(08-07-2023 02:45 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 12:51 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 12:37 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Can't wait for this to get to the Supreme Court. It will be flushed down the crapper along with Biden and his corrupt justice department. This Smith clown will be trashed relentlessly.

1. It won’t.

2. He will climb up the fail ladder of the democrat party deep state.

That's what has happened here apparently. The last SCOTUS appearance by Hack Smith I'm aware of was the cropdusting he received from an 8-zippity-doo-dads decision he was awarded when he tried to rail-road Va. Gov. Bob McDonnell in '16 I think it was.

"Boundless interpretations" of acts that could be viewed as corruption, something like that. Yet, despite that kind of ruling, here we are. With "that guy" running two of these sham investigations seeking to lock up political opponents.

And, some folks sit idly by and wave the pom-poms as we more quickly swirl the bowl into socialism and banana republicville. Great Just great.


Sad.

Its disgusting.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...stigation/

Its all third world low iq shite.

Que our resident expert to tell us why this is all "sig heil" fitting and proper

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 12:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Julie doesnt read the issue very well.

Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are. Maybe you need to write Judge Norieka a note telling her it was no big deal HUnter Bidens law firm called the clerk and had a docket that wasnt submitted by them removed, because she seems to believe it was a big enough deal that Hunter lawfirm can no longer contact the clerk directly.

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 12:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Julie doesnt read the issue very well.

Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

I guess you are too fing stupid to understand the word 'post-indictment' in that order. Bummer.

Quote:Maybe you need to write Judge Norieka a note telling her it was no big deal HUnter Bidens law firm called the clerk and had a docket that wasnt submitted by them removed, because she seems to believe it was a big enough deal that Hunter lawfirm can no longer contact the clerk directly.

Maybe you need to say *exactly* where I noted it was 'no big deal'. Again, you have a real problem with stating things precisely or, for that matter, somewhat near the truth.

Im looking forward to where I said that it was no big deal. Be precise.

You continuously astound me that you can make such amazingly ignorant comments, and still have the brain function to breathe.

(08-07-2023 04:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 12:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Julie doesnt read the issue very well.

Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

I guess you are too fing stupid to understand the word 'post-indictment' in that order. Bummer.

Quote:Maybe you need to write Judge Norieka a note telling her it was no big deal HUnter Bidens law firm called the clerk and had a docket that wasnt submitted by them removed, because she seems to believe it was a big enough deal that Hunter lawfirm can no longer contact the clerk directly.

Maybe you need to say *exactly* where I noted it was 'no big deal'. Again, you have a real problem with stating things precisely or, for that matter, somewhat near the truth.

Im looking forward to where I said that it was no big deal. Be precise.

You continuously astound me that you can make such amazingly ignorant comments, and still have the brain function to breathe.

Have you written the note to the judge yet? Please keep it curt, with fewer than 54 paragraphs and 40,000 words.

(08-07-2023 04:15 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 12:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Julie doesnt read the issue very well.

Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

I guess you are too fing stupid to understand the word 'post-indictment' in that order. Bummer.

Quote:Maybe you need to write Judge Norieka a note telling her it was no big deal HUnter Bidens law firm called the clerk and had a docket that wasnt submitted by them removed, because she seems to believe it was a big enough deal that Hunter lawfirm can no longer contact the clerk directly.

Maybe you need to say *exactly* where I noted it was 'no big deal'. Again, you have a real problem with stating things precisely or, for that matter, somewhat near the truth.

Im looking forward to where I said that it was no big deal. Be precise.

You continuously astound me that you can make such amazingly ignorant comments, and still have the brain function to breathe.

Have you written the note to the judge yet? Please keep it curt, with fewer than 54 paragraphs and 40,000 words.

Maybe point out where I said it in the first place, my friend...

I dont see that above. I will take your answer that you cannot. And that you are pulling this out of your ass. Imagine that.

Good for you. You tend to do that a lot.

All we get is above is blubber. Im sure you will do nothing more than that. Blubber some more for us, chuckles. Again, please state exactly where I said it was 'no big deal'.... should be easy with all your gum flapping above. Lolz.

Wow, that Tanq must be a terrible lawyer...or a great one because he just won't admit defeat. Let's take a vote.

(08-07-2023 04:56 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Wow, that Tanq must be a terrible lawyer...or a great one because he just won't admit defeat. Let's take a vote.

Clouded by reeeeeeeeeee

(08-07-2023 04:56 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Wow, that Tanq must be a terrible lawyer...or a great one because he just won't admit defeat. Let's take a vote.

Maybe *you* might point out where I supposedly said 'its no big deal'?

When you find the section, you might even find where I say 'If it is shown that the attorney did it, she should be put up for disciplinary action', or something to that effect.

Imagine that.

I find the above post very amusing.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

Such an amazing lack of self awareness.

(08-07-2023 04:46 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:15 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 12:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Julie doesnt read the issue very well.

Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

I guess you are too fing stupid to understand the word 'post-indictment' in that order. Bummer.

Quote:Maybe you need to write Judge Norieka a note telling her it was no big deal HUnter Bidens law firm called the clerk and had a docket that wasnt submitted by them removed, because she seems to believe it was a big enough deal that Hunter lawfirm can no longer contact the clerk directly.

Maybe you need to say *exactly* where I noted it was 'no big deal'. Again, you have a real problem with stating things precisely or, for that matter, somewhat near the truth.

Im looking forward to where I said that it was no big deal. Be precise.

You continuously astound me that you can make such amazingly ignorant comments, and still have the brain function to breathe.

Have you written the note to the judge yet? Please keep it curt, with fewer than 54 paragraphs and 40,000 words.

Maybe point out where I said it in the first place, my friend...

I dont see that above. I will take your answer that you cannot. And that you are pulling this out of your ass. Imagine that.

Good for you. You tend to do that a lot.

All we get is above is blubber. Im sure you will do nothing more than that. Blubber some more for us, chuckles. Again, please state exactly where I said it was 'no big deal'.... should be easy with all your gum flapping above. Lolz.

You'll never get that mope to admit to anything or back up of any of the nonsense he continually spews. It's a fruitless exercise. He'll either run away or start pontificating about taints and genitalia. He's completely bereft of integrity.

(08-07-2023 04:56 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Wow, that Tanq must be a terrible lawyer...or a great one because he just won't admit defeat. Let's take a vote.

Yeah, lets take a vote in a bar asking if the patrons approve of alcohol.

(08-08-2023 05:49 AM)appst89 Wrote:  I find the above post very amusing.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

IKR?

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

(08-08-2023 08:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:46 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:15 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

I guess you are too fing stupid to understand the word 'post-indictment' in that order. Bummer.

Quote:Maybe you need to write Judge Norieka a note telling her it was no big deal HUnter Bidens law firm called the clerk and had a docket that wasnt submitted by them removed, because she seems to believe it was a big enough deal that Hunter lawfirm can no longer contact the clerk directly.

Maybe you need to say *exactly* where I noted it was 'no big deal'. Again, you have a real problem with stating things precisely or, for that matter, somewhat near the truth.

Im looking forward to where I said that it was no big deal. Be precise.

You continuously astound me that you can make such amazingly ignorant comments, and still have the brain function to breathe.

Have you written the note to the judge yet? Please keep it curt, with fewer than 54 paragraphs and 40,000 words.

Maybe point out where I said it in the first place, my friend...

I dont see that above. I will take your answer that you cannot. And that you are pulling this out of your ass. Imagine that.

Good for you. You tend to do that a lot.

All we get is above is blubber. Im sure you will do nothing more than that. Blubber some more for us, chuckles. Again, please state exactly where I said it was 'no big deal'.... should be easy with all your gum flapping above. Lolz.

You'll never get that mope to admit to anything or back up of any of the nonsense he continually spews. It's a fruitless exercise. He'll either run away or start pontificating about taints and genitalia. He's completely bereft of integrity.

And yet you said the USWNT lost by a pubic hair in another thread. Hypocrite much?

(08-08-2023 08:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 05:49 AM)appst89 Wrote:  I find the above post very amusing.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

IKR?

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

If you're going to respond to me at least try to know what is being talked about.

(08-08-2023 08:52 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 08:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:46 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:15 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I guess you are too fing stupid to understand the word 'post-indictment' in that order. Bummer.


Maybe you need to say *exactly* where I noted it was 'no big deal'. Again, you have a real problem with stating things precisely or, for that matter, somewhat near the truth.

Im looking forward to where I said that it was no big deal. Be precise.

You continuously astound me that you can make such amazingly ignorant comments, and still have the brain function to breathe.

Have you written the note to the judge yet? Please keep it curt, with fewer than 54 paragraphs and 40,000 words.

Maybe point out where I said it in the first place, my friend...

I dont see that above. I will take your answer that you cannot. And that you are pulling this out of your ass. Imagine that.

Good for you. You tend to do that a lot.

All we get is above is blubber. Im sure you will do nothing more than that. Blubber some more for us, chuckles. Again, please state exactly where I said it was 'no big deal'.... should be easy with all your gum flapping above. Lolz.

You'll never get that mope to admit to anything or back up of any of the nonsense he continually spews. It's a fruitless exercise. He'll either run away or start pontificating about taints and genitalia. He's completely bereft of integrity.

And yet you said the USWNT lost by a pubic hair in another thread. Hypocrite much?

Sorry, but a pubic hair is neither a taint nor genitalia, and if you saw the replay my description is dead on balls accurate.

(08-08-2023 08:53 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 08:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 05:49 AM)appst89 Wrote:  I find the above post very amusing.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

IKR?

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

If you're going to respond to me at least try to know what is being talked about.

Geez, you're slow on the uptake.

(08-08-2023 09:01 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 08:53 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 08:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 05:49 AM)appst89 Wrote:  I find the above post very amusing.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

IKR?

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

If you're going to respond to me at least try to know what is being talked about.

Geez, you're slow on the uptake.

And you still have no idea what I was referencing. A hypocrite, a liar and an idiot, what a combination.

(08-08-2023 08:53 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 08:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 05:49 AM)appst89 Wrote:  I find the above post very amusing.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

IKR?

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

If you're going to respond to me at least try to know what is being talked about.

Bad hair day, app?

You seem mad that UStateSchool cant show where I said what he claims.

You get your panties in a wad for that being pointed out, apparently. Sounds fun.

UBU.

(08-08-2023 09:08 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 08:53 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 08:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 05:49 AM)appst89 Wrote:  I find the above post very amusing.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

IKR?

(08-07-2023 02:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Julie isnt continuously wrong. You are.

If you're going to respond to me at least try to know what is being talked about.

Bad hair day, app?

You seem mad that UStateSchool cant show where I said what he claims.

You get your panties in a wad for that being pointed out, apparently. Sounds fun.

UBU.

No, you sanctimonious putz, I was laughing at you for accusing someone else of responding to something you didn't say. You've responded to me now four times on this forum and you are 0 for 4 in responding to anything I actually said. To make matters worse, when I pointed it out to you the first time, you made some half-assed so-called apology where you blamed me for your failure to respond to what I said. The other times, you just didn't respond at all to being called out for it.

So, what I think is funny is you having the gall to call anyone else out for the behavior you exhibit on a regular basis. But UBU, Chuckles.

Is this where I put a lolz, or a funny that?