bwahahqahahahahaha


How easy is it to create fake polls showing democrats doing well and get the libturds to swallow the taint. Turns out, its too easy.


Wedgewood polls released a series of polls that looked good for the dems, so much so that Nate Silver and the NYT's included them. Despite the poll having zero history or credibility. And there's a reason there was no history or credibility. Because Wedgewood has since come out and said their polls are fake, and they did it to prove a point that the media does not check poll credentials. Wedgewood just made stuff up that looked good for the dems, and the dems ran with it.

And it gets worse for them. Their fake poll showed the dem within 4 points in the senate race in mississippi. That should have been a poll that caused the dems to side-eye the poll and think it was fake. But nope. Instead, Schumer bought it and sent over $1million in senate funds to the dem in the race in mississippi.

Dems’ and their media allies’ incompetence is explained, in part, by an inability to regularly access anything higher-functioning than their brainstem due to blind hatred toward Trump and his voters.

Whats hilarious is that Nate Silver got duped. This is supposed to be the polling and analytical genius.

The NYT's, The Hill, 270toWin and Newsweek were easy targets to getting fooled by Wedgewood, and they were. But you would have thought Nate Silver would have sniffed this one out.

#Nope

#GotDuped

#SwallowedTheTaint

I don't see anywhere that Schumer was motivated to contribute to the Colom race due to the poll.

Seems Eric Daughtery is speculating on this scenario. And he might be accurate to do so.

But has any media reported that Schumer, in fact, contributed because of the Wedgewood poll?

Maybe I'm overlooking.

https://mississippitoday.org/2026/10/20/...is-waning/

https://magnoliatribune.com/2026/10/20/p...abricated/

(10-21-2026 10:23 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I don't see anywhere that Schumer was motivated to contribute to the Colom race due to the poll.

Seems Eric Daughtery is speculating on this scenario. And he might be accurate to do so.

But has any media reported that Schumer, in fact, contributed because of the Wedgewood poll?

Maybe I'm overlooking.

https://mississippitoday.org/2026/10/20/...is-waning/

https://magnoliatribune.com/2026/10/20/p...abricated/

Dems are in the fight of their life trying to keep seats in MN, MI, and NH, the DNC is broke, and Schumer is sending $1million to a senate race where the dem is going to get schlonged.


Thats proof enough for me.

(10-21-2026 10:30 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-21-2026 10:23 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I don't see anywhere that Schumer was motivated to contribute to the Colom race due to the poll.

Seems Eric Daughtery is speculating on this scenario. And he might be accurate to do so.

But has any media reported that Schumer, in fact, contributed because of the Wedgewood poll?

Maybe I'm overlooking.

https://mississippitoday.org/2026/10/20/...is-waning/

https://magnoliatribune.com/2026/10/20/p...abricated/

Dems are in the fight of their life trying to keep seats in MN, MI, and NH, the DNC is broke, and Schumer is sending $1million to a senate race where the dem is going to get schlonged.


Thats proof enough for me.

Maybe Schumer contributed after having been fooled by the fake poll. I would not be surprised. But maybe not. If he was motivated by the fake poll ... embarrassing.

An interesting article:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/...Nzk26kXHAL

Schumer and schlong in the same sentence appears to get bill excited.

(10-21-2026 10:17 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Whats hilarious is that Nate Silver got duped. This is supposed to be the polling and analytical genius.

(10-21-2026 10:30 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Dems are in the fight of their life trying to keep seats in MN, MI, and NH, the DNC is broke, and Schumer is sending $1million to a senate race where the dem is going to get schlonged.

The DNC has been broke or almost-broke since the 1970s. That’s not where Democrats put their serious money, hasn’t been since forever.

Actually Democrats put OUR money into USAID so it could be laundered and sent back to them from their NGO partners. That’s the real reason street protests and terror attacks have stopped. Democrats can’t afford to pay for the mayhem.

(10-21-2026 02:43 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Schumer and schlong in the same sentence appears to get bill excited.

well, they can both be plastic and flaccid at the same time ...

#substanceLivesMatter

disclaimer: couldn't tell you who's running against Hyde-Smith ... not that it would ever matter ...

(10-21-2026 04:01 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Actually Democrats put OUR money into USAID so it could be laundered and sent back to them from their NGO partners. That’s the real reason street protests and terror attacks have stopped. Democrats can’t afford to pay for the mayhem.

Right wing Trump aligned candidates have won like 7 elections in a row in Latin America since UsAid was shut down. Thats pretty telling.

(10-21-2026 04:19 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-21-2026 04:01 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Actually Democrats put OUR money into USAID so it could be laundered and sent back to them from their NGO partners. That’s the real reason street protests and terror attacks have stopped. Democrats can’t afford to pay for the mayhem.

Right wing Trump aligned candidates have won like 7 elections in a row in Latin America since UsAid was shut down. Thats pretty telling.

maybe in 10 years or so, they'll write a book(s) or make a movie(s) in the same vein as 'Margin Call' or the 'The Big Short', eh?!

it's obvious why they haven't to date ... they still think they have 'bill-it-eee with wool over lenses (and for 38% diehards, they do ... it's a shame that number is shrinking)

/sarc

(10-21-2026 02:43 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Schumer and schlong in the same sentence appears to get bill excited.

Schumer and Schlong suggests a boutique law firm. (And note that I deftly deployed "schlong" and "firm" in the same sentence.)

Ok, I chuckled bill.

(10-21-2026 04:54 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Ok, I chuckled bill.

I'm pleased to hear, my good man.

(10-21-2026 04:19 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-21-2026 04:01 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Actually Democrats put OUR money into USAID so it could be laundered and sent back to them from their NGO partners. That’s the real reason street protests and terror attacks have stopped. Democrats can’t afford to pay for the mayhem.

Right wing Trump aligned candidates have won like 7 elections in a row in Latin America since UsAid was shut down. Thats pretty telling.

How are Trump aligned candidates doing in U.S. elections? Pretty telling.

(10-21-2026 05:22 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(10-21-2026 04:19 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-21-2026 04:01 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Actually Democrats put OUR money into USAID so it could be laundered and sent back to them from their NGO partners. That’s the real reason street protests and terror attacks have stopped. Democrats can’t afford to pay for the mayhem.

Right wing Trump aligned candidates have won like 7 elections in a row in Latin America since UsAid was shut down. Thats pretty telling.

How are Trump aligned candidates doing in U.S. elections? Pretty telling.

I believe CNN said he had the highest endorsement winning record in history.

And here's an AI summary


Senate Endorsement Success Rates

• Trump’s Record: Trump’s endorsed Senate candidates consistently win upward of 95% to 100% of Republican primary contests (such as a 24-for-24 clean sweep in recent cycles), frequently clearing out more moderate or establishment incumbents.
• Historical Comparison (Obama & Biden): During the 2018 midterms analyzed by Brookings, Barack Obama and Joe Biden-backed candidates in congressional races achieved combined win rates roughly between 57% and 74%, significantly lower than Trump’s primary figures.
• Incumbency Factor: Political analysts note that a large share of Trump’s endorsements go to safe incumbents, though he has also uniquely deployed his backing to oust sitting members of his own party who cross him.

(10-21-2026 05:43 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  And here's an AI summary


Senate Endorsement Success Rates

• Trump’s Record: Trump’s endorsed Senate candidates consistently win upward of 95% to 100% of Republican primary contests (such as a 24-for-24 clean sweep in recent cycles), frequently clearing out more moderate or establishment incumbents.
• Historical Comparison (Obama & Biden): During the 2018 midterms analyzed by Brookings, Barack Obama and Joe Biden-backed candidates in congressional races achieved combined win rates roughly between 57% and 74%, significantly lower than Trump’s primary figures.
• Incumbency Factor: Political analysts note that a large share of Trump’s endorsements go to safe incumbents, though he has also uniquely deployed his backing to oust sitting members of his own party who cross him.

Year — Pri Wins —General Wins
2026 96% 0%
2025 100% 43%
2024 96% 89%
2023 67% 80%
2022 93% 84%
2021 100% 100%
2020 97% 79%
2019 80% 67%
2018 95% 59%

He has been successful but he has also peaked and is on the downward trend. 30% approval rating will do that.