(11-21-2022 12:58 PM)Screwball Wrote:  This is barn ball, and we are in trouble. Mitchell with like 25, can't miss. UT down 70-65 with 3:11. UT was 18 point favs.

Take Toledo's opponent and the points could make Jack a wealthy man!

0-9 from 3 in the second half.

What a disaster. Down 10 with 1:36.

Jay Lehman is filling in the play-by-play with Brent Balbinot filling in behind. Weird broadcast. Weird game.

Brent Balbinot said shot off the iron seems like a dozen times in the closing minutes. Rockets went scoreless for three and one-half minutes. Wake up call?

Coach K will phone in the post-game interview on WSPD. Will it be a collect call?

Just when you think this is a good team…

Wow! 83-71. They looked awful in the second half. Mitchell with 35 points. We had to get out rebounded by a ton too.

83-71 pile of dung. Brent had the score 83-65 before the final trey. At times. he seems to not know what is going on in the game (any game).

KC was better on defense, and we couldn't compete inside, so we chucked up a bunch of threes and didn't make many.

Lose to a 1-4 team.

Just when I was fully onboard with this team, we take a wickedly bad loss

Losing to KC automatically removes any MAC team from at-large consideration, no matter what your final record is.

Win MACC for first time since 1980 or bust

I don’t like those odds.

(11-21-2022 01:26 PM)Nick in Cleveland Wrote:  Just when I was fully onboard with this team, we take a wickedly bad loss

Losing to KC automatically removes any MAC team from at-large consideration, no matter what your final record is.

Win MACC for first time since 1980 or bust

I don’t like those odds.

JC... relax its November.

When Brent Balbinot said the Rockets could not throw the ball into the ocean and they are on the coast of Florida, you just knew that they were in trouble.

(11-21-2022 01:34 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:26 PM)Nick in Cleveland Wrote:  Just when I was fully onboard with this team, we take a wickedly bad loss

Losing to KC automatically removes any MAC team from at-large consideration, no matter what your final record is.

Win MACC for first time since 1980 or bust

I don’t like those odds.

JC... relax its November.

You’re right, it’s November and everyone can relax, especially because there was never any real chance of a MAC team getting an at large bid anyway. And one stinker of a game is no reason to give up on the MACC.

(11-21-2022 01:47 PM)rkt Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:34 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:26 PM)Nick in Cleveland Wrote:  Just when I was fully onboard with this team, we take a wickedly bad loss

Losing to KC automatically removes any MAC team from at-large consideration, no matter what your final record is.

Win MACC for first time since 1980 or bust

I don’t like those odds.

JC... relax its November.

You’re right, it’s November and everyone can relax, especially because there was never any real chance of a MAC team getting an at large bid anyway. And one stinker of a game is no reason to give up on the MACC.

You don’t need to agree with the Karen on the board. People have every right to believe we’ll get knocked out again in the MAC semis like we do almost every year…

This game once again brings out the COACH we all know and love. Another great coaching job. After the two recent wins the swagger was coming out that he was the greatest thing since sliced white bread! It’s a tourney so I think it really doesn’t matter too much but can we expect the same scenario that we’re accustomed to as we move on ??? I hope I can eat my words!

(11-21-2022 01:50 PM)Rocket_Fanatic Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:47 PM)rkt Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:34 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:26 PM)Nick in Cleveland Wrote:  Just when I was fully onboard with this team, we take a wickedly bad loss

Losing to KC automatically removes any MAC team from at-large consideration, no matter what your final record is.

Win MACC for first time since 1980 or bust

I don’t like those odds.

JC... relax its November.

You’re right, it’s November and everyone can relax, especially because there was never any real chance of a MAC team getting an at large bid anyway. And one stinker of a game is no reason to give up on the MACC.

You don’t need to agree with the Karen on the board. People have every right to believe we’ll get knocked out again in the MAC semis like we do almost every year…

Coming from the guy who ******* and moans about everything... Must be that time of the month for you.

Everything pretty even except Rockets shot like 39% FG. 27% 3 PT. UMKC shot 54% and 42%. The Roos had 9 more Defensive Rebounds, but that makes sense with all the missed shots by UT. Rockets were better from the charity stripe, Offensive Rebounds, and had fewer turnovers.

(11-21-2022 01:47 PM)rkt Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:34 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 01:26 PM)Nick in Cleveland Wrote:  Just when I was fully onboard with this team, we take a wickedly bad loss

Losing to KC automatically removes any MAC team from at-large consideration, no matter what your final record is.

Win MACC for first time since 1980 or bust

I don’t like those odds.

JC... relax its November.

You’re right, it’s November and everyone can relax, especially because there was never any real chance of a MAC team getting an at large bid anyway. And one stinker of a game is no reason to give up on the MACC.

Zero games against any P5 teams or the Big East will NOT get an at-large bid.