So... Alvin Bragg receives a "suspicious" white powder??? Did someone have to stop him from snorting it or something???

(03-26-2023 07:41 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 06:45 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 06:09 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Y'all are still arguing with this fool? You're feeding him and his need for attention.

I see a civil, honest question there. Answered in a civil, honest manner. More of discussion.

Yes, there are people out there that might think differently than you. Must be quite the horrific thought for some, right?

I am sorry you chose a pinhead mode retort -- that is on you. Surprise, surprise.

Unlike your response which is NO surprise.

Bartlett -- I am simply responding in a similar tone and manner to Tiger Blue regarding a comment about me. Maybe you didnt notice that?


BD types out a civil question.

Tiger Blue types out a snotty, whiny comment, calling one a 'fool'.

I answered BDs question, civilly.

I counter-punched to Tiger Blues idiot add on.

Again...

BD asks a civil question -- gets a civil answer in return.

TB tries a whiny ad hom add-on, gets a (rather mild) counter punch in return.

Capiche? Honestly, it seems obvious there and shouldnt really warrant that comment from you.

In short, I'll treat every comment to me in the same manner, and tone, as it is made. Which occurred above both with BD and Tiger Blue.

To be liberal in that application, I'll take your comment as you innocently didnt notice the above, or that it didnt register.

The only thing that should be NO surprise to you above is the civil reply to a civil question, insulting reply to an insulting comment. Seems to be pretty obvious to me there. And exactly in line as discussed with you in the thread about 'insulting in talk here'.

And I made the offer to you to that I wouldnt unload on you if you acted civilly. I'll treat the above as simple mistake on your part. Sound good to you Mr Bartlett?

wacko in waco

(03-26-2023 08:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  And I made the offer to you to that I wouldnt unload on you if you acted civilly. I'll treat the above as simple mistake on your part. Sound good to you Mr Bartlett?

No mistake was made. You sir are a condescending arse and you may unload on me all you want. As if I give a spit about your opinion.

(03-26-2023 08:40 AM)Unionman76 Wrote:  wacko in waco

Maybe so. Do you find the current sleaze in the White House an improvement? If so, you have just as many issues as the Wacko in Waco.

(03-26-2023 09:06 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 08:40 AM)Unionman76 Wrote:  wacko in waco

Maybe so. Do you find the current sleaze in the White House an improvement? If so, you have just as many issues as the Wacko in Waco.

BD, the guy uses Unionman76. He loves the corrupt cud in the White House.

(03-26-2023 06:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 11:39 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 10:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:44 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:35 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Got it -- all a conspiracy. Is there any answer *but* that from some particular people.

Quite a good low information based knee jerk viewpoint. Bravo. (I guess...)

Of course there are no conspiracies.

Who said that? There are plenty of conspiracies. Just seems pretty rash to automatically claim one -- as happens around here on a highly consistent basis. As a matter of first comment.

Quote: Government good.

And that has exactly *what* to do with this? That is aside from you typing out the phrases that seemingly rush into mind for you.

Quote: Conspiracy bad.

A goody. Another random thought from the ether.

Quote: Trump break law.

Maybe - -maybe not. Again, a great example of an automatic kneejerk reaction.

Quote:Manhattan DA bring justice.

Maybe, maybe not. You are on quite the role of random existentialism tonite. Have fun.

Tanq, has it ever occurred to you that all of these Trump legal endeavors are politically motivated by the Progressive Liberals?

I've thought (and said elsewhere) and thought that some (note the word 'some') actually are.

Some seem to involve actual problems that DJT did, and quite honestly, some he brought on himself. Bummer he may have actually done some or enough of the stuff that comes back against him in *some* of the stuff.

The current Bragg fiasco looks to be magnified up by Bragg. At its base, it should ne no more than a misdemeanor. I'll chalk that one up to what you describe above. As I would the first impeachment, and the Steele dossier.

Does that look like "all the Trump legal issues" to you? If I recall correctly, you have a master's (maybe more), and should know the difference between 'some' and the 'all' that you use above.

And how in the world does that tie in to the apparent automatic belief that the threat is automatically a false flag operation by progressives?

Turning further to your use of the word 'all', has it ever occurred to you that this forum for the most part automatically makes the assertion that Trump is in fact clean of just about everything? Or that death threats against people running these operations are automatically 'false flag' operations?

Quote:No one cares about Trump more than the Regressives

MAGA nation sure as heck does make a good run at that, for better or worse.

Actually, belay that. Trump cares more about Trump to the exclusion of anyone else around. By a wide, wide margin.

Answered like a tried and skewed Atty. Since the dawn of time justice equals whose bull got gored and what recompense should be paid. And only the effected party wants that recompense as others are not so entitled therefore show little interest.

You dance around the meat of the premise of the question with character attacks on Trump. I will give you that. He is an easy target and his mouth is as large as the state of Texas itself. But, you want to see him as the only dirty spot among the rest of the filth that covers the room. For that conclusion you fail miserably.

If you are so clueless that you can't see a Progressive brainwashing propaganda ideology such as this doesn't want to annihilate Trump at all cost then you truly are a lost soul. Even Liberals understand this. Pull your head out and see the landscape for what it is NOT WHAT YOU WANT IT TO BE.

I believe in the sanctity of our elected officials and truly believe they do no evil. The only malfeasance that occurs in our Government is Trump. Signed Tanq.

Now carry on with your mind twisting blather if it makes you feel validated.

(03-26-2023 09:05 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 08:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  And I made the offer to you to that I wouldnt unload on you if you acted civilly. I'll treat the above as simple mistake on your part. Sound good to you Mr Bartlett?

No mistake was made. You sir are a condescending arse and you may unload on me all you want. As if I give a spit about your opinion.

Got it, warrior man. Fun, fun, fun.

You sir, seemingly revel in shallow ass Beavis statements that are whiny an attacking in nature, to the exclusion of anything else, lacking completely in any substance except for your ignorant lashing out, and to the exclusion of any effort to anything else.. Just 'attack the person'.

Quite the fing shallow pud there. Got to be fun.... lolz. Quote the warrior way, barteet. Double lolx. And somehow you excuse that as to some kneejerk pinhead manner to being akin to a 'warrior'. Triple lolz.

Life must be smashingly fun at Casa Barteet. Quadruple lolz.

Jeezus Krist there is a shallow, venal aspect in the Barteet genetic pool somewhere.

(03-26-2023 09:25 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 06:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 11:39 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 10:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:44 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Of course there are no conspiracies.

Who said that? There are plenty of conspiracies. Just seems pretty rash to automatically claim one -- as happens around here on a highly consistent basis. As a matter of first comment.

Quote: Government good.

And that has exactly *what* to do with this? That is aside from you typing out the phrases that seemingly rush into mind for you.

Quote: Conspiracy bad.

A goody. Another random thought from the ether.

Quote: Trump break law.

Maybe - -maybe not. Again, a great example of an automatic kneejerk reaction.

Quote:Manhattan DA bring justice.

Maybe, maybe not. You are on quite the role of random existentialism tonite. Have fun.

Tanq, has it ever occurred to you that all of these Trump legal endeavors are politically motivated by the Progressive Liberals?

I've thought (and said elsewhere) and thought that some (note the word 'some') actually are.

Some seem to involve actual problems that DJT did, and quite honestly, some he brought on himself. Bummer he may have actually done some or enough of the stuff that comes back against him in *some* of the stuff.

The current Bragg fiasco looks to be magnified up by Bragg. At its base, it should ne no more than a misdemeanor. I'll chalk that one up to what you describe above. As I would the first impeachment, and the Steele dossier.

Does that look like "all the Trump legal issues" to you? If I recall correctly, you have a master's (maybe more), and should know the difference between 'some' and the 'all' that you use above.

And how in the world does that tie in to the apparent automatic belief that the threat is automatically a false flag operation by progressives?

Turning further to your use of the word 'all', has it ever occurred to you that this forum for the most part automatically makes the assertion that Trump is in fact clean of just about everything? Or that death threats against people running these operations are automatically 'false flag' operations?

Quote:No one cares about Trump more than the Regressives

MAGA nation sure as heck does make a good run at that, for better or worse.

Actually, belay that. Trump cares more about Trump to the exclusion of anyone else around. By a wide, wide margin.

Answered like a tried and skewed Atty. Since the dawn of time justice equals whose bull got gored and what recompense should be paid. And only the effected party wants that recompense as others are not so entitled therefore show little interest.

Thats your social angst. Not mine.

Quote:You dance around the meat of the premise of the question with character attacks on Trump.

I actually answered your somewhat poorly constructed issue around 'all'. Some are unwarranted, no doubt. Some are not.

I have callen out the ones that are to me unwarranted in applying, or are unwarranted in scope. Others are much more warranted, imo.

Quote:He is an easy target and his mouth is as large as the state of Texas itself.

His being a ******* and and ******* have nothing to do with those perceptions, Blue. He can be an easy target for issues that I think are much more on point than his 'large mouth'.

His 'large mouth' has zero to do with the items that I call against him in a legal sense. But a nice deflection there.

You tend to forget I actually voted for him in '20, notwithstanding his 'big mouth' issues. My big issues with him run to a far deeper moral/legality subject. But, even though I think that his somewhat bankrupt in that sense -- there are times and instances he has been improperly pursued. And other times properly pursued in my book.

Quote:But, you want to see him as the only dirty spot among the rest of the filth that covers the room.

And there you go, making assumptions. Trump is *far* from the only dirty spot from my POV.

Quote: For that conclusion you fail miserably.

Actually it is only that assumption and corresponding false conclusion about me and my beliefs that fails miserably.

Quote:If you are so clueless that you can't see a Progressive brainwashing propaganda ideology such as this doesn't want to annihilate Trump at all cost

Absolutely there are progressives that wish to do so. There are also a lot of libertarians that join that club, and a lot of conservatives.

And not all progressives, libertarians, and conservatives are such that their main goal is to 'get Trump'. But somehow in your analysis, anyone that is critical of *anything* that Trump has done/performed falls into that rubric.

As I said, some things Trump is/has been accused of I dont subscribe to that --- Steele, first impeachment, and several others.

Other items I am fierce critic of his. For quite honestly, fairly surficial and valid reasons. But somehow *you* translate the issues I have with Trump on those (which are fatal to my supporting him) to 'no matter what the issue is get Trump' (which is utterly false), to 'you dont see the filth on the other side to the exclusion of Trump' (again, a wholly incorrect assumption, to 'every progressive has a life mission to get to Trump, and only limited to progressives' (again a wholly false assumption).

But if you want to make up excuses to the heresy that you see in my POV on a grossly false, basis --- that is a *you* problem. Not a *me* problem.

Quote:I believe in the sanctity of our elected officials and truly believe they do no evil. The only malfeasance that occurs in our Government is Trump. Signed Tanq.

For an educated guy you sure do poorly with making extreme, and false in the stupid extreme, statements.

Quote:Now carry on with your mind twisting blather if it makes you feel validated.

Twisting blather is making the shallow extremes that you assign above, with all respect. Not my problem that when you get worked up into a lather all you seemingly can do is lash out like you do above.

Look if you want to automatically believe that a death threat to Bragg is automatically the work of progressives -- go for it. Free country and all that jazz. To assume that automatically indicates a real lack of depth to critical thinking in my viewpoint. As does the ultimate, broad, and in the extreme viewpoints that you seem to also automatically sign me up without bother, without apparent thought, and quite honestly spuriously. Sounds like fun.

Making extreme assumptions like your idiotic assumptions about my viewpoints (detailed above, and further evidenced by the bolded) doesnt help you much. Just saying.

(03-26-2023 10:04 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 09:25 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 06:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 11:39 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 10:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Who said that? There are plenty of conspiracies. Just seems pretty rash to automatically claim one -- as happens around here on a highly consistent basis. As a matter of first comment.


And that has exactly *what* to do with this? That is aside from you typing out the phrases that seemingly rush into mind for you.


A goody. Another random thought from the ether.


Maybe - -maybe not. Again, a great example of an automatic kneejerk reaction.


Maybe, maybe not. You are on quite the role of random existentialism tonite. Have fun.

Tanq, has it ever occurred to you that all of these Trump legal endeavors are politically motivated by the Progressive Liberals?

I've thought (and said elsewhere) and thought that some (note the word 'some') actually are.

Some seem to involve actual problems that DJT did, and quite honestly, some he brought on himself. Bummer he may have actually done some or enough of the stuff that comes back against him in *some* of the stuff.

The current Bragg fiasco looks to be magnified up by Bragg. At its base, it should ne no more than a misdemeanor. I'll chalk that one up to what you describe above. As I would the first impeachment, and the Steele dossier.

Does that look like "all the Trump legal issues" to you? If I recall correctly, you have a master's (maybe more), and should know the difference between 'some' and the 'all' that you use above.

And how in the world does that tie in to the apparent automatic belief that the threat is automatically a false flag operation by progressives?

Turning further to your use of the word 'all', has it ever occurred to you that this forum for the most part automatically makes the assertion that Trump is in fact clean of just about everything? Or that death threats against people running these operations are automatically 'false flag' operations?

Quote:No one cares about Trump more than the Regressives

MAGA nation sure as heck does make a good run at that, for better or worse.

Actually, belay that. Trump cares more about Trump to the exclusion of anyone else around. By a wide, wide margin.

Answered like a tried and skewed Atty. Since the dawn of time justice equals whose bull got gored and what recompense should be paid. And only the effected party wants that recompense as others are not so entitled therefore show little interest.

Thats your social angst. Not mine.

Quote:You dance around the meat of the premise of the question with character attacks on Trump.

I actually answered your somewhat poorly constructed issue around 'all'. Some are unwarranted, no doubt. Some are not.

I have callen out the ones that are to me unwarranted in applying, or are unwarranted in scope. Others are much more warranted, imo.

Quote:He is an easy target and his mouth is as large as the state of Texas itself.

His being a ******* and and ******* have nothing to do with those perceptions, Blue. He can be an easy target for issues that I think are much more on point than his 'large mouth'.

His 'large mouth' has zero to do with the items that I call against him in a legal sense. But a nice deflection there.

You tend to forget I actually voted for him in '20, notwithstanding his 'big mouth' issues. My big issues with him run to a far deeper moral/legality subject. But, even though I think that his somewhat bankrupt in that sense -- there are times and instances he has been improperly pursued. And other times properly pursued in my book.

Quote:But, you want to see him as the only dirty spot among the rest of the filth that covers the room.

And there you go, making assumptions. Trump is *far* from the only dirty spot from my POV.

Quote: For that conclusion you fail miserably.

Actually it is only that assumption and corresponding false conclusion about me and my beliefs that fails miserably.

Quote:If you are so clueless that you can't see a Progressive brainwashing propaganda ideology such as this doesn't want to annihilate Trump at all cost

Absolutely there are progressives that wish to do so. There are also a lot of libertarians that join that club, and a lot of conservatives.

And not all progressives, libertarians, and conservatives are such that their main goal is to 'get Trump'. But somehow in your analysis, anyone that is critical of *anything* that Trump has done/performed falls into that rubric.

As I said, some things Trump is/has been accused of I dont subscribe to that --- Steele, first impeachment, and several others.

Other items I am fierce critic of his. For quite honestly, fairly surficial and valid reasons. But somehow *you* translate the issues I have with Trump on those (which are fatal to my supporting him) to 'no matter what the issue is get Trump' (which is utterly false), to 'you dont see the filth on the other side to the exclusion of Trump' (again, a wholly incorrect assumption, to 'every progressive has a life mission to get to Trump, and only limited to progressives' (again a wholly false assumption).

But if you want to make up excuses to the heresy that you see in my POV on a grossly false, basis --- that is a *you* problem. Not a *me* problem.

Quote:I believe in the sanctity of our elected officials and truly believe they do no evil. The only malfeasance that occurs in our Government is Trump. Signed Tanq.

For an educated guy you sure do poorly with making extreme, and false in the stupid extreme, statements.

Quote:Now carry on with your mind twisting blather if it makes you feel validated.

Twisting blather is making the shallow extremes that you assign above, with all respect. Not my problem that when you get worked up into a lather all you seemingly can do is lash out like you do above.

Look if you want to automatically believe that a death threat to Bragg is automatically the work of progressives -- go for it. Free country and all that jazz. To assume that automatically indicates a real lack of depth to critical thinking in my viewpoint. As does the ultimate, broad, and in the extreme viewpoints that you seem to also automatically sign me up without bother, without apparent thought, and quite honestly spuriously. Sounds like fun.

Making extreme assumptions like your idiotic assumptions about my viewpoints (detailed above, and further evidenced by the bolded) doesnt help you much. Just saying.

Honest questions not answered honestly. Assumptions made on the said person’s verbiage in articulating said responses.

Do you own 100% polyester pin striped seersuckers suits, clip on ties and dippety doo for court appearances? Just asking for my friend ODUSmitty.

Funny. Tanq seemed like he was trying to make nice nice with a few folks but no one seemed at all interested, so back with the barbs. He just doesn't get it. Sad.

(03-26-2023 11:06 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 10:04 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 09:25 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 06:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 11:39 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  Tanq, has it ever occurred to you that all of these Trump legal endeavors are politically motivated by the Progressive Liberals?

I've thought (and said elsewhere) and thought that some (note the word 'some') actually are.

Some seem to involve actual problems that DJT did, and quite honestly, some he brought on himself. Bummer he may have actually done some or enough of the stuff that comes back against him in *some* of the stuff.

The current Bragg fiasco looks to be magnified up by Bragg. At its base, it should ne no more than a misdemeanor. I'll chalk that one up to what you describe above. As I would the first impeachment, and the Steele dossier.

Does that look like "all the Trump legal issues" to you? If I recall correctly, you have a master's (maybe more), and should know the difference between 'some' and the 'all' that you use above.

And how in the world does that tie in to the apparent automatic belief that the threat is automatically a false flag operation by progressives?

Turning further to your use of the word 'all', has it ever occurred to you that this forum for the most part automatically makes the assertion that Trump is in fact clean of just about everything? Or that death threats against people running these operations are automatically 'false flag' operations?

Quote:No one cares about Trump more than the Regressives

MAGA nation sure as heck does make a good run at that, for better or worse.

Actually, belay that. Trump cares more about Trump to the exclusion of anyone else around. By a wide, wide margin.

Answered like a tried and skewed Atty. Since the dawn of time justice equals whose bull got gored and what recompense should be paid. And only the effected party wants that recompense as others are not so entitled therefore show little interest.

Thats your social angst. Not mine.

Quote:You dance around the meat of the premise of the question with character attacks on Trump.

I actually answered your somewhat poorly constructed issue around 'all'. Some are unwarranted, no doubt. Some are not.

I have callen out the ones that are to me unwarranted in applying, or are unwarranted in scope. Others are much more warranted, imo.

Quote:He is an easy target and his mouth is as large as the state of Texas itself.

His being a ******* and and ******* have nothing to do with those perceptions, Blue. He can be an easy target for issues that I think are much more on point than his 'large mouth'.

His 'large mouth' has zero to do with the items that I call against him in a legal sense. But a nice deflection there.

You tend to forget I actually voted for him in '20, notwithstanding his 'big mouth' issues. My big issues with him run to a far deeper moral/legality subject. But, even though I think that his somewhat bankrupt in that sense -- there are times and instances he has been improperly pursued. And other times properly pursued in my book.

Quote:But, you want to see him as the only dirty spot among the rest of the filth that covers the room.

And there you go, making assumptions. Trump is *far* from the only dirty spot from my POV.

Quote: For that conclusion you fail miserably.

Actually it is only that assumption and corresponding false conclusion about me and my beliefs that fails miserably.

Quote:If you are so clueless that you can't see a Progressive brainwashing propaganda ideology such as this doesn't want to annihilate Trump at all cost

Absolutely there are progressives that wish to do so. There are also a lot of libertarians that join that club, and a lot of conservatives.

And not all progressives, libertarians, and conservatives are such that their main goal is to 'get Trump'. But somehow in your analysis, anyone that is critical of *anything* that Trump has done/performed falls into that rubric.

As I said, some things Trump is/has been accused of I dont subscribe to that --- Steele, first impeachment, and several others.

Other items I am fierce critic of his. For quite honestly, fairly surficial and valid reasons. But somehow *you* translate the issues I have with Trump on those (which are fatal to my supporting him) to 'no matter what the issue is get Trump' (which is utterly false), to 'you dont see the filth on the other side to the exclusion of Trump' (again, a wholly incorrect assumption, to 'every progressive has a life mission to get to Trump, and only limited to progressives' (again a wholly false assumption).

But if you want to make up excuses to the heresy that you see in my POV on a grossly false, basis --- that is a *you* problem. Not a *me* problem.

Quote:I believe in the sanctity of our elected officials and truly believe they do no evil. The only malfeasance that occurs in our Government is Trump. Signed Tanq.

For an educated guy you sure do poorly with making extreme, and false in the stupid extreme, statements.

Quote:Now carry on with your mind twisting blather if it makes you feel validated.

Twisting blather is making the shallow extremes that you assign above, with all respect. Not my problem that when you get worked up into a lather all you seemingly can do is lash out like you do above.

Look if you want to automatically believe that a death threat to Bragg is automatically the work of progressives -- go for it. Free country and all that jazz. To assume that automatically indicates a real lack of depth to critical thinking in my viewpoint. As does the ultimate, broad, and in the extreme viewpoints that you seem to also automatically sign me up without bother, without apparent thought, and quite honestly spuriously. Sounds like fun.

Making extreme assumptions like your idiotic assumptions about my viewpoints (detailed above, and further evidenced by the bolded) doesnt help you much. Just saying.

Honest questions not answered honestly. Assumptions made on the said person’s verbiage in articulating said responses.

Well, right in front of you you have the counter factuals. Yet you dont even bother to consider them above. Who exactly has honesty issues here, BD?

Let alone your paean to drop in the overbroad, and extreme positions such as automatically assigning the death threat to Bragg to a liberal cause.

Yes, how dare I not take that position automatically. I dont have a clue who did this, and honestly, neither to you. How dare I point out that kneejerk expectation of yours as, well, kneejerk. Not to mention your horribly broad (and false, mind you) soliloquy bolded above.

Quote:Do you own 100% polyester pin striped seersuckers suits, clip on ties and dippety doo for court appearances? Just asking for my friend ODUSmitty.

I guess you missed the part about replying to anyone, including your friend ODUSmitty, in the equivalent tone and manner I am addressed. Tell him bummer for that.

(03-26-2023 11:18 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Funny. Tanq seemed like he was trying to make nice nice with a few folks but no one seemed at all interested, so back with the barbs. He just doesn't get it. Sad.

No, I respond in the same manner I am addressed. You want to be a venal, hostile, empty asshat, that is a *you* problem in that respect.

Guess you are too fing stupid I did make nice with you. Twice. You responded with you proverbial Beavis crap.

Funny you dont clue into that.

Actually scratch that -- Im not surprised with you. "Warrior way" -- god that cracks me up.....

I didn’t mean to hurt your feelings so.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/...r-cynicism
Even Cuomo is saying its ridiculous.

"...Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo accused the New York and Georgia grand jury investigations into former President Donald Trump of being politically motivated and part of a "cancer in our body politic."

Cuomo, a Democrat who resigned in disgrace in 2021 amid sexual misconduct allegations, made the comments during an appearance this week on WABC 770 talk radio show "The Cats Roundtable." The former governor told host John Catsimatidis that he "doesn't understand" why Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was "putting such an emphasis" on Trump's 2016 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.


“You have a cynical public, they don’t believe anyone and when you start to see these prosecutors bring political cases, it just affirms everybody’s cynicism,” Cuomo said.

"I don’t believe a Democratic prosecutor just happens to be attacking a Republican. I don’t believe a Republican prosecutor just happens to be attacking a Democrat. I think it’s all politics, and I think that’s what the people of this country are saying,” he continued. "And I think it’s feeds the cynicism, and that’s the cancer in our body politic right now....""

You wonder when some of the TDSers will finally understand how dangerous and ridiculous this stuff is.

(03-26-2023 12:38 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I didn’t mean to hurt your feelings so.

No feelings hurt here, 'way of the warrior' man. Can't wait for your next whiny and empty comment.

(03-26-2023 12:38 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I didn’t mean to hurt your feelings so.

Hes broken

(03-26-2023 01:27 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 12:38 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I didn’t mean to hurt your feelings so.

Hes broken

Speaking of empty, whiny and venal comments, with a flash of the "Warrior Way" signal and riding to the aid of Barteet the warrior comes Tigger the jack-ss, so we may savor the true beauty of male bonding of emptiness, whine, and venality.

Quite the model of male/male bonding thing you have going -- almost like the Lone Ranger and Tonto, or Starsky and Hutch, or Beavis and Butthead, or Pete and Chasten Buttigieg.

(03-26-2023 01:34 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 01:27 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 12:38 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I didn’t mean to hurt your feelings so.

Hes broken

Riding to the aid of Barteet the warrior comes Tigger the *******, so we may savor the true beauty of male bonding of emptiness and venality.

Quite the model of male/male bonding thing you have going -- almost like the Lone Ranger and Tonto, or Starsky and Hutch, or Pete and Chasten Buttigieg.

Why does any guy in America give a damn who Chasten is, if that's his name. You shouldn't care enough to know his name. The tell here is the second reveal for you as your handle is the first? I bet you order Tanquary because Beefeaters would be an explanatory third, huh? Weak sauce for a weak souse.

(03-26-2023 01:34 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 01:27 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-26-2023 12:38 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I didn’t mean to hurt your feelings so.

Hes broken

Speaking of empty, whiny and venal comments, with a flash of the "Warrior Way" signal and riding to the aid of Barteet the warrior comes Tigger the jack-ss, so we may savor the true beauty of male bonding of emptiness, whine, and venality.

Quite the model of male/male bonding thing you have going -- almost like the Lone Ranger and Tonto, or Starsky and Hutch, or Beavis and Butthead, or Pete and Chasten Buttigieg.

Broken