(03-23-2023 11:47 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 11:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Alvin Bragg is a moron.

Last good NYC DA:

Also the last great owner of Daytona International Speedway.

(03-23-2023 11:51 AM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 11:47 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 11:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Alvin Bragg is a moron.

Last good NYC DA:

Points for you sir

An Alabamian that graduated from Memphis State

(03-23-2023 11:52 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 11:47 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 11:41 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Alvin Bragg is a moron.

Last good NYC DA:

Also the last great owner of Daytona International Speedway.

... if only Bobby D. was the governor, Rowdy may still be driving...

(03-23-2023 09:15 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 07:39 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-22-2023 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-22-2023 10:55 PM)450bench Wrote:  My point to you, tanq, is that your distain for Trump robs you of the ability to be objective. And that detracts from any point you make, even if your point had/has merit.

Yes I dislike Trump.

What precisely is incorrect about my statements, due to that dislike?

Not any generalized comment like that 'wow you dont like Trump.' What specifically have I said that is unfair, untrue, or deceptive.

Im all ears.

My profession, I *have* to be objective. I *have* to get over a distaste of a client -- I *have* to provide the *best*, most candid assessment I can.

And, honestly, I do a pretty good job of that.

Quote:Much like Owl’s reply to your question earlier in the thread, when you review the history, dating back to 2016, it’s difficult to support the effort the left is placing on the latest Trump quest.

Do you realize I just dumped on the NY issue, in that getting a felony is going to be a real hard road to hoe?

If I am so die hard non-objective, wouldnt you find that a tad odd?

And, I can point you to another discussion with #s earlier today, in the Rice forum, where we discussed the earlier issues. Many of those earlier issues I cam down squarely on 'wow, they have a hard on for Trump.' Try the Rice board and look at my comments there.

So please dont tell me how I blind myself one way or the other. I actually have a record there -- look at it.

In order, Trump faced an unfair and unwarranted attack via the Steele dossier and through the Mueller investigation.

The first impeachment of him was based on very thin grounds -- it should have never been launched.

Im *on record* as supporting him and his position on those. Seriously.

When it comes to 1/6, I am harsh on Trump. His actions leading to 1/6 were disgusting. I cannot believe that someone so thoroughly tried to bork the process of certification, even without the issue of the riot.

I am a very harsh critic of how he handled himself during the Capitol riot. Bummer. I call those as I see them.

As for MAL, I dont see the giant conspiracy that many here see. I do see a guy who lied to the Archives, lied under oath to the DOJ about having stuff, and ultimately threw the middle finger enough times he got his ass searched and the items he shouldnt have had seized.

In the NY Cohen case, I think at worst this should be a misdemeanor.

I dont know enough about Georgia, or the other aspects of the Special Prosecutor's case to have an opinion. But I am *not* going to kneejerk and yell he is guilty, nor not guilty as many do here for those issues.

Quote:While people like me didn’t like Clinton, he was still a good President. We can admit that, in fairness. He also had a hand in making some of us wealthy in a way we didn’t view as possible.

I freely admit that Trump did many things I supported. Criminy, I even voted for the guy in '20.

I cant stand how he has, at least to me, taken a giant **** on the electoral process in the events leading to 1/6. He, being Trump, simply flipped the finger at the process that was going to render a result he didnt like. And no, I cannot condone doing that. At all.

Quote:Trump was a good President, better than good actually. And he helped make some of us even more wealthy. Even the less fortunate saw an uptick in everything monetary and that’s great.

I would agree partially. On the whole there were many things I liked and supported. I have said this many times. That doesnt blind me to what I consider to be some very serious shortcomings.

Quote:But a faction of the population have an agenda and allow that agenda to harpoon their ability to be objective.

What about my positions above are 'an agenda' and render my ability to be objective to nothing?

Look I respect your opinion. I cannot rip a genuinely held opinion. Even when it differs from mine. In short, your view on the good that Trump did is positive. It tends potentially to you overlooking some serious stuff.

My view is that there is a deal of good that Trump did in office. Again, I voted for him in '20, when I did not do so in '16.

My view is also, during the run up to 1/6, he absolutely attempted to subvert the process. He may have genuinely believed that he did not lose -- but, even then -- he seriously tried to mess with those rules and processes that have done us fairly well for the last 240+ years. Solely for his benefit, imo.

In my book that is inexcusable. That does not 'flow over' into a 'anything to get Trump mode' as some seem to think that I hold. Again, as an example, the issue currently in New York should be no more than a misdemeanor. Does that sound like an unobjective Get Trump No Matter What position?

Thank you for the calm and considered language and tone in your post. Hopefully this reciprocates that.

I might have missed it, but can you point to the post where you show your disdain for the absolute criminal in office at the moment.

I just see the broken record on Trump.



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

The search function works well here, and I have made those comments about Biden.

I use Tapatalk to access this forum and the search function sucks donkey balls, so if you could kindly point me to a few of your incessant insults of Biden



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

On Tuesday, I realized I was supposed to have girded my loins but hadn't.
I promised I'd double-gird next time.

The GJ is meeting today.
Is it time for me to double gird my loins?
Or aren't we there yet.

Bragg is just another wealthy, well dressed liar. Paints himself as somebody who grew up on the mean streets of Harlem. Only one problem with that story.

Quote:Manhattan's new District Attorney Alvin Bragg regularly gives speeches about the hardships of growing up in Harlem, recalling cops pointing guns at him

DailyMail.com has learned that he grew up in an upper middle-class enclave of brownstones and attended an elite school on the Upper West Side

Manhattan's new District Attorney Alvin Bragg regularly gives speeches about his childhood, recalling that cops and civilians pointed guns at him a half dozen times, and says it's his hardships growing up in Harlem that make him the right man for the moment.

But critics familiar with his upbringing tell DailyMail.com that he actually enjoyed quite a cushy existence, and should stop distorting his past to justify reforms that would keep all but the most serious felons out of jail.

Bragg, the first black Manhattan DA, grew up in Harlem but on one of the safest blocks around, an upper middle-class enclave of brownstones known as Strivers Row, and since age 4 commuted to the elite Trinity School on Manhattan's Upper West Side - details he conveniently leaves out when he makes his case.

'He's made his biography his moral compass, making it seem like there's something magic about his life story that gives him the wisdom to establish policies that affect over one million people,' one insider told DailyMall.com. 'I'm not saying he hasn't experienced racism, but there's lots of privilege he leaves out of his story.'

Quote:He barely mentioned the fact he didn't have to attend public school or hang out in the projects. Waking up on Strivers Row, he commuted out of Harlem to the now $57,000-a-year Trinity School on West 91st Street, where children have less a chance gaining admission than getting into Harvard. He currently sends his two children to the private school, where legacy students have a decidedly upper hand.

The school boasts of the success of its graduates, who include everyone from Eric Trump to John McEnroe.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...forms.html

(03-23-2023 10:41 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 10:37 AM)450bench Wrote:  The libs are in panic mode as usual. Ya can’t make this crap up.

And you're clueless, as usual.

Again, this is by FAR the least consequential legal matter for trump. The documents case and the Georgia case...and even the Carroll civil rape case...are way more worrisome for trump.

As Tanq has pointed out numerous times, this will most likely only result in a misdemeanor.

BUCKLE THE **** UP!!!!!

ANY DAY NOW

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(03-23-2023 12:01 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 09:15 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 07:39 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-22-2023 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-22-2023 10:55 PM)450bench Wrote:  My point to you, tanq, is that your distain for Trump robs you of the ability to be objective. And that detracts from any point you make, even if your point had/has merit.

Yes I dislike Trump.

What precisely is incorrect about my statements, due to that dislike?

Not any generalized comment like that 'wow you dont like Trump.' What specifically have I said that is unfair, untrue, or deceptive.

Im all ears.

My profession, I *have* to be objective. I *have* to get over a distaste of a client -- I *have* to provide the *best*, most candid assessment I can.

And, honestly, I do a pretty good job of that.

Quote:Much like Owl’s reply to your question earlier in the thread, when you review the history, dating back to 2016, it’s difficult to support the effort the left is placing on the latest Trump quest.

Do you realize I just dumped on the NY issue, in that getting a felony is going to be a real hard road to hoe?

If I am so die hard non-objective, wouldnt you find that a tad odd?

And, I can point you to another discussion with #s earlier today, in the Rice forum, where we discussed the earlier issues. Many of those earlier issues I cam down squarely on 'wow, they have a hard on for Trump.' Try the Rice board and look at my comments there.

So please dont tell me how I blind myself one way or the other. I actually have a record there -- look at it.

In order, Trump faced an unfair and unwarranted attack via the Steele dossier and through the Mueller investigation.

The first impeachment of him was based on very thin grounds -- it should have never been launched.

Im *on record* as supporting him and his position on those. Seriously.

When it comes to 1/6, I am harsh on Trump. His actions leading to 1/6 were disgusting. I cannot believe that someone so thoroughly tried to bork the process of certification, even without the issue of the riot.

I am a very harsh critic of how he handled himself during the Capitol riot. Bummer. I call those as I see them.

As for MAL, I dont see the giant conspiracy that many here see. I do see a guy who lied to the Archives, lied under oath to the DOJ about having stuff, and ultimately threw the middle finger enough times he got his ass searched and the items he shouldnt have had seized.

In the NY Cohen case, I think at worst this should be a misdemeanor.

I dont know enough about Georgia, or the other aspects of the Special Prosecutor's case to have an opinion. But I am *not* going to kneejerk and yell he is guilty, nor not guilty as many do here for those issues.

Quote:While people like me didn’t like Clinton, he was still a good President. We can admit that, in fairness. He also had a hand in making some of us wealthy in a way we didn’t view as possible.

I freely admit that Trump did many things I supported. Criminy, I even voted for the guy in '20.

I cant stand how he has, at least to me, taken a giant **** on the electoral process in the events leading to 1/6. He, being Trump, simply flipped the finger at the process that was going to render a result he didnt like. And no, I cannot condone doing that. At all.

Quote:Trump was a good President, better than good actually. And he helped make some of us even more wealthy. Even the less fortunate saw an uptick in everything monetary and that’s great.

I would agree partially. On the whole there were many things I liked and supported. I have said this many times. That doesnt blind me to what I consider to be some very serious shortcomings.

Quote:But a faction of the population have an agenda and allow that agenda to harpoon their ability to be objective.

What about my positions above are 'an agenda' and render my ability to be objective to nothing?

Look I respect your opinion. I cannot rip a genuinely held opinion. Even when it differs from mine. In short, your view on the good that Trump did is positive. It tends potentially to you overlooking some serious stuff.

My view is that there is a deal of good that Trump did in office. Again, I voted for him in '20, when I did not do so in '16.

My view is also, during the run up to 1/6, he absolutely attempted to subvert the process. He may have genuinely believed that he did not lose -- but, even then -- he seriously tried to mess with those rules and processes that have done us fairly well for the last 240+ years. Solely for his benefit, imo.

In my book that is inexcusable. That does not 'flow over' into a 'anything to get Trump mode' as some seem to think that I hold. Again, as an example, the issue currently in New York should be no more than a misdemeanor. Does that sound like an unobjective Get Trump No Matter What position?

Thank you for the calm and considered language and tone in your post. Hopefully this reciprocates that.

I might have missed it, but can you point to the post where you show your disdain for the absolute criminal in office at the moment.

I just see the broken record on Trump.



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

The search function works well here, and I have made those comments about Biden.

I use Tapatalk to access this forum and the search function sucks donkey balls, so if you could kindly point me to a few of your incessant insults of Biden



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

I thought it was disdain. Now you demand 'insults'. Not just that 'incessant' insults. Got it. I suggest try again.

Not going to find incessant insults. Bummer. May find a few insults. You will find where there is no way I support the vast number of his policies, and there is no way I would vote for the man.

But please decide what is the level you want first. You seem to be angrily drifting, and apoplectic that I am not an equal opportunity insulter or critic. How dare that happen.

At the end of the issue, however, that, my friend, is a 'you' problem, not a 'me' problem.

And if your search doesnt seem to be effective, again, that would appear to be, good sir, a 'you' problem, not a 'me' problem.

(03-23-2023 12:14 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 10:41 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 10:37 AM)450bench Wrote:  The libs are in panic mode as usual. Ya can’t make this crap up.

And you're clueless, as usual.

Again, this is by FAR the least consequential legal matter for trump. The documents case and the Georgia case...and even the Carroll civil rape case...are way more worrisome for trump.

As Tanq has pointed out numerous times, this will most likely only result in a misdemeanor.

BUCKLE THE **** UP!!!!!

ANY DAY NOW

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Toms all buckled, but then found out it aint happening again.

You can tell the rightoids are breathing a collective sigh of relief. It was doom & gloom, civil war and politicking speculation when Trump announced this. Fortunately for them, their golden idol lives to fight another legal day.

Considering that you pigeons donated $3 million to Trump's grift fund over this, I have a feeling I'm gonna have to take a day off work to watch the fireworks when it does finally happen

(03-23-2023 12:36 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Toms all buckled, but then found out it aint happening again.

Glad you explained that. Thought it was Tigger posting to me.

(03-23-2023 12:39 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  You can tell the rightoids are breathing a collective sigh of relief. It was doom & gloom, civil war and politicking speculation when Trump announced this. Fortunately for them, their golden idol lives to fight another legal day.

Considering that you pigeons donated $3 million to Trump's grift fund over this, I have a feeling I'm gonna have to take a day off work to watch the fireworks when it does finally happen

A sigh of relief? We've been daring you turd brains to do it.

(03-23-2023 12:39 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  You can tell the rightoids are breathing a collective sigh of relief. It was doom & gloom, civil war and politicking speculation when Trump announced this. Fortunately for them, their golden idol lives to fight another legal day.

Considering that you pigeons donated $3 million to Trump's grift fund over this, I have a feeling I'm gonna have to take a day off work to watch the fireworks when it does finally happen

I think you underestimate how many conservatives privately would be happy to see him not be able to run for POTUS due to this stuff. You progs are doing everything possible to insure a landslide victory for whatever GOP candidate wins the nomination.

(03-23-2023 12:36 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 12:01 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 09:15 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 07:39 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-22-2023 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Yes I dislike Trump.

What precisely is incorrect about my statements, due to that dislike?

Not any generalized comment like that 'wow you dont like Trump.' What specifically have I said that is unfair, untrue, or deceptive.

Im all ears.

My profession, I *have* to be objective. I *have* to get over a distaste of a client -- I *have* to provide the *best*, most candid assessment I can.

And, honestly, I do a pretty good job of that.


Do you realize I just dumped on the NY issue, in that getting a felony is going to be a real hard road to hoe?

If I am so die hard non-objective, wouldnt you find that a tad odd?

And, I can point you to another discussion with #s earlier today, in the Rice forum, where we discussed the earlier issues. Many of those earlier issues I cam down squarely on 'wow, they have a hard on for Trump.' Try the Rice board and look at my comments there.

So please dont tell me how I blind myself one way or the other. I actually have a record there -- look at it.

In order, Trump faced an unfair and unwarranted attack via the Steele dossier and through the Mueller investigation.

The first impeachment of him was based on very thin grounds -- it should have never been launched.

Im *on record* as supporting him and his position on those. Seriously.

When it comes to 1/6, I am harsh on Trump. His actions leading to 1/6 were disgusting. I cannot believe that someone so thoroughly tried to bork the process of certification, even without the issue of the riot.

I am a very harsh critic of how he handled himself during the Capitol riot. Bummer. I call those as I see them.

As for MAL, I dont see the giant conspiracy that many here see. I do see a guy who lied to the Archives, lied under oath to the DOJ about having stuff, and ultimately threw the middle finger enough times he got his ass searched and the items he shouldnt have had seized.

In the NY Cohen case, I think at worst this should be a misdemeanor.

I dont know enough about Georgia, or the other aspects of the Special Prosecutor's case to have an opinion. But I am *not* going to kneejerk and yell he is guilty, nor not guilty as many do here for those issues.


I freely admit that Trump did many things I supported. Criminy, I even voted for the guy in '20.

I cant stand how he has, at least to me, taken a giant **** on the electoral process in the events leading to 1/6. He, being Trump, simply flipped the finger at the process that was going to render a result he didnt like. And no, I cannot condone doing that. At all.


I would agree partially. On the whole there were many things I liked and supported. I have said this many times. That doesnt blind me to what I consider to be some very serious shortcomings.


What about my positions above are 'an agenda' and render my ability to be objective to nothing?

Look I respect your opinion. I cannot rip a genuinely held opinion. Even when it differs from mine. In short, your view on the good that Trump did is positive. It tends potentially to you overlooking some serious stuff.

My view is that there is a deal of good that Trump did in office. Again, I voted for him in '20, when I did not do so in '16.

My view is also, during the run up to 1/6, he absolutely attempted to subvert the process. He may have genuinely believed that he did not lose -- but, even then -- he seriously tried to mess with those rules and processes that have done us fairly well for the last 240+ years. Solely for his benefit, imo.

In my book that is inexcusable. That does not 'flow over' into a 'anything to get Trump mode' as some seem to think that I hold. Again, as an example, the issue currently in New York should be no more than a misdemeanor. Does that sound like an unobjective Get Trump No Matter What position?

Thank you for the calm and considered language and tone in your post. Hopefully this reciprocates that.

I might have missed it, but can you point to the post where you show your disdain for the absolute criminal in office at the moment.

I just see the broken record on Trump.



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

The search function works well here, and I have made those comments about Biden.

I use Tapatalk to access this forum and the search function sucks donkey balls, so if you could kindly point me to a few of your incessant insults of Biden



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

I thought it was disdain. Now you demand 'insults'. Not just that 'incessant' insults. Got it. I suggest try again.

Not going to find incessant insults. Bummer. May find a few insults. You will find where there is no way I support the vast number of his policies, and there is no way I would vote for the man.

But please decide what is the level you want first. You seem to be angrily drifting, and apoplectic that I am not an equal opportunity insulter or critic. How dare that happen.

At the end of the issue, however, that, my friend, is a 'you' problem, not a 'me' problem.

And if your search doesnt seem to be effective, again, that would appear to be, good sir, a 'you' problem, not a 'me' problem.

Disdain, insults, incessant insults... you know...how you exhibit your obsession with Trump

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

The latest communications to the orangearamus's minions

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump...8780503850

(03-23-2023 09:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 09:37 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(03-23-2023 09:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sure all the small government conservatives here will also be outraged at the unprecedented federal government interference into state and local affairs, AMIRITE?

The things you post as victories are downright hilarious.

You thinking this was touting a victory is downright hilarious. Dude, it's more evidence that a bunch of posters here are raging hypocrites.

True. You and your buddies.

(03-23-2023 01:00 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  The latest communications to the orangearamus's minions

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump...8780503850

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

·
2h
District Attorney Bragg is a danger to our Country, and should be removed immediately, along with Radical Lunatic Bombthrower Jack Smith, who is harassing and intimidating innocent people at levels not seen before, “Get Trump” Letitia James, the worst Attorney General in the United States, and Atlanta D.A. Fani Willis, who is trying to make PERFECT phone calls into a plot to destroy America, but reigns over the most violent Crime Scene in America, and does nothing about it!



The Magnificent Orange Bastard is right.

(03-23-2023 01:00 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  The latest communications to the orangearamus's minions

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump...8780503850

I've never seen people so obsessed with another human being as Liberals are over DJT. They now even follow him on his own social media. LOL.

Trump describes the Manhattan DA's office as a dystopian hellhole.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump...6404/embed