South Alabama (2-9, 1-6) v/s Louisiana (6-4, 4-2)
Saturday, Nov. 24, 2012 @ 4:00 PM Central / 5:00PM Eastern
ESPN GamePlan lineup ... channel 788 on DirecTV.

Louisiana-Lafayette has had some explosive plays and capitalized on Jag turnovers and lead 17-13. USA currently at the Louisiana-Lafayette 35.

Jags added a FG and it's 17-16. Jags have the ball now in Louisiana-Lafayette territory.

For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

(11-24-2012 07:20 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:20 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points. Then on a play on the first drive out of halftime the ULL receiver obviously stepped out of bounds but the replay officials missed it, even when it stared them in the face on replay. ULL scored 7 points. 14 points on a platter. Two blown reviews. Way to go Sun Belt.

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:20 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points.

Pass interference was called on that play ... on the Jag defender. Due to the pass interference penalty, Lawson was not required to establish himself in bounds before touching the ball. He was simply required to catch the ball in bounds.

Brian

(11-24-2012 07:50 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:20 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points.

Pass interference was called on that play ... on the Jag defender. Due to the pass interference penalty, Lawson was not required to establish himself in bounds before touching the ball. He was simply required to catch the ball in bounds.

Brian

I thought you were referring to the other pass interference on the botched extra point.

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:20 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points. Then on a play on the first drive out of halftime the ULL receiver obviously stepped out of bounds but the replay officials missed it, even when it stared them in the face on replay. ULL scored 7 points. 14 points on a platter. Two blown reviews. Way to go Sun Belt.

SAL scores, so you are still in it. Louisiana 38 SAL 23, 2:27 left in 3rdqtr.

(11-24-2012 07:56 PM)HoustonCajun Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:20 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points. Then on a play on the first drive out of halftime the ULL receiver obviously stepped out of bounds but the replay officials missed it, even when it stared them in the face on replay. ULL scored 7 points. 14 points on a platter. Two blown reviews. Way to go Sun Belt.

SAL scores, so you are still in it. Louisiana 38 SAL 23, 2:27 left in 3rdqtr.

Gaithersburg enters game and immediately throws a TD pass. UL 45 SAL 23.

Correction on automatic spelling. Should be Gauthier. To be an announcement immediately after game. Expect a N O Bowl invite.

(11-24-2012 07:55 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:50 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:20 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  For any Cajun fans not at the game and watching, what are your objective thoughts on the last two plays that were reviewed? They both went in your favor and led to 14 Cajun points. To me, these were clearly blown calls. Even your announcers thought they should have went in USA's favor. These refs are pathetic.

If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points.

Pass interference was called on that play ... on the Jag defender. Due to the pass interference penalty, Lawson was not required to establish himself in bounds before touching the ball. He was simply required to catch the ball in bounds.

Brian

I thought you were referring to the other pass interference on the botched extra point.

No, but that was pass interference as well. :-)

On the Lawson play, the refs threw a flag for pass interference and also ruled that the contact was responsible for Lawson going OB. None of which is reviewable.

Brian

(11-24-2012 08:11 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:55 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:50 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points.

Pass interference was called on that play ... on the Jag defender. Due to the pass interference penalty, Lawson was not required to establish himself in bounds before touching the ball. He was simply required to catch the ball in bounds.

Brian

I thought you were referring to the other pass interference on the botched extra point.

No, but that was pass interference as well. :-)

On the Lawson play, the refs threw a flag for pass interference and also ruled that the contact was responsible for Lawson going OB. None of which is reviewable.

Brian

This game isn't over. We are only up by 15.

(11-24-2012 08:11 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:55 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:50 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:38 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  If you are referring to the play where pass interference was called, Lawson went OB, subsequently caught the ball in bounds, and then scored ... the TV announcers were in error. The officials were not reviewing whether or not the Jag defender pushed Lawson OB. Pass interference was called (and there was pass interference) and that in and of itself is not reviewable. The officials were reviewing whether or not Lawson caught the ball in bounds and actually scored. He did.

Had Lawson not caught the ball in bounds, the pass interference penalty would have been accepted and enforced.

Brian

Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points.

Pass interference was called on that play ... on the Jag defender. Due to the pass interference penalty, Lawson was not required to establish himself in bounds before touching the ball. He was simply required to catch the ball in bounds.

Brian

I thought you were referring to the other pass interference on the botched extra point.

No, but that was pass interference as well. :-)

On the Lawson play, the refs threw a flag for pass interference and also ruled that the contact was responsible for Lawson going OB. None of which is reviewable.

Brian

SAL scores. UL 45 SAL 30.

(11-24-2012 08:27 PM)HoustonCajun Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 08:11 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:55 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:50 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points.

Pass interference was called on that play ... on the Jag defender. Due to the pass interference penalty, Lawson was not required to establish himself in bounds before touching the ball. He was simply required to catch the ball in bounds.

Brian

I thought you were referring to the other pass interference on the botched extra point.

No, but that was pass interference as well. :-)

On the Lawson play, the refs threw a flag for pass interference and also ruled that the contact was responsible for Lawson going OB. None of which is reviewable.

Brian

SAL scores. UL 45 SAL 30.

UL 52 SAL 30. 5 mins remaining.

(11-24-2012 08:27 PM)HoustonCajun Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 08:11 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:55 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:50 PM)gonegolfin Wrote:  

(11-24-2012 07:44 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  Not talking about the pass interference. Talking about the "Jag defender pushing the ULL receiver out of bounds" seconds before halftime. That was bogus and ULL got 7 points.

Pass interference was called on that play ... on the Jag defender. Due to the pass interference penalty, Lawson was not required to establish himself in bounds before touching the ball. He was simply required to catch the ball in bounds.

Brian

I thought you were referring to the other pass interference on the botched extra point.

No, but that was pass interference as well. :-)

On the Lawson play, the refs threw a flag for pass interference and also ruled that the contact was responsible for Lawson going OB. None of which is reviewable.

Brian

SAL scores. UL 45 SAL 30.

Alright now I think we can breath easy. UL 52 USA 30. The Jags are a tough team being so new to 1-A football.

With our top two RBs out our running game sucked. I've never been a fan of having 180 lb go-to guys between the tackles. We've been penalty prone all year too. No excuses for losing though, ya'll clearly have the better team. Already looking forward to next year.

(11-24-2012 08:48 PM)HCJag Wrote:  With our top two RBs out our running game sucked. I've never been a fan of having 180 lb go-to guys between the tackles. We've been penalty prone all year too. No excuses for losing though, ya'll clearly have the better team. Already looking forward to next year.

South Alabama is football country. No doubt you guys will be a force to be reckoned with down the road.

When we are kicking we are a prolific offense... Possibly the best in the Sunbelt.

Hello New Orleans!!!

Z

(11-24-2012 08:48 PM)HCJag Wrote:  With our top two RBs out our running game sucked. I've never been a fan of having 180 lb go-to guys between the tackles. We've been penalty prone all year too. No excuses for losing though, ya'll clearly have the better team. Already looking forward to next year.

UL also was playing with third and fourth string running backs tonight.

Good game tonight but I was very disappointed in the personal fouls committed towards the end of the game. I was getting worried that a player was going to get hurt.