(08-26-2022 07:57 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 06:54 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 06:09 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 04:22 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-25-2022 04:00 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Cant wait to see the flurry and fury over the redactions that will be sure to come from some here.

I'll pre-type some here: biased judge. conspiracy. halfwit judge. conspiracy. unprecedented case requires all of the affidavit. conspiracy.

I'll offer one more: "There is no showing whatsoever of probable cause to issue the warrant based upon the non-redacted information. I remain skeptical."

Rejoinder by tanq: "He followed the Rules of Procedure, so you have no basis for questioning it. God, I don't know why I waste my time with ignorant cretins like you. Why haven't I yet been named poster of the year? This place just doesn't appreciate true brilliance like mine."

Not enough paragraphs.

Nice.

might be the first person ever that i put on ignore for rattling on incessantly.

He must prescribe to the tenet that if he can't dazzle us with brilliance he'll baffle us with bull****.

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

The 'Northern District of California' thing on the page might give you a clue.

Last I saw Florida <> California.

It still hasnt been released.

(08-26-2022 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

The 'Northern District of California' thing on the page might give you a clue.

Last I saw Florida <> California.

It still hasnt been released.

My bad, I saw District of Columbia. I may need my contact prescription updated. And yes, I realize that DC <>California so you got me either way.

Edit again: I thought it was supposed to be released by today.

Oh, one more thing, congratulations on the brevity of your response.

(08-26-2022 09:46 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

The 'Northern District of California' thing on the page might give you a clue.

Last I saw Florida <> California.

It still hasnt been released.

My bad, I saw District of Columbia. I may need my contact prescription updated. And yes, I realize that DC <>California so you got me either way.

No sweat. I forgot to add the smiley **** in my post, and realized it probably came off as a snarkfest. Apologies for that.

And to your credit, the label was very much hard to read and not leaping out.

(08-26-2022 09:46 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

The 'Northern District of California' thing on the page might give you a clue.

Last I saw Florida <> California.

It still hasnt been released.

My bad, I saw District of Columbia. I may need my contact prescription updated. And yes, I realize that DC <>California so you got me either way.

Edit again: I thought it was supposed to be released by today.

By noon today in the order.

(08-26-2022 09:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:46 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

The 'Northern District of California' thing on the page might give you a clue.

Last I saw Florida <> California.

It still hasnt been released.

My bad, I saw District of Columbia. I may need my contact prescription updated. And yes, I realize that DC <>California so you got me either way.

No sweat. I forgot to add the smiley **** in my post, and realized it probably came off as a snarkfest. Apologies for that.

And to your credit, the label was very much hard to read and not leaping out.

Honestly, I didn't take it that way at all. I appreciated the correction.

(08-26-2022 09:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:46 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

The 'Northern District of California' thing on the page might give you a clue.

Last I saw Florida <> California.

It still hasnt been released.

My bad, I saw District of Columbia. I may need my contact prescription updated. And yes, I realize that DC <>California so you got me either way.

Edit again: I thought it was supposed to be released by today.

By noon today in the order.

Thank you for the clarification.

Guess they are going to drag it out until 11:59:59

(08-26-2022 10:27 AM)bobdizole Wrote:  Guess they are going to drag it out until 11:59:59

What they did yesterday.

(08-26-2022 10:27 AM)bobdizole Wrote:  Guess they are going to drag it out until 11:59:59

its Friday. I expect a 5-6pm news dump and then hope it goes away.

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

Sarcasm, but I would not be surprised if it ended up looking like that.

(08-26-2022 10:41 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 09:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

Is that really it or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?

Sarcasm, but I would not be surprised if it ended up looking like that.

I fully expect it to be closer to complete redaction than complete transparency.

Just now released; it seems several pages are 100% redacted and others are fairly open for perusal. I'm fairly sure NOTHING of serious impact/issue will be available to be read.

38 pages, happy reading. Don't let your favorite media spin it how they want it. Read it yourself

Link

(08-26-2022 11:34 AM)bobdizole Wrote:  38 pages, happy reading. Don't let your favorite media spin it how they want it. Read it yourself

Link

They knew they were there and needed a warrant to retrieve them because they were too heavy to carry when they saw them. Did I miss anything?

(08-26-2022 11:34 AM)bobdizole Wrote:  38 pages, happy reading. Don't let your favorite media spin it how they want it. Read it yourself

Link

Meh more like 10ish. After first 4 it’s mostly redacted.

(08-26-2022 08:11 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Ok public, here you go!

anyone else surprised there are pages in the actual released affidavit that look almost exactly like the joke meme? Clownworld...progs/rinos/msm/gubmintalphabetagencies...

I'll wait for insights from the smarter folks on this board, but I did notice one point that made me curious: why is the identity of the signing FBI agent redacted? Does that suggest that they were running an undercover investigation on the former president?

(08-26-2022 11:46 AM)natibeast2.0 Wrote:  

(08-26-2022 11:34 AM)bobdizole Wrote:  38 pages, happy reading. Don't let your favorite media spin it how they want it. Read it yourself

Link

Meh more like 10ish. After first 4 it’s mostly redacted.

lol, yes it was a fast read after the introduction. Nothing ground breaking. The government seems to stake the position that after the June visit they came to the conclusion that classified NDI documents had been so badly mishandled they needed a search warrant for the property to find all the missing documents. The section under Probable Cause to Believe That Documents Containing Classified NDI and
Presidential Records Remain at the Premises is completely redacted. CNN will blow this up, but I personally didn't learn anything from this that hadn't already been leaked