(07-30-2013 09:56 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:52 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:46 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:43 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  facts are facts buddy and you are mad about those facts. That's telling. I don't want the locusts invading my state. It's that simple. You can call me a bigot until you are red with fury. That doesn't change the fact that I am right about what is happening.

Your reasoning is illogical and you are an idiot bigot if you think all Californians are liberals. You are an embarrassment to conservatives and to people with a brain.

Dude, go take a cold shower. I never said all Californians are liberals. However, if they are anything like you, they sure as hell aren't conservatives.

Show me how I'm not conservative. I challenge you.

Because you argue and think like a liberal. You are in denial about how states closer to CA have already fallen victim to fleeing CA liberals.

Hope you never leave OK

(07-30-2013 09:56 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:52 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:46 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:43 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  facts are facts buddy and you are mad about those facts. That's telling. I don't want the locusts invading my state. It's that simple. You can call me a bigot until you are red with fury. That doesn't change the fact that I am right about what is happening.

Your reasoning is illogical and you are an idiot bigot if you think all Californians are liberals. You are an embarrassment to conservatives and to people with a brain.

Dude, go take a cold shower. I never said all Californians are liberals. However, if they are anything like you, they sure as hell aren't conservatives.

Show me how I'm not conservative. I challenge you.

Because you argue and think like a liberal. You are in denial about how states closer to CA have already fallen victim to fleeing CA liberals.

Prove any of that that you just said about me.

(07-30-2013 10:00 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:46 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  You are Mr. History how many years has Texas been democratic or republican?

Texas has always been conservative regardless of party affiliation.

The point is this has happened in all blue states. Liberals destroy one host, then migrate to new one. Rinse and repeat.

Nice way to deflect the answer

Being democrat doesn't always mean being liberal. I didn't deflect. I bypassed your fallacy. Oklahoma has more registered Democrats, yet all 77 counties go for the GOP.

Wait a minute that certainly didn't appear to be what you were saying a few days ago when you were so sure NC was being Californicaated. According to you if you had a D by your name you were liberal. Let's be consistent here Okie.

Three things. Oklahoma has a Dixiecrat background. They are true blue dogs. That means they tend to vote for the conservative party. This simply means Oklahoma is home to many of the old south democrats. I don't know much about North Carolina democrats, but they are on the verge of turning your state blue. What does that tell you?

In California, Democrats have a super majority. California democrats tend to be liberal democrats or progressives. This is because they are far from the solid south or bible belt. So they are like night and day when compared to many of our democrats. Considering how little power the GOP has in CA, deductive reasoning leads me to the conclusion they will not be voting GOP.
They are exactly what our outnumbered and angry liberals are really need to be competitive.

The Californians that are fleeing tend to be lower income families. There are several studies out now that show that. That group tends to be on the left.

Any questions?

(07-30-2013 10:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:00 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Texas has always been conservative regardless of party affiliation.

The point is this has happened in all blue states. Liberals destroy one host, then migrate to new one. Rinse and repeat.

Nice way to deflect the answer

Being democrat doesn't always mean being liberal. I didn't deflect. I bypassed your fallacy. Oklahoma has more registered Democrats, yet all 77 counties go for the GOP.

Wait a minute that certainly didn't appear to be what you were saying a few days ago when you were so sure NC was being Californicaated. According to you if you had a D by your name you were liberal. Let's be consistent here Okie.

Three things. Oklahoma has a Dixiecrat background. They are true blue dogs. That means they tend to vote for the conservative party. This simply means Oklahoma is home to many of the old south democrats. I don't know much about North Carolina democrats, but they are on the verge of turning your state blue. What does that tell you?

In California, Democrats have a super majority. California democrats tend to be liberal democrats or progressives. This is because they are far from the solid south or bible belt. So they are like night and day when compared to many of our democrats. Considering how little power the GOP has in CA, deductive reasoning leads me to the conclusion they will not be voting GOP.
They are exactly what our outnumbered and angry liberals are really need to be competitive.

The Californians that are fleeing tend to be lower income families. There are several studies out now that show that. That group tends to be on the left.

Any questions?

The Californians I run into in Austin could buy and sell the two of us in a heartbeat.

(07-30-2013 10:02 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:56 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:52 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:46 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  Your reasoning is illogical and you are an idiot bigot if you think all Californians are liberals. You are an embarrassment to conservatives and to people with a brain.

Dude, go take a cold shower. I never said all Californians are liberals. However, if they are anything like you, they sure as hell aren't conservatives.

Show me how I'm not conservative. I challenge you.

Because you argue and think like a liberal. You are in denial about how states closer to CA have already fallen victim to fleeing CA liberals.

Prove any of that that you just said about me.

If you were conservative, you would understand the locust effect. You would say "yes, It can be a bad thing if enough far left zealots migrate to another state that is traditionally to the right. But instead, you resort to the age old liberal tactic: The ad hominem.

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:00 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  Nice way to deflect the answer

Being democrat doesn't always mean being liberal. I didn't deflect. I bypassed your fallacy. Oklahoma has more registered Democrats, yet all 77 counties go for the GOP.

Wait a minute that certainly didn't appear to be what you were saying a few days ago when you were so sure NC was being Californicaated. According to you if you had a D by your name you were liberal. Let's be consistent here Okie.

Three things. Oklahoma has a Dixiecrat background. They are true blue dogs. That means they tend to vote for the conservative party. This simply means Oklahoma is home to many of the old south democrats. I don't know much about North Carolina democrats, but they are on the verge of turning your state blue. What does that tell you?

In California, Democrats have a super majority. California democrats tend to be liberal democrats or progressives. This is because they are far from the solid south or bible belt. So they are like night and day when compared to many of our democrats. Considering how little power the GOP has in CA, deductive reasoning leads me to the conclusion they will not be voting GOP.
They are exactly what our outnumbered and angry liberals are really need to be competitive.

The Californians that are fleeing tend to be lower income families. There are several studies out now that show that. That group tends to be on the left.

Any questions?

The Californians I run into in Austin could buy and sell the two of us in a heartbeat.

Then why are they in Austin? And that statement doesn't mean anything. You are wanting me to take your word for it without offering any clue to how they acquired their wealth.

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:02 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:56 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:52 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Dude, go take a cold shower. I never said all Californians are liberals. However, if they are anything like you, they sure as hell aren't conservatives.

Show me how I'm not conservative. I challenge you.

Because you argue and think like a liberal. You are in denial about how states closer to CA have already fallen victim to fleeing CA liberals.

Prove any of that that you just said about me.

If you were conservative, you would understand the locust effect. You would say "yes, It can be a bad thing if enough far left zealots migrate to another state that is traditionally to the right. But instead, you resort to the age old liberal tactic: The ad hominem.

You are making up anecdotal proof. Try again, with something that I actually said/typed.

By the way, your deductive reasoning is not deducing right.

(07-30-2013 10:14 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:00 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Being democrat doesn't always mean being liberal. I didn't deflect. I bypassed your fallacy. Oklahoma has more registered Democrats, yet all 77 counties go for the GOP.

Wait a minute that certainly didn't appear to be what you were saying a few days ago when you were so sure NC was being Californicaated. According to you if you had a D by your name you were liberal. Let's be consistent here Okie.

Three things. Oklahoma has a Dixiecrat background. They are true blue dogs. That means they tend to vote for the conservative party. This simply means Oklahoma is home to many of the old south democrats. I don't know much about North Carolina democrats, but they are on the verge of turning your state blue. What does that tell you?

In California, Democrats have a super majority. California democrats tend to be liberal democrats or progressives. This is because they are far from the solid south or bible belt. So they are like night and day when compared to many of our democrats. Considering how little power the GOP has in CA, deductive reasoning leads me to the conclusion they will not be voting GOP.
They are exactly what our outnumbered and angry liberals are really need to be competitive.

The Californians that are fleeing tend to be lower income families. There are several studies out now that show that. That group tends to be on the left.

Any questions?

The Californians I run into in Austin could buy and sell the two of us in a heartbeat.

Then why are they in Austin? And that statement doesn't mean anything. You are wanting me to take your word for it without offering any clue to how they acquired their wealth.

Umm, Austin is a technology hub. You don't get out much do you?

(07-30-2013 10:15 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:02 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:56 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  Show me how I'm not conservative. I challenge you.

Because you argue and think like a liberal. You are in denial about how states closer to CA have already fallen victim to fleeing CA liberals.

Prove any of that that you just said about me.

If you were conservative, you would understand the locust effect. You would say "yes, It can be a bad thing if enough far left zealots migrate to another state that is traditionally to the right. But instead, you resort to the age old liberal tactic: The ad hominem.

You are making up anecdotal proof. Try again, with something that I actually said/typed.

By the way, your deductive reasoning is not deducing right.

The only counter argument you have offered is to call me an idiot and a bigot. So until you can come up with a way to prove my point about Colorado and Oregon wrong, you have nothing.

(07-30-2013 10:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:00 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:53 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Texas has always been conservative regardless of party affiliation.

The point is this has happened in all blue states. Liberals destroy one host, then migrate to new one. Rinse and repeat.

Nice way to deflect the answer

Being democrat doesn't always mean being liberal. I didn't deflect. I bypassed your fallacy. Oklahoma has more registered Democrats, yet all 77 counties go for the GOP.

Wait a minute that certainly didn't appear to be what you were saying a few days ago when you were so sure NC was being Californicaated. According to you if you had a D by your name you were liberal. Let's be consistent here Okie.

Three things. Oklahoma has a Dixiecrat background. They are true blue dogs. That means they tend to vote for the conservative party. This simply means Oklahoma is home to many of the old south democrats. I don't know much about North Carolina democrats, but they are on the verge of turning your state blue. What does that tell you?

In California, Democrats have a super majority. California democrats tend to be liberal democrats or progressives. This is because they are far from the solid south or bible belt. So they are like night and day when compared to many of our democrats. Considering how little power the GOP has in CA, deductive reasoning leads me to the conclusion they will not be voting GOP.
They are exactly what our outnumbered and angry liberals are really need to be competitive.

The Californians that are fleeing tend to be lower income families. There are several studies out now that show that. That group tends to be on the left.

Any questions?

I highlighted the key statement. You were certainly convinced you knew all about the Old North State a few days ago. I'm still looking around for these California transplants. Other than some military stationed at Ft Bragg I can count a total of one that I know and he is a Republican school teacher.

(07-30-2013 10:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:15 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:02 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:56 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Because you argue and think like a liberal. You are in denial about how states closer to CA have already fallen victim to fleeing CA liberals.

Prove any of that that you just said about me.

If you were conservative, you would understand the locust effect. You would say "yes, It can be a bad thing if enough far left zealots migrate to another state that is traditionally to the right. But instead, you resort to the age old liberal tactic: The ad hominem.

You are making up anecdotal proof. Try again, with something that I actually said/typed.

By the way, your deductive reasoning is not deducing right.

The only counter argument you have offered is to call me an idiot and a bigot. So until you can come up with a way to prove my point about Colorado and Oregon wrong, you have nothing.

You can't even prove that I said you were wrong about that. Guy...you don't seem to be catching on.

(07-30-2013 10:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:15 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:02 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 09:56 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Because you argue and think like a liberal. You are in denial about how states closer to CA have already fallen victim to fleeing CA liberals.

Prove any of that that you just said about me.

If you were conservative, you would understand the locust effect. You would say "yes, It can be a bad thing if enough far left zealots migrate to another state that is traditionally to the right. But instead, you resort to the age old liberal tactic: The ad hominem.

You are making up anecdotal proof. Try again, with something that I actually said/typed.

By the way, your deductive reasoning is not deducing right.

The only counter argument you have offered is to call me an idiot and a bigot. So until you can come up with a way to prove my point about Colorado and Oregon wrong, you have nothing.

Well you are a bigot so we know that is true, you keep digging a hole about the idiot part

(07-30-2013 10:16 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:14 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:00 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Wait a minute that certainly didn't appear to be what you were saying a few days ago when you were so sure NC was being Californicaated. According to you if you had a D by your name you were liberal. Let's be consistent here Okie.

Three things. Oklahoma has a Dixiecrat background. They are true blue dogs. That means they tend to vote for the conservative party. This simply means Oklahoma is home to many of the old south democrats. I don't know much about North Carolina democrats, but they are on the verge of turning your state blue. What does that tell you?

In California, Democrats have a super majority. California democrats tend to be liberal democrats or progressives. This is because they are far from the solid south or bible belt. So they are like night and day when compared to many of our democrats. Considering how little power the GOP has in CA, deductive reasoning leads me to the conclusion they will not be voting GOP.
They are exactly what our outnumbered and angry liberals are really need to be competitive.

The Californians that are fleeing tend to be lower income families. There are several studies out now that show that. That group tends to be on the left.

Any questions?

The Californians I run into in Austin could buy and sell the two of us in a heartbeat.

Then why are they in Austin? And that statement doesn't mean anything. You are wanting me to take your word for it without offering any clue to how they acquired their wealth.

Umm, Austin is a technology hub. You don't get out much do you?

So is Silicone Valley. You have many so called conservatives leaving CA for Texas but it's not because Austin is a technology hub. It has more to do with CA than it does Texas.

(07-30-2013 10:20 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:16 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:14 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Three things. Oklahoma has a Dixiecrat background. They are true blue dogs. That means they tend to vote for the conservative party. This simply means Oklahoma is home to many of the old south democrats. I don't know much about North Carolina democrats, but they are on the verge of turning your state blue. What does that tell you?

In California, Democrats have a super majority. California democrats tend to be liberal democrats or progressives. This is because they are far from the solid south or bible belt. So they are like night and day when compared to many of our democrats. Considering how little power the GOP has in CA, deductive reasoning leads me to the conclusion they will not be voting GOP.
They are exactly what our outnumbered and angry liberals are really need to be competitive.

The Californians that are fleeing tend to be lower income families. There are several studies out now that show that. That group tends to be on the left.

Any questions?

The Californians I run into in Austin could buy and sell the two of us in a heartbeat.

Then why are they in Austin? And that statement doesn't mean anything. You are wanting me to take your word for it without offering any clue to how they acquired their wealth.

Umm, Austin is a technology hub. You don't get out much do you?

So is Silicone Valley. You have many so called conservatives leaving CA for Texas but it's not because Austin is a technology hub. It has more to do with CA than it does Texas.

Ok, I call BS on that one. They are coming here for the jobs. I read the Austin Business Journal and Austin American Statesman daily and both say it is for the jobs.

Got you stumped on this one

(07-30-2013 10:24 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:20 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:16 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:14 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:12 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  The Californians I run into in Austin could buy and sell the two of us in a heartbeat.

Then why are they in Austin? And that statement doesn't mean anything. You are wanting me to take your word for it without offering any clue to how they acquired their wealth.

Umm, Austin is a technology hub. You don't get out much do you?

So is Silicone Valley. You have many so called conservatives leaving CA for Texas but it's not because Austin is a technology hub. It has more to do with CA than it does Texas.

Ok, I call BS on that one. They are coming here for the jobs. I read the Austin Business Journal and Austin American Statesman daily and both say it is for the jobs.

Got you stumped on this one

You're right they are, idiot. So I guess they can't buy and sell us both after all. You have only stumped yourself little one.

(07-30-2013 10:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:24 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:20 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:16 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:14 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Then why are they in Austin? And that statement doesn't mean anything. You are wanting me to take your word for it without offering any clue to how they acquired their wealth.

Umm, Austin is a technology hub. You don't get out much do you?

So is Silicone Valley. You have many so called conservatives leaving CA for Texas but it's not because Austin is a technology hub. It has more to do with CA than it does Texas.

Ok, I call BS on that one. They are coming here for the jobs. I read the Austin Business Journal and Austin American Statesman daily and both say it is for the jobs.

Got you stumped on this one

You're right they are, idiot. So I guess they can't buy and sell us both after all. You have only stumped yourself little one.

You said they were coming because of California not the jobs so what have you proven?

Just come out and say it. You hate blacks, Mexicans, lesbians, gay males and Democrats. After that we are cool.

Come on Okie...I'm still waiting for the proof of me being a liberal and also me saying that your anecdotal evidence was wrong.

(07-30-2013 10:30 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:24 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:20 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:16 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  Umm, Austin is a technology hub. You don't get out much do you?

So is Silicone Valley. You have many so called conservatives leaving CA for Texas but it's not because Austin is a technology hub. It has more to do with CA than it does Texas.

Ok, I call BS on that one. They are coming here for the jobs. I read the Austin Business Journal and Austin American Statesman daily and both say it is for the jobs.

Got you stumped on this one

You're right they are, idiot. So I guess they can't buy and sell us both after all. You have only stumped yourself little one.

You said they were coming because of California not the jobs so what have you proven?

Just come out and say it. You hate blacks, Mexicans, lesbians, gay males and Democrats. After that we are cool.

OK after you admit you are a far left zealot that has never pulled the lever for a GOP.

Just come out and say it. You hate white, male, straight conservative Christians. Why are you such a bigot?

(07-30-2013 10:32 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  Come on Okie...I'm still waiting for the proof of me being a liberal and also me saying that your anecdotal evidence was wrong.

You proved that yourself. You haven't been able to disprove anything I have stated.

(07-30-2013 10:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:30 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:24 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(07-30-2013 10:20 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  So is Silicone Valley. You have many so called conservatives leaving CA for Texas but it's not because Austin is a technology hub. It has more to do with CA than it does Texas.

Ok, I call BS on that one. They are coming here for the jobs. I read the Austin Business Journal and Austin American Statesman daily and both say it is for the jobs.

Got you stumped on this one

You're right they are, idiot. So I guess they can't buy and sell us both after all. You have only stumped yourself little one.

You said they were coming because of California not the jobs so what have you proven?

Just come out and say it. You hate blacks, Mexicans, lesbians, gay males and Democrats. After that we are cool.

OK after you admit you are a far left zealot that has never pulled the lever for a GOP.

Just come out and say it. You hate white, male, straight conservative Christians. Why are you such a bigot?

And you deflect once again. Since I was 18 (now 41) I have voted 95% Republican. I attend church weekly and volunteer at least 6 hours a week for meals in wheels