BREAKING: Transgender Nashville school shooter had detailed manifesto, map of Christian school, police confirm

(03-27-2023 12:35 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Where was the good teenage girl with a gun to stop all of this?

(03-27-2023 01:35 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 01:29 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 01:23 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 01:18 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 01:16 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Oh my bad, I'll wait a week until you all forget about this then say the same thing again. Better?

What is your solution?

We've been talking solutions since Sandy Hook, and still nothing has changed. Solutions won't be coming from y'all, it will be coming despite you, if it comes at all.

What is your solution?

His solution is to sit around and b!tch about guns.

Bringing back a swift death penalty would likely deter some crimes.

Not many. Being deterred takes rational thinking, and the people who go around shooting people aren’t known for their rationality.

We’re doomed. The most basic functions of society can’t even be performed any more.

I thought progressives wanted to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.

Zes would be a good place to start.

(03-27-2023 04:57 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  The Nashville school shooter was a biological female who 'identified as male' and used he/him pronouns. As DC_Draino notes, Hale had some disturbing artwork:

Quote: A sample of art from Audrey Hale’s website pic.twitter.com/6aSQr1Fm0E

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) March 27, 2023

could use some trans control laws and control laws against those who encourage these folks who need real traditional psychological help, not egging them on or trying to make money from their disorders.

If this is true, the national news sure is ignoring it. In this case, the person is a female. Nothing else.

(03-27-2023 04:52 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  What difference does it make if they're trans? No one has been talking about gun laws or what we should do, while specifically excluding whatever alphabet soup diversity wokeness you guys can fear up. The fact that this is coming from Charlie Kirk, who has a monetary incentive to drive up culture war nonsense, should be telling enough? Are you all so easily distracted?

I assume you're all for mental health checks before allowing someone to have a gun.

Finally about 5 minutes in, they do mention she identified as a transgender female. Whatever that is. Usually that means a male who is unhappy.

(03-27-2023 06:05 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 04:57 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  The Nashville school shooter was a biological female who 'identified as male' and used he/him pronouns. As DC_Draino notes, Hale had some disturbing artwork:

Quote: A sample of art from Audrey Hale’s website pic.twitter.com/6aSQr1Fm0E

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) March 27, 2023

could use some trans control laws and control laws against those who encourage these folks who need real traditional psychological help, not egging them on or trying to make money from their disorders.

If this is true, the national news sure is ignoring it. In this case, the person is a female. Nothing else.

Transgender = mentally ill. These folks are unstable, attention-seeking, and violent, and our dumbarse country is arguing about whether they should be reading books to our kids at local libraries.

(03-27-2023 05:46 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 05:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 02:14 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 01:39 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 01:35 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  His solution is to sit around and b!tch about guns.

Bringing back a swift death penalty would likely deter some crimes.

Public hanging. Use to work OK.

Quote:No, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws.

Capital Punishment does not deter crime. And if the shooter is already dead it is a moot point.

How do we know it doesn't deter crime?

If Mr. Soon-to-be-criminal saw an execution, how do we know he didn't say, "Welp, I guess it's a no-go."

Capital punishment = 0% recidivism rates.

This is true.

(03-27-2023 05:45 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 03:04 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 03:01 PM)b2b Wrote:  At it's root almost every problem with deal with in this country is spiritual in nature. We've tolerated and out right promoted degenerate insanity for too long. It's just getting worse and worse. If you're unable to see the fruits of the past 50-60 years of taking God out of schools and the subsequent failed social polities I pity you. More government and stripping away more rights isn't the solution. The only solution is a nation-wide, spiritual revival.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

So nothing concrete? Just pray and hope it gets better?

You do realize that prior to the mid-60s after prayer and the Bible had been banned from schools, kids actually used to take rifles to school. Not mandatory as in everyone bring your rifle tomorrow. But rifles in pickups, etc were commonplace.

How many schools shootings were happening the the 1700s, 1800s, early 1900s?

How many in the late 1900s and 2000s?

school bombing in 1927

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_School_disaster

(03-27-2023 06:05 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-27-2023 04:52 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  What difference does it make if they're trans? No one has been talking about gun laws or what we should do, while specifically excluding whatever alphabet soup diversity wokeness you guys can fear up. The fact that this is coming from Charlie Kirk, who has a monetary incentive to drive up culture war nonsense, should be telling enough? Are you all so easily distracted?

I assume you're all for mental health checks before allowing someone to have a gun.

Ha! I'm all for them before you are going to have a child. And yes on the national form for a firearms application there is a question, "Have you ever been adjudicated to have a mental deficit." I think the old forms were "Have you ever been adjudicated to be mentally ill." If you answer yes then you are disqualified. Now the problem with that is that people lie, even under threat of incarceration for perjury, and why should they not lie if they have been found to be mentally impaired in any way? You have to be deemed competent to stand trial for your crimes.

I'm sure there are attorneys here who could elucidate further, but the bottom line is the person applying for a gun purchase can easily lie. No today the computer system is supposed to flag these but you are only as competent as your data entry. Isn't that a scary thought?

Biden, Garland, and Wray have been attacking Christians and traditional families for several years now, helping to radicalize people like Audrey Hale.

Can we do the same before allowing people to vote? IQ tests, employed, etc. It would eliminate the trashy Dems from voting their moronic politicians into office. It’s a start.

(03-27-2023 04:52 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  What difference does it make if they're trans? No one has been talking about gun laws or what we should do, while specifically excluding whatever alphabet soup diversity wokeness you guys can fear up. The fact that this is coming from Charlie Kirk, who has a monetary incentive to drive up culture war nonsense, should be telling enough? Are you all so easily distracted?

It must matter to a lot of folks. MSM outlets are going out of their way not to mention it, and you have to dig to discover the shooter's gender at all. Most are eschewing pronouns and just saying "the shooter."

I guarantee if the shooter was a white male, that would be the first thing mentioned.

Just more proof that MAGA is not the problem nor are the 120 million gunowners in this country, but rather the radical leftist commie democrats are the problem that use violence to make their point.

(03-27-2023 06:27 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  Just more proof that MAGA is not the problem nor are the 120 million gunowners in this country, but rather the radical leftist commie democrats are the problem that use violence to make their point.

Bingo

(03-27-2023 06:21 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  Can we do the same before allowing people to vote? IQ tests, employed, etc. It would eliminate the trashy Dems from voting their moronic politicians into office. It’s a start.

Competency and literacy requirements for voting died with Jim Crow. What's funny is that the Nazi's copied those from us, including sterilization laws we had on the books.

It truly was not our finest hour. The laws on literacy existed because of the ease with which a poll worker could manipulate the vote of those who could not read, at least that was the concept. It also extended to anyone who may have been permitted to go into the booth with them. In those days the machines were taller than you were (unless you were 6'5" or taller) and you flipped a toggle on each election to indicate your vote, and you pulled the large lever to tabulate your vote. Then someone else would come in and vote. The machines literally had a curtain which obscured the public vision of your voting actions.

I actually kind of liked them and the experience would have been better during covid with a wipe down of surfaces between each vote.

damn, this came back to blow up in LGBTQNations's face.