Tanq is so out of his league

(09-03-2025 07:36 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:29 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 09:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:38 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:31 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They aren't Americans, and in fact are killing Americans, and thus have no due process.

You’d think this simple fact wouldnt need to be explained, but then again, the Dems arent the brightest bulbs. When will a radical leftist judge declare this strike unconstitutional and say we are no longer allowed to do them?

So just blow up anyone there. Without regard. Cool cool.

Nice inclusion of the 'radical leftist judge' fallback de jure. Lol.

Do you think that we just randomly picked that boat with those people aboard and blew them up for no reason? That's the only explanation for defending them. If a boat full of armed men from anywhere was known to be headed to America with a lethal cargo would you be concerned for their welfare also or would it be OK to blow them up, eliminating the threat once and for all?

all those packages (visible in the vid) in 'saranwrap' were food supplies headed to Tobago ... c'mon mayun ...

ya did have to appreciate the investment in the quad 150hps moving that 'traffic', eh?! ... lmmfao

According to Little Marco that is where they were headed. I guess you missed that.

By the way, happen to know where that boat was 'splodey done, and happen to know the range of that boat? Last I saw, cant move the 1300 mi to the US with those. Maybe 200, tops. But hey, they were going to the US..... lolz.

Not to mention the UN charter ships really cannot fire on other ships except in self-defense or when in a state of war. But hey, lets give the MAGA base a raging boner by bazookaing some ship that can be interdicted, and didnt fire at anything itself. Sounds neato.

3a --- cant wait for your conniption fit about the term 'bazookaing' and your throw down of all your vaunted consultancy work in that conniption fit.....

(09-03-2025 07:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:29 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 09:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:38 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:31 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They aren't Americans, and in fact are killing Americans, and thus have no due process.

You’d think this simple fact wouldnt need to be explained, but then again, the Dems arent the brightest bulbs. When will a radical leftist judge declare this strike unconstitutional and say we are no longer allowed to do them?

So just blow up anyone there. Without regard. Cool cool.

Nice inclusion of the 'radical leftist judge' fallback de jure. Lol.

Do you think that we just randomly picked that boat with those people aboard and blew them up for no reason? That's the only explanation for defending them. If a boat full of armed men from anywhere was known to be headed to America with a lethal cargo would you be concerned for their welfare also or would it be OK to blow them up, eliminating the threat once and for all?

Last I saw, when a force can track a boat, it can sure as hell can interdict it.

Last I saw the policy was to interdict, board, gather evidence and hand them over.

Now I guess it is to simply spot someone and blow it up. Seems pretty inane to me given the above. Something best reserved to a tinpot authoritarian and geared to those who dont really understand anything but 'show of force' as the only solution to anything and everything.

But Trump seemingly has to play 'splodey macho man to his minions who think that every issue is best solved with a missile, or best solved with sending military force in to quell stuff in the streets.

Hey Tanq, do you actually understand the meaning of war? Or the specific designation of all drug cartels as terrorists?

Perfectly legal, Clarence. Damn, you are dense.

(09-03-2025 07:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:29 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 09:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:38 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:31 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They aren't Americans, and in fact are killing Americans, and thus have no due process.

You’d think this simple fact wouldnt need to be explained, but then again, the Dems arent the brightest bulbs. When will a radical leftist judge declare this strike unconstitutional and say we are no longer allowed to do them?

So just blow up anyone there. Without regard. Cool cool.

Nice inclusion of the 'radical leftist judge' fallback de jure. Lol.

Do you think that we just randomly picked that boat with those people aboard and blew them up for no reason? That's the only explanation for defending them. If a boat full of armed men from anywhere was known to be headed to America with a lethal cargo would you be concerned for their welfare also or would it be OK to blow them up, eliminating the threat once and for all?

Last I saw, when a force can track a boat, it can sure as hell can interdict it.

Last I saw the policy was to interdict, board, gather evidence and hand them over.

Now I guess it is to simply spot someone and blow it up. Seems pretty inane to me given the above. Something best reserved to a tinpot authoritarian and geared to those who dont really understand anything but 'show of force' as the only solution to anything and everything.

But Trump seemingly has to play 'splodey macho man to his minions who think that every issue is best solved with a missile, or best solved with sending military force in to quell stuff in the streets.

why waste the time and resources when you can squash the gnat in a nano ... you probably thought Truman was wrong, too...

you'd rather see engagement where US lives would most certainly be lost ... or better yet, let's get that lefty judiciary involved so you can defend brownies that couldn't give two fks about our way of life...

we getcha...

(09-03-2025 07:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Last I saw, when a force can track a boat, it can sure as hell can interdict it.

Last I saw the policy was to interdict, board, gather evidence and hand them over.

So you want someone else’s son (or daughter) to be potentially put in harm’s way against cartel-funded and presumably well-armed criminals so that you can feel better about yourself.

You, tanq., are not just a bad American. You are a bad human being.

(09-03-2025 08:01 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:36 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:29 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 09:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:38 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  You’d think this simple fact wouldnt need to be explained, but then again, the Dems arent the brightest bulbs. When will a radical leftist judge declare this strike unconstitutional and say we are no longer allowed to do them?

So just blow up anyone there. Without regard. Cool cool.

Nice inclusion of the 'radical leftist judge' fallback de jure. Lol.

Do you think that we just randomly picked that boat with those people aboard and blew them up for no reason? That's the only explanation for defending them. If a boat full of armed men from anywhere was known to be headed to America with a lethal cargo would you be concerned for their welfare also or would it be OK to blow them up, eliminating the threat once and for all?

all those packages (visible in the vid) in 'saranwrap' were food supplies headed to Tobago ... c'mon mayun ...

ya did have to appreciate the investment in the quad 150hps moving that 'traffic', eh?! ... lmmfao

According to Little Marco that is where they were headed. I guess you missed that.

By the way, happen to know where that boat was 'splodey done, and happen to know the range of that boat? Last I saw, cant move the 1300 mi to the US with those. Maybe 200, tops. But hey, they were going to the US..... lolz.

Not to mention the UN charter ships really cannot fire on other ships except in self-defense or when in a state of war. But hey, lets give the MAGA base a raging boner by bazookaing some ship that can be interdicted, and didnt fire at anything itself. Sounds neato.

3a --- cant wait for your conniption fit about the term 'bazookaing' and your throw down of all your vaunted consultancy work in that conniption fit.....

refueling ... it's a thingy...

(09-03-2025 08:05 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Last I saw, when a force can track a boat, it can sure as hell can interdict it.

Last I saw the policy was to interdict, board, gather evidence and hand them over.

So you want someone else’s son (or daughter) to be potentially put in harm’s way against cartel-funded and presumably well-armed criminals so that you can feel better about yourself.

You, tanq., are not just a bad American. You are a bad human being.

Not to mention, he's dense.

(09-03-2025 03:59 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Might I suggest the ignore feature…
I’ve been on these boards for over two decades now and used it twice….

Ignore is highly recommended. Some people just like to swordplay on the interwebs. Must scratch an itch.

(09-03-2025 08:12 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 03:59 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Might I suggest the ignore feature…
I’ve been on these boards for over two decades now and used it twice….

Ignore is highly recommended. Some people just like to swordplay on the interwebs. Must scratch an itch.

every now and then, one does have to scratch those that spin in circles...

I had one a couple of days ago that's still hangin' ... it's amazing what happens when you don't respond...

It’s just shocking that any red blooded American could find fault in blowing up a literal boatload of cocaine hauling terrorists.

There really are no words to accurately describe how deep the hole is liberals are digging for themselves politically.

Like Shere says all the time, you just can’t hate these people enough.

They can't resist dying on the hill for the losing side of 90-10 issues.

(09-03-2025 08:53 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  They can't resist dying on the hill for the losing side of 90-10 issues.

It’s just shocking.
It defines cutting off your nose to spite your face. There’s never been a more perfect example.

Poor tanq just doesn’t understand that his law degree is worth absolutely nothing here.

(09-03-2025 09:09 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Poor tanq just doesn’t understand that his law degree is worth absolutely nothing here.

He called TripleA cute in an earlier post.
He may pee sitting down. No guy refers to anything from another guy as cute unless he prefers quiche over a good old ham sandwich.

(09-03-2025 08:02 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:29 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 09:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:38 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  You’d think this simple fact wouldnt need to be explained, but then again, the Dems arent the brightest bulbs. When will a radical leftist judge declare this strike unconstitutional and say we are no longer allowed to do them?

So just blow up anyone there. Without regard. Cool cool.

Nice inclusion of the 'radical leftist judge' fallback de jure. Lol.

Do you think that we just randomly picked that boat with those people aboard and blew them up for no reason? That's the only explanation for defending them. If a boat full of armed men from anywhere was known to be headed to America with a lethal cargo would you be concerned for their welfare also or would it be OK to blow them up, eliminating the threat once and for all?

Last I saw, when a force can track a boat, it can sure as hell can interdict it.

Last I saw the policy was to interdict, board, gather evidence and hand them over.

Now I guess it is to simply spot someone and blow it up. Seems pretty inane to me given the above. Something best reserved to a tinpot authoritarian and geared to those who dont really understand anything but 'show of force' as the only solution to anything and everything.

But Trump seemingly has to play 'splodey macho man to his minions who think that every issue is best solved with a missile, or best solved with sending military force in to quell stuff in the streets.

Hey Tanq, do you actually understand the meaning of war? Or the specific designation of all drug cartels as terrorists?

Perfectly legal, Clarence. Damn, you are dense.

Care to point us where that declaration of war is, sparkles? Last I saw that requires an act of congress.....

Yeah, I understand the legalities of war. Apparently you do not. Very apparent simply on your question.... Imagine that.

ANd I suggest re-reading the italicized. Seems to fit you pretty well.

Hey, lets just Hellfire a speedboat in the Caribbean. Simply because the MAGA faithful get a boner over that. Sounds fun.

(09-03-2025 08:03 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  you'd rather see engagement where US lives would most certainly be lost ...

Wow, going straight and deep to the 'pull the (made up) strawman out of your ass' on that one.... lolz.

I doubt *any* US lives would be lost in interdicting a fing speedboat. Double Lolz.

Quote:or better yet, let's get that lefty judiciary involved so you can defend brownies that couldn't give two fks about our way of life...

Ah, back to the empty rhetoric of 'lefty judiciary'. Always the favorite backstop I guess.

Stink, I find it stupid as **** to missile a flipping speedboat off of Venezuela. Absurdly stupid. But leave it to the bellicose orange hair to do it this way.

Quote:we getcha...

Nope. You obviously dont. Try another swing.

(09-03-2025 08:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:31 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They aren't Americans, and in fact are killing Americans, and thus have no due process.

So its justified in your book to blow up any dark colored folk, since the core rationale is 'they arent Americans'. Neat analysis.

Id say arrest them and send them away. Why am I not surprised your bent is to simpy blow them up since 'they arent Americans'. Cool cool.

The wages of sin is death. We just paid their debt. Too bad you lost another paycheck Clarence.

(09-03-2025 08:06 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 08:01 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:36 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 07:29 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 09:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  So just blow up anyone there. Without regard. Cool cool.

Nice inclusion of the 'radical leftist judge' fallback de jure. Lol.

Do you think that we just randomly picked that boat with those people aboard and blew them up for no reason? That's the only explanation for defending them. If a boat full of armed men from anywhere was known to be headed to America with a lethal cargo would you be concerned for their welfare also or would it be OK to blow them up, eliminating the threat once and for all?

all those packages (visible in the vid) in 'saranwrap' were food supplies headed to Tobago ... c'mon mayun ...

ya did have to appreciate the investment in the quad 150hps moving that 'traffic', eh?! ... lmmfao

According to Little Marco that is where they were headed. I guess you missed that.

By the way, happen to know where that boat was 'splodey done, and happen to know the range of that boat? Last I saw, cant move the 1300 mi to the US with those. Maybe 200, tops. But hey, they were going to the US..... lolz.

Not to mention the UN charter ships really cannot fire on other ships except in self-defense or when in a state of war. But hey, lets give the MAGA base a raging boner by bazookaing some ship that can be interdicted, and didnt fire at anything itself. Sounds neato.

3a --- cant wait for your conniption fit about the term 'bazookaing' and your throw down of all your vaunted consultancy work in that conniption fit.....

refueling ... it's a thingy...

So now you retreat from 'heading to America' I see when the facts catch up with your story. Cool cool.

The simple thing is that you magically made up the ship headed to America, without bothering with the base facts. Maybe next time. Maybe next time your supposition will be a little less grounded in thin air.

But hey, sounds *much* cooler to add the 'headed to America' when defending the really stupid act of vaporizing the boat. Makes much better impact (except when it factually cant happen....)

(09-03-2025 08:49 PM)450bench Wrote:  It’s just shocking that any red blooded American could find fault in blowing up a literal boatload of cocaine hauling terrorists.

There really are no words to accurately describe how deep the hole is liberals are digging for themselves politically.

Like Shere says all the time, you just can’t hate these people enough.

Im always intrigued with the bevy of dumbasses who at one point spray 'cant believe *anything* the government says' --

then pivot on a dime and blindly repeat 'a boatload of cocaine hauling terrorists' when there is no proof beyond what the government has told you.

Bravo for the utterly shallow display of selective hypocrisy there 450. Not that I would ever think you wouldnt do that absolute pivot and switch like an ape following a banana. Nor many of a whole slew of people in this forum.

(09-03-2025 09:24 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 09:09 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Poor tanq just doesn’t understand that his law degree is worth absolutely nothing here.

He called TripleA cute in an earlier post.
He may pee sitting down. No guy refers to anything from another guy as cute unless he prefers quiche over a good old ham sandwich.

Lolz. About par for what I expect out a pure moronic meathead as yourself. Please continue..... Lolz.