(11-10-2024 12:10 AM)TripleA Wrote: Latest Cabinet possibilities, per Fox (in no particular order):
SEC of State: Hagerty, Rubio, Grenell
SEC of Defense: Waltz, Rogers
Homeland Security: Wolf, Homan
AG: Lee, Paxton, Whitaker
Energy: Burgum
Others who will likely be in the Cabinet in some form: Musk, RFK Jr., Gabbard, Ramaswamy
OUT: Pompeo, Haley
What does Rubio bring to the SoS position? Honest question, thoughts?
verve if he approaches in earnest ... I personally see 'faux-billity' in his stride ... he would basically be another Sessions ... I'm with JR and Vivek being best method (JR hasn't stated such in this thread ... however, nut zongo 'members thingys)
#thatGuyIsWickedSmart
I'm a little worried that Musk and Ramaswamy haven't gotten much attention since the election, other than what was said during Trump's campaign. If Trump does not assign either of them to significant duties, I would find it difficult to understand his actions. Trump often leans toward individuals who can garner instant popularity, but neglecting capable figures could potentially undermine the effectiveness of his administration. This oversight may lead to missed opportunities for innovation and progress, particularly in areas where both Musk and Ramaswamy could contribute significantly. It remains to be seen whether Trump's focus on immediate appeal will overshadow the potential benefits of incorporating their expertise into his plans.
I wonder whether the same thought process that rejected Haley and Pompeo is in play. Reports indicate that he was hesitant to put either of them in a position where they could mount a challenge to JD in 2028 given their almost certain shared goal of becoming president in 2028. I believe that attracting the most intelligent individuals should take precedence over an appointee's future aspirations for the highest position, as is obvious with Vivek. However, it seems that political strategy often prioritizes immediate gains over long-term vision, which can ultimately hinder the effectiveness of a candidate's team. By surrounding himself with diverse—I am all for diversity of thought—perspectives and expertise, Trump could strengthen his administration and better position himself against potential roadblocks, ensuring a more robust platform moving forward.
Although I don't think Elon wants to be president, he must be heavily involved in Trump's next administration. His innovative mindset and experience in navigating complex industries could bring fresh ideas to the table, potentially transforming traditional governance approaches. Moreover, collaboration between tech leaders and political figures may foster a more adaptive and forward-thinking policy framework that addresses todays challenges effectively.
(This post was last modified: 11-12-2024 08:28 AM by TigerBlue4Ever.)
(11-10-2024 12:10 AM)TripleA Wrote: Latest Cabinet possibilities, per Fox (in no particular order):
SEC of State: Hagerty, Rubio, Grenell
SEC of Defense: Waltz, Rogers
Homeland Security: Wolf, Homan
AG: Lee, Paxton, Whitaker
Energy: Burgum
Others who will likely be in the Cabinet in some form: Musk, RFK Jr., Gabbard, Ramaswamy
OUT: Pompeo, Haley
What does Rubio bring to the SoS position? Honest question, thoughts?
verve if he approaches in earnest ... I personally see 'faux-billity' in his stride ... he would basically be another Sessions ... I'm with JR and Vivek being best method (JR hasn't stated such in this thread ... however, nut zongo 'members thingys)
#thatGuyIsWickedSmart
I'm a little worried that Musk and Ramaswamy haven't gotten much attention since the election, other than what was said during Trump's campaign. If Trump does not assign either of them to significant duties, I would find it difficult to understand his actions. Trump often leans toward individuals who can garner instant popularity, but neglecting capable figures could potentially undermine the effectiveness of his administration. This oversight may lead to missed opportunities for innovation and progress, particularly in areas where both Musk and Ramaswamy could contribute significantly. It remains to be seen whether Trump's focus on immediate appeal will overshadow the potential benefits of incorporating their expertise into his plans.
I wonder whether the same thought process that rejected Haley and Pompeo is in play. Reports indicate that he was hesitant to put either of them in a position where they could mount a challenge to JD in 2028 given their almost certain shared goal of becoming president in 2028. I believe that attracting the most intelligent individuals should take precedence over an appointee's future aspirations for the highest position, as is obvious with Vivek. However, it seems that political strategy often prioritizes immediate gains over long-term vision, which can ultimately hinder the effectiveness of a candidate's team. By surrounding himself with diverse—I am all for diversity of thought—perspectives and expertise, Trump could strengthen his administration and better position himself against potential roadblocks, ensuring a more robust platform moving forward.
Although I don't think Elon wants to be president, he must be heavily involved in Trump's next administration. His innovative mindset and experience in navigating complex industries could bring fresh ideas to the table, potentially transforming traditional governance approaches. Moreover, collaboration between tech leaders and political figures may foster a more adaptive and forward-thinking policy framework that addresses todays challenges effectively.
He didnt put Haley and Pompeo in any position because they have historically spared no opportunity to stab Trump in the back.
This is the type of refreshing moral clarity lately missing which will result in sound policies.
Under Trump, Israel will be given free rein so they can eradicate evil terrorists still holding Americans hostage. Meanwhile, we should focus on the head of the snake - Iran - and starve them of funds and take direct action when wise and necessary.
(11-12-2024 08:43 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: This is the type of refreshing moral clarity lately missing which will result in sound policies.
Under Trump, Israel will be given free rein so they can eradicate evil terrorists still holding Americans hostage. Meanwhile, we should focus on the head of the snake - Iran - and starve them of funds and take direct action when wise and necessary.
I'm for both...
I'll bump the 'Iran sand to glass nuked' thread if req'd ...
it's always been I-fk'n-Ran-Shite
(This post was last modified: 11-12-2024 08:59 AM by stinkfist.)
Quote:Scott Bessent, born in 1962 in Conway, South Carolina, is an American investor, board member, and educator. He has been considered for the position of U.S. Treasury Secretary in the incoming Donald Trump administration following the 2024 election. Here is a summary of his background and views that could influence policy:
Background:
Bessent graduated from Yale College in 1984. During his time at Yale, he was involved with The Yale Daily News, was president of the Wolf's Head Society, and served as treasurer for his class.
He worked for several notable financial institutions including Brown Brothers Harriman, Kynikos Associates, and joined Soros Fund Management (SFM) in 1991, eventually becoming the head of the London office. He played a key role in SFM's significant bet against the British pound in 1992.
In 2015, he founded Key Square Group, a global macro investment firm, which had received significant investments from George Soros.
Economic and Policy Views
Cryptocurrency:
Bessent is known to be supportive of cryptocurrencies, potentially making him the first pro-crypto Treasury Secretary. His positive stance could lead to more favorable regulatory environments for digital assets in the U.S.
Economic Strategy:
He has advocated for policies reminiscent of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's "Three Arrows" - a combination of fiscal stimulus, monetary easing, and structural reforms. For the U.S., this might translate into:
Deregulation:
Reducing regulatory burdens to stimulate economic growth.
Tax Policy:
Extending tax cuts, particularly aiming to extend provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Energy Policy:
Boosting energy production to achieve energy dominance.
Inflation and Deficits:
Bessent has criticized current economic policies for exacerbating inflation and deficits, suggesting policies aimed at reducing inflation through increased commodity production and possibly rethinking or scrapping initiatives like the Inflation Reduction Act.
Tariffs:
While he has supported Trump's use of tariffs as a negotiating tool, Bessent has suggested implementing them gradually to monitor and counteract any inflationary effects. This indicates a strategic rather than a blanket approach to trade policy.
Federal Reserve:
He floated the idea of a "shadow" Fed chair, not to make policy but to provide public guidance, which could indicate a desire for more transparency or different forms of oversight in monetary policy.
Public and Political Engagement:
Bessent has been a significant fundraiser for Trump and has publicly supported several of Trump's economic initiatives.
His past association with George Soros has been noted, but his current alignment seems more with Republican economic ideals, focusing on laissez-faire economics, which might appeal to a Trump administration looking to reduce government intervention in the economy.
Bessent's appointment, if confirmed, would likely steer U.S. economic policy towards a more market-driven approach with an emphasis on reducing government size, promoting deregulation, embracing new financial technologies like cryptocurrencies, and possibly revisiting or renegotiating trade deals through strategic tariff impositions. However, his views on key economic issues like the Federal Reserve's role might stir debate, especially in how they could potentially influence traditional monetary policy frameworks.
(11-10-2024 12:10 AM)TripleA Wrote: Latest Cabinet possibilities, per Fox (in no particular order):
SEC of State: Hagerty, Rubio, Grenell
SEC of Defense: Waltz, Rogers
Homeland Security: Wolf, Homan
AG: Lee, Paxton, Whitaker
Energy: Burgum
Others who will likely be in the Cabinet in some form: Musk, RFK Jr., Gabbard, Ramaswamy
OUT: Pompeo, Haley
What does Rubio bring to the SoS position? Honest question, thoughts?
verve if he approaches in earnest ... I personally see 'faux-billity' in his stride ... he would basically be another Sessions ... I'm with JR and Vivek being best method (JR hasn't stated such in this thread ... however, nut zongo 'members thingys)
#thatGuyIsWickedSmart
I'm a little worried that Musk and Ramaswamy haven't gotten much attention since the election, other than what was said during Trump's campaign. If Trump does not assign either of them to significant duties, I would find it difficult to understand his actions. Trump often leans toward individuals who can garner instant popularity, but neglecting capable figures could potentially undermine the effectiveness of his administration. This oversight may lead to missed opportunities for innovation and progress, particularly in areas where both Musk and Ramaswamy could contribute significantly. It remains to be seen whether Trump's focus on immediate appeal will overshadow the potential benefits of incorporating their expertise into his plans.
I wonder whether the same thought process that rejected Haley and Pompeo is in play. Reports indicate that he was hesitant to put either of them in a position where they could mount a challenge to JD in 2028 given their almost certain shared goal of becoming president in 2028. I believe that attracting the most intelligent individuals should take precedence over an appointee's future aspirations for the highest position, as is obvious with Vivek. However, it seems that political strategy often prioritizes immediate gains over long-term vision, which can ultimately hinder the effectiveness of a candidate's team. By surrounding himself with diverse—I am all for diversity of thought—perspectives and expertise, Trump could strengthen his administration and better position himself against potential roadblocks, ensuring a more robust platform moving forward.
Although I don't think Elon wants to be president, he must be heavily involved in Trump's next administration. His innovative mindset and experience in navigating complex industries could bring fresh ideas to the table, potentially transforming traditional governance approaches. Moreover, collaboration between tech leaders and political figures may foster a more adaptive and forward-thinking policy framework that addresses todays challenges effectively.
(11-11-2024 07:00 PM)bullet Wrote: I hope somebody is counting with Trump. That's 2 Republican congressmen pulled with a very narrow margin.
I just expressed that same concern on X.
I posted this in the Election thread, but Sean Duffy was just on Fox saying the same.
He said 2 of the seats the Rs had counted on winning, they have now fallen behind, and it looks like 220 will be the final number.
With Waltz and Stefanik out, that puts the Rs right at 218 until the special elections are held, and there is no guarantee that Stefanik's district will automatically go red again.
(11-10-2024 12:10 AM)TripleA Wrote: Latest Cabinet possibilities, per Fox (in no particular order):
SEC of State: Hagerty, Rubio, Grenell
SEC of Defense: Waltz, Rogers
Homeland Security: Wolf, Homan
AG: Lee, Paxton, Whitaker
Energy: Burgum
Others who will likely be in the Cabinet in some form: Musk, RFK Jr., Gabbard, Ramaswamy
OUT: Pompeo, Haley
What does Rubio bring to the SoS position? Honest question, thoughts?
verve if he approaches in earnest ... I personally see 'faux-billity' in his stride ... he would basically be another Sessions ... I'm with JR and Vivek being best method (JR hasn't stated such in this thread ... however, nut zongo 'members thingys)
#thatGuyIsWickedSmart
I'm a little worried that Musk and Ramaswamy haven't gotten much attention since the election, other than what was said during Trump's campaign. If Trump does not assign either of them to significant duties, I would find it difficult to understand his actions. Trump often leans toward individuals who can garner instant popularity, but neglecting capable figures could potentially undermine the effectiveness of his administration. This oversight may lead to missed opportunities for innovation and progress, particularly in areas where both Musk and Ramaswamy could contribute significantly. It remains to be seen whether Trump's focus on immediate appeal will overshadow the potential benefits of incorporating their expertise into his plans.
I wonder whether the same thought process that rejected Haley and Pompeo is in play. Reports indicate that he was hesitant to put either of them in a position where they could mount a challenge to JD in 2028 given their almost certain shared goal of becoming president in 2028. I believe that attracting the most intelligent individuals should take precedence over an appointee's future aspirations for the highest position, as is obvious with Vivek. However, it seems that political strategy often prioritizes immediate gains over long-term vision, which can ultimately hinder the effectiveness of a candidate's team. By surrounding himself with diverse—I am all for diversity of thought—perspectives and expertise, Trump could strengthen his administration and better position himself against potential roadblocks, ensuring a more robust platform moving forward.
Although I don't think Elon wants to be president, he must be heavily involved in Trump's next administration. His innovative mindset and experience in navigating complex industries could bring fresh ideas to the table, potentially transforming traditional governance approaches. Moreover, collaboration between tech leaders and political figures may foster a more adaptive and forward-thinking policy framework that addresses todays challenges effectively.
Trump hasn’t said anything and neither has the supposed recent nominees. There’s only sketchy anonymous sources to the NYT. Maybe it’s real but something tells me it’s not
(11-11-2024 07:00 PM)bullet Wrote: I hope somebody is counting with Trump. That's 2 Republican congressmen pulled with a very narrow margin.
I just expressed that same concern on X.
I posted this in the Election thread, but Sean Duffy was just on Fox saying the same.
He said 2 of the seats the Rs had counted on winning, they have now fallen behind, and it looks like 220 will be the final number.
With Waltz and Stefanik out, that puts the Rs right at 218 until the special elections are held, and there is no guarantee that Stefanik's district will automatically go red again.
No, but she did get 62%. NY gerrymandered 3 Rs out of seats, so she probably has a redder district than before.
(11-10-2024 12:10 AM)TripleA Wrote: Latest Cabinet possibilities, per Fox (in no particular order):
SEC of State: Hagerty, Rubio, Grenell
SEC of Defense: Waltz, Rogers
Homeland Security: Wolf, Homan
AG: Lee, Paxton, Whitaker
Energy: Burgum
Others who will likely be in the Cabinet in some form: Musk, RFK Jr., Gabbard, Ramaswamy
OUT: Pompeo, Haley
What does Rubio bring to the SoS position? Honest question, thoughts?
verve if he approaches in earnest ... I personally see 'faux-billity' in his stride ... he would basically be another Sessions ... I'm with JR and Vivek being best method (JR hasn't stated such in this thread ... however, nut zongo 'members thingys)
#thatGuyIsWickedSmart
I'm a little worried that Musk and Ramaswamy haven't gotten much attention since the election, other than what was said during Trump's campaign. If Trump does not assign either of them to significant duties, I would find it difficult to understand his actions. Trump often leans toward individuals who can garner instant popularity, but neglecting capable figures could potentially undermine the effectiveness of his administration. This oversight may lead to missed opportunities for innovation and progress, particularly in areas where both Musk and Ramaswamy could contribute significantly. It remains to be seen whether Trump's focus on immediate appeal will overshadow the potential benefits of incorporating their expertise into his plans.
I wonder whether the same thought process that rejected Haley and Pompeo is in play. Reports indicate that he was hesitant to put either of them in a position where they could mount a challenge to JD in 2028 given their almost certain shared goal of becoming president in 2028. I believe that attracting the most intelligent individuals should take precedence over an appointee's future aspirations for the highest position, as is obvious with Vivek. However, it seems that political strategy often prioritizes immediate gains over long-term vision, which can ultimately hinder the effectiveness of a candidate's team. By surrounding himself with diverse—I am all for diversity of thought—perspectives and expertise, Trump could strengthen his administration and better position himself against potential roadblocks, ensuring a more robust platform moving forward.
Although I don't think Elon wants to be president, he must be heavily involved in Trump's next administration. His innovative mindset and experience in navigating complex industries could bring fresh ideas to the table, potentially transforming traditional governance approaches. Moreover, collaboration between tech leaders and political figures may foster a more adaptive and forward-thinking policy framework that addresses todays challenges effectively.
He didnt put Haley and Pompeo in any position because they have historically spared no opportunity to stab Trump in the back.
(11-11-2024 09:43 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote: What does Rubio bring to the SoS position? Honest question, thoughts?
verve if he approaches in earnest ... I personally see 'faux-billity' in his stride ... he would basically be another Sessions ... I'm with JR and Vivek being best method (JR hasn't stated such in this thread ... however, nut zongo 'members thingys)
#thatGuyIsWickedSmart
I'm a little worried that Musk and Ramaswamy haven't gotten much attention since the election, other than what was said during Trump's campaign. If Trump does not assign either of them to significant duties, I would find it difficult to understand his actions. Trump often leans toward individuals who can garner instant popularity, but neglecting capable figures could potentially undermine the effectiveness of his administration. This oversight may lead to missed opportunities for innovation and progress, particularly in areas where both Musk and Ramaswamy could contribute significantly. It remains to be seen whether Trump's focus on immediate appeal will overshadow the potential benefits of incorporating their expertise into his plans.
I wonder whether the same thought process that rejected Haley and Pompeo is in play. Reports indicate that he was hesitant to put either of them in a position where they could mount a challenge to JD in 2028 given their almost certain shared goal of becoming president in 2028. I believe that attracting the most intelligent individuals should take precedence over an appointee's future aspirations for the highest position, as is obvious with Vivek. However, it seems that political strategy often prioritizes immediate gains over long-term vision, which can ultimately hinder the effectiveness of a candidate's team. By surrounding himself with diverse—I am all for diversity of thought—perspectives and expertise, Trump could strengthen his administration and better position himself against potential roadblocks, ensuring a more robust platform moving forward.
Although I don't think Elon wants to be president, he must be heavily involved in Trump's next administration. His innovative mindset and experience in navigating complex industries could bring fresh ideas to the table, potentially transforming traditional governance approaches. Moreover, collaboration between tech leaders and political figures may foster a more adaptive and forward-thinking policy framework that addresses todays challenges effectively.
He didnt put Haley and Pompeo in any position because they have historically spared no opportunity to stab Trump in the back.
That too...
simply b/c I'm surprised #groverII came to fruition (my revo-psycho was meaningless other than laughs), I cannot be MORE IMPRESSED how this has played out in seven days ... some cALL thaTTT a 'weak' ... nuts zongo feeds them the meek and the whey ...
yeah, I'm still gloating ... is it showing ...
(This post was last modified: 11-12-2024 06:53 PM by stinkfist.)
![[Image: 49298912dec91407.jpg]](https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/113/472/422/409/269/079/small/49298912dec91407.jpg)
![[Image: 3eba27bc37260aa3.jpg]](https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/113/472/415/933/463/635/small/3eba27bc37260aa3.jpg)
