(04-15-2025 11:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  More news on the other dude, still in US custody, Santos. Judge allows the DOJ to drop the gun charges against him so they can proceed to deportation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-g...-13-leader

Bwhahahaha is this the gay barber or soccer player?

It's funny to watch the mental gymnastics these slimeball attorneys go through to try and keep these clowns in this country.

Now pay me in cash.... says the slimeball attorney










Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

More proof that the liberal mindset is a mental illness. As witnessed in this thread.

Democrat Leader Threatens Trump Administration: Bring Back MS-13 Illegal Alien Gangbanger to US or Activist Courts Will Need to Hold Marco Rubio and Pam Bondi in Contempt

I would love to see a district judge try to hold a cabinet member in contempt. If I were POTUS and this happened, boom instant terrorist designation and NDAA snatch and grab in the middle of the night with no due process. Let them fight that one while Hakeem is chilling in El Salvador.

(04-15-2025 11:34 AM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  Democrat Leader Threatens Trump Administration: Bring Back MS-13 Illegal Alien Gangbanger to US or Activist Courts Will Need to Hold Marco Rubio and Pam Bondi in Contempt

(04-14-2025 08:20 PM)boss man Wrote:  

(04-14-2025 07:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were unlawful and reversed 9-0 unanimously, stating clearly that neither the Secretary of State nor the President could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who, again, is a member of MS-13, as confirmed by the courts.

End of discussion, tanq. Take the L.

Maybe read the actual SCOTUS ruling, retard.

The ruling let stand the District Court finding of no due process, and that the deportation was improper, and let stand every single item of the DC ruling -- except that the D had to be clearer I what the term "effectuate" means.

Read the base material. Or act like a fing moron and don't, and tell everyone what is in it.

(04-14-2025 07:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey Clarence, you continue to ignore that foreign policy and national security interests take precedence over an immigration court ruling.

Gladto know that overruled the 14th. You be you.

To quote explicitly the 14th amendment "no person shall be denied Due process" chuckles.

Quote:Blah blah blah bleat for illegal alien gangbangers seems more important to you.

"No person ", champ.

Quote:Oh, and the dude got due process. It was ruled he is a gang member and should be deported back to El Salvador. That is due process.

Overriding an existing ruling by rendition is the issue champ. A current order. Please play your retardo mix and match previous time with current time crap. Cool cool.

Quote:What you are arguing is that the immigration court ruling that he remain here should take precedence over national security interests. Nope.

"No person shall be denied due process". Please flail some more in your funny little attempt to, egay SCOTUS has backed, a fundental violation of the 14th amendment. Lolz.

(04-15-2025 12:13 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-14-2025 08:20 PM)boss man Wrote:  

(04-14-2025 07:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were unlawful and reversed 9-0 unanimously, stating clearly that neither the Secretary of State nor the President could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who, again, is a member of MS-13, as confirmed by the courts.

End of discussion, tanq. Take the L.

Maybe read the actual SCOTUS ruling, retard.

The ruling let stand the District Court finding of no due process, and that the deportation was improper, and let stand every single item of the DC ruling -- except that the D had to be clearer I what the term "effectuate" means.

Read the base material. Or act like a fing moron and don't, and tell everyone what is in it.

What’s up with the name calling? Lolol. Your hypocrisy tends to bleed out daily however, as we all witness.

Again, take the L dude. You should be used to it by now.
Your interpretation of the ruling(s) is comical.

For the hearing impaired:


The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were unlawful and reversed 9-0 unanimously, stating clearly that neither the Secretary of State nor the President could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who, again, is a member of MS-13, as confirmed by the courts.

(04-15-2025 12:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-14-2025 07:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey Clarence, you continue to ignore that foreign policy and national security interests take precedence over an immigration court ruling.

Gladto know that overruled the 14th. You be you.

To quote explicitly the 14th amendment "no person shall be denied Due process" chuckles.

Quote:Blah blah blah bleat for illegal alien gangbangers seems more important to you.

"No person ", champ.

Quote:Oh, and the dude got due process. It was ruled he is a gang member and should be deported back to El Salvador. That is due process.

Overriding an existing ruling by rendition is the issue champ. A current order. Please play your retardo mix and match previous time with current time crap. Cool cool.

Quote:What you are arguing is that the immigration court ruling that he remain here should take precedence over national security interests. Nope.

"No person shall be denied due process". Please flail some more in your funny little attempt to, egay SCOTUS has backed, a fundental violation of the 14th amendment. Lolz.

Wrong

It does not say every person on earth or no dead person either

If a retard thinks thats what means it doesnt make it so.

Its the US constituition not the world constitution.

You lost. Go buy a low priced egg and suck it .

I'll trade you "any person" for "shall not be infringed".

(04-15-2025 12:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-14-2025 07:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey Clarence, you continue to ignore that foreign policy and national security interests take precedence over an immigration court ruling.

Gladto know that overruled the 14th. You be you.

To quote explicitly the 14th amendment "no person shall be denied Due process" chuckles.

Quote:Blah blah blah bleat for illegal alien gangbangers seems more important to you.

"No person ", champ.

Quote:Oh, and the dude got due process. It was ruled he is a gang member and should be deported back to El Salvador. That is due process.

Overriding an existing ruling by rendition is the issue champ. A current order. Please play your retardo mix and match previous time with current time crap. Cool cool.

Quote:What you are arguing is that the immigration court ruling that he remain here should take precedence over national security interests. Nope.

"No person shall be denied due process". Please flail some more in your funny little attempt to, egay SCOTUS has backed, a fundental violation of the 14th amendment. Lolz.

Adios Muchachos

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(04-15-2025 12:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  "No person shall be denied due process". Please flail some more in your funny little attempt to, egay SCOTUS has backed, a fundental violation of the 14th amendment. Lolz.

He got due process.

0-147

(04-15-2025 12:52 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-15-2025 12:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  "No person shall be denied due process". Please flail some more in your funny little attempt to, egay SCOTUS has backed, a fundental violation of the 14th amendment. Lolz.

He got due process.

0-147

Due. Due to gtfo

.... the "immigration system" was formed by a bunch of backward laws written by "attorneys," the immigration courts and appeals courts led by ..... "attorneys" who are now judges, the lovely gang members are represented by immigration... "attorneys", "attorneys" sue local jurisdictions to discourage enforcement of laws, "attorneys" helped craft sanctuary city policies

I could go on for days, but I'd say there is a problem here but I can't put my finger on it





Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Abrego is Abregone.

Deport all the illegal bastards.

Hey Tanq, does the 9/11 murderer sitting in a cell at Gitmo without a trial for 20+ years count as "all persons?"

And the one you're arguing about has already been IDed as MS-13 in a court proceeding, so there's your due process. Terrorist org.

Andy McCarthy and John Yoo both said due process does NOT apply equally to all persons. Circumstances vary. Oops.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

suck it!

Whether you love or hate Miller, he is right on this individual case
Trump administration admitted they should not have deported the individual to El Salvador
However, no Court can order the POTUS to ask the President of another Country to do anything regarding to a citizen of another country.
There is no LEGAL remedy to the administrative error that occurred

Could Trump ask for the release of the individual deported, sure he could
If Trump asked for the release of the individual deported would the El Savadorian President comply with the request, most likely
All of this would be a foreign policy request as opposed to complying with any type of law
And no court can force POTUS to exercise foreign policy powers to correct an administrative error with no legal remedy

Trump is basically daring the District Court judge to tell him how to handle foreign policy when he knows that is a black and white issue, POTUS runs the show on foreign policy
He wants the judge to overstep so the SCOTUS has no option but to rebuke the judge, thereby establishing major precedent moving foward
The District Court judge is throwing a hissy because they know they cannot force the return...and is doing everything they can to make day to day operations difficult