if it can net TWO of these four states in the process: North Carolina, Virginia, Oklahoma, Kansas.

2012-2013 TV ratings have shown us that Texas A&M is actually big enough to carry a significant number of Texas TV sets. You don't HAVE to take another Texas school unless you REALLY like them as an institution and don't mind sharing. There is still plenty of value left in the well (between AAC and Big XII schools) - but I don't think there is a need to go back to it for a LONG time.

I do not think that it is a smart move for Slive to offend the one school that has opened the doors of Texas football to the SEC. I think that the correct move for the SEC is to build a presence in North Carolina and Virginia. Adding two from NCSU/UNC/UVA/VT would offend nobody and bring a potential SEC network into many, many more homes.
Well said and I agree with the sentiment. But I will quibble only one point. If Texas wanted into any conference, who would turn them down? Hate 'em or not they add tremendous content value to television contracts, add academically, and most years are decent in all sports, and attend and travel well.

Outside of that you are exactly right. The only way the SEC goes to 18, or 20 is if Delany is doing the same. We would be forced to block a Big 10 incursion into the ACC, and most particularly into North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida.

There are plenty who would disagree with me, but the best way for the SEC to take a Virginia school and North Carolina school without destroying the ACC would be for Texas, Baylor, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to move to the ACC as a Western division and for the ACC to permit Virginia Tech and N.C. State to move to the SEC. This would permit the ACC footprint to remain the same in the East while adding the 27 million plus of Texas and Oklahoma. People in the ACC would ask why do this? The answer is simple, to keep the SEC from offering more, blocking, or taking a portion of those teams. The SEC, A&M, and everyone would be happier (including I think N.C. State). Perhaps Virginia Tech would be happier later when Beamer retires.

If not this, something like this could permit such a move without causing bad blood between the ACC and SEC. Chirp as we might at times we really have a great working relationship. Anyway that addition would make an ACCN more viable, add tremendous props to their football, and not significantly challenge the kingpins of their basketball schools. The SEC might not get their prime targets, but they would amicably get their desired markets. The move really shouldn't anger the Big 10 too much as they could still grab Kansas and either Iowa State or Connecticut (whom they have been in talks with for hockey) and make their bump up to 16 as well.
(This post was last modified: 09-25-2013 09:51 AM by JRsec.)
09-25-2013 09:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,171
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7899
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #243
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-25-2013 08:23 AM)oliveandblue Wrote:  Why are you so convinced that Delany wants to turn the B1G into a giant conglomerate of schools that don't exactly have everything in common with each other? What happens when the TV ratings fall a bit under what we thought they'd be?

The SEC is "just right" at 14 in my opinion - and should only go to 16 if it can net TWO of these four states in the process: North Carolina, Virginia, Oklahoma, Kansas.

2012-2013 TV ratings have shown us that Texas A&M is actually big enough to carry a significant number of Texas TV sets. You don't HAVE to take another Texas school unless you REALLY like them as an institution and don't mind sharing. There is still plenty of value left in the well (between AAC and Big XII schools) - but I don't think there is a need to go back to it for a LONG time.

I do not think that it is a smart move for Slive to offend the one school that has opened the doors of Texas football to the SEC. I think that the correct move for the SEC is to build a presence in North Carolina and Virginia. Adding two from NCSU/UNC/UVA/VT would offend nobody and bring a potential SEC network into many, many more homes.
Well said and I agree with the sentiment. But I will quibble only one point. If Texas wanted into any conference, who would turn them down? Hate 'em or not they add tremendous content value to television contracts, add academically, and most years are decent in all sports, and attend and travel well.

Outside of that you are exactly right. The only way the SEC goes to 18, or 20 is if Delany is doing the same. We would be forced to block a Big 10 incursion into the ACC, and most particularly into North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida.

There are plenty who would disagree with me, but the best way for the SEC to take a Virginia school and North Carolina school without destroying the ACC would be for Texas, Baylor, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to move to the ACC as a Western division and for the ACC to permit Virginia Tech and N.C. State to move to the SEC to permit their footprint to remain the same in the East while adding the 27 million plus of Texas and Oklahoma. People in the ACC would ask why do this? The answer is simple, to keep the SEC from offering more, blocking, or taking a portion of those teams. The SEC, A&M, and everyone would be happier (including I think N.C. State). Perhaps Virginia Tech would be happier later when Beamer retires.

If not this something like this could permit such a move without causing bad blood between the ACC and SEC. Chirp as we might at times we really have a great working relationship. Anyway that addition would make an ACCN more viable, add tremendous props to their football, and not significantly challenge the kingpins of their basketball schools. The SEC might not get their prime targets, but they would amicably get their desired markets. The move really shouldn't anger the Big 10 too much as they could still grab Kansas and either Iowa State or Connecticut (whom they have been in talks with for hockey) and make their bump up to 16 as well.
(This post was last modified: 09-25-2013 04:51 PM by JRsec.)
09-25-2013 09:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SeaBlue Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,191
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 43
I Root For: Michigan
Location: Indy
Post: #244
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
I really doubt B1G ever goes further south than Virginia.

Doesn't most of this speculation come down to what Texas does and when they do it?
09-25-2013 01:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bitcruncher Offline
pepperoni roll psycho...
*

Posts: 61,859
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 526
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post: #245
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
I doubt the B1G gets into Virginia either...
09-25-2013 01:45 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,358
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #246
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
And I will quibble not with the idea that it could happen (we could very well be out voted) but with the idea that A&M would be HAPPY with bringing in OU, UT and (especially) BU.

We would be the opposite of happy.

Having them rot in the B12 for another 20 years would make us VERY happy! 03-wink
09-25-2013 02:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #247
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-25-2013 01:45 PM)bitcruncher Wrote:  I doubt the B1G gets into Virginia either...

There's not much that the B1G can offer to UVa that it can't get for itself. Coupled with a nearly $5 Billion endowment and powerful alums in and around the DC metro gives the Wahoos all the leverage they could want.
09-25-2013 02:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SeaBlue Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,191
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 43
I Root For: Michigan
Location: Indy
Post: #248
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
I didn't mean to imply that Virginia would go to B1G, but let the Maryland move sink in for a few years and then if the ACC starts getting pulled apart again... Suddenly Virginia might have something in common with Michigan, Wiscy and Northwestern.
(This post was last modified: 09-25-2013 02:52 PM by SeaBlue.)
09-25-2013 02:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
He1nousOne Offline
The One you Love to Hate.
*

Posts: 13,285
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 215
I Root For: Iowa/ASU
Location: Arizona
Post: #249
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
Yeah, Virginia doesn't need the Big Ten like Maryland did. That is why I had Maryland listed in pretty much every scenario as far as them leaving the ACC. Virginia would pick the Big Ten should the scene lead to programs leaving the Big Ten but I really don't think they feel any pressure to do so at this time.
09-25-2013 07:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,171
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7899
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #250
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-25-2013 07:40 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  Yeah, Virginia doesn't need the Big Ten like Maryland did. That is why I had Maryland listed in pretty much every scenario as far as them leaving the ACC. Virginia would pick the Big Ten should the scene lead to programs leaving the Big Ten but I really don't think they feel any pressure to do so at this time.

I think you meant "should the scene lead to programs leaving the ACC" but I got your point. I do think if the ACC ever gets breached that Virginia of all of what were once considered Southern schools would be the most likely to lean to the Big 10. I think North Carolina would lean toward the SEC. It would be very interesting to see if North Carolina would rather be with Virginia, or if Virginia would rather be with North Carolina and Duke. We may wait quite awhile to find out the answer to that one, unless there is no ACCN forthcoming.
09-25-2013 08:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oliveandblue Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,781
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Tulane
Location:
Post: #251
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
Question: Why would Texas A&M be offended by Oklahoma joining the SEC - if they were to join alone? Did Oklahoma do something to tick off the Aggies before?
09-25-2013 09:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #252
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
Olive: Not to put word's in 10th's mouth, but currently A&M offers a unique experiences to Texas HSFB players; play in the best CFB conference and stay in Texas. While a completely different state, OU heavily recruits Texas and thus would be able to offer a similar enticement if allowed in the SEC.
09-26-2013 07:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,358
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #253
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
Van has it correct.

The Okie schools are defacto Texas schools when it comes to recruiting Texas kids.

Nobody has been more hurt in recruiting by our move than OU because now a lot of those blue chip TX kids who were choosing OU in the original B12 are instead jumping at the offer of "why leave the state when you can stay here and play in the SEC"

As one recruit put it "Oklahoma is a great program...but Texas A&M plays in the SEC and if you wanna play on Sundays you wanna play in the SEC"

We would be stupid to vote "yes" on an expansion that took that advantage away and re-empowered OU in TX recruiting.

We may not get our way, but A&M will be a firm member of the "stay at 14 until and unless we get an opportunity to get into the NC/VA markets" group
09-26-2013 08:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oliveandblue Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,781
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Tulane
Location:
Post: #254
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-26-2013 08:43 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  Van has it correct.

The Okie schools are defacto Texas schools when it comes to recruiting Texas kids.

Nobody has been more hurt in recruiting by our move than OU because now a lot of those blue chip TX kids who were choosing OU in the original B12 are instead jumping at the offer of "why leave the state when you can stay here and play in the SEC"

As one recruit put it "Oklahoma is a great program...but Texas A&M plays in the SEC and if you wanna play on Sundays you wanna play in the SEC"

We would be stupid to vote "yes" on an expansion that took that advantage away and re-empowered OU in TX recruiting.

We may not get our way, but A&M will be a firm member of the "stay at 14 until and unless we get an opportunity to get into the NC/VA markets" group

I wasn't all too aware of how OU recruits. Thanks for the reply.

I've seen a lot of quality NFL guys come from outside of the SEC/B1G. The SEC has done a great job of selling the NFL angle, however - and that will wind up scoring them recruits they wouldn't normally have access to in the future.

If I were Oklahoma, I would just "go national" in my recruiting now that A&M is in the SEC. The Oklahoma brand (good school as well, but I'm talking about the football brand) is outstanding, and in my opinion it transcends the reach of the Big XII.

----------------

Looking at why recruits prefer the SEC these days:

There are some ugly flaws in the "SEC logic" AND SEC establishment.

Slive's administration - and all of the SEC school leaders - damn well know this, and therefore they choose to compensate by doing a great job of marketing who they are PLANNING TO BE to recruits, fans, and even potential students. If you tell enough people that you are the greatest, eventually everyone believes it - and that includes future five-star players.

There's a lesson to be learned from the SEC's growth. It follows this tried and true phrase: "If you don't believe in yourself, no one else will". The SEC built an elite football product by capitalizing on their biggest flaws (arrogance and conceit) - and converting them into positive features (confidence and aggression).

It went down like this:
1. SEC tells everyone they are the greatest (when they're not).
2. Recruits hear nothing but "SEC is the greatest".
3. Recruits like the new-found SEC "confidence", and sign in to the system at hand.
4. SEC schools experience on-field dominance thanks to improved recruiting driven by their own arrogance.
5. The SEC is now ACTUALLY THE BEST, and what was once known to be "SEC arrogance" becomes "SEC confidence and accomplishment".

The beauty of it isn't the result (SEC = #1 football conference). The beauty of it is the masterfully engineered public deception that laid the foundation for nearly a DECADE of SEC dominance.
(This post was last modified: 09-26-2013 09:35 AM by oliveandblue.)
09-26-2013 09:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigblueblindness Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,073
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 53
I Root For: UK, Lipscomb
Location: Kentucky
Post: #255
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-26-2013 09:33 AM)oliveandblue Wrote:  
(09-26-2013 08:43 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  Van has it correct.

The Okie schools are defacto Texas schools when it comes to recruiting Texas kids.

Nobody has been more hurt in recruiting by our move than OU because now a lot of those blue chip TX kids who were choosing OU in the original B12 are instead jumping at the offer of "why leave the state when you can stay here and play in the SEC"

As one recruit put it "Oklahoma is a great program...but Texas A&M plays in the SEC and if you wanna play on Sundays you wanna play in the SEC"

We would be stupid to vote "yes" on an expansion that took that advantage away and re-empowered OU in TX recruiting.

We may not get our way, but A&M will be a firm member of the "stay at 14 until and unless we get an opportunity to get into the NC/VA markets" group

I wasn't all too aware of how OU recruits. Thanks for the reply.

I've seen a lot of quality NFL guys come from outside of the SEC/B1G. The SEC has done a great job of selling the NFL angle, however - and that will wind up scoring them recruits they wouldn't normally have access to in the future.

If I were Oklahoma, I would just "go national" in my recruiting now that A&M is in the SEC. The Oklahoma brand (good school as well, but I'm talking about the football brand) is outstanding, and in my opinion it transcends the reach of the Big XII.

----------------

Looking at why recruits prefer the SEC these days:

There are some ugly flaws in the "SEC logic" AND SEC establishment.

Slive's administration - and all of the SEC school leaders - damn well know this, and therefore they choose to compensate by doing a great job of marketing who they are PLANNING TO BE to recruits, fans, and even potential students. If you tell enough people that you are the greatest, eventually everyone believes it - and that includes future five-star players.

There's a lesson to be learned from the SEC's growth. It follows this tried and true phrase: "If you don't believe in yourself, no one else will". The SEC built an elite football product by capitalizing on their biggest flaws (arrogance and conceit) - and converting them into positive features (confidence and aggression).

It went down like this:
1. SEC tells everyone they are the greatest (when they're not).
2. Recruits hear nothing but "SEC is the greatest".
3. Recruits like the new-found SEC "confidence", and sign in to the system at hand.
4. SEC schools experience on-field dominance thanks to improved recruiting driven by their own arrogance.
5. The SEC is now ACTUALLY THE BEST, and what was once known to be "SEC arrogance" becomes "SEC confidence and accomplishment".

The beauty of it isn't the result (SEC = #1 football conference). The beauty of it is the masterfully engineered public deception that laid the foundation for nearly a DECADE of SEC dominance.

Looks like the SEC has already won, Olive... you are thinking way too much about them 04-cheers

On this board, we are not Houston, Cincy, or UConn fans that feel compelled to spit out our resume every time it is questioned. This would be a good topic for the general board.
09-26-2013 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oliveandblue Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,781
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Tulane
Location:
Post: #256
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-26-2013 09:52 AM)bigblueblindness Wrote:  
(09-26-2013 09:33 AM)oliveandblue Wrote:  
(09-26-2013 08:43 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  Van has it correct.

The Okie schools are defacto Texas schools when it comes to recruiting Texas kids.

Nobody has been more hurt in recruiting by our move than OU because now a lot of those blue chip TX kids who were choosing OU in the original B12 are instead jumping at the offer of "why leave the state when you can stay here and play in the SEC"

As one recruit put it "Oklahoma is a great program...but Texas A&M plays in the SEC and if you wanna play on Sundays you wanna play in the SEC"

We would be stupid to vote "yes" on an expansion that took that advantage away and re-empowered OU in TX recruiting.

We may not get our way, but A&M will be a firm member of the "stay at 14 until and unless we get an opportunity to get into the NC/VA markets" group

I wasn't all too aware of how OU recruits. Thanks for the reply.

I've seen a lot of quality NFL guys come from outside of the SEC/B1G. The SEC has done a great job of selling the NFL angle, however - and that will wind up scoring them recruits they wouldn't normally have access to in the future.

If I were Oklahoma, I would just "go national" in my recruiting now that A&M is in the SEC. The Oklahoma brand (good school as well, but I'm talking about the football brand) is outstanding, and in my opinion it transcends the reach of the Big XII.

----------------

Looking at why recruits prefer the SEC these days:

There are some ugly flaws in the "SEC logic" AND SEC establishment.

Slive's administration - and all of the SEC school leaders - damn well know this, and therefore they choose to compensate by doing a great job of marketing who they are PLANNING TO BE to recruits, fans, and even potential students. If you tell enough people that you are the greatest, eventually everyone believes it - and that includes future five-star players.

There's a lesson to be learned from the SEC's growth. It follows this tried and true phrase: "If you don't believe in yourself, no one else will". The SEC built an elite football product by capitalizing on their biggest flaws (arrogance and conceit) - and converting them into positive features (confidence and aggression).

It went down like this:
1. SEC tells everyone they are the greatest (when they're not).
2. Recruits hear nothing but "SEC is the greatest".
3. Recruits like the new-found SEC "confidence", and sign in to the system at hand.
4. SEC schools experience on-field dominance thanks to improved recruiting driven by their own arrogance.
5. The SEC is now ACTUALLY THE BEST, and what was once known to be "SEC arrogance" becomes "SEC confidence and accomplishment".

The beauty of it isn't the result (SEC = #1 football conference). The beauty of it is the masterfully engineered public deception that laid the foundation for nearly a DECADE of SEC dominance.

Looks like the SEC has already won, Olive... you are thinking way too much about them 04-cheers

On this board, we are not Houston, Cincy, or UConn fans that feel compelled to spit out our resume every time it is questioned. This would be a good topic for the general board.

The SEC has absolutely won, bigblue. To be honest I'm just impressed at how they did it - they took the next step from "great conference" to "superpower". Congratulations - and enjoy the ride.

A school like LSU, UF, UGA, Tennessee, or A&M doesn't need to say who they are since they ARE the known quantity at this point.
09-26-2013 10:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,358
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #257
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
Doesn't hurt when your conference has more draftees than the next 3 combined either 03-wink
09-26-2013 10:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigblueblindness Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,073
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 53
I Root For: UK, Lipscomb
Location: Kentucky
Post: #258
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
(09-26-2013 10:01 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  Doesn't hurt when your conference has more draftees than the next 3 combined either 03-wink

I admit that I did smile a bit when the ACC was tied for the 2nd most draft picks last year with the SEC...... East. The ACC and SEC East each had 31 picks.

The SEC West had the most draftees with 32. It is just crazy that one SEC division had more draft picks than any other conference, and the other division was tied for 2nd.
09-26-2013 10:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,171
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7899
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #259
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
I'll offer a counter viewpoint on why the rise of the SEC has been as great as it has been.

The South was not a pro union region. The first moves of corporations were not overseas but rather away from pro union states. So the economy of the South particularly the Southeast which did not have the money from oil and was therefore more accommodating to industrial location attracted jobs and money that once resided elsewhere in the nation.

2. The South has had a long long family history of father's and son's who played athletics whether baseball, football or both. Culturally no part of the nation supported the government policies of the Viet Nam era more completely than did the Southeast and Southwest. God, Country, Family are interwoven into the fabric of the Southeast and Southwest and were still very dominant themes in the 70's and 80's when those values were slipping away in the West, Northeast, and parts of the Midwest. As those values slipped elsewhere dedication and encouragement of combative sports like football began to slip with them somewhat.

3. The South remained more rural than many parts of the West and Northeast. Kids grew up working outdoors in farming, saw milling, ranching, or some field related to one of the above. They fished and hunted and were interested in martial activities and their natural aggression found outlets in those activities and in sports and they grew in self confidence not out of hype (that's B.S.) but out of experience in relying upon themselves.

4. In small towns and rural areas in the South where there was new money from jobs locating near their communities even the poor could afford to buy their kids football pads and encourage their participation in organized sports which until there were more than a few channels on television were the communities' favorite avenue of entertainment. The children enjoyed the adulation of the parents, the parents enjoyed the adulation of the community, and the community enjoyed the successes of their sports teams.

Prior to the jobs however the poor kids didn't get to participate as much as the middle and upper income kids did. So this was a huge turning point for the Southeast. Prior to that time poor kids, particularly poor African American kids had limited access to sports and community support. The so called great era of the Big 10 had two issues going for it. In the 50's through the early 70's Jim Crow didn't affect Big 10 athletics. Talented Southern black kids could get a scholarship in the Big 10 and their parents could get jobs in the North. Hence the strength of the Big 10 was enhanced. In the 70's that started to change for many reasons. Jobs leaving, the death of Jim Crow in the South, the first scholarships offered to African American kids to go to SEC schools, and the end of African American migration North. Most black families are very conservative when it comes to Christian values. With opportunities being opened to them in the South the motivation to leave for a less culturally suitable areas of the country became less appealing.

5. With the advent of the electronic age the South has been one of the last areas, in the rural portions, to suffer the disinterest in sports that many of the kids of today eschew in favor of video games and other forms of electronic entertainment. Perhaps it is only in the rural South and Southwest that boys are still expected to show their manhood in competition, and where some of them still prefer the outdoors to the video monitor. What you are now seeing as the SEC dominance has nothing to do with arrogance, it has everything to do with a culture that still encourages sports, still supports sports from the pee wee ranks up through high school, and still goes nuts over college athletics. Do you think attendance records in the South are just part of hype as well? There are three very successful programs in the Big 10 (Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State). They also have the largest populations and in the rural areas the values that still support sports like in the South. Outside of those schools and the SEC the rest of the nation just doesn't turn out to support their sports programs. I would argue that Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State ought to join the Texas schools and Oklahoma schools in the SEC because their fans share the same habits of support.

In rural areas of the South everybody still turns out on Friday nights to watch the local high school teams, even if they have no children playing. That's no longer the case in the cities of the South where sports attendance for high school games is practically nil. Yankees will tell you that's because high schools can't compete with other forms of entertainment. That's B.S.. It's because their is no sense of pride or of community in cities where neighbors do not know each other by name, and everyone is carefully trained to be afraid of everybody else. Birmingham, Atlanta, New Orleans, Jacksonville, Knoxville, Savannah, and Nashville all suffer from low support of high school athletics. Small town South has no such problem in most locations. Community pride is still the motivation for the turnout. The kids are still cheered during the week the same as they are on Friday night, and their parents are congratulated at work as well as after the games. This happens because in small towns across the South people still know each other whether they are in the same social class or not and Friday's are cohesion events.

6. The SEC is at a zenith because it represents the last of what once made America great. It wan't always representative of this and it wasn't always great. But it's probably the last part of America where there is small town cohesion coupled with jobs, coupled with a still viable middle class, coupled with sports traditions, coupled with kids who aren't raised to be gang members, druggies, or video wusses, because their parents encourage them, their daddy's have jobs, their church families encourage them, their communities are proud of them, and they are encouraged to be better than even they think they can be. Therefore they produce. They love sports. And they are in sufficient numbers to make the success of their local college teams apparent.

But even the South is losing that. It is being replaced by the narcissistic spoiled me first wealthy kids who have never participated in a true team endeavor and only know what mamma and daddy can buy them, the drug doing lazy latch key middle class kids who only aspire to be Beavis and Butthead and are afraid of the physicality of competition, and the poor kids who have no daddies, whose mom's are working two and three jobs to keep their families fed, who have no community support or faith based support to encourage them and have only the gangs to support them in an ever increasing violent society. In other words Olive and Blue the sickness that is an immoral America is infecting the deep South and Southwest and what was one of the few remaining pockets of community oriented life is dying here too. It has come in through electronic cultures influence and with those corporate jobs that started locating here in the 70's, and through a general disillusionment in the structures of our society. No faith in government. No faith in religious institutions. No faith in justice. No faith ultimately in each other. It's New York and Los Angeles spread everywhere and its disgusting.

What you call the success of the SEC is really just the only vestige of what made this country that is still left around. When it dies out the nation will truly just be a shell of its former self and when our technology is no longer paramount someone else will kick our butts. China is first in line. Look at the folks around you every day and ask yourself this question, "if we were under assault by an enemy invader who here would risk their life for me?" Because a nation that can't stick up for each other is destined to die individually. When we have no community, no civic and national pride, no sense of teamwork, and no cohesion we are toast.
(This post was last modified: 09-26-2013 11:26 AM by JRsec.)
09-26-2013 10:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oliveandblue Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,781
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Tulane
Location:
Post: #260
RE: If the SEC did expand again and did so from the Big 12 who should we take and why?
When Katrina hit New Orleans, the city (and Tulane, for that matter) lost a whole lot. The billions of dollars in damages that took place are probably never going to be remedied (what a great first-world country we are). However, what did take place for a few years in the city (and still exists in some element today) was a re-commitment of individuals to their neighborhoods. People in the city were reminded of the fact that your number one support network consists of the people that are directly in front of your face - and not a distant federal body of governance. While New Orleans will continue to be ravaged by drugs in the bad sections of the city - drug issues are prevalent in many US cities for that matter - there were a number of communities that returned back to their tighter roots out of necessity. The idea of rebuilding New Orleans was never a federal setup - it was mostly devised by charity groups, community leaders, and the men and women in your neighborhood.

I miss that part of New Orleans. It taught me that your number one source of protection wasn't the law or welfare - it was the people that were the prize.

Thanks to New Orleans, I now believe that cultural protection is stronger than government protection.

I understand your point about the South's definition of "community" - even if I think of it from another perspective.

I remember a Bill Hicks stand-up piece where he said something along the lines of "you have your southern football team, even if you never went to school there - it's a family thing".
09-26-2013 11:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.