You will be missed.

(02-27-2011 09:24 PM)Charm City Bronco Wrote:  

This.

Hallelujah.

Looks like 69 was caught in the crossfire, at least temporarily.

This thread makes me think I'm in the student section at Lawson waving someone into the penalty box. Twice. Which makes it a sausage fest.

I enjoy a little mischief on the boards. I'm never a fan of banning. And even less a fan of laying down the law and then locking the thread.

But I'm a moderator myself, and it can be the world's most thankless job. When your board is losing posters because of an excess of personal insults, you have to take action. I would have preferred paddling their bare behinds and sending them to bed without supper, but that wasn't an option.

I've enjoyed both of these posters until recently. I'm hoping they'll have a chance to come back.

(03-02-2011 04:25 PM)Whinny1 Wrote:  I enjoy a little mischief on the boards. I'm never a fan of banning. And even less a fan of laying down the law and then locking the thread.

But I'm a moderator myself, and it can be the world's most thankless job. When your board is losing posters because of an excess of personal insults, you have to take action. I would have preferred paddling their bare behinds and sending them to bed without supper, but that wasn't an option.

I've enjoyed both of these posters until recently. I'm hoping they'll have a chance to come back.

I'm not a fan of banning myself. I prefer to send PM's to settle people down. Those dudes just took things to another level even after they was warned. I hope they have a chance to return as well.

(03-02-2011 04:25 PM)Whinny1 Wrote:  I've enjoyed both of these posters until recently. I'm hoping they'll have a chance to come back.

With all due respect, Whinny - why?!

"Stampede" has been infinitely better with out them, and they added nothing positive.

This isn't-should be a sand box or play ground for immature juveniles.

(03-02-2011 07:54 PM)MajorHoople Wrote:  This isn't-should be a sand box or play ground for immature juveniles.

I'm wondering if you didn't mean shouldn't? Clarify if it was an innocent typo.

I'm trying to figure out if I agree or not.

(03-02-2011 08:06 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(03-02-2011 07:54 PM)MajorHoople Wrote:  This isn't-should be a sand box or play ground for immature juveniles.

I'm wondering if you didn't mean shouldn't? Clarify if it was an innocent typo.

I'm trying to figure out if I agree or not.

I agree that you dont-should[nt] agree with what Major said, unless he clarifies.