Quote:I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.

I thought this would happen even before the debate made it obvious, but for now, I'm really skeptical of the source. We'll see.

Even if this is true, the Dems don't really care. Party > Country.

(09-12-2024 03:41 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Even if this is true, the Dems don't really care. Party > Country.

Well of course. And Rs will believe it. The only place it matters is in the swing states and with peeps who are deciding whether to vote or not.

(09-12-2024 03:31 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I thought this would happen even before the debate made it obvious, but for now, I'm really skeptical of the source. We'll see.

Yup, we'll see.

Willing to wait-and-see but very skeptical of this for now.

If true, especially with the notarized notes documented before the debate, then it’s a huge deal. Media will ignore it and laughed it off

(09-12-2024 03:52 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Willing to wait-and-see but very skeptical of this for now.

Same here.

I don't think anything is going to really move the needle between now and Nov. 5, short of a freaking pandemic or such. Although THAT one won't work again, lol.

This is just as serious. Mark Penn is calling for ABC/Harris to be investigated. It sounds like there is some "there" there.

They will never release anything because they don’t have anything. Claiming to have seen this proof to get the usual assortment of morons spun up, but much like Trumps healthcare plan it will never be released.

I'm not sure why some of y'all are skeptical about this. Didn't they feed the questions beforehand to Hillary in 2016? Or, was that Joe in 2020? I forget.

When are Republicans going to stop doing these stupid things with corporate media. There just need to be a list of topics - set the timer to 5 to 10 minutes each candidate with counter debate minutes and move on to the next question. American people are not getting anything out of these things when the moderators are more of the subject than the actual candidates

(09-12-2024 04:37 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  I'm not sure why some of y'all are skeptical about this. Didn't they feed the questions beforehand to Hillary in 2016? Or, was that Joe in 2020? I forget.

HIllary. WHen the DNC got hacked and the emails dropped, Donna Brazille's email was in there telling them a question a certain person was going to ask. I think this was the debate where they had people ask them questions) Brazille originally denied the email's authenticity and said she was a christian woman. But the email was generated from a system in which you could verify its authenticity by entering in the email and the hash info from it. It was authentic. She later admitted to it.

No shite

ABC is the Pravda of the US.

(09-12-2024 04:41 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  When are Republicans going to stop doing these stupid things with corporate media. There just need to be a list of topics - set the timer to 5 to 10 minutes each candidate with counter debate minutes and move on to the next question. American people are not getting anything out of these things when the moderators are more of the subject than the actual candidates

Agreed. They like the set up the way it is b/c it's dumbed down to be entertainment & allows them to interject easier

(09-12-2024 04:37 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  I'm not sure why some of y'all are skeptical about this. Didn't they feed the questions beforehand to Hillary in 2016? Or, was that Joe in 2020? I forget.

Skeptical of the source, not necessarily the info. I'm sure it's right to some degree. I'm just not buying the source without confirmation.

(09-12-2024 05:01 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-12-2024 04:37 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  I'm not sure why some of y'all are skeptical about this. Didn't they feed the questions beforehand to Hillary in 2016? Or, was that Joe in 2020? I forget.

Skeptical of the source, not necessarily the info. I'm sure it's right to some degree. I'm just not buying the source without confirmation.

The longer the Harris campaign goes without addressing it, the more real it is.

(09-12-2024 05:01 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-12-2024 04:37 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  I'm not sure why some of y'all are skeptical about this. Didn't they feed the questions beforehand to Hillary in 2016? Or, was that Joe in 2020? I forget.

Skeptical of the source, not necessarily the info. I'm sure it's right to some degree. I'm just not buying the source without confirmation.

Well, let's just say if the user doesn't show his affidavit before this weekend as promised, he'll never be taken seriously again.

When it was just one of the mini-news sites,. i was skeptical until this guy claimed he had the affidavit. You don't dare compromise your X account for something like this, unless you really believe you've got something.